OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Casio EXILIM EX ZS5 Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£70Sensor size:1/2.3"Weight:141 gBattery life (CIPA):180 shots

Casio EXILIM EX ZS5 Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

3.7

Overall score

Score
3.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 97% of models
Score components

90%

3.3

Technical score

10%

7.5

User score

▼Worse than 97% of cameras
3.3

Technical score

Technical score
3.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components

28%

4.1

Sensor & Image

25%

2.9

Photo Features

18%

2.9

Video & Audio

14%

4.4

Display & Design

8%

2.5

Battery & Power

7%

2.0

Connectivity & Storage

▼Worse than 99% of cameras
7.5

User score

User score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 89% of models
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

5.4

Number of reviews

Based on 26 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▼Worse than 89% of cameras
  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £70

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Casio EXILIM EX ZS5

Technical score
Technical score
3.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components:

28%

4.1

Sensor & Image

25%

2.9

Photo Features

18%

2.9

Video & Audio

14%

4.4

Display & Design

8%

2.5

Battery & Power

7%

2.0

Connectivity & Storage

3.3
User score
User score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 89% of models
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

5.4

Number of reviews

Based on 26 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.5
Popularity
Popularity
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 60% of models
Popularity:
Casio EXILIM EX ZS5 has a popularity score of 5.4, which is higher than 59.6% of cameras.
5.4
Value for money
Value for money
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 87% of models
Score components:

