Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£180Sensor size:1/2.3"Weight:127 gBattery life (CIPA):230 shots

Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

3.9

Overall score

Score
3.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

3.4

Technical score

10%

8.3

User score

▼Worse than 94% of cameras
3.4

Technical score

Technical score
3.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

4.1

Sensor & Image

25%

2.8

Photo Features

18%

3.3

Video & Audio

14%

4.4

Display & Design

8%

2.9

Battery & Power

7%

2.0

Connectivity & Storage

▼Worse than 98% of cameras
8.3

User score

User score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.9

User ratings

30%

9.2

Number of reviews

Based on 544 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▲Better than 78% of cameras
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Canon PowerShot ELPH 135

Technical score
Technical score
3.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

4.1

Sensor & Image

25%

2.8

Photo Features

18%

3.3

Video & Audio

14%

4.4

Display & Design

8%

2.9

Battery & Power

7%

2.0

Connectivity & Storage

3.4
User score
User score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.9

User ratings

30%

9.2

Number of reviews

Based on 544 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.3
Popularity
Popularity
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 has a popularity score of 9.2, which is higher than 86.4% of cameras.
9.2
Value for money
Value for money
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

3.9

Overall score

40%

9.6

Price

5.6
Sensor size
1/2.3"
Sensor size
1/2.3"
This camera uses a sensor classified as 1/2.3"; it is smaller than the sensor in 60.5% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 38.1% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
16 MP
Main camera megapixels
16 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 16 MP, which is lower than that of 61.9% of cameras and equal to that of 10.1% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
1.34 µm
Main camera pixel size
1.34 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 1.34 µm, which are smaller than those in 74.1% of cameras and the same size as those in 14% of cameras.
Base ISO
100
Base ISO
100
This camera has a base ISO of 100 which is higher than that of 19.9% of cameras and equal to that of 52.4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 1600 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 1,600
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 1,600, which is lower than that of 85.9% of cameras and equal to that of 13.2% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
N/A
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
9
N. of focus points
9
This camera has 9 focus points, fewer than the number offered by 67.1% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 26% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
This camera does not support phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.5% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
1,280 px
Max video resolution
1,280 px
This camera supports 1,280 px video recording which is lower quality than that of 71.4% of cameras and equal to that of 18.5% of cameras.
Video bitrate
12 Mbps
Video bitrate
12 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 12 Mbps which is lower than that of 89.5% of cameras and equal to that of 0.8% of cameras.
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
This camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 69.9% of cameras.
Video codecs
H.264
Show more
Type
compact
Weight
127 g
Weight
127 g
This camera weighs 127 g which is lighter than 93.8% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.1% of cameras.
Width
95.2 mm
Width
95.2 mm
This camera has a width of 95.2 mm which is narrower than 92.4% of cameras and equal to that of 0.5% of cameras.
Height
54.3 mm
Height
54.3 mm
This camera has a height of 54.3 mm which is shorter than 96.6% of cameras and equal to that of 0.4% of cameras.
Thickness
22.1 mm
Thickness
22.1 mm
This camera has a thickness of 22.1 mm which is thinner than 89.2% of cameras and equal to that of 0.5% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
230 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
230 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 230 shots, which is shorter than that of 79.1% of cameras and equal to that of 3% of cameras.
310 in Eco mode.
Battery capacity
680 mAh
Battery capacity
680 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 680 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 92.7% of cameras and equal to those in 2.8% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • 268 g lighter
    Weight
    127 g
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (127 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    127 g vs 395 g
  • Supports live streaming
    Live streaming (first-party)
    yes
    This camera supports live streaming, the average camera does not.
    EOS Webcam Utility.
  • 19.6 mm shorter body
    Height
    54.3 mm
    This camera is shorter than the average camera (54.3 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    54.3 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 24.7 mm narrower
    Width
    95.2 mm
    This camera is narrower than the average camera (95.2 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    95.2 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • 23.9 mm thinner
    Thickness
    22.1 mm
    This camera is thinner than the average camera (22.1 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    22.1 mm vs 46 mm
  • 4% higher user score
    User score
    8.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Canon PowerShot ELPH 135
    the average camera
    Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 has a higher user score than the average camera (8.32 vs 8.000).
    8.32 vs 8
  • 4.77x more popular
    Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 is more popular than the average camera (9.21 vs 1.9).
    9.21 vs 1.93
  • 4% higher user score
    User score
    8.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Canon PowerShot ELPH 135
    the average camera
    Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 has a higher user score than the average camera (8.32 vs 8.000).
    8.32 vs 8
  • 4.77x more popular
    Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 is more popular than the average camera (9.21 vs 1.9).
    9.21 vs 1.93
  • 268 g lighter
    Weight
    127 g
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (127 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    127 g vs 395 g
  • 24.7 mm narrower
    Width
    95.2 mm
    This camera is narrower than the average camera (95.2 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    95.2 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • 19.6 mm shorter body
    Height
    54.3 mm
    This camera is shorter than the average camera (54.3 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    54.3 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 23.9 mm thinner
    Thickness
    22.1 mm
    This camera is thinner than the average camera (22.1 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    22.1 mm vs 46 mm
  • Supports live streaming
    Live streaming (first-party)
    yes
    This camera supports live streaming, the average camera does not.
    EOS Webcam Utility.
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    1/2.3"
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/2.3" vs APS-C).
    1/2.3" vs APS-C
  • 4.9 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    0.8 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (0.8 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    0.8 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 2 µm smaller sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    1.34 µm
    This camera has smaller sensor pixels than the average camera (1.3 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    1.34 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 0.3 in smaller screen diagonal
    Screen size
    2.7 in
    This camera has a smaller screen than the average camera (2.7 in vs 3 in). The average camera has a screen size of 3 in.
    2.7 in vs 3 in
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • Lower video resolution
    Max video resolution
    1,280 px
    This camera records lower-resolution video than the average camera (1280 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    1280 px vs 1920 px
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    focus locked at recording start
  • No hot shoe
    Hot shoe
    no
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • 10.2% worse value for money
    Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 has a worse value-for-money score than the average camera (5.63 vs 6.2).
    5.63 vs 6.2
  • 0.3 in smaller screen diagonal
    Screen size
    2.7 in
    This camera has a smaller screen than the average camera (2.7 in vs 3 in). The average camera has a screen size of 3 in.
    2.7 in vs 3 in
  • No hot shoe
    Hot shoe
    no
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    1/2.3"
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/2.3" vs APS-C).
    1/2.3" vs APS-C
  • 2 µm smaller sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    1.34 µm
    This camera has smaller sensor pixels than the average camera (1.3 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    1.34 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • 4,800 ISO lower maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    1,600 ISO
    This camera has a lower maximum sensitivity than the average camera (1600 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    1,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • 22,100 ISO lower extended sensitivity limit
    Max expanded ISO
    3,200 ISO
    This camera has a lower expanded ISO than the average camera (3200 ISO vs 25300 ISO). The average camera reaches an expanded ISO of 25300 ISO.
    Low Light mode only.
    3,200 ISO vs 25,300 ISO
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    16 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (16 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    16 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 4.9 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    0.8 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (0.8 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    0.8 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • No RAW photo capture
    RAW photo capture
    no
    This camera does not support RAW photo capture, the average camera does. 62.8% of cameras support RAW formats.
  • 14 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    9
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (9 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    9 vs 23
  • No manual focus mode
    Manual focus
    no
    This camera does not support manual focus, the average camera does. 71.7% of cameras include a manual focus mode.
    Only presets or special modes, not full manual focus.
  • No manual exposure control
    Manual exposure
    no
    This camera does not support manual exposure, the average camera does. 72% of cameras support manual exposure controls.
    No true manual exposure mode.
  • Lower video resolution
    Max video resolution
    1,280 px
    This camera records lower-resolution video than the average camera (1280 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    1280 px vs 1920 px
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    focus locked at recording start
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • 18 Mbps lower video bitrate
    Video bitrate
    12 Mbps
    This camera has a lower video bitrate than the average camera (12 Mbps vs 30 Mbps). The average camera records at 30 Mbps.
    12 Mbps vs 30 Mbps
  • 440 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    680 mAh
    This camera has a lower battery capacity than the average camera (680 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    680 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • 100 shots fewer shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    230 shots
    This camera has shorter battery life than the average camera (230 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    310 in Eco mode.
    230 shots vs 330 shots
  • No HDMI output
    HDMI output
    no
    This camera does not support HDMI output, the average camera does. 78.7% of cameras support HDMI output.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

