Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

HP Photosmart R927 Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£70Sensor size:1/1.8"Weight:212 gBattery life (CIPA):200 shots

HP Photosmart R927 Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

4.1

Overall score

Score
4.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

3.8

Technical score

10%

6.5

User score

â–¼Worse than 90% of cameras
3.8

Technical score

Technical score
3.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

4.4

Sensor & Image

25%

3.0

Photo Features

18%

3.5

Video & Audio

14%

5.8

Display & Design

8%

3.4

Battery & Power

7%

2.1

Connectivity & Storage

â–¼Worse than 90% of cameras
6.5

User score

User score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.7

User ratings

30%

3.8

Number of reviews

Based on 9 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 97% of cameras
  • hp-photosmart-r927
hp-photosmart-r927

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera HP Photosmart R927

Technical score
Technical score
3.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

4.4

Sensor & Image

25%

3.0

Photo Features

18%

3.5

Video & Audio

14%

5.8

Display & Design

8%

3.4

Battery & Power

7%

2.1

Connectivity & Storage

3.8
User score
User score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.7

User ratings

30%

3.8

Number of reviews

Based on 9 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
6.5
Popularity
Popularity
3.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
HP Photosmart R927 has a popularity score of 3.8, which is higher than 54.2% of cameras.
3.8
Value for money
Value for money
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

4.1

Overall score

40%

10

Price

5.9
Sensor size
1/1.8"
Sensor size
1/1.8"
This camera uses a sensor classified as 1/1.8"; it is smaller than the sensor in 59.8% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
8.2 MP
Main camera megapixels
8.2 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 8.2 MP, which is lower than that of 99% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
2.2 µm
Main camera pixel size
2.2 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 2.2 µm, which are smaller than those in 56.5% of cameras and the same size as those in 0.6% of cameras.
Base ISO
100
Base ISO
100
This camera has a base ISO of 100 which is higher than that of 19.9% of cameras and equal to that of 52.4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 400 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 400
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 400, which is lower than that of 99.8% of cameras and equal to that of 0.2% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
N/A
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
?
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
This camera does not support phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.5% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
no
AF tracking
no
This camera does not support AF tracking. 88.1% of cameras support this feature.
Show more
Max video resolution
640 px
Max video resolution
640 px
This camera supports 640 px video recording which is lower quality than that of 90.6% of cameras and equal to that of 1.1% of cameras.
Video bitrate
?
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
This camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 69.9% of cameras.
Video codecs
MPEG-1
Show more
Type
compact
Weight
212 g
Weight
212 g
This camera weighs 212 g which is lighter than 76.7% of cameras.
Width
96 mm
Width
96 mm
This camera has a width of 96 mm which is narrower than 89.7% of cameras and equal to that of 1% of cameras.
Height
62 mm
Height
62 mm
This camera has a height of 62 mm which is shorter than 72.9% of cameras and equal to that of 1% of cameras.
Thickness
26 mm
Thickness
26 mm
This camera has a thickness of 26 mm which is thinner than 84.4% of cameras and equal to that of 0.5% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
200 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
200 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 200 shots, which is shorter than that of 90.5% of cameras and equal to that of 3.8% of cameras.
Battery capacity
1,050 mAh
Battery capacity
1,050 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 1,050 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 56.1% of cameras and equal to those in 3.6% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

