OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

Shark IZ320UKT Review | 52 Data compared

Avg. price:~£550Suction power (AW):199.79 AWBattery runtime:60 minutesCapacity:0.7 LWeight:4.58 kg

Shark IZ320UKT Review: Compare 52 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Vacuum Cleaners category and whether it is worth buying.

8.3

Overall score

Score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the vacuum cleaner's quality, based on technical analysis and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference for identifying the best vacuum cleaners on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 96% of models
Score components

80%

8.3

Technical Score

20%

8.4

User score

★Better than 96% of vacuum-cleaners
8.3

Technical Score

Technical score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 96% of models
Score components

28%

8.1

Performance

22%

9.6

Battery

18%

8.2

Filtration

14%

9.2

Attachments

10%

6.6

Design

8%

6.1

Smart features

★Better than 96% of vacuum-cleaners
8.4

User score

User score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 79% of models
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

7.6

Number of reviews

Based on 478 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–²Better than 79% of vacuum-cleaners
  • shark-iz320ukt
  • shark-iz320ukt
  • shark-iz320ukt
  • shark-iz320ukt
  • shark-iz320ukt
  • shark-iz320ukt
  • shark-iz320ukt
  • shark-iz320ukt
shark-iz320ukt
shark-iz320ukt
shark-iz320ukt
shark-iz320ukt
shark-iz320ukt
shark-iz320ukt
shark-iz320ukt
shark-iz320ukt

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The Shark IZ320UKT is a 25.2V bagless cordless stick vacuum cleaner featuring a 0.7-litre dust capacity, three power modes, and a 4.58kg convertible chassis designed for versatile handheld or upright cleaning. Its primary advantages include a dual-battery setup providing an impressive runtime of up to 120 minutes, an LED Smart Display, a flexible Flexology wand for reaching under furniture, a dedicated Motorised Pet Tool, and a DuoClean floorhead integrated with PowerFins and Anti Hair Wrap technology to prevent roller tangles. However, some users note drawbacks such as its heavy, top-heavy distribution when used as a stick vacuum, the inability to stand upright on its own when unfolded, and a slightly plasticky exterior build.

Technical Specifications of vacuum cleaner Shark IZ320UKT

Technical Score
Technical score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 96% of models
Score components:

28%

8.1

Performance

22%

9.6

Battery

18%

8.2

Filtration

14%

9.2

Attachments

10%

6.6

Design

8%

6.1

Smart features

8.3
Shark IZ320UKT has a technical score of 8.3 points, which is higher than 95.6% of vacuum cleaners.
User score
User score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 79% of models
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

7.6

Number of reviews

Based on 478 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.4
Shark IZ320UKT has a user score of 8.45 points, which is higher than 79.3% of vacuum cleaners.
Popularity
Popularity
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you prefer a vacuum cleaner that has been chosen and reviewed by many other buyers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 68% of models
Popularity:
Shark IZ320UKT has a popularity score of 7.6 points, which is higher than 67.6% of vacuum cleaners.
7.6
Shark IZ320UKT has a popularity score of 7.6 points, which is higher than 67.6% of vacuum cleaners.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the vacuum cleaner's overall score with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a vacuum cleaner with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 78% of models
Score components:

