Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Canon IXUS 510 HS Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£350Sensor size:1/2.3"Weight:163 gBattery life (CIPA):190 shots

Canon IXUS 510 HS Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

4.8

Overall score

Score
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

4.6

Technical score

10%

7.4

User score

▼Worse than 64% of cameras
4.6

Technical score

Technical score
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

4.5

Sensor & Image

25%

3.6

Photo Features

18%

5.1

Video & Audio

14%

6.9

Display & Design

8%

2.9

Battery & Power

7%

3.9

Connectivity & Storage

▼Worse than 68% of cameras
7.4

User score

User score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.6

User ratings

30%

6.9

Number of reviews

Based on 79 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▼Worse than 91% of cameras
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Canon IXUS 510 HS

Technical score
Technical score
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

4.5

Sensor & Image

25%

3.6

Photo Features

18%

5.1

Video & Audio

14%

6.9

Display & Design

8%

2.9

Battery & Power

7%

3.9

Connectivity & Storage

4.6
User score
User score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.6

User ratings

30%

6.9

Number of reviews

Based on 79 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.4
Popularity
Popularity
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Canon IXUS 510 HS has a popularity score of 6.9, which is higher than 67.3% of cameras.
6.9
Value for money
Value for money
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

4.8

Overall score

40%

8.7

Price

6.0
Sensor size
1/2.3"
Sensor size
1/2.3"
This camera uses a sensor classified as 1/2.3"; it is smaller than the sensor in 60.5% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 38.1% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
10.1 MP
Main camera megapixels
10.1 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 10.1 MP, which is lower than that of 96.5% of cameras and equal to that of 1.3% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
1.68 µm
Main camera pixel size
1.68 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 1.68 µm, which are smaller than those in 60.6% of cameras and the same size as those in 0.2% of cameras.
Base ISO
100
Base ISO
100
This camera has a base ISO of 100 which is higher than that of 19.9% of cameras and equal to that of 52.4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 3200 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 3,200
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 3,200, which is lower than that of 62.9% of cameras and equal to that of 22.7% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
N/A
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
9
N. of focus points
9
This camera has 9 focus points, fewer than the number offered by 67.1% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 26% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
This camera does not support phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.5% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
1920 px
Max video resolution
1920 px
This camera supports 1920 px video recording which is higher quality than that of 28.7% of cameras and equal to that of 47.1% of cameras.
Video bitrate
38 Mbps
Video bitrate
38 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 38 Mbps which is higher than that of 60.3% of cameras and equal to that of 2.9% of cameras.
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
This camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 69.9% of cameras.
Video codecs
H.264
Show more
Type
compact
Weight
163 g
Weight
163 g
This camera weighs 163 g which is lighter than 86.4% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.1% of cameras.
Width
85.8 mm
Width
85.8 mm
This camera has a width of 85.8 mm which is narrower than 98.8% of cameras.
Height
53.5 mm
Height
53.5 mm
This camera has a height of 53.5 mm which is shorter than 97.9% of cameras and equal to that of 0.2% of cameras.
Thickness
19.8 mm
Thickness
19.8 mm
This camera has a thickness of 19.8 mm which is thinner than 94.7% of cameras and equal to that of 0.4% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
190 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
190 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 190 shots, which is shorter than that of 94.6% of cameras and equal to that of 1.1% of cameras.
Battery capacity
870 mAh
Battery capacity
870 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 870 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 81.7% of cameras and equal to those in 0.6% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This camera supports Wi-Fi. This feature is available on 47.8% of cameras.
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
This camera uses Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) which is newer than that of 54.2% of cameras and equal to that of 35.6% of cameras.
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Canon IXUS 510 HS vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    yes
    This camera uses a BSI sensor, the average camera does not. 34.8% of cameras use a BSI sensor.
  • Supports slow-motion video
    Slow-motion video
    yes
    This camera supports slow-motion video, the average camera does not.
    Supports up to 240 fps high-speed video.
  • 0.2 in larger screen diagonal
    Screen size
    3.2 in
    This camera has a larger screen than the average camera (3.2 in vs 3 in). The average camera has a screen size of 3 in.
    3.2 in vs 3 in
  • Has a touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This camera has a touchscreen, the average camera does not. 36.6% of cameras support touchscreen input.
  • 232 g lighter
    Weight
    163 g
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (163 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    163 g vs 395 g
  • Supports Wi-Fi connectivity
    Wi-Fi connectivity
    yes
    This camera supports Wi-Fi, the average camera does not. 47.8% of cameras support Wi-Fi.
  • Supports live streaming
    Live streaming (first-party)
    yes
    This camera supports live streaming, the average camera does not.
    EOS Webcam Utility.
  • Supports 24p cinema mode
    24p cinema mode
    yes
    This camera supports 24p cinema mode, the average camera does not. 44% of cameras support this mode.
    Full HD only
  • 0.2 in larger screen diagonal
    Screen size
    3.2 in
    This camera has a larger screen than the average camera (3.2 in vs 3 in). The average camera has a screen size of 3 in.
    3.2 in vs 3 in
  • Has a touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This camera has a touchscreen, the average camera does not. 36.6% of cameras support touchscreen input.
