Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£570Sensor size:four thirdsWeight:410 gBattery life (CIPA):330 shots

Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

6.4

Overall score

Score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

6.4

Technical score

10%

?

User score

â–²Better than 78% of cameras
6.4

Technical score

Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

6.9

Sensor & Image

25%

6.6

Photo Features

18%

5.7

Video & Audio

14%

7.7

Display & Design

8%

5.2

Battery & Power

7%

4.9

Connectivity & Storage

â–²Better than 79% of cameras
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III

Technical score
Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

6.9

Sensor & Image

25%

6.6

Photo Features

18%

5.7

Video & Audio

14%

7.7

Display & Design

8%

5.2

Battery & Power

7%

4.9

Connectivity & Storage

6.4
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III has a popularity score of 1, which is lower than 51.3% of cameras.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

6.4

Overall score

40%

7.5

Price

6.7
Sensor size
four thirds
Sensor size
four thirds
This camera uses a sensor classified as four thirds; it is larger than the sensor in 49% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 8.1% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
16.1 MP
Main camera megapixels
16.1 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 16.1 MP, which is lower than that of 53.3% of cameras and equal to that of 7.9% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
3.76 µm
Main camera pixel size
3.76 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 3.76 µm, which are larger than those in 55.4% of cameras and the same size as those in 5.3% of cameras.
Base ISO
200
Base ISO
200
This camera has a base ISO of 200 which is higher than that of 84.7% of cameras and equal to that of 13.9% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 25600 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 25,600
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 25,600, which is higher than that of 75.6% of cameras and equal to that of 12.5% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
Micro Four Thirds
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
121
N. of focus points
121
This camera has 121 focus points, more than the number offered by 80.6% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 1.3% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
This camera does not support phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.5% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
3,840 px
Max video resolution
3,840 px
This camera supports 3,840 px video recording which is higher quality than that of 76% of cameras and equal to that of 19.2% of cameras.
Video bitrate
102 Mbps
Video bitrate
102 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 102 Mbps which is higher than that of 82.1% of cameras and equal to that of 1% of cameras.
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
This camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 69.9% of cameras.
Video codecs
H.264
Show more
Type
mirrorless
Weight
410 g
Weight
410 g
This camera weighs 410 g which is heavier than 52% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.1% of cameras.
Width
121.5 mm
Width
121.5 mm
This camera has a width of 121.5 mm which is wider than 53.2% of cameras and equal to that of 0.3% of cameras.
Height
84 mm
Height
84 mm
This camera has a height of 84 mm which is taller than 61% of cameras and equal to that of 0.4% of cameras.
Thickness
49.5 mm
Thickness
49.5 mm
This camera has a thickness of 49.5 mm which is thicker than 52.7% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
330 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
330 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 330 shots, which is longer than that of 48.1% of cameras and equal to that of 3.9% of cameras.
Battery capacity
1,210 mAh
Battery capacity
1,210 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 1,210 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 54.9% of cameras and equal to those in 0.9% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This camera supports Wi-Fi. This feature is available on 47.8% of cameras.
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
This camera uses Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) which is newer than that of 54.2% of cameras and equal to that of 35.6% of cameras.
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • In-body stabilization
    Sensor-shift stabilization
    yes
    This camera supports in-body stabilization, the average camera does not.
    5-axis in-body stabilization.
  • 19,200 ISO higher maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    25,600 ISO
    This camera has a higher maximum sensitivity than the average camera (25600 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    25,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • Human eye AF
    Eye detection AF (human)
    yes
    This camera supports human eye-detection AF, the average camera does not.
  • 98 more AF points
    N. of focus points
    121
    This camera has more focus points than the average camera (121 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    121 vs 23
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    electronic
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (electronic vs none).
    electronic vs none
  • Higher video resolution
    Max video resolution
    3,840 px
    This camera records higher-resolution video than the average camera (3840 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    3840 px vs 1920 px
  • Supports slow-motion video
    Slow-motion video
    yes
    This camera supports slow-motion video, the average camera does not.
    Supports up to 120 fps high-speed video.
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    Supersonic Wave Filter.
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    electronic
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (electronic vs none).
    electronic vs none
  • Has a touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This camera has a touchscreen, the average camera does not. 36.6% of cameras support touchscreen input.
  • 60 Hz higher EVF refresh rate
    Max EVF refresh rate
    120 Hz