HP Photosmart R927 vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • 183 g lighter
    Weight
    212 g
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (212 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    212 g vs 395 g
  • 23.9 mm narrower
    Width
    96 mm
    This camera is narrower than the average camera (96 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    96 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • 20 mm thinner
    Thickness
    26 mm
    This camera is thinner than the average camera (26 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    26 mm vs 46 mm
  • 0.03 GB more storage
    Internal storage
    0.032 GB
    This camera has a higher internal storage than the average camera (0 GB vs 0 GB). The average camera offers 0 GB of internal storage.
    0.032 GB vs 0 GB
  • 4.14x cheaper
    HP Photosmart R927 is cheaper than the average camera (£70 vs £290).
    £70 vs £290
  • In-camera panorama mode
    In-camera panorama mode
    yes
    This camera includes an in-camera panorama mode, the average camera does not.
  • 11.9 mm shorter body
    Height
    62 mm
    This camera is shorter than the average camera (62 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    62 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 4.14x cheaper
    HP Photosmart R927 is cheaper than the average camera (£70 vs £290).
    £70 vs £290
  • 183 g lighter
    Weight
    212 g
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (212 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    212 g vs 395 g
  • 23.9 mm narrower
    Width
    96 mm
    This camera is narrower than the average camera (96 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    96 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • 20 mm thinner
    Thickness
    26 mm
    This camera is thinner than the average camera (26 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    26 mm vs 46 mm
  • 11.9 mm shorter body
    Height
    62 mm
    This camera is shorter than the average camera (62 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    62 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • In-camera panorama mode
    In-camera panorama mode
    yes
    This camera includes an in-camera panorama mode, the average camera does not.
  • 0.03 GB more storage
    Internal storage
    0.032 GB
    This camera has a higher internal storage than the average camera (0 GB vs 0 GB). The average camera offers 0 GB of internal storage.
    0.032 GB vs 0 GB
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    1/1.8"
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/1.8" vs APS-C).
    1/1.8" vs APS-C
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    8.2 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (8.2 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    8.2 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • Lower video resolution
    Max video resolution
    640 px
    This camera records lower-resolution video than the average camera (640 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    640 px vs 1920 px
  • No AF tracking
    AF tracking
    no
    This camera does not support AF tracking, the average camera does. 88% of cameras support it.
  • 4.1 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    1.6 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (1.6 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    1.6 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    focus locked at recording start
  • No hot shoe
    Hot shoe
    no
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • 23.1% lower user score
    User score
    6.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    HP Photosmart R927
    the average camera
    HP Photosmart R927 has a lower user score than the average camera (6.50 vs 8.000).
    6.5 vs 8
  • 5.7% worse value for money
    HP Photosmart R927 has a worse value-for-money score than the average camera (5.87 vs 6.2).
    5.87 vs 6.2
  • No hot shoe
    Hot shoe
    no
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    1/1.8"
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/1.8" vs APS-C).
    1/1.8" vs APS-C
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    8.2 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (8.2 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    8.2 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • 6,000 ISO lower maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    400 ISO
    This camera has a lower maximum sensitivity than the average camera (400 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    400 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • 1.14 µm smaller sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    2.2 µm
    This camera has smaller sensor pixels than the average camera (2.2 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    2.2 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 7 older
    Release date
    2006
    This camera is older than the average camera (2006 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    2,006 vs 2,013
  • No AF tracking
    AF tracking
    no
    This camera does not support AF tracking, the average camera does. 88% of cameras support it.
  • 4.1 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    1.6 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (1.6 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    1.6 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • No RAW photo capture
    RAW photo capture
    no
    This camera does not support RAW photo capture, the average camera does. 62.8% of cameras support RAW formats.
  • Lower video resolution
    Max video resolution
    640 px
    This camera records lower-resolution video than the average camera (640 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    640 px vs 1920 px
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    focus locked at recording start
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • 130 shots fewer shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    200 shots
    This camera has shorter battery life than the average camera (200 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    200 shots vs 330 shots
  • 70 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    1,050 mAh
    This camera has a lower battery capacity than the average camera (1050 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    1,050 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • No HDMI output
    HDMI output
    no
    This camera does not support HDMI output, the average camera does. 78.7% of cameras support HDMI output.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

C
cnet.com
05/05/2006
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
30/06/2006
Summary of the review
I
imaging-resource.com
06/10/2006
Summary of the review
N
neilgrogan.com
14/06/2007
Summary of the review
P
popphoto.com
17/12/2008
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
13/08/2013
Summary of the review
T
thetimes.com
07/05/2006
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
10/10/2006
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
10/10/2006
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
10/10/2006
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
04/01/2006
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 9 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about HP Photosmart R927

  • Large, bright 3-inch LCD screen for easy photo review
  • Sleek and sturdy stainless steel metallic body
  • Beginner-friendly with extensive help menus and 'Image Advice' features
  • Unique creative features like in-camera panorama stitching and 'slimming' effects
  • Compact and pocketable design
  • Powerful flash that performs well in dark settings

What we don't like about HP Photosmart R927

  • Noticeable shutter lag and sluggish overall performance
  • Poor battery life, often requiring a spare for extended use
  • Image quality issues, including high noise at higher ISO settings and detail blurring from noise suppression
  • Awkward button placement, specifically the flash and macro controls on top
  • Requires a specific dock for charging or connecting to a computer
  • Microphone picks up lens adjustment noise during video recording

Verdict

The HP Photosmart R927 is a compact 8.2-megapixel digital camera released in 2006, featuring a durable brushed-metal body and a large 3.0-inch LCD screen with a wide 170-degree viewing angle. Key technical specs include a 3x internal optical zoom (35–105mm equivalent), 32MB of internal memory, and unique in-camera 'Real Life' technologies such as automatic red-eye removal, adaptive lighting for shadow detail, and panoramic stitching for up to five images. Its main pros include an exceptionally user-friendly interface with built-in 'Image Advice' for photography tips, manual exposure controls (Aperture/Shutter priority), and creative filters like the 'slimming' effect. However, notable cons include poor battery life (rated at approximately 114 shots), noticeable shutter lag, and significant image noise at higher ISO settings, which are limited to a maximum of 400.

Compare HP Photosmart R927 with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of HP Photosmart R927 and other products in the Cameras category

No results found