  • 232 g lighter
    Weight
    163 g
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (163 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    163 g vs 395 g
  • 34.1 mm narrower
    Width
    85.8 mm
    This camera is narrower than the average camera (85.8 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    85.8 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • 20.4 mm shorter body
    Height
    53.5 mm
    This camera is shorter than the average camera (53.5 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    53.5 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 26.2 mm thinner
    Thickness
    19.8 mm
    This camera is thinner than the average camera (19.8 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    19.8 mm vs 46 mm
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    yes
    This camera uses a BSI sensor, the average camera does not. 34.8% of cameras use a BSI sensor.
  • Supports touch autofocus
    Touch autofocus
    yes
    This camera supports touch autofocus, the average camera does not. 34.9% of cameras support touch autofocus.
  • Supports slow-motion video
    Slow-motion video
    yes
    This camera supports slow-motion video, the average camera does not.
    Supports up to 240 fps high-speed video.
  • Supports live streaming
    Live streaming (first-party)
    yes
    This camera supports live streaming, the average camera does not.
    EOS Webcam Utility.
  • Supports 24p cinema mode
    24p cinema mode
    yes
    This camera supports 24p cinema mode, the average camera does not. 44% of cameras support this mode.
    Full HD only
  • Supports Wi-Fi connectivity
    Wi-Fi connectivity
    yes
    This camera supports Wi-Fi, the average camera does not. 47.8% of cameras support Wi-Fi.
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    1/2.3"
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/2.3" vs APS-C).
    1/2.3" vs APS-C
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    10.1 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (10.1 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    10.1 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • No hot shoe
    Hot shoe
    no
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • 140 shots fewer shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    190 shots
    This camera has shorter battery life than the average camera (190 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    190 shots vs 330 shots
  • 3.1 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    2.6 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (2.6 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    2.6 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • No RAW photo capture
    RAW photo capture
    no
    This camera does not support RAW photo capture, the average camera does. 62.8% of cameras support RAW formats.
  • 1.66 µm smaller sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    1.68 µm
    This camera has smaller sensor pixels than the average camera (1.7 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    1.68 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 8.4% lower user score
    User score
    7.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Canon IXUS 510 HS
    the average camera
    Canon IXUS 510 HS has a lower user score than the average camera (7.38 vs 8.000).
    7.38 vs 8
  • 3.4% worse value for money
    Canon IXUS 510 HS has a worse value-for-money score than the average camera (6 vs 6.2).
    6 vs 6.2
  • No hot shoe
    Hot shoe
    no
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    1/2.3"
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/2.3" vs APS-C).
    1/2.3" vs APS-C
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    10.1 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (10.1 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    10.1 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • 1.66 µm smaller sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    1.68 µm
    This camera has smaller sensor pixels than the average camera (1.7 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    1.68 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 18,900 ISO lower extended sensitivity limit
    Max expanded ISO
    6,400 ISO
    This camera has a lower expanded ISO than the average camera (6400 ISO vs 25300 ISO). The average camera reaches an expanded ISO of 25300 ISO.
    Low Light mode only.
    6,400 ISO vs 25,300 ISO
  • 3,200 ISO lower maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    3,200 ISO
    This camera has a lower maximum sensitivity than the average camera (3200 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    3,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • 1 older
    Release date
    2012
    This camera is older than the average camera (2012 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    2,012 vs 2,013
  • 3.1 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    2.6 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (2.6 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    2.6 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • No RAW photo capture
    RAW photo capture
    no
    This camera does not support RAW photo capture, the average camera does. 62.8% of cameras support RAW formats.
  • 14 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    9
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (9 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    9 vs 23
  • No manual focus mode
    Manual focus
    no
    This camera does not support manual focus, the average camera does. 71.7% of cameras include a manual focus mode.
  • No manual exposure control
    Manual exposure
    no
    This camera does not support manual exposure, the average camera does. 72% of cameras support manual exposure controls.
    No true manual exposure mode.
  • 20 min shorter recording time
    Max video recording time
    10 min
    This camera records continuously for less time than the average camera (10 min vs 30 min). The average camera records for 30 min.
    29:59 in HD
    10 min vs 30 min
  • 140 shots fewer shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    190 shots
    This camera has shorter battery life than the average camera (190 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    190 shots vs 330 shots
  • 250 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    870 mAh
    This camera has a lower battery capacity than the average camera (870 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    870 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • Older HDMI version
    HDMI version
    1.3
    This camera uses HDMI 1.3, while the average camera uses HDMI 1.4.
    1.3 vs 1.4

