Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Leica Q2 Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£3,850Sensor size:full frameWeight:734 gBattery life (CIPA):370 shots

Leica Q2 Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

6.8

Overall score

Score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

6.8

Technical score

10%

?

User score

â–²Better than 84% of cameras
6.8

Technical score

Technical score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

8.1

Sensor & Image

25%

6.1

Photo Features

18%

6.0

Video & Audio

14%

7.3

Display & Design

8%

7.1

Battery & Power

7%

5.3

Connectivity & Storage

â–²Better than 85% of cameras
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £3,850
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Leica Q2

Technical score
Technical score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

8.1

Sensor & Image

25%

6.1

Photo Features

18%

6.0

Video & Audio

14%

7.3

Display & Design

8%

7.1

Battery & Power

7%

5.3

Connectivity & Storage

6.8
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Leica Q2 has a popularity score of 1, which is lower than 51.3% of cameras.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
5.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

6.8

Overall score

40%

1.0

Price

5.1
Sensor size
full frame
Sensor size
full frame
This camera uses a sensor classified as full frame; it is larger than the sensor in 83.7% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 14% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
47.3 MP
Main camera megapixels
47.3 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 47.3 MP, which is higher than that of 96.1% of cameras and equal to that of 0.3% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
4.3 µm
Main camera pixel size
4.3 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 4.3 µm, which are larger than those in 71% of cameras and the same size as those in 1.2% of cameras.
Base ISO
50
Base ISO
50
This camera has a base ISO of 50 which is lower than that of 99.3% of cameras and equal to that of 0.7% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 50000 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 50,000
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 50,000, which is higher than that of 90.4% of cameras and equal to that of 1.5% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
N/A
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
225
N. of focus points
225
This camera has 225 focus points, more than the number offered by 85.1% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 1.4% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
This camera does not support phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.5% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
3,840 px
Max video resolution
3,840 px
This camera supports 3,840 px video recording which is higher quality than that of 76% of cameras and equal to that of 19.2% of cameras.
Video bitrate
100 Mbps
Video bitrate
100 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 100 Mbps which is higher than that of 73% of cameras and equal to that of 8.7% of cameras.
Video bit depth
10 bit
Video bit depth
10 bit
This camera supports video at 10 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 88.5% of cameras and equal to that of 7.4% of cameras.
HDMI
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
This camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 69.9% of cameras.
Video codecs
H.264
Show more
Type
compact
Weight
734 g
Weight
734 g
This camera weighs 734 g which is heavier than 85.8% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.1% of cameras.
Width
130 mm
Width
130 mm
This camera has a width of 130 mm which is wider than 72.1% of cameras and equal to that of 1.1% of cameras.
Height
80 mm
Height
80 mm
This camera has a height of 80 mm which is taller than 54.4% of cameras and equal to that of 2.4% of cameras.
Thickness
91.9 mm
Thickness
91.9 mm
This camera has a thickness of 91.9 mm which is thicker than 89.2% of cameras and equal to that of 0.4% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
370 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
370 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 370 shots, which is longer than that of 62.2% of cameras and equal to that of 1.6% of cameras.
Battery capacity
1,860 mAh
Battery capacity
1,860 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 1,860 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 82.6% of cameras and equal to those in 2.6% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This camera supports Wi-Fi. This feature is available on 47.8% of cameras.
802.11b/g/n
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
This camera uses Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) which is newer than that of 89.9% of cameras and equal to that of 9.6% of cameras.
Bluetooth connectivity
yes
Bluetooth connectivity
yes
This camera has Bluetooth. 22.6% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
4.2
Bluetooth version
4.2
This camera supports Bluetooth version 4.2 which is newer than that supported by 86.3% of cameras and equal to that of 9.6% of cameras.
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Data and power.
Show more