    This camera has a higher EVF refresh rate than the average camera (120 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average camera has an EVF refresh rate of 60 Hz.
    120 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • 0.45 x more viewfinder magnification
    Viewfinder magnification
    1.23 x
    This camera has a higher viewfinder magnification than the average camera (1.2 x vs 0.78 x). The average camera has a viewfinder magnification of 0.78 x.
    1.23 x vs 0.78 x
  • 2 more customizable buttons
    Customizable button count
    2
    This camera has more customizable buttons than the average camera (2 vs 0). The average camera offers 0 customizable buttons.
    2 vs 0
  • 19,200 ISO higher maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    25,600 ISO
    This camera has a higher maximum sensitivity than the average camera (25600 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    25,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    Supersonic Wave Filter.
  • 4 newer
    Release date
    2017
    This camera is newer than the average camera (2017 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    September 2017
    2,017 vs 2,013
  • 100 higher base ISO
    Base ISO
    200
    This camera has a higher base ISO than the average camera (200 vs 100). The average camera has a base ISO of 100.
    200 vs 100
  • 0.42 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    3.76 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (3.8 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    3.76 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • In-body stabilization
    Sensor-shift stabilization
    yes
    This camera supports in-body stabilization, the average camera does not.
    5-axis in-body stabilization.
  • Human eye AF
    Eye detection AF (human)
    yes
    This camera supports human eye-detection AF, the average camera does not.
  • 98 more AF points
    N. of focus points
    121
    This camera has more focus points than the average camera (121 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    121 vs 23
  • 1,770 s longer maximum exposure
    Longest shutter speed
    1,800 s
    This camera supports a longer maximum exposure than the average camera (1800 s s vs 30 s s). The average camera supports a longest shutter speed of 30 s s.
    1,800 s vs 30 s
  • 2.9 fps faster mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    8.6 fps
    This camera has a faster mechanical burst than the average camera (8.6 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    8.6 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • Lossless compressed RAW
    Lossless compressed RAW
    yes
    This camera supports lossless compressed RAW, while the average camera does not.
    Lossless RAW capture is supported.
  • Supports touch autofocus
    Touch autofocus
    yes
    This camera supports touch autofocus, the average camera does not. 34.9% of cameras support touch autofocus.
  • Supports focus bracketing
    Focus bracketing
    yes
    This camera supports focus bracketing, the average camera does not.
  • Higher video resolution
    Max video resolution
    3,840 px
    This camera records higher-resolution video than the average camera (3840 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    3840 px vs 1920 px
  • Supports slow-motion video
    Slow-motion video
    yes
    This camera supports slow-motion video, the average camera does not.
    Supports up to 120 fps high-speed video.
  • 72 Mbps higher video bitrate
    Video bitrate
    102 Mbps
    This camera has a higher video bitrate than the average camera (102 Mbps vs 30 Mbps). The average camera records at 30 Mbps.
    102 Mbps vs 30 Mbps
  • Built-in timelapse
    Timelapse function
    yes
    This camera includes timelapse capture, the average camera does not.
  • Supports 24p cinema mode
    24p cinema mode
    yes
    This camera supports 24p cinema mode, the average camera does not. 44% of cameras support this mode.
  • Supports Wi-Fi connectivity
    Wi-Fi connectivity
    yes
    This camera supports Wi-Fi, the average camera does not. 47.8% of cameras support Wi-Fi.
  • Smartphone remote control
    Smartphone remote control
    yes
    This camera supports smartphone remote control, the average camera does not. 46.2% of cameras support smartphone remote control.
    via OI.Share
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    four thirds
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (four thirds vs APS-C).
    four thirds vs APS-C
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    -2
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (-2 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    -2 vs -4
  • 93% less popular
    Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III is less popular than the average camera (1 vs 1.9).
    1 vs 1.93
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    16.1 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (16.1 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    16.1 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 96.6% more expensive
    Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III is more expensive than the average camera (£570 vs £290).
    £570 vs £290
  • 10.1 mm taller body
    Height
    84 mm
    This camera is taller than the average camera (84 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    84 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 93% less popular
    Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III is less popular than the average camera (1 vs 1.9).
    1 vs 1.93
  • 96.6% more expensive
    Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III is more expensive than the average camera (£570 vs £290).
    £570 vs £290
  • 10.1 mm taller body
    Height
    84 mm
    This camera is taller than the average camera (84 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    84 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    four thirds
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (four thirds vs APS-C).
    four thirds vs APS-C
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    16.1 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (16.1 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    16.1 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    -2
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (-2 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    -2 vs -4

