Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Canon PowerShot SX220 HS Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£160Sensor size:1/2.3"Weight:215 gBattery life (CIPA):210 shots

Canon PowerShot SX220 HS Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

4.7

Overall score

Score
4.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

4.3

Technical score

10%

8.4

User score

▼Worse than 69% of cameras
4.3

Technical score

Technical score
4.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

4.7

Sensor & Image

25%

3.3

Photo Features

18%

4.9

Video & Audio

14%

5.8

Display & Design

8%

3.7

Battery & Power

7%

2.6

Connectivity & Storage

▼Worse than 78% of cameras
8.4

User score

User score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.3

User ratings

30%

8.7

Number of reviews

Based on 304 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▲Better than 79% of cameras
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Canon PowerShot SX220 HS

Technical score
Technical score
4.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

4.7

Sensor & Image

25%

3.3

Photo Features

18%

4.9

Video & Audio

14%

5.8

Display & Design

8%

3.7

Battery & Power

7%

2.6

Connectivity & Storage

4.3
User score
User score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.3

User ratings

30%

8.7

Number of reviews

Based on 304 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.4
Popularity
Popularity
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Canon PowerShot SX220 HS has a popularity score of 8.7, which is higher than 81.5% of cameras.
8.7
Value for money
Value for money
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

4.7

Overall score

40%

9.7

Price

6.2
Sensor size
1/2.3"
Sensor size
1/2.3"
This camera uses a sensor classified as 1/2.3"; it is smaller than the sensor in 60.5% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 38.1% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
12.1 MP
Main camera megapixels
12.1 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 12.1 MP, which is lower than that of 86.6% of cameras and equal to that of 6.9% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
1.55 µm
Main camera pixel size
1.55 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 1.55 µm, which are smaller than those in 60.9% of cameras and the same size as those in 1.2% of cameras.
Base ISO
100
Base ISO
100
This camera has a base ISO of 100 which is higher than that of 19.9% of cameras and equal to that of 52.4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 3200 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 3,200
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 3,200, which is lower than that of 62.9% of cameras and equal to that of 22.7% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
N/A
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
1
N. of focus points
1
This camera has 1 focus points, fewer than the number offered by 95.4% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 4.6% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
This camera does not support phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.5% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
1920 px
Max video resolution
1920 px
This camera supports 1920 px video recording which is higher quality than that of 28.7% of cameras and equal to that of 47.1% of cameras.
Video bitrate
38 Mbps
Video bitrate
38 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 38 Mbps which is higher than that of 60.3% of cameras and equal to that of 2.9% of cameras.
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
This camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 69.9% of cameras.
Video codecs
H.264
Show more
Type
compact
Weight
215 g
Weight
215 g
This camera weighs 215 g which is lighter than 75.4% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.5% of cameras.
Width
105.7 mm
Width
105.7 mm
This camera has a width of 105.7 mm which is narrower than 74% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Height
59.3 mm
Height
59.3 mm
This camera has a height of 59.3 mm which is shorter than 81% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Thickness
33.2 mm
Thickness
33.2 mm
This camera has a thickness of 33.2 mm which is thinner than 70.4% of cameras and equal to that of 0.3% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
210 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
210 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 210 shots, which is shorter than that of 86.9% of cameras and equal to that of 3.4% of cameras.
Battery capacity
1,120 mAh
Battery capacity
1,120 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 1,120 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 48.9% of cameras and equal to those in 1.1% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Canon PowerShot SX220 HS vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    yes
    This camera uses a BSI sensor, the average camera does not. 34.8% of cameras use a BSI sensor.
  • Supports slow-motion video
    Slow-motion video
    yes
    This camera supports slow-motion video, the average camera does not.
    Supports up to 120 fps high-speed video.
  • 180 g lighter
    Weight
    215 g
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (215 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    215 g vs 395 g
  • Supports 24p cinema mode
    24p cinema mode
    yes
    This camera supports 24p cinema mode, the average camera does not. 44% of cameras support this mode.
  • 14.6 mm shorter body
    Height
    59.3 mm
    This camera is shorter than the average camera (59.3 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    59.3 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 14.2 mm narrower
    Width
    105.7 mm
    This camera is narrower than the average camera (105.7 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    105.7 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • 5.6% higher user score
    User score
    8.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Canon PowerShot SX220 HS
    the average camera
    Canon PowerShot SX220 HS has a higher user score than the average camera (8.45 vs 8.000).
    8.45 vs 8
  • 12.8 mm thinner
    Thickness
    33.2 mm
    This camera is thinner than the average camera (33.2 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    33.2 mm vs 46 mm
  • 5.6% higher user score
    User score
    8.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Canon PowerShot SX220 HS
    the average camera
    Canon PowerShot SX220 HS has a higher user score than the average camera (8.45 vs 8.000).
    8.45 vs 8
  • 4.49x more popular
    Canon PowerShot SX220 HS is more popular than the average camera (8.67 vs 1.9).
    8.67 vs 1.93
  • 180 g lighter
    Weight
    215 g
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (215 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    215 g vs 395 g
  • 14.6 mm shorter body
    Height
    59.3 mm
    This camera is shorter than the average camera (59.3 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    59.3 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 14.2 mm narrower
    Width
    105.7 mm
    This camera is narrower than the average camera (105.7 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    105.7 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • 12.8 mm thinner
    Thickness
    33.2 mm
    This camera is thinner than the average camera (33.2 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    33.2 mm vs 46 mm
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    yes
    This camera uses a BSI sensor, the average camera does not. 34.8% of cameras use a BSI sensor.
  • Supports slow-motion video
    Slow-motion video
    yes
    This camera supports slow-motion video, the average camera does not.
    Supports up to 120 fps high-speed video.
  • Supports 24p cinema mode
    24p cinema mode
    yes
    This camera supports 24p cinema mode, the average camera does not. 44% of cameras support this mode.
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    1/2.3"
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/2.3" vs APS-C).
    1/2.3" vs APS-C
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    12.1 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (12.1 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    12.1 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • No hot shoe
    Hot shoe
    no
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • 1.79 µm smaller sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    1.55 µm
    This camera has smaller sensor pixels than the average camera (1.6 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    1.55 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 120 shots fewer shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    210 shots
    This camera has shorter battery life than the average camera (210 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    210 shots vs 330 shots
  • 22 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    1
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (1 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    1 vs 23
  • No RAW photo capture
    RAW photo capture
    no
    This camera does not support RAW photo capture, the average camera does. 62.8% of cameras support RAW formats.
  • No hot shoe
    Hot shoe
    no
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    1/2.3"
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/2.3" vs APS-C).
    1/2.3" vs APS-C
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    12.1 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (12.1 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    12.1 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • 1.79 µm smaller sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    1.55 µm
    This camera has smaller sensor pixels than the average camera (1.6 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    1.55 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 3,200 ISO lower maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    3,200 ISO
    This camera has a lower maximum sensitivity than the average camera (3200 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    3,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • 2 older
    Release date
    2011
    This camera is older than the average camera (2011 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    2,011 vs 2,013
  • 22 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    1
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (1 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    1 vs 23
  • No RAW photo capture
    RAW photo capture
    no
    This camera does not support RAW photo capture, the average camera does. 62.8% of cameras support RAW formats.
  • 2.5 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    3.2 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (3.2 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    3.2 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 120 shots fewer shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    210 shots
    This camera has shorter battery life than the average camera (210 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    210 shots vs 330 shots
  • Older HDMI version
    HDMI version
    1.3
    This camera uses HDMI 1.3, while the average camera uses HDMI 1.4.
    1.3 vs 1.4

