Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Canon IXUS 255 HS Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£230Sensor size:1/2.3"Weight:144 gBattery life (CIPA):220 shots

Canon IXUS 255 HS Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

4.7

Overall score

Score
4.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

4.2

Technical score

10%

8.7

User score

▼Worse than 70% of cameras
4.2

Technical score

Technical score
4.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

4.7

Sensor & Image

25%

2.9

Photo Features

18%

4.8

Video & Audio

14%

5.9

Display & Design

8%

2.9

Battery & Power

7%

3.9

Connectivity & Storage

▼Worse than 80% of cameras
8.7

User score

User score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.6

User ratings

30%

8.9

Number of reviews

Based on 363 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▲Better than 85% of cameras
  • canon-ixus-255-hs
  • canon-ixus-255-hs
  • canon-ixus-255-hs
  • canon-ixus-255-hs
  • canon-ixus-255-hs
  • canon-ixus-255-hs
canon-ixus-255-hs
canon-ixus-255-hs
canon-ixus-255-hs
canon-ixus-255-hs
canon-ixus-255-hs
canon-ixus-255-hs

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Canon IXUS 255 HS

Technical score
Technical score
4.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

4.7

Sensor & Image

25%

2.9

Photo Features

18%

4.8

Video & Audio

14%

5.9

Display & Design

8%

2.9

Battery & Power

7%

3.9

Connectivity & Storage

4.2
User score
User score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.6

User ratings

30%

8.9

Number of reviews

Based on 363 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.7
Popularity
Popularity
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Canon IXUS 255 HS has a popularity score of 8.9, which is higher than 83.8% of cameras.
8.9
Value for money
Value for money
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

