Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Ricoh GR Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£1,190Sensor size:APS-CWeight:245 gBattery life (CIPA):290 shots

Ricoh GR Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

5.2

Overall score

Score
5.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

5.2

Technical score

10%

?

User score

â–¼Worse than 51% of cameras
5.2

Technical score

Technical score
5.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

6.5

Sensor & Image

25%

3.7

Photo Features

18%

5.1

Video & Audio

14%

6.5

Display & Design

8%

4.8

Battery & Power

7%

2.8

Connectivity & Storage

â–²Better than 55% of cameras
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £1,190

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Ricoh GR

Technical score
Technical score
5.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

6.5

Sensor & Image

25%

3.7

Photo Features

18%

5.1

Video & Audio

14%

6.5

Display & Design

8%

4.8

Battery & Power

7%

2.8

Connectivity & Storage

5.2
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Ricoh GR has a popularity score of 1, which is lower than 51.3% of cameras.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

5.2

Overall score

40%

4.2

Price

4.9
Sensor size
APS-C
Sensor size
APS-C
This camera uses a sensor classified as APS-C; it is larger than the sensor in 57.4% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 25.7% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
16.2 MP
Main camera megapixels
16.2 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP, which is higher than that of 46.8% of cameras and equal to that of 4.2% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
4.79 µm
Main camera pixel size
4.79 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 4.79 µm, which are larger than those in 78.6% of cameras and the same size as those in 0.6% of cameras.
Base ISO
100
Base ISO
100
This camera has a base ISO of 100 which is higher than that of 19.9% of cameras and equal to that of 52.4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 25600 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 25,600
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 25,600, which is higher than that of 75.6% of cameras and equal to that of 12.5% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
N/A
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
9
N. of focus points
9
This camera has 9 focus points, fewer than the number offered by 67.1% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 26% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
This camera does not support phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.5% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
1920 px
Max video resolution
1920 px
This camera supports 1920 px video recording which is higher quality than that of 28.7% of cameras and equal to that of 47.1% of cameras.
Video bitrate
?
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
This camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 69.9% of cameras.
Video codecs
H.264
Show more
Type
compact
Weight
245 g
Weight
245 g
This camera weighs 245 g which is lighter than 69.3% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.3% of cameras.
Width
117 mm
Width
117 mm
This camera has a width of 117 mm which is narrower than 53.8% of cameras and equal to that of 0.7% of cameras.
Height
61 mm
Height
61 mm
This camera has a height of 61 mm which is shorter than 75.7% of cameras and equal to that of 1.1% of cameras.
Thickness
34.7 mm
Thickness
34.7 mm
This camera has a thickness of 34.7 mm which is thinner than 67.9% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
290 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
290 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 290 shots, which is shorter than that of 65% of cameras and equal to that of 1.5% of cameras.
Battery capacity
1,250 mAh
Battery capacity
1,250 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 1,250 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 60.4% of cameras and equal to those in 3.9% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Ricoh GR vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • 19,200 ISO higher maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    25,600 ISO
    This camera has a higher maximum sensitivity than the average camera (25600 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    25,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • Has microphone input
    Microphone input
    yes
    This camera has microphone input, the average camera does not.
  • 1.45 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    4.79 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (4.8 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    4.79 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 1,170 s longer maximum exposure
    Longest shutter speed
    1,200 s
    This camera supports a longer maximum exposure than the average camera (1200 s s vs 30 s s). The average camera supports a longest shutter speed of 30 s s.
    1,200 s vs 30 s
  • 1.1 points higher DxOMark Landscape score
    DxOMark landscape score
    13.5 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark landscape score than the average camera (13.5 points vs 12.4 points). The average camera scores 12.4 points.
    13.5 points vs 12.4 points
  • Built-in timelapse
    Timelapse function
    yes
    This camera includes timelapse capture, the average camera does not.
  • Supports 24p cinema mode
    24p cinema mode
    yes
    This camera supports 24p cinema mode, the average camera does not. 44% of cameras support this mode.
    Full HD only
  • 2 GB more storage
    Internal storage
    2 GB
    This camera has a higher internal storage than the average camera (2 GB vs 0 GB). The average camera offers 0 GB of internal storage.
    2 GB vs 0 GB
  • 150 g lighter
    Weight
    245 g
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (245 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    245 g vs 395 g
  • 3 more customizable buttons
    Customizable button count
    3
    This camera has more customizable buttons than the average camera (3 vs 0). The average camera offers 0 customizable buttons.
    3 vs 0
  • 12.9 mm shorter body
    Height
    61 mm
    This camera is shorter than the average camera (61 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    61 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 19,200 ISO higher maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    25,600 ISO
    This camera has a higher maximum sensitivity than the average camera (25600 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    25,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • 1.45 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    4.79 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (4.8 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    4.79 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 1.1 points higher DxOMark Landscape score
    DxOMark landscape score
    13.5 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark landscape score than the average camera (13.5 points vs 12.4 points). The average camera scores 12.4 points.
    13.5 points vs 12.4 points
  • 0.6 points higher DxOMark Portrait score
    DxOMark portrait score
    23.6 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark portrait score than the average camera (23.6 points vs 23 points). The average camera scores 23.0 points.
    23.6 points vs 23.0 points
  • 5 points higher DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    78 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (78 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    78 points vs 73 points
  • 1,170 s longer maximum exposure
    Longest shutter speed
    1,200 s
    This camera supports a longer maximum exposure than the average camera (1200 s s vs 30 s s). The average camera supports a longest shutter speed of 30 s s.
    1,200 s vs 30 s
  • Has microphone input
    Microphone input
    yes
    This camera has microphone input, the average camera does not.
  • Built-in timelapse
    Timelapse function
    yes
    This camera includes timelapse capture, the average camera does not.
  • Supports 24p cinema mode
    24p cinema mode
    yes
    This camera supports 24p cinema mode, the average camera does not. 44% of cameras support this mode.
    Full HD only
  • 130 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    1,250 mAh
    This camera has a higher battery capacity than the average camera (1250 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    1,250 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • 2 GB more storage
    Internal storage
    2 GB
    This camera has a higher internal storage than the average camera (2 GB vs 0 GB). The average camera offers 0 GB of internal storage.
    2 GB vs 0 GB
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
  • 14 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    9
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (9 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    9 vs 23
  • 1.7 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    4 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (4 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    4 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 40 shots fewer shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    290 shots
    This camera has shorter battery life than the average camera (290 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    290 shots vs 330 shots
  • 26.9% worse value for money
    Ricoh GR has a worse value-for-money score than the average camera (4.88 vs 6.2).
    4.88 vs 6.2
  • 4.1x more expensive
    Ricoh GR is more expensive than the average camera (£1,190 vs £290).
    £1,190 vs £290
  • 26.9% worse value for money
    Ricoh GR has a worse value-for-money score than the average camera (4.88 vs 6.2).
    4.88 vs 6.2
  • 4.1x more expensive
    Ricoh GR is more expensive than the average camera (£1,190 vs £290).
    £1,190 vs £290
  • 93% less popular
    Ricoh GR is less popular than the average camera (1 vs 1.9).
    1 vs 1.93
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • 14 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    9
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (9 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    9 vs 23
  • 1.7 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    4 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (4 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    4 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 85.9% less optical zoom
    Optical zoom
    1 x
    40% less optical zoom: this camera offers 1 x, compared with 7.1 x on the average camera.
    The fixed built-in lens has no optical zoom range, equivalent to 1x.
    1 x vs 7.1 x
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
  • 5 min shorter recording time
    Max video recording time
    25 min
    This camera records continuously for less time than the average camera (25 min vs 30 min). The average camera records for 30 min.
    25 min vs 30 min
  • 40 shots fewer shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    290 shots
    This camera has shorter battery life than the average camera (290 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    290 shots vs 330 shots

