Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Canon IXUS 265 HS Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£220Sensor size:1/2.3"Weight:147 gBattery life (CIPA):190 shots

Canon IXUS 265 HS Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

4.8

Overall score

Score
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

4.4

Technical score

10%

8.7

User score

â–¼Worse than 66% of cameras
4.4

Technical score

Technical score
4.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

5.1

Sensor & Image

25%

2.9

Photo Features

18%

4.5

Video & Audio

14%

5.9

Display & Design

8%

2.7

Battery & Power

7%

4.9

Connectivity & Storage

â–¼Worse than 76% of cameras
8.7

User score

User score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

8.6

Number of reviews

Based on 294 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–²Better than 87% of cameras
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Canon IXUS 265 HS

Technical score
Technical score
4.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

5.1

Sensor & Image

25%

2.9

Photo Features

18%

4.5

Video & Audio

14%

5.9

Display & Design

8%

2.7

Battery & Power

7%

4.9

Connectivity & Storage

4.4
User score
User score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

8.6

Number of reviews

Based on 294 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.7
Popularity
Popularity
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Canon IXUS 265 HS has a popularity score of 8.6, which is higher than 80.7% of cameras.
8.6
Value for money
Value for money
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

4.8

Overall score

40%

9.4

Price

6.2
Sensor size
1/2.3"
Sensor size
1/2.3"
This camera uses a sensor classified as 1/2.3"; it is smaller than the sensor in 60.5% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 38.1% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
16.1 MP
Main camera megapixels
16.1 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 16.1 MP, which is lower than that of 53.3% of cameras and equal to that of 7.9% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
1.34 µm
Main camera pixel size
1.34 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 1.34 µm, which are smaller than those in 74.1% of cameras and the same size as those in 14% of cameras.
Base ISO
100
Base ISO
100
This camera has a base ISO of 100 which is higher than that of 19.9% of cameras and equal to that of 52.4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 3200 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 3,200
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 3,200, which is lower than that of 62.9% of cameras and equal to that of 22.7% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
N/A
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
9
N. of focus points
9
This camera has 9 focus points, fewer than the number offered by 67.1% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 26% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
This camera does not support phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.5% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
1920 px
Max video resolution
1920 px
This camera supports 1920 px video recording which is higher quality than that of 28.7% of cameras and equal to that of 47.1% of cameras.
Video bitrate
30 Mbps
Video bitrate
30 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 30 Mbps which is higher than that of 48.6% of cameras and equal to that of 3.9% of cameras.
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
This camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 69.9% of cameras.
Video codecs
H.264
Show more
Type
compact
Weight
147 g
Weight
147 g
This camera weighs 147 g which is lighter than 88.6% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.2% of cameras.
Width
99.7 mm
Width
99.7 mm
This camera has a width of 99.7 mm which is narrower than 83.8% of cameras.
Height
57.6 mm
Height
57.6 mm
This camera has a height of 57.6 mm which is shorter than 89.6% of cameras and equal to that of 0.5% of cameras.
Thickness
22.4 mm
Thickness
22.4 mm
This camera has a thickness of 22.4 mm which is thinner than 89.1% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
190 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
190 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 190 shots, which is shorter than that of 94.6% of cameras and equal to that of 1.1% of cameras.
280 in Eco mode.
Battery capacity
800 mAh
Battery capacity
800 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 800 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 83.6% of cameras and equal to those in 1.2% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This camera supports Wi-Fi. This feature is available on 47.8% of cameras.
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
This camera uses Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) which is newer than that of 54.2% of cameras and equal to that of 35.6% of cameras.
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Canon IXUS 265 HS vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    yes
    This camera uses a BSI sensor, the average camera does not. 34.8% of cameras use a BSI sensor.
  • Supports slow-motion video
    Slow-motion video
    yes
    This camera supports slow-motion video, the average camera does not.
    Supports up to 240 fps high-speed video.
  • 248 g lighter
    Weight
    147 g
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (147 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    147 g vs 395 g
  • Supports Wi-Fi connectivity
    Wi-Fi connectivity
    yes
    This camera supports Wi-Fi, the average camera does not. 47.8% of cameras support Wi-Fi.
  • Smartphone remote control
    Smartphone remote control
    yes
    This camera supports smartphone remote control, the average camera does not. 46.2% of cameras support smartphone remote control.
    via Canon Camera Connect
  • 16.3 mm shorter body
    Height
    57.6 mm
    This camera is shorter than the average camera (57.6 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    57.6 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 23.6 mm thinner
    Thickness
    22.4 mm
    This camera is thinner than the average camera (22.4 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    22.4 mm vs 46 mm
  • 20.2 mm narrower
    Width
    99.7 mm
    This camera is narrower than the average camera (99.7 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    99.7 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • 9.4% higher user score
    User score
    8.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Canon IXUS 265 HS
    the average camera
    Canon IXUS 265 HS has a higher user score than the average camera (8.75 vs 8.000).
    8.75 vs 8
  • 4.47x more popular
    Canon IXUS 265 HS is more popular than the average camera (8.63 vs 1.9).
    8.63 vs 1.93
  • 248 g lighter
    Weight
    147 g
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (147 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    147 g vs 395 g
  • 16.3 mm shorter body
    Height
    57.6 mm
    This camera is shorter than the average camera (57.6 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    57.6 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 23.6 mm thinner
    Thickness
    22.4 mm
    This camera is thinner than the average camera (22.4 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    22.4 mm vs 46 mm
  • 20.2 mm narrower
    Width
    99.7 mm
    This camera is narrower than the average camera (99.7 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    99.7 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    yes
    This camera uses a BSI sensor, the average camera does not. 34.8% of cameras use a BSI sensor.
  • Supports slow-motion video
    Slow-motion video
    yes
    This camera supports slow-motion video, the average camera does not.
    Supports up to 240 fps high-speed video.
  • Supports Wi-Fi connectivity
    Wi-Fi connectivity
    yes
    This camera supports Wi-Fi, the average camera does not. 47.8% of cameras support Wi-Fi.
  • Smartphone remote control
    Smartphone remote control
    yes
    This camera supports smartphone remote control, the average camera does not. 46.2% of cameras support smartphone remote control.
    via Canon Camera Connect
  • Has NFC
    NFC
    yes
    This camera supports NFC, the average camera does not. 15% of cameras support NFC.
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    1/2.3"
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/2.3" vs APS-C).
    1/2.3" vs APS-C
  • 2 µm smaller sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    1.34 µm
    This camera has smaller sensor pixels than the average camera (1.3 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    1.34 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 1.5 stops less CIPA-rated stabilization
    Image stabilization rating (CIPA)
    2.5 stops
    This camera offers less CIPA-rated stabilization than the average camera (2.5 stops vs 4 stops). The average camera reaches 4 stops.
    2.5 stops vs 4 stops
  • No hot shoe
    Hot shoe
    no
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • 140 shots fewer shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    190 shots
    This camera has shorter battery life than the average camera (190 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    280 in Eco mode.
    190 shots vs 330 shots
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • No RAW photo capture
    RAW photo capture
    no
    This camera does not support RAW photo capture, the average camera does. 62.8% of cameras support RAW formats.
  • 320 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    800 mAh
    This camera has a lower battery capacity than the average camera (800 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    800 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • No hot shoe
    Hot shoe
    no
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    1/2.3"
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/2.3" vs APS-C).
    1/2.3" vs APS-C
  • 2 µm smaller sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    1.34 µm
    This camera has smaller sensor pixels than the average camera (1.3 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    1.34 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 3,200 ISO lower maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    3,200 ISO
    This camera has a lower maximum sensitivity than the average camera (3200 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    3,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    16.1 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (16.1 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    16.1 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 1.5 stops less CIPA-rated stabilization
    Image stabilization rating (CIPA)
    2.5 stops
    This camera offers less CIPA-rated stabilization than the average camera (2.5 stops vs 4 stops). The average camera reaches 4 stops.
    2.5 stops vs 4 stops
  • No RAW photo capture
    RAW photo capture
    no
    This camera does not support RAW photo capture, the average camera does. 62.8% of cameras support RAW formats.
  • 14 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    9
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (9 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    9 vs 23
  • 1.8 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    3.9 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (3.9 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    3.9 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • No manual focus mode
    Manual focus
    no
    This camera does not support manual focus, the average camera does. 71.7% of cameras include a manual focus mode.
    Only presets or special modes, not full manual focus.
  • No manual exposure control
    Manual exposure
    no
    This camera does not support manual exposure, the average camera does. 72% of cameras support manual exposure controls.
    No true manual exposure mode.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • 140 shots fewer shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    190 shots
    This camera has shorter battery life than the average camera (190 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    280 in Eco mode.
    190 shots vs 330 shots
  • 320 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    800 mAh
    This camera has a lower battery capacity than the average camera (800 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    800 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • Older HDMI version
    HDMI version
    1.3
    This camera uses HDMI 1.3, while the average camera uses HDMI 1.4.
    1.3 vs 1.4

