Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Canon PowerShot G1 X Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£290Sensor size:1.5-inchWeight:534 gBattery life (CIPA):250 shots

Canon PowerShot G1 X Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

4.8

Overall score

Score
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

4.4

Technical score

10%

8.2

User score

â–¼Worse than 66% of cameras
4.4

Technical score

Technical score
4.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

5.4

Sensor & Image

25%

3.5

Photo Features

18%

3.7

Video & Audio

14%

6.3

Display & Design

8%

3.6

Battery & Power

7%

2.6

Connectivity & Storage

â–¼Worse than 74% of cameras
8.2

User score

User score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.1

User ratings

30%

8.5

Number of reviews

Based on 491 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–²Better than 75% of cameras
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Canon PowerShot G1 X

Technical score
Technical score
4.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

5.4

Sensor & Image

25%

3.5

Photo Features

18%

3.7

Video & Audio

14%

6.3

Display & Design

8%

3.6

Battery & Power

7%

2.6

Connectivity & Storage

4.4
User score
User score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.1

User ratings

30%

8.5

Number of reviews

Based on 491 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.2
Popularity
Popularity
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Canon PowerShot G1 X has a popularity score of 8.5, which is higher than 80% of cameras.
8.5
Value for money
Value for money
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

4.8

Overall score

40%

9.0

Price

6.1
Sensor size
1.5-inch
Sensor size
1.5-inch
This camera uses a sensor classified as 1.5-inch; it is larger than the sensor in 57.2% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 0.1% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
14.3 MP
Main camera megapixels
14.3 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 14.3 MP, which is lower than that of 73.2% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
4.3 µm
Main camera pixel size
4.3 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 4.3 µm, which are larger than those in 71% of cameras and the same size as those in 1.2% of cameras.
Base ISO
100
Base ISO
100
This camera has a base ISO of 100 which is higher than that of 19.9% of cameras and equal to that of 52.4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 12800 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 12,800
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 12,800, which is higher than that of 54.4% of cameras and equal to that of 18.8% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
N/A
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
9
N. of focus points
9
This camera has 9 focus points, fewer than the number offered by 67.1% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 26% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
This camera does not support phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.5% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
1920 px
Max video resolution
1920 px
This camera supports 1920 px video recording which is higher quality than that of 28.7% of cameras and equal to that of 47.1% of cameras.
Video bitrate
36 Mbps
Video bitrate
36 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 36 Mbps which is higher than that of 57.3% of cameras and equal to that of 2.6% of cameras.
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
This camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 69.9% of cameras.
Video codecs
H.264
Show more
Type
compact
Weight
534 g
Weight
534 g
This camera weighs 534 g which is heavier than 67.3% of cameras.
Width
116.7 mm
Width
116.7 mm
This camera has a width of 116.7 mm which is narrower than 55.4% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Height
80.5 mm
Height
80.5 mm
This camera has a height of 80.5 mm which is taller than 57.3% of cameras.
Thickness
64.7 mm
Thickness
64.7 mm
This camera has a thickness of 64.7 mm which is thicker than 60.4% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
250 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
250 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 250 shots, which is shorter than that of 72.1% of cameras and equal to that of 4.2% of cameras.
Battery capacity
920 mAh
Battery capacity
920 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 920 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 77% of cameras and equal to those in 0.7% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Canon PowerShot G1 X vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • Fully articulated screen
    Flip-out screen
    yes
    This camera has a fully articulated screen, the average camera does not.
  • 0.96 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    4.3 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (4.3 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    4.3 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    optical
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (optical vs none).
    optical vs none
  • Lossless compressed RAW
    Lossless compressed RAW
    yes
    This camera supports lossless compressed RAW, while the average camera does not.
    Lossless RAW capture is supported.
  • Supports 24p cinema mode
    24p cinema mode
    yes
    This camera supports 24p cinema mode, the average camera does not. 44% of cameras support this mode.
  • 6,400 ISO higher maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    12,800 ISO
    This camera has a higher maximum sensitivity than the average camera (12800 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    12,800 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • Supports focus bracketing
    Focus bracketing
    yes
    This camera supports focus bracketing, the average camera does not.
    Automatic multi-shot focus bracketing available.
  • 2.6% higher user score
    User score
    8.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Canon PowerShot G1 X
    the average camera
    Canon PowerShot G1 X has a higher user score than the average camera (8.21 vs 8.000).
    8.21 vs 8
  • 2.6% higher user score
    User score
    8.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Canon PowerShot G1 X
    the average camera
    Canon PowerShot G1 X has a higher user score than the average camera (8.21 vs 8.000).
    8.21 vs 8
  • Fully articulated screen
    Flip-out screen
    yes
    This camera has a fully articulated screen, the average camera does not.
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    optical
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (optical vs none).
    optical vs none