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

C
cnet.com
29/07/2012
Summary of the review
E
ephotozine.com
30/05/2012
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
25/05/2012
Summary of the review
P
pocket-lint.com
16/04/2013
Summary of the review
T
t3.com
27/06/2012
Summary of the review
S
smh.com.au
20/09/2012
Summary of the review
R
reviewed.com
13/04/2012
Summary of the review
I
imaging-resource.com
04/12/2012
Summary of the review
W
whatdigitalcamera.com
08/06/2012
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
25/05/2012
Summary of the review
R
reviewed.com
13/04/2012
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
26/04/2012
Summary of the review
D
dkamera.de
04/06/2012
Summary of the review
C
connect-living.de
20/06/2012
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
19/07/2012
Summary of the review
S
stadt-bremerhaven.de
17/08/2012
Summary of the review
N
netzwelt.de
23/08/2012
Summary of the review
N
netzwelt.de
13/06/2012
Summary of the review
D
dkamera.de
01/07/2012
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
08/07/2015
Summary of the review
D
dailymotion.com
07/01/2014
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
01/01/2012
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
07/02/2012
Summary of the review
F
focus.it
16/05/2012
Summary of the review
T
tvtech.it
27/07/2012
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 79 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Canon IXUS 510 HS

  • Sleek and compact design that fits easily into a pocket
  • Impressive 12x optical zoom for its small size
  • Solid build quality with a premium metal casing
  • Good image quality with accurate colors and effective noise reduction
  • Useful Wi-Fi connectivity for wireless photo transfers
  • Intelligent Image Stabilisation (IS) helps keep shots steady

What we don't like about Canon IXUS 510 HS

  • Resistive touchscreen is often non-responsive and laggy
  • Noticeably short battery life (roughly 120 images per charge)
  • Lack of physical buttons makes navigating menus tedious
  • Uses microSD cards rather than standard SD cards, which can be inconvenient
  • Wi-Fi setup and connection process can be complex and frustrating
  • Some images may appear soft, especially at the edges or full zoom

Verdict

The Canon IXUS 510 HS (also known as the PowerShot ELPH 530 HS) is a stylish ultra-compact camera featuring a 10.1 MP backlit CMOS sensor and a powerful 12x optical zoom lens (28-336mm equivalent) within a pocket-sized metal body. Key characteristics include the DIGIC 5 image processor, a large 3.2-inch touchscreen LCD with 461k-dot resolution, and built-in Wi-Fi for wireless image sharing. It supports Full HD 1080p video recording at 24fps and features Intelligent Image Stabilization for sharper shots. Main pros are its impressive zoom range for its size, sleek minimalist design, and excellent macro performance allowing focus as close as 1cm. However, notable cons include a short battery life rated at approximately 190 shots, the use of microSD cards which may be less convenient for some users, and a resistive touchscreen that can feel laggy or unresponsive compared to modern standards.

Compare Canon IXUS 510 HS with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Canon IXUS 510 HS and other products in the Cameras category

No results found