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

D
dpreview.com
06/09/2017
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
05/01/2018
Summary of the review
D
digitalcameraworld.com
20/09/2019
Summary of the review
E
ephotozine.com
13/09/2017
Summary of the review
O
olympuspassion.com
11/04/2018
Summary of the review
F
focus-review.com
28/01/2018
Summary of the review
R
rangefinderonline.com
12/12/2017
Summary of the review
N
newinzurich.com
03/12/2017
Summary of the review
A
aarondesigns.org
14/02/2023
Summary of the review
O
olympuspassion.com
15/07/2020
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
31/08/2017
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
25/09/2017
Summary of the review
F
fotomagazin.de
30/01/2018
Summary of the review
D
dkamera.de
16/11/2017
Summary of the review
D
digitalphoto.de
07/11/2017
Summary of the review
P
photoscala.de
24/09/2017
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
05/09/2017
Summary of the review
0
01net.com
05/02/2018
Summary of the review
O
onmetlesvoiles.com
08/11/2017
Summary of the review
S
superchinois801.wordpress.com
28/01/2019
Summary of the review
P
priice.fr
08/11/2017
Summary of the review
X
xatakafoto.com
18/09/2017
Summary of the review
P
photolari.com
24/10/2017
Summary of the review
P
photo-review.com
17/09/2018
Summary of the review
R
reflex-mania.com
16/12/2020
Summary of the review
F
fotocamerapro.it
16/03/2018
Summary of the review
C
camerarace.com
31/08/2017
Summary of the review
A
amatech.it
12/04/2018
Summary of the review
P
patatofriendly.com
02/08/2018
Summary of the review
G
global.techradar.com
10/12/2019
Summary of the review
P
photomaniaci.com
16/10/2018
Summary of the review
F
focus-review.com
28/01/2018
Summary of the review
F
fotografille.nl
02/11/2020
Summary of the review
P
papertravels.nl
29/08/2018
Summary of the review
W
wander-lust.nl
09/10/2017
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What we like about Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III

  • Stylish, compact, and lightweight design with excellent build quality
  • Effective 5-axis in-body image stabilization
  • Fast autofocus with 121 points and good performance
  • Excellent, user-friendly 4K video capability
  • High-resolution OLED electronic viewfinder
  • Handy tilting touchscreen LCD
  • Good, ergonomic grip for holding
  • Intuitive menu system for beginners

What we don't like about Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III

  • 16MP sensor resolution is beginning to feel dated
  • Autofocus is not reliable for fast-action shooting
  • No USB charging capability
  • Battery life is relatively short (approx. 330 shots)
  • Auto ISO is basic and unavailable for manual video
  • Default noise reduction and sharpening are heavy-handed

Verdict

The **Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III** is a compact, retro-styled mirrorless camera featuring a 16.1MP Micro Four Thirds Live MOS sensor paired with the TruePic VIII image processor. Its standout characteristics include a highly effective 5-axis in-body image stabilization system, 4K UHD video recording at up to 30p, an 8.6 fps continuous burst rate, and a 121-point contrast-detect autofocus system. The camera's main pros are its lightweight design, excellent JPEG colour reproduction, and a high-resolution 2.36M-dot electronic viewfinder alongside a 3-inch tilting touchscreen. However, it has some cons, such as its reliance on an aging sensor resolution compared to higher-MP rivals, sluggish autofocus performance for fast action or low-light situations, a largely plastic body construction, and the lack of a microphone input.

Compare Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III and other products in the Cameras category

No results found