4.7

Overall score

40%

9.3

Price

6.1
Sensor size
1/2.3"
Sensor size
1/2.3"
This camera uses a sensor classified as 1/2.3"; it is smaller than the sensor in 60.5% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 38.1% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
12.1 MP
Main camera megapixels
12.1 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 12.1 MP, which is lower than that of 86.6% of cameras and equal to that of 6.9% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
1.54 µm
Main camera pixel size
1.54 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 1.54 µm, which are smaller than those in 62.2% of cameras and the same size as those in 2.2% of cameras.
Base ISO
80
Base ISO
80
This camera has a base ISO of 80 which is lower than that of 80.3% of cameras and equal to that of 15.4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 6400 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 6,400
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 6,400, which is higher than that of 37.3% of cameras and equal to that of 16.2% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
N/A
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
9
N. of focus points
9
This camera has 9 focus points, fewer than the number offered by 67.1% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 26% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
This camera does not support phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.5% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
1920 px
Max video resolution
1920 px
This camera supports 1920 px video recording which is higher quality than that of 28.7% of cameras and equal to that of 47.1% of cameras.
Video bitrate
35 Mbps
Video bitrate
35 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 35 Mbps which is higher than that of 53.8% of cameras and equal to that of 3.4% of cameras.
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
This camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 69.9% of cameras.
Video codecs
H.264
Show more
Type
compact
Weight
144 g
Weight
144 g
This camera weighs 144 g which is lighter than 89.5% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.1% of cameras.
Width
97.2 mm
Width
97.2 mm
This camera has a width of 97.2 mm which is narrower than 88% of cameras.
Height
56.4 mm
Height
56.4 mm
This camera has a height of 56.4 mm which is shorter than 93.3% of cameras.
Thickness
22.5 mm
Thickness
22.5 mm
This camera has a thickness of 22.5 mm which is thinner than 88.5% of cameras and equal to that of 0.5% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
220 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
220 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 220 shots, which is shorter than that of 82.2% of cameras and equal to that of 4.6% of cameras.
Battery capacity
760 mAh
Battery capacity
760 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 760 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 85.2% of cameras and equal to those in 0.3% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This camera supports Wi-Fi. This feature is available on 47.8% of cameras.
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
This camera uses Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) which is newer than that of 54.2% of cameras and equal to that of 35.6% of cameras.
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Canon IXUS 255 HS vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    yes
    This camera uses a BSI sensor, the average camera does not. 34.8% of cameras use a BSI sensor.
  • Supports slow-motion video
    Slow-motion video
    yes
    This camera supports slow-motion video, the average camera does not.
    Supports up to 240 fps high-speed video.
  • 251 g lighter
    Weight
    144 g
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (144 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    144 g vs 395 g
  • Supports Wi-Fi connectivity
    Wi-Fi connectivity
    yes
    This camera supports Wi-Fi, the average camera does not. 47.8% of cameras support Wi-Fi.
  • Supports 24p cinema mode
    24p cinema mode
    yes
    This camera supports 24p cinema mode, the average camera does not. 44% of cameras support this mode.
  • 17.5 mm shorter body
    Height
    56.4 mm
    This camera is shorter than the average camera (56.4 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    56.4 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 22.7 mm narrower
    Width
    97.2 mm
    This camera is narrower than the average camera (97.2 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    97.2 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • 23.5 mm thinner
    Thickness
    22.5 mm
    This camera is thinner than the average camera (22.5 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    22.5 mm vs 46 mm
  • 8.6% higher user score
    User score
    8.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Canon IXUS 255 HS
    the average camera
    Canon IXUS 255 HS has a higher user score than the average camera (8.69 vs 8.000).
    8.69 vs 8
  • 4.62x more popular
    Canon IXUS 255 HS is more popular than the average camera (8.91 vs 1.9).
    8.91 vs 1.93
  • 251 g lighter
    Weight
    144 g
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (144 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    144 g vs 395 g
  • 17.5 mm shorter body
    Height
    56.4 mm
    This camera is shorter than the average camera (56.4 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    56.4 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 22.7 mm narrower
    Width
    97.2 mm
    This camera is narrower than the average camera (97.2 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    97.2 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • 23.5 mm thinner
    Thickness
    22.5 mm
    This camera is thinner than the average camera (22.5 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    22.5 mm vs 46 mm
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    yes
    This camera uses a BSI sensor, the average camera does not. 34.8% of cameras use a BSI sensor.
  • Supports slow-motion video
    Slow-motion video
    yes
    This camera supports slow-motion video, the average camera does not.
    Supports up to 240 fps high-speed video.
  • Supports 24p cinema mode
    24p cinema mode
    yes
    This camera supports 24p cinema mode, the average camera does not. 44% of cameras support this mode.
  • Supports Wi-Fi connectivity
    Wi-Fi connectivity
    yes
    This camera supports Wi-Fi, the average camera does not. 47.8% of cameras support Wi-Fi.
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    1/2.3"
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/2.3" vs APS-C).
    1/2.3" vs APS-C
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    12.1 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (12.1 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    12.1 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • 3.3 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    2.4 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (2.4 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    2.4 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • No hot shoe
    Hot shoe
    no
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • 1.8 µm smaller sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    1.54 µm
    This camera has smaller sensor pixels than the average camera (1.5 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    1.54 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 1 stops less CIPA-rated stabilization
    Image stabilization rating (CIPA)
    3 stops
    This camera offers less CIPA-rated stabilization than the average camera (3 stops vs 4 stops). The average camera reaches 4 stops.
    3 stops vs 4 stops
  • No RAW photo capture
    RAW photo capture
    no
    This camera does not support RAW photo capture, the average camera does. 62.8% of cameras support RAW formats.
  • No hot shoe
    Hot shoe
    no
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    1/2.3"
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/2.3" vs APS-C).
    1/2.3" vs APS-C
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    12.1 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (12.1 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    12.1 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • 1.8 µm smaller sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    1.54 µm
    This camera has smaller sensor pixels than the average camera (1.5 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    1.54 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 18,900 ISO lower extended sensitivity limit
    Max expanded ISO
    6,400 ISO
    This camera has a lower expanded ISO than the average camera (6400 ISO vs 25300 ISO). The average camera reaches an expanded ISO of 25300 ISO.
    Low Light mode only.
    6,400 ISO vs 25,300 ISO
  • 3.3 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    2.4 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (2.4 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    2.4 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 1 stops less CIPA-rated stabilization
    Image stabilization rating (CIPA)
    3 stops
    This camera offers less CIPA-rated stabilization than the average camera (3 stops vs 4 stops). The average camera reaches 4 stops.
    3 stops vs 4 stops
  • No RAW photo capture
    RAW photo capture
    no
    This camera does not support RAW photo capture, the average camera does. 62.8% of cameras support RAW formats.
  • 14 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    9
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (9 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    9 vs 23
  • No manual focus mode
    Manual focus
    no
    This camera does not support manual focus, the average camera does. 71.7% of cameras include a manual focus mode.
  • No manual exposure control
    Manual exposure
    no
    This camera does not support manual exposure, the average camera does. 72% of cameras support manual exposure controls.
    No true manual exposure mode.
  • 110 shots fewer shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    220 shots
    This camera has shorter battery life than the average camera (220 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    220 shots vs 330 shots
  • 360 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    760 mAh
    This camera has a lower battery capacity than the average camera (760 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    760 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • Older HDMI version
    HDMI version
    1.3
    This camera uses HDMI 1.3, while the average camera uses HDMI 1.4.
    1.3 vs 1.4