  • 1 more customizable buttons
    Customizable button count
    1
    This camera has more customizable buttons than the average camera (1 vs 0). The average camera offers 0 customizable buttons.
    1 vs 0
  • 0.96 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    4.3 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (4.3 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    4.3 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 6,400 ISO higher maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    12,800 ISO
    This camera has a higher maximum sensitivity than the average camera (12800 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    12,800 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • Lossless compressed RAW
    Lossless compressed RAW
    yes
    This camera supports lossless compressed RAW, while the average camera does not.
    Lossless RAW capture is supported.
  • Supports focus bracketing
    Focus bracketing
    yes
    This camera supports focus bracketing, the average camera does not.
    Automatic multi-shot focus bracketing available.
  • Supports 24p cinema mode
    24p cinema mode
    yes
    This camera supports 24p cinema mode, the average camera does not. 44% of cameras support this mode.
  • 30 min longer recording time
    Max video recording time
    60 min
    This camera records continuously for longer than the average camera (60 min vs 30 min). The average camera records for 30 min.
    29:59 in HD
    60 min vs 30 min
  • 23 % lower viewfinder coverage
    Viewfinder coverage
    77 %
    This camera has a lower viewfinder coverage than the average camera (77 % vs 100 %). The average camera has viewfinder coverage of 100 %.
    77 % vs 100 %
  • 3.8 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    1.9 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (1.9 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    1.9 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    focus locked at recording start
  • 1.6 points lower DxOMark Landscape score
    DxOMark landscape score
    10.8 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark landscape score than the average camera (10.8 points vs 12.4 points). The average camera scores 12.4 points.
    10.8 points vs 12.4 points
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    14.3 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (14.3 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    14.3 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 13 points lower DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    60 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (60 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    60 points vs 73 points
  • 14 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    9
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (9 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    9 vs 23
  • 80 shots fewer shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    250 shots
    This camera has shorter battery life than the average camera (250 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    250 shots vs 330 shots
  • 23 % lower viewfinder coverage
    Viewfinder coverage
    77 %
    This camera has a lower viewfinder coverage than the average camera (77 % vs 100 %). The average camera has viewfinder coverage of 100 %.
    77 % vs 100 %
  • 139 g heavier
    Weight
    534 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (534 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    534 g vs 395 g
  • 18.7 mm thicker
    Thickness
    64.7 mm
    This camera is thicker than the average camera (64.7 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    64.7 mm vs 46 mm
  • 1.6 points lower DxOMark Landscape score
    DxOMark landscape score
    10.8 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark landscape score than the average camera (10.8 points vs 12.4 points). The average camera scores 12.4 points.
    10.8 points vs 12.4 points
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    14.3 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (14.3 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    14.3 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 13 points lower DxOMark sensor score
    DxOMark sensor score
    60 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sensor score than the average camera (60 points vs 73 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sensor score of 73 points.
    60 points vs 73 points
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    1.5-inch
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1.5-inch vs APS-C).
    1.5-inch vs APS-C
  • 199 points lower DxOMark Sports score
    DxOMark sports score
    644 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sports score than the average camera (644 points vs 843 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sports score of 843 points.
    644 points vs 843 points
  • 0.5 points lower DxOMark Portrait score
    DxOMark portrait score
    22.5 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark portrait score than the average camera (22.5 points vs 23 points). The average camera scores 23.0 points.
    22.5 points vs 23.0 points
  • 12,500 ISO lower extended sensitivity limit
    Max expanded ISO
    12,800 ISO
    This camera has a lower expanded ISO than the average camera (12800 ISO vs 25300 ISO). The average camera reaches an expanded ISO of 25300 ISO.
    12,800 ISO vs 25,300 ISO
  • 1 older
    Release date
    2012
    This camera is older than the average camera (2012 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    January 2012
    2,012 vs 2,013
  • 3.8 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    1.9 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (1.9 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    1.9 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 14 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    9
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (9 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    9 vs 23
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    focus locked at recording start
  • 80 shots fewer shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    250 shots
    This camera has shorter battery life than the average camera (250 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    250 shots vs 330 shots
  • 200 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    920 mAh
    This camera has a lower battery capacity than the average camera (920 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    920 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • Older HDMI version
    HDMI version
    1.3
    This camera uses HDMI 1.3, while the average camera uses HDMI 1.4.
    1.3 vs 1.4