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

U
uk.pcmag.com
24/04/2013
Summary of the review
D
dpreview.com
20/06/2013
Summary of the review
W
whatdigitalcamera.com
20/06/2013
Summary of the review
T
trunghoangphotography.com
21/10/2026
Summary of the review
S
stevehuffphoto.com
07/06/2013
Summary of the review
P
petapixel.com
19/05/2013
Summary of the review
C
compactshooter.com
03/12/2016
Summary of the review
G
gizmodo.com
18/06/2013
Summary of the review
A
amateurphotographer.com
21/05/2013
Summary of the review
S
spiegel.de
16/07/2013
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
19/09/2013
Summary of the review
C
connect-living.de
07/10/2013
Summary of the review
H
heise.de
29/04/2014
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
05/08/2014
Summary of the review
S
spiegel.de
16/07/2013
Summary of the review
S
spiegelberg.org
22/06/2013
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
13/05/2013
Summary of the review
X
xatakafoto.com
21/05/2014
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What we like about Ricoh GR

  • Truly pocketable design that fits in jeans or shirt pockets
  • Professional-grade image quality from a large APS-C sensor
  • Exceptionally sharp fixed 28mm equivalent lens
  • Innovative 'Snap Focus' feature for instant street photography
  • Highly customizable controls and intuitive one-handed ergonomics
  • Fast startup time and overall responsive performance
  • Effective in-body image stabilization (IBIS) in newer models
  • Excellent JPEG color profiles, particularly the 'Positive Film' look

What we don't like about Ricoh GR

  • Short battery life requiring frequent swaps or external charging
  • Autofocus can be slow or struggle to track in low-light conditions
  • Lack of a built-in viewfinder or articulating/tilt screen
  • Poor video quality and limited video control options
  • Lack of weather sealing makes it vulnerable to dust and moisture
  • Rear screen can be difficult to see in direct sunlight
  • Occasional issues with sensor dust and flimsy control dials
  • Smartphone app connectivity can be slow or unreliable

Verdict

The Ricoh GR III is a premier pocket-sized compact camera featuring a large 24.2-megapixel APS-C CMOS sensor paired with a sharp, fixed 18.3mm f/2.8 lens (28mm full-frame equivalent). Renowned for its magnesium alloy build and minimalist design, it includes a hybrid autofocus system, a 3-axis sensor-shift shake reduction system providing up to four stops of compensation, and a 3.0-inch touchscreen LCD. Its main pros include exceptional image quality, rapid startup times (~0.8 seconds), a built-in 2-stop ND filter, and the highly efficient 'Snap Focus' mode for instant street photography. However, significant cons include poor battery life (rated at approximately 200 shots), the lack of a built-in flash or viewfinder, no weather sealing, and subpar video capabilities limited to 1080p.

Compare Ricoh GR with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Ricoh GR and other products in the Cameras category

No results found