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

E
ephotozine.com
09/05/2013
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
30/05/2013
Summary of the review
E
expertreviews.co.uk
27/03/2013
Summary of the review
C
cameralabs.com
10/08/2013
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
16/05/2014
Summary of the review
R
reviewed.com
30/09/2013
Summary of the review
R
reviewcentralme.com
08/10/2013
Summary of the review
M
m.economictimes.com
25/11/2013
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
26/03/2013
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
30/05/2013
Summary of the review
C
cameralabs.com
10/08/2013
Summary of the review
M
m.economictimes.com
25/11/2013
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
22/04/2013
Summary of the review
D
dkamera.de
07/05/2013
Summary of the review
C
connect-living.de
24/07/2013
Summary of the review
T
t-online.de
29/08/2013
Summary of the review
D
dkamera.de
05/04/2013
Summary of the review
Q
quechoisir.org
01/03/2013
Summary of the review
R
reway.nl
21/10/2026
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 363 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Canon IXUS 255 HS

  • Excellent image quality with vibrant colors and sharp details
  • Impressive 10x optical zoom in a very compact, pocketable body
  • Good low-light performance for its class, especially at ISO 400-800
  • Effective 'Intelligent IS' image stabilisation for steady shots
  • High-quality Full HD (1080p) video recording with stereo sound
  • Fast and responsive performance, including quick power-on times
  • Sturdy build quality with a bright, 3-inch high-resolution screen
  • Built-in Wi-Fi for wireless image transfer to smartphones

What we don't like about Canon IXUS 255 HS

  • Short battery life, typically providing under 200 shots per charge
  • Wi-Fi setup can be unintuitive and tedious for some users
  • Super Slow Motion video mode is limited to low resolutions
  • Lacks full manual exposure controls (mostly point-and-shoot)
  • Visible red-eye issues when using the built-in flash
  • No in-camera photo editing features besides basic rotation
  • Screen can be difficult to view in direct, bright sunlight
  • Zoom motor noise is often audible on video soundtracks

Verdict

The Canon IXUS 255 HS is an ultra-compact digital camera featuring a 12.1-megapixel back-illuminated CMOS sensor paired with a DIGIC 5 image processor and a 10x optical zoom lens (24–240mm equivalent). It is designed for portability and ease of use, boasting built-in Wi-Fi, a 3.0-inch PureColor II G LCD screen, and the ability to record Full HD 1080p video with stereo sound. Key advantages include its impressive low-light performance through the HS System, effective Intelligent Image Stabilisation, and a 1cm minimum focusing distance for macro photography. However, users may find the battery life somewhat limited, and the camera lacks manual exposure controls for advanced users.

Compare Canon IXUS 255 HS with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Canon IXUS 255 HS and other products in the Cameras category

No results found