Leica Q2 vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • 202 more AF points
    N. of focus points
    225
    This camera has more focus points than the average camera (225 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    225 vs 23
  • Higher sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    47.3 MP
    This camera has a higher sensor resolution than the average camera (47.3 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    47.3 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 43,600 ISO higher maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    50,000 ISO
    This camera has a higher maximum sensitivity than the average camera (50000 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    50,000 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • Human eye AF
    Eye detection AF (human)
    yes
    This camera supports human eye-detection AF, the average camera does not.
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    electronic
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (electronic vs none).
    electronic vs none
  • Higher video resolution
    Max video resolution
    3,840 px
    This camera records higher-resolution video than the average camera (3840 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    3840 px vs 1920 px
  • Supports slow-motion video
    Slow-motion video
    yes
    This camera supports slow-motion video, the average camera does not.
    Supports up to 120 fps high-speed video.
  • 4.3 fps faster mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    10 fps
    This camera has a faster mechanical burst than the average camera (10 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    10 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    electronic
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (electronic vs none).
    electronic vs none
  • Has a touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This camera has a touchscreen, the average camera does not. 36.6% of cameras support touchscreen input.
  • 1330000 dots higher EVF resolution
    EVF resolution
    3,690,000 dots
    This camera has a higher EVF resolution than the average camera (3690000 dots vs 2360000 dots). The average camera has an EVF resolution of 2360000 dots.
    3690000 dots vs 2360000 dots
  • 60 Hz higher EVF refresh rate
    Max EVF refresh rate
    120 Hz
    This camera has a higher EVF refresh rate than the average camera (120 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average camera has an EVF refresh rate of 60 Hz.
    120 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • Higher sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    47.3 MP
    This camera has a higher sensor resolution than the average camera (47.3 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    47.3 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 43,600 ISO higher maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    50,000 ISO
    This camera has a higher maximum sensitivity than the average camera (50000 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    50,000 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • 1,648 points higher DxOMark Sports score
    DxOMark sports score
    2,491 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark sports score than the average camera (2491 points vs 843 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sports score of 843 points.
    2,491 points vs 843 points
  • 3.4 points higher DxOMark Portrait score
    DxOMark portrait score
    26.4 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark portrait score than the average camera (26.4 points vs 23 points). The average camera scores 23.0 points.
    26.4 points vs 23.0 points
  • Larger sensor
    Sensor size
    full frame
    This camera has a larger sensor than the average camera (full frame vs APS-C).
    full frame vs APS-C
  • 23 points higher DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    96 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (96 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    96 points vs 73 points
  • 0.96 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    4.3 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (4.3 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    4.3 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 6 newer
    Release date
    2019
    This camera is newer than the average camera (2019 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    March 2019
    2,019 vs 2,013
  • 1.1 points higher DxOMark Landscape score
    DxOMark landscape score
    13.5 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark landscape score than the average camera (13.5 points vs 12.4 points). The average camera scores 12.4 points.
    13.5 points vs 12.4 points
  • 202 more AF points
    N. of focus points
    225
    This camera has more focus points than the average camera (225 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    225 vs 23
  • Human eye AF
    Eye detection AF (human)
    yes
    This camera supports human eye-detection AF, the average camera does not.
  • 4.3 fps faster mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    10 fps
    This camera has a faster mechanical burst than the average camera (10 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    10 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • Supports touch autofocus
    Touch autofocus
    yes
    This camera supports touch autofocus, the average camera does not. 34.9% of cameras support touch autofocus.
  • In-camera panorama mode
    In-camera panorama mode
    yes
    This camera includes an in-camera panorama mode, the average camera does not.
    SCN mode
  • 90 s longer maximum exposure
    Longest shutter speed
    120 s
    This camera supports a longer maximum exposure than the average camera (120 s s vs 30 s s). The average camera supports a longest shutter speed of 30 s s.
    120 s vs 30 s
  • Higher video resolution
    Max video resolution
    3,840 px
    This camera records higher-resolution video than the average camera (3840 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    3840 px vs 1920 px
  • Supports slow-motion video
    Slow-motion video
    yes
    This camera supports slow-motion video, the average camera does not.
    Supports up to 120 fps high-speed video.
  • Higher video color depth
    Video bit depth
    10 bit
    This camera supports a higher video bit depth than the average camera (10 bit vs 8 bit). The average camera supports video at 8 bit.
    HDMI
    10 bit vs 8 bit
  • 70 Mbps higher video bitrate
    Video bitrate
    100 Mbps
    This camera has a higher video bitrate than the average camera (100 Mbps vs 30 Mbps). The average camera records at 30 Mbps.
    100 Mbps vs 30 Mbps
  • Clean HDMI output
    Clean HDMI output
    yes
    This camera offers clean HDMI output, the average camera does not.
  • Built-in timelapse
    Timelapse function
    yes
    This camera includes timelapse capture, the average camera does not.
  • Supports 24p cinema mode
    24p cinema mode
    yes
    This camera supports 24p cinema mode, the average camera does not. 44% of cameras support this mode.
  • 740 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    1,860 mAh
    This camera has a higher battery capacity than the average camera (1860 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    1,860 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • 40 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    370 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (370 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    370 shots vs 330 shots
  • Has Bluetooth
    Bluetooth connectivity
    yes
    This camera supports Bluetooth, the average camera does not. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
  • Supports Wi-Fi connectivity
    Wi-Fi connectivity
    yes
    This camera supports Wi-Fi, the average camera does not. 47.8% of cameras support Wi-Fi.
    802.11b/g/n
  • Smartphone remote control
    Smartphone remote control
    yes
    This camera supports smartphone remote control, the average camera does not. 46.2% of cameras support smartphone remote control.
    via Leica FOTOS
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    4
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (4 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    4 vs -4
  • 339 g heavier
    Weight
    734 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (734 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    734 g vs 395 g
  • No HDMI output
    HDMI output
    no
    This camera does not support HDMI output, the average camera does. 78.7% of cameras support HDMI output.
  • No flash
    Flash
    no
    This camera does not have a built-in flash, the average camera does. 73.4% of cameras have a flash.
  • 45.9 mm thicker
    Thickness
    91.9 mm
    This camera is thicker than the average camera (91.9 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    91.9 mm vs 46 mm
  • 13.28x more expensive
    Leica Q2 is more expensive than the average camera (£3,850 vs £290).
    £3,850 vs £290
  • 21.9% worse value for money
    Leica Q2 has a worse value-for-money score than the average camera (5.08 vs 6.2).
    5.08 vs 6.2
  • 93% less popular
    Leica Q2 is less popular than the average camera (1 vs 1.9).
    1 vs 1.93
  • 13.28x more expensive
    Leica Q2 is more expensive than the average camera (£3,850 vs £290).
    £3,850 vs £290
  • 21.9% worse value for money
    Leica Q2 has a worse value-for-money score than the average camera (5.08 vs 6.2).
    5.08 vs 6.2
  • 93% less popular
    Leica Q2 is less popular than the average camera (1 vs 1.9).
    1 vs 1.93
  • 339 g heavier
    Weight
    734 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (734 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    734 g vs 395 g
  • No flash
    Flash
    no
    This camera does not have a built-in flash, the average camera does. 73.4% of cameras have a flash.
  • 45.9 mm thicker
    Thickness
    91.9 mm
    This camera is thicker than the average camera (91.9 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    91.9 mm vs 46 mm
  • 10.1 mm wider
    Width
    130 mm
    This camera is wider than the average camera (130 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    130 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    4
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (4 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    4 vs -4
  • 85.9% less optical zoom
    Optical zoom
    1 x
    40% less optical zoom: this camera offers 1 x, compared with 7.1 x on the average camera.
    The fixed built-in lens has no optical zoom range, equivalent to 1x.
    1 x vs 7.1 x
  • No HDMI output
    HDMI output
    no
    This camera does not support HDMI output, the average camera does. 78.7% of cameras support HDMI output.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