60%

3.7

Overall score

40%

10

Price

5.6
Sensor size
1/2.3"
Sensor size
1/2.3"
▼ Worse than 61% of models
This camera uses a sensor classified as 1/2.3"; it is smaller than the sensor in 60.5% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 38.1% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
14.1 MP
Main camera megapixels
14.1 MP
▼ Worse than 76% of models
This camera has a sensor resolution of 14.1 MP, which is lower than that of 75.5% of cameras and equal to that of 2.7% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
1.43 µm
Main camera pixel size
1.43 µm
▼ Worse than 68% of models
Market range: <1.33 µm – >5.94 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 1.43 µm, which are smaller than those in 67.6% of cameras and the same size as those in 2.7% of cameras.
Base ISO
64
Base ISO
64
▼ Worse than 96% of models
Market range: <80 – >200
This camera has a base ISO of 64 which is lower than that of 95.8% of cameras and equal to that of 3.4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 1600 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 1,600
▼ Worse than 86% of models
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 1,600, which is lower than that of 85.9% of cameras and equal to that of 13.2% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
N/A
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
▼ Worse than 11% of models
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
1
N. of focus points
1
▼ Worse than 95% of models
Market range: <9 – >399
This camera has 1 focus points, fewer than the number offered by 95.4% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 4.6% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
▼ Worse than 37% of models
This camera does not support phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.5% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
▲ Better than 12% of models
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
848 px
Max video resolution
848 px
▼ Worse than 90% of models
This camera supports 848 px video recording which is lower quality than that of 90.1% of cameras and equal to that of 0.4% of cameras.
Video bitrate
13 Mbps
Video bitrate
13 Mbps
▼ Worse than 88% of models
Market range: <12 Mbps – >237 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 13 Mbps which is lower than that of 88.4% of cameras and equal to that of 1% of cameras.
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
▼ Worse than 12% of models
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
▼ Worse than 22% of models
This camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 69.9% of cameras.
Video codecs
Motion JPEG
Show more
Type
compact
Weight
141 g
Weight
141 g
★ Better than 90% of models
Market range: <142 g – >812 g
This camera weighs 141 g which is lighter than 90.2% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.3% of cameras.
Width
95.8 mm
Width
95.8 mm
★ Better than 91% of models
Market range: <96 mm – >142.6 mm
This camera has a width of 95.8 mm which is narrower than 90.8% of cameras and equal to that of 0.2% of cameras.
Height
56.9 mm
Height
56.9 mm
★ Better than 92% of models
Market range: <57.6 mm – >105.8 mm
This camera has a height of 56.9 mm which is shorter than 91.9% of cameras and equal to that of 0.2% of cameras.
Thickness
20.7 mm
Thickness
20.7 mm
★ Better than 92% of models
Market range: <21.9 mm – >92 mm
This camera has a thickness of 20.7 mm which is thinner than 92.4% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
180 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
180 shots
▼ Worse than 96% of models
Market range: <210 shots – >700 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 180 shots, which is shorter than that of 95.9% of cameras and equal to that of 0.9% of cameras.
Battery capacity
700 mAh
Battery capacity
700 mAh
▼ Worse than 88% of models
Market range: <700 mAh – >2.2k mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 700 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 88.2% of cameras and equal to those in 3.6% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
▲ Better than 1% of models
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
▼ Worse than 10% of models
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
▼ Worse than 48% of models
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
▼ Worse than 23% of models
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
▼ Worse than 15% of models
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Casio EXILIM EX ZS5 vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • 254 g lighter
    Weight
    141 g
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    Market range: <142 g – >812 g
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (141 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    141 g vs 395 g
  • 24.1 mm narrower
    Width
    95.8 mm
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <96 mm – >142.6 mm
    This camera is narrower than the average camera (95.8 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    95.8 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • 17 mm shorter body
    Height
    56.9 mm
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    Market range: <57.6 mm – >105.8 mm
    This camera is shorter than the average camera (56.9 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    56.9 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 25.3 mm thinner
    Thickness
    20.7 mm
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    Market range: <21.9 mm – >92 mm
    This camera is thinner than the average camera (20.7 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    20.7 mm vs 46 mm
  • 4.14x cheaper
    Casio EXILIM EX ZS5 is cheaper than the average camera (£70 vs £290).
    £70 vs £290
  • 0.01 GB more storage
    Internal storage
    0.0142 GB
    ▲ Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >0.07 GB
    This camera has a higher internal storage than the average camera (0 GB vs 0 GB). The average camera offers 0 GB of internal storage.
    0.0142 GB vs 0 GB
  • 4.14x cheaper
    Casio EXILIM EX ZS5 is cheaper than the average camera (£70 vs £290).
    £70 vs £290
  • 254 g lighter
    Weight
    141 g
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    Market range: <142 g – >812 g
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (141 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    141 g vs 395 g
  • 24.1 mm narrower
    Width
    95.8 mm
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <96 mm – >142.6 mm
    This camera is narrower than the average camera (95.8 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    95.8 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • 17 mm shorter body
    Height
    56.9 mm
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    Market range: <57.6 mm – >105.8 mm
    This camera is shorter than the average camera (56.9 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    56.9 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 25.3 mm thinner
    Thickness
    20.7 mm
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    Market range: <21.9 mm – >92 mm
    This camera is thinner than the average camera (20.7 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    20.7 mm vs 46 mm
  • 0.01 GB more storage
    Internal storage
    0.0142 GB
    ▲ Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >0.07 GB
    This camera has a higher internal storage than the average camera (0 GB vs 0 GB). The average camera offers 0 GB of internal storage.
    0.0142 GB vs 0 GB
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    1/2.3"
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/2.3" vs APS-C).
    1/2.3" vs APS-C
  • 5.2 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    0.5 fps
    ▼ Worse than 99% of models
    Market range: <1.08 fps – >10 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (0.5 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    0.5 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • Lower video resolution
    Max video resolution
    848 px
    ▼ Worse than 90% of models
    This camera records lower-resolution video than the average camera (848 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    848 px vs 1920 px
  • 0.3 in smaller screen diagonal
    Screen size
    2.7 in
    ▼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <2.7 in – >3.2 in
    This camera has a smaller screen than the average camera (2.7 in vs 3 in). The average camera has a screen size of 3 in.
    2.7 in vs 3 in
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    ▼ Worse than 55% of models
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    ▼ Worse than 71% of models
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
  • 1.91 µm smaller sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    1.43 µm
    ▼ Worse than 68% of models
    Market range: <1.33 µm – >5.94 µm
    This camera has smaller sensor pixels than the average camera (1.4 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    1.43 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • No hot shoe
    Hot shoe
    no
    ▼ Worse than 54% of models
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • 10.2% worse value for money
    Casio EXILIM EX ZS5 has a worse value-for-money score than the average camera (5.62 vs 6.2).
    5.62 vs 6.2
  • 6.9% lower user score
    User score
    7.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Casio EXILIM EX ZS5
    the average camera
    Casio EXILIM EX ZS5 has a lower user score than the average camera (7.48 vs 8.000).
    7.48 vs 8
  • 0.3 in smaller screen diagonal
    Screen size
    2.7 in
    ▼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <2.7 in – >3.2 in
    This camera has a smaller screen than the average camera (2.7 in vs 3 in). The average camera has a screen size of 3 in.
    2.7 in vs 3 in
  • No hot shoe
    Hot shoe
    no
    ▼ Worse than 54% of models
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    1/2.3"
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/2.3" vs APS-C).
    1/2.3" vs APS-C
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    ▼ Worse than 55% of models
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • 1.91 µm smaller sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    1.43 µm
    ▼ Worse than 68% of models
    Market range: <1.33 µm – >5.94 µm
    This camera has smaller sensor pixels than the average camera (1.4 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    1.43 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    14.1 MP
    ▼ Worse than 76% of models
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (14.1 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    14.1 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 4,800 ISO lower maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    1,600 ISO
    ▼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <1.6k ISO – >40k ISO
    This camera has a lower maximum sensitivity than the average camera (1600 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    1,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • 22,100 ISO lower extended sensitivity limit
    Max expanded ISO
    3,200 ISO
    ▼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <3.2k ISO – >102.4k ISO
    This camera has a lower expanded ISO than the average camera (3200 ISO vs 25300 ISO). The average camera reaches an expanded ISO of 25300 ISO.
    3,200 ISO vs 25,300 ISO
  • 2 older
    Release date
    2011
    ▼ Worse than 77% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This camera is older than the average camera (2011 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    March 2011
    2,011 vs 2,013
  • 5.2 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    0.5 fps
    ▼ Worse than 99% of models
    Market range: <1.08 fps – >10 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (0.5 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    0.5 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 22 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    1
    ▼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <9 – >399
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (1 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    1 vs 23
  • No RAW photo capture
    RAW photo capture
    no
    ▼ Worse than 63% of models
    This camera does not support RAW photo capture, the average camera does. 62.8% of cameras support RAW formats.
  • No manual exposure control
    Manual exposure
    no
    ▼ Worse than 72% of models
    This camera does not support manual exposure, the average camera does. 72% of cameras support manual exposure controls.
  • 26 s shorter maximum exposure
    Longest shutter speed
    4 s
    ▼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <4 s – >1.8k s
    This camera supports a shorter maximum exposure than the average camera (4 s s vs 30 s s). The average camera supports a longest shutter speed of 30 s s.
    4 s vs 30 s
  • Lower video resolution
    Max video resolution
    848 px
    ▼ Worse than 90% of models
    This camera records lower-resolution video than the average camera (848 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    848 px vs 1920 px
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    ▼ Worse than 71% of models
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    ▼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <1 – >2
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • 17 Mbps lower video bitrate
    Video bitrate
    13 Mbps
    ▼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <12 Mbps – >237 Mbps
    This camera has a lower video bitrate than the average camera (13 Mbps vs 30 Mbps). The average camera records at 30 Mbps.
    13 Mbps vs 30 Mbps
  • 150 shots fewer shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    180 shots
    ▼ Worse than 96% of models
    Market range: <210 shots – >700 shots
    This camera has shorter battery life than the average camera (180 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    180 shots vs 330 shots
  • 420 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    700 mAh
    ▼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <700 mAh – >2.2k mAh
    This camera has a lower battery capacity than the average camera (700 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    700 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • No HDMI output
    HDMI output
    no
    ▼ Worse than 79% of models
    This camera does not support HDMI output, the average camera does. 78.7% of cameras support HDMI output.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