60%

8.3

Overall score

40%

7.6

Price

8.1
Shark IZ320UKT has a value-for-money score of 8.1 points, which is higher than 78.2% of vacuum cleaners.
Suction power (AW)
199.79 AW
Suction power (AW)
199.79 AW
â–² Better than 72% of models
Market range: <40 AW – >280 AW
This vacuum cleaner has a suction power of 199.79 AW, which is higher than that of 71.6% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 0.2% of vacuum cleaners.
Suction power (kPa)
?
Airflow
?
Motor type
brushless
Power consumption
309 W
Power consumption
309 W
â–² Better than 74% of models
Market range: <165 W – >899 W
This vacuum cleaner draws 309 W, which is lower than the power consumption of 73.8% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 1.1% of vacuum cleaners.
Show more
Cordless
yes
Cordless
yes
â–² Better than 51% of models
This vacuum cleaner works cordlessly. 49.5% of vacuum cleaners offer cordless operation.
Battery runtime
60 minutes
Battery runtime
60 minutes
â–² Better than 63% of models
Market range: <30 minutes – >70 minutes
This vacuum cleaner offers a battery runtime of 60 minutes, which is longer than that of 62.8% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 22.8% of vacuum cleaners.
Charging time
4 hours
Charging time
4 hours
â–² Better than 42% of models
Market range: <3 hours – >5 hours
This vacuum cleaner charges in 4 hours, which is faster than 42.4% of vacuum cleaners and equal to 25.6% of vacuum cleaners.
Battery capacity
4,700 mAh
Battery capacity
4,700 mAh
★ Better than 99% of models
Market range: <2k mAh – >3.6k mAh
This vacuum cleaner has a battery capacity of 4,700 mAh, which is larger than that of 99.5% of vacuum cleaners.
Battery voltage
25.2 V
Battery voltage
25.2 V
â–² Better than 56% of models
Market range: <18 V – >28.8 V
This vacuum cleaner uses a battery voltage of 25.2 V, which is higher than that of 56.5% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 23.5% of vacuum cleaners.
Show more
Filter class
hepa
Filter class
hepa
â–¼ Worse than 38% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses filter class hepa, which is more advanced than the class used by 16% of vacuum cleaners and the same as the class used by 46% of vacuum cleaners.
Minimum overall efficiency
99.95%
Minimum overall efficiency
99.95%
â–¼ Worse than 41% of models
Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
This vacuum cleaner reaches 99.95% minimum overall efficiency, which is higher than that of 32% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 26.9% of vacuum cleaners.
Suitable for allergy sufferers
yes
Suitable for allergy sufferers
yes
â–² Better than 18% of models
This vacuum cleaner is suitable for allergy sufferers. 82.4% of vacuum cleaners are allergy-friendly.
Capacity
0.7 L
Capacity
0.7 L
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
This vacuum cleaner has a dust capacity of 0.7 L, which is smaller than that of 62.8% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 5.9% of vacuum cleaners.
Bagless
yes
Bagless
yes
â–² Better than 21% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses a bagless design. 78.6% of vacuum cleaners use this setup.
Show more
Main brush type
roll brush
Roller type
multi-surface
Anti-tangle brush
yes
Anti-tangle brush
yes
â–² Better than 74% of models
This vacuum cleaner includes an anti-tangle brush. 25.7% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
Mini motorized brush
yes
Mini motorized brush
yes
â–² Better than 73% of models
This vacuum cleaner includes a mini motorized brush. 26.9% of vacuum cleaners include this attachment.
Suitable for pet owners
yes
Suitable for pet owners
yes
â–² Better than 28% of models
This vacuum cleaner is suitable for pet owners. 72% of vacuum cleaners handle pet hair well.
Show more
Vacuum type
stick
Weight
4.58 kg
Weight
4.58 kg
â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
This vacuum cleaner weighs 4.58 kg, which is greater than the weight of 66.3% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 0.2% of vacuum cleaners.
2-in-1 design
yes
2-in-1 design
yes
â–² Better than 47% of models
This vacuum cleaner offers a 2-in-1 design. 53% of vacuum cleaners offer this flexible format.
Self-standing
no
Self-standing
no
â–¼ Worse than 19% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not stand on its own. 18.9% of vacuum cleaners offer this convenience.
Adjustable tube height
no
Adjustable tube height
no
â–¼ Worse than 47% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include adjustable tube height. 47.4% of vacuum cleaners offer this ergonomic feature.
Show more
Auto suction adjustment
no
Auto suction adjustment
no
â–¼ Worse than 20% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support automatic suction adjustment. 19.9% of vacuum cleaners support this feature.
Dust particle sensor
no
Dust particle sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 8% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a dust particle sensor. 8% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
LED display
yes
LED display
yes
â–² Better than 74% of models
This vacuum cleaner includes an LED display. 25.9% of vacuum cleaners include this interface feature.
Nozzle light
yes
Nozzle light
yes
â–² Better than 57% of models
This vacuum cleaner includes a nozzle light. 43.4% of vacuum cleaners include this visibility feature.
Mopping support
no
Mopping support
no
â–¼ Worse than 4% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support mopping. 3.7% of vacuum cleaners support this multi-function feature.