D
dpreview.com
21/05/2019
Summary of the review
M
macfilos.com
07/03/2019
Summary of the review
D
dxomark.com
05/06/2019
Summary of the review
S
slack.co.uk
07/03/2019
Summary of the review
M
macfilos.com
26/02/2021
Summary of the review
J
joewilcox.com
12/01/2022
Summary of the review
O
overgaard.dk
01/02/2019
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
07/03/2019
Summary of the review
N
neunzehn72.de
19/03/2019
Summary of the review
Q
qimago.de
07/03/2019
Summary of the review
D
doctor-speed.de
13/05/2019
Summary of the review
B
behance.net
19/09/2022
Summary of the review
F
florian-renz.de
19/01/2025
Summary of the review
E
endlichbilder.de
21/10/2026
Summary of the review
W
welt.de
15/03/2019
Summary of the review
L
l-camera-forum.com
22/06/2021
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
07/03/2019
Summary of the review
F
fotomagazin.de
02/06/2020
Summary of the review
R
roter-punkt-kamera.de
24/02/2021
Summary of the review
0
01net.com
03/04/2019
Summary of the review
M
mizuwari.fr
26/04/2019
Summary of the review
C
commeuncamion.com
15/03/2020
Summary of the review
A
alpinemag.fr
28/12/2021
Summary of the review
L
leclaireur.fnac.com
16/09/2019
Summary of the review
X
xatakafoto.com
04/02/2020
Summary of the review
P
photo-review.com
15/06/2022
Summary of the review
P
photolari.com
07/03/2019
Summary of the review
F
fotografidigitali.it
03/02/2023
Summary of the review
F
fotografidigitali.it
20/06/2019
Summary of the review
F
fotoimage.it
10/03/2019
Summary of the review
F
fotografiebeginner.nl
14/03/2022
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What we like about Leica Q2