E
ephotozine.com
20/05/2011
Summary of the review
Casio Exilim EX-ZS5 vs EX-ZS10 Digital Compact Camera Review - ePHOTOzine
L
lemon8-app.com
01/01/2025
Summary of the review
Casio Exilim EX-ZS5: Sharp, cool-tone & affordable - Lemon8
L
lemon8-app.com
13/08/2025
Summary of the review
Exploring the Classic Casio Exilim EX-ZS5: Sample Photos & First Impressions - Lemon8
C
camerarace.com
05/01/2011
Summary of the review
Casio Exilim EX-ZS5 - Review and Specifications - Camerarace
(Translated)Show original
M
m.alatest.fr
22/10/2026
Summary of the review
Casio Exilim EX-ZS5 | Reviews, Tests and Price
(Translated)Show original
R
reway.nl
No date specified
Summary of the review
Casio Exilim EX-ZS5 Digital Compact Camera - Pink - Reway
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on 26 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Casio EXILIM EX ZS5

  • Ultra-compact and lightweight design, making it highly portable for daily use
  • Beginner-friendly operation with simple controls and helpful 'Best Shot' scene modes
  • Produces a nostalgic 'vintage' aesthetic with unique cool-tone color output
  • Convenient in-camera battery charging via USB
  • Equipped with tracking autofocus that can follow moving subjects
  • Affordable price point for an entry-level digital camera

What we don't like about Casio EXILIM EX ZS5

  • Lacks optical or digital image stabilisation, which can lead to blurry shots
  • Poor low-light performance due to its small sensor and dim telephoto aperture (f/6.5)
  • Low video resolution limited to standard definition VGA (640x480)
  • No support for RAW format or manual exposure/focus modes
  • Lack of modern connectivity features like Wi-Fi or Bluetooth for easy file transfer
  • Fixed LCD screen that does not tilt or flip for selfies or creative angles

Verdict

The Casio Exilim EX-ZS5 is an ultracompact entry-level digital camera featuring a 14.1-megapixel 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor and a 5x optical zoom lens with a 26mm wide-angle to 130mm telephoto equivalent focal range. Key characteristics include a 2.7-inch 230k-dot LCD screen, 23 'Best Shot' scene modes for automated shooting, and the convenience of in-camera USB charging for its NP-80 lithium-ion battery. Its main pros are its remarkably slim 20mm body, lightweight 141g build that fits easily into pockets, and a user-friendly 'Easy Mode' designed for beginners. However, notable cons include a lack of optical image stabilization, standard definition video limited to VGA (640x480) or 848x480 resolution, and the absence of manual exposure controls or RAW file support.

Compare Casio EXILIM EX ZS5 with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Casio EXILIM EX ZS5 and other products in the Cameras category

No results found