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

C
cnet.com
22/03/2011
Summary of the review
E
ephotozine.com
31/03/2011
Summary of the review
W
whatdigitalcamera.com
15/04/2011
Summary of the review
W
worldtour-outdoorexperience.com
11/07/2012
Summary of the review
G
gloriouslylost.wordpress.com
25/11/2012
Summary of the review
P
pocket-lint.com
16/04/2013
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
01/03/2011
Summary of the review
D
dpreview.com
20/07/2011
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
08/06/2011
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
14/06/2011
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
30/09/2011
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
19/05/2011
Summary of the review
T
test-portal.net
28/04/2011
Summary of the review
W
worldtour-outdoorexperience.com
11/07/2012
Summary of the review
C
camerarace.com
07/02/2011
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
11/01/2013
Summary of the review
P
portablegear.nl
01/05/2011
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 304 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Canon PowerShot SX220 HS

  • Versatile 14x optical zoom in a compact, pocketable body
  • Effective optical image stabilisation for clearer handheld shots
  • High-quality 1080p HD video recording with stereo sound
  • Intuitive controls and easy-to-use interface suitable for beginners
  • Sturdy build quality with a mix of metal and plastic
  • Good low-light performance due to the HS (High Sensitivity) system
  • Includes full manual exposure controls (PASM) for advanced users

What we don't like about Canon PowerShot SX220 HS

  • Poorly positioned pop-up flash that often deploys automatically
  • Relatively short battery life (rated at approx. 210 shots)
  • Noticeable vignetting and soft corners at the maximum zoom range
  • Handling issues with the small, sometimes fiddly control dial
  • Lack of RAW shooting capability
  • Slow continuous shooting speeds compared to rivals
  • The 16:9 screen aspect ratio can feel awkward for standard 4:3 still photos

Verdict

The Canon PowerShot SX220 HS is a versatile travel-zoom compact camera featuring a 12.1-megapixel back-illuminated CMOS sensor and a powerful 14x optical zoom lens (28–392mm equivalent) with a maximum aperture of f/3.1–5.9. Its standout characteristics include full 1080p HD video recording at 24fps with stereo sound, a 3.0-inch widescreen PureColor II G LCD with 461k-dot resolution, and the DIGIC 4 image processor. Main pros include its highly portable metal body, effective 4-stop optical image stabilisation, and the availability of full P/A/S/M manual controls for advanced users. However, notable cons include a relatively short battery life of approximately 210 shots per charge, the lack of RAW file support, and an auto-pop-up flash that some users find poorly positioned.

Compare Canon PowerShot SX220 HS with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Canon PowerShot SX220 HS and other products in the Cameras category

No results found