  • Exceptional 28mm f/1.7 Summilux lens known for incredible sharpness and 'Leica look' rendering
  • High-resolution 47.3MP full-frame sensor that allows for significant cropping flexibility
  • Rugged, premium build quality with IP52 weather sealing for shooting in various conditions
  • Simplified, intuitive menu system and physical controls that prioritize the shooting experience
  • Fast and accurate leaf shutter that is quiet and allows for high-speed flash sync
  • Effective macro mode that is easily engaged via a dedicated lens ring

What we don't like about Leica Q2

  • High retail price makes it a significant investment compared to other fixed-lens or mirrorless systems
  • Autofocus performance is often cited as slow and less reliable for moving subjects compared to Sony or Canon
  • Lack of modern features such as a tilting screen or USB-C charging
  • Poor highlight recovery in RAW files compared to competitors, often requiring underexposure
  • Limited ergonomics; the camera can be difficult to hold comfortably without an optional, expensive grip
  • Large file sizes (up to 90MB for RAW) require significant storage and computer processing power

Verdict

The Leica Q2 is a premium full-frame compact camera featuring a high-resolution 47.3-megapixel CMOS sensor paired with a fixed, optically stabilised Summilux 28mm f/1.7 ASPH lens. Built for exceptional detail and speed, it includes a robust magnesium-alloy body with IP52-rated weather sealing, a crisp 3.68MP OLED electronic viewfinder, a 10 fps burst shooting speed, and the ability to capture DCI 4K and UHD 4K video. Its major advantages are its superb edge-to-edge optical sharpness, excellent low-light performance, intuitive manual controls, and a dedicated macro focus mode that allows close-ups down to 17cm. On the downside, the camera comes with a very high price tag, lacks standard ports for external microphones or headphones, has a fixed focal length that restricts versatility for some users, and has a relatively small buffer that limits long continuous shooting bursts.

Compare Leica Q2 with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Leica Q2 and other products in the Cameras category

No results found