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

D
dpreview.com
29/03/2012
Summary of the review
E
ephotozine.com
12/03/2012
Summary of the review
D
digital-photography-school.com
18/03/2012
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
03/03/2013
Summary of the review
E
eoshd.com
06/03/2012
Summary of the review
B
bobatkins.com
21/10/2026
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
07/02/2012
Summary of the review
W
whatdigitalcamera.com
18/02/2012
Summary of the review
K
kenrockwell.com
09/03/2012
Summary of the review
D
dxomark.com
31/01/2012
Summary of the review
C
cameralabs.com
15/03/2012
Summary of the review
A
amateurphotographer.com
21/10/2026
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
24/04/2012
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
03/02/2012
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
05/03/2012
Summary of the review
C
computerwoche.de
15/07/2012
Summary of the review
D
dkamera.de
20/04/2012
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
08/07/2015
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
06/02/2012
Summary of the review
0
01net.com
14/06/2012
Summary of the review
C
cnetfrance.fr
27/03/2012
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
31/01/2012
Summary of the review
C
camerarace.com
29/03/2012
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
09/01/2012
Summary of the review
D
dailymotion.com
07/01/2014
Summary of the review
L
leclaireur.fnac.com
17/02/2012
Summary of the review
X
xatakafoto.com
03/06/2012
Summary of the review
J
jordijerez.com
14/05/2012
Summary of the review
T
tuttodigitale.it
Aprile 2012
Summary of the review
F
fotografiastore.it
21/10/2026
Summary of the review
C
camerarace.com
29/03/2012
Summary of the review
P
portablegear.nl
14/02/2012
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 491 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Canon PowerShot G1 X

  • Excellent image quality with sharp detail due to the large 1.5-inch sensor
  • Strong high ISO performance with very low noise even in dark conditions
  • High-quality build with a solid, tank-like metal chassis
  • Articulating vari-angle LCD screen useful for creative shooting angles
  • Intuitive controls including dual dials and dedicated exposure compensation
  • Highly effective optical image stabilisation system
  • Built-in 3-stop ND filter for shooting in bright light

What we don't like about Canon PowerShot G1 X

  • Sluggish autofocus speed, especially compared to mirrorless rivals
  • Very poor macro capability with a long minimum focus distance
  • Optical viewfinder is small, inaccurate, and lacks exposure information
  • Slow continuous shooting rate (approx. 1.6 fps)
  • Bulky and heavy for a compact camera, making it barely pocketable
  • Middling battery life (rated at approximately 250 shots)
  • Lens aperture slows down significantly at the telephoto end (f/5.8)

Verdict

The Canon PowerShot G1 X is a premium compact camera featuring a large 14.3-megapixel 1.5-inch CMOS sensor, which is nearly equivalent to the APS-C size found in DSLRs. It is equipped with a 28-112mm (4x optical zoom) lens with an f/2.8-5.8 aperture range, a DIGIC 5 processor, and an ISO range of 100-12800. Main pros include exceptional image quality for its size, robust build quality with a metal body, and versatile manual controls, including 14-bit RAW shooting and a 3.0-inch vari-angle 922k-dot LCD screen. Notable cons are its relatively slow autofocus system, a mediocre optical viewfinder with only 77% coverage, and a limited macro focusing distance of 20cm at the wide end.

Compare Canon PowerShot G1 X with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Canon PowerShot G1 X and other products in the Cameras category

No results found