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

E
ephotozine.com
12/05/2014
Summary of the review
E
expertreviews.co.uk
14/09/2014
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
23/11/2017
Summary of the review
C
cameralabs.com
11/10/2014
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
12/03/2014
Summary of the review
R
reviewed.com
04/04/2014
Summary of the review
D
digitaltrends.com
24/04/2023
Summary of the review
S
stories.miln.eu
15/04/2014
Summary of the review
C
cameralabs.com
11/10/2014
Summary of the review
T
technuovo.com
13/02/2014
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
30/07/2014
Summary of the review
S
snoopsmaus.de
19/02/2015
Summary of the review
S
scrapimpulse.com
12/01/2015
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
25/11/2014
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
21/10/2026
Summary of the review
P
priice.fr
20/01/2015
Summary of the review
R
reway.nl
21/10/2026
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 294 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Canon IXUS 265 HS

  • Compact, lightweight, and pocket-friendly body design
  • Versatile 12x optical zoom range for a small point-and-shoot
  • Good overall image quality with vibrant outdoor color reproduction
  • Built-in Wi-Fi and NFC for easy wireless photo sharing and remote control
  • Fun Hybrid Auto mode that captures short video summaries of each photo
  • Fast and responsive startup time with optical image stabilization

What we don't like about Canon IXUS 265 HS

  • Noticeable image noise and grainy performance in low-light settings
  • Lack of a touchscreen display
  • Limited manual controls and complete reliance on automatic exposure modes
  • Autofocus points cannot be manually adjusted or set by the user
  • Slight loss of sharpness and soft corners when using the maximum wide-angle lens setting
  • Short battery life, particularly when using video recording or Wi-Fi functions

Verdict

The Canon IXUS 265 HS is a sleek, ultra-compact digital camera equipped with a 16-megapixel back-illuminated CMOS sensor and a DIGIC 4+ processor. Its standout characteristic is a 12x optical zoom lens with a 25–300mm equivalent focal range and Intelligent Image Stabilisation to reduce blur. Main pros include its highly portable pocket-sized design, Full HD 1080p video recording at 30fps, and built-in Wi-Fi with NFC for easy smartphone sharing. However, it suffers from a relatively short battery life of approximately 190 shots per charge, noticeable image noise at higher ISO settings above 400, and soft corner sharpness at the wide-angle end of the zoom range.

Compare Canon IXUS 265 HS with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Canon IXUS 265 HS and other products in the Cameras category

No results found