P
pcmag.com
25/06/2014
Summary of the review
A
au.pcmag.com
26/06/2014
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
25/06/2014
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
31/07/2014
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
10/06/2014
Summary of the review
L
labo-photo.net
09/02/2014
Summary of the review
F
fotocamerapro.it
13/10/2014
Summary of the review
R
reway.nl
No date listed
Summary of the review
R
reway.nl
No date listed
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 544 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Canon PowerShot ELPH 135

  • Inexpensive and budget-friendly compared to other ELPH models
  • Compact and lightweight design, making it highly portable for travel and daily use
  • Versatile 8x optical zoom range (28-224mm equivalent)
  • Simple and intuitive user interface with a dedicated 'Help' button for settings
  • Smart AUTO mode effectively selects from 32 predefined scenes
  • Appreciated for its 'retro' aesthetic and color rendition from the CCD sensor

What we don't like about Canon PowerShot ELPH 135

  • Lacks optical image stabilization (only features less effective digital stabilization)
  • Image quality is often noisy, especially as ISO sensitivity increases
  • Video recording is limited to 720p HD rather than 1080p
  • Rear LCD screen has a low resolution (230k-dot), making it harder to review details
  • Lacks modern connectivity features like built-in Wi-Fi or NFC
  • Battery life is relatively short, rated for approximately 230 shots per charge
  • Limited wide-angle coverage at 28mm compared to more modern compacts

Verdict

The Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 is an ultracompact point-and-shoot camera featuring a 16.0-megapixel 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor and a versatile 8x optical zoom lens with a 28–224mm focal length range. Powered by the DIGIC 4+ image processor, it offers fast focusing and a Smart AUTO mode capable of recognizing 32 distinct scenes for simplified shooting. Its main advantages include its highly portable, lightweight design—weighing just 127g—and user-friendly interface with a dedicated 'Help' button on the 2.7-inch LCD. However, it lacks optical image stabilization, relying instead on less effective digital stabilization, and is limited to 720p HD video recording while lacking modern wireless connectivity like Wi-Fi.

Compare Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Canon PowerShot ELPH 135 and other products in the Cameras category

No results found