Shark IZ320UKT vs the average vacuum cleaner

246810TotalPerformanceBatteryFiltrationAttachmentsDesignSmart features
  • 2,200 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    4,700 mAh
    ★ Better than 99% of models
    Market range: <2k mAh – >3.6k mAh
    This vacuum cleaner has a larger battery capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (4700 mAh vs 2500 mAh).
    4,700 mAh vs 2,500 mAh
  • Cordless operation
    Cordless
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This vacuum cleaner works cordlessly, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Includes mini motorized brush
    Mini motorized brush
    yes
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a mini motorized brush, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Includes anti-tangle brush
    Anti-tangle brush
    yes
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes an anti-tangle brush, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Includes removable battery
    Removable battery
    yes
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a removable battery, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 49.79 AW higher suction power
    Suction power (AW)
    199.79 AW
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    Market range: <40 AW – >280 AW
    This vacuum cleaner has higher suction power than the average vacuum cleaner (199.8 AW vs 150 AW).
    199.79 AW vs 150 AW
  • 10 minutes longer runtime
    Battery runtime
    60 minutes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    Market range: <30 minutes – >70 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers longer battery runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (60 minutes vs 50 minutes).
    60 minutes vs 50 minutes
  • 8 minutes longer turbo runtime
    Turbo mode runtime
    20 minutes
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <6 minutes – >20 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers longer turbo runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (20 minutes vs 12 minutes).
    20 minutes vs 12 minutes
  • 5.6% higher user score
    User score
    8.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Shark IZ320UKT
    the average vacuum cleaner
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Shark IZ320UKT has a higher user score than the average vacuum cleaner (8.45 vs 8.000).
    8.45 vs 8
  • 49.79 AW higher suction power
    Suction power (AW)
    199.79 AW
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    Market range: <40 AW – >280 AW
    This vacuum cleaner has higher suction power than the average vacuum cleaner (199.8 AW vs 150 AW).
    199.79 AW vs 150 AW
  • 291 W lower power consumption
    Power consumption
    309 W
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws less power than the average vacuum cleaner (309 W vs 600 W).
    309 W vs 600 W
  • 1 more power levels
    Number of speeds
    3
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    Market range: <1 – >4
    This vacuum cleaner offers more speed levels than the average vacuum cleaner (3 vs 2).
    3 vs 2
  • 2,200 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    4,700 mAh
    ★ Better than 99% of models
    Market range: <2k mAh – >3.6k mAh
    This vacuum cleaner has a larger battery capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (4700 mAh vs 2500 mAh).
    4,700 mAh vs 2,500 mAh
  • Cordless operation
    Cordless
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This vacuum cleaner works cordlessly, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Includes removable battery
    Removable battery
    yes
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a removable battery, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 10 minutes longer runtime
    Battery runtime
    60 minutes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    Market range: <30 minutes – >70 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers longer battery runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (60 minutes vs 50 minutes).
    60 minutes vs 50 minutes
  • 8 minutes longer turbo runtime
    Turbo mode runtime
    20 minutes
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <6 minutes – >20 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers longer turbo runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (20 minutes vs 12 minutes).
    20 minutes vs 12 minutes
  • Includes battery indicator
    Battery level indicator
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a battery level indicator, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 3 V higher voltage
    Battery voltage
    25.2 V
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    Market range: <18 V – >28.8 V
    This vacuum cleaner has a higher battery voltage than the average vacuum cleaner (25.2 V vs 22.2 V).
    25.2 V vs 22.2 V
  • Includes mini motorized brush
    Mini motorized brush
    yes
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a mini motorized brush, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Includes anti-tangle brush
    Anti-tangle brush
    yes
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes an anti-tangle brush, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Includes foldable tube
    Foldable tube
    yes
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a foldable tube, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Includes nozzle light
    Nozzle light
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a nozzle light, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Includes LED display
    LED display
    yes
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes an LED display, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 0.3 L smaller dust container
    Capacity
    0.7 L
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
    This vacuum cleaner has a smaller dust capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (0.7 L vs 1 L).
    0.7 L vs 1 L
  • 26.5% higher weight
    Weight
    4.58 kg
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
    This vacuum cleaner is heavier than the average vacuum cleaner (4.6 kg vs 3.62 kg).
    4.58 kg vs 3.62 kg
  • 49 mm narrower cleaning path
    Cleaning path width
    211 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <230 mm – >309 mm
    This vacuum cleaner has a narrower cleaning path than the average vacuum cleaner (211 mm vs 260 mm).
    211 mm vs 260 mm
  • 3.67x more expensive
    Shark IZ320UKT is more expensive than the average vacuum cleaner (£550 vs £150).
    £550 vs £150
  • 80 mm taller body
    Height
    1,180 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <290 mm – >1.2k mm
    This vacuum cleaner is taller than the average vacuum cleaner (1180 mm vs 1100 mm).
    1,180 mm vs 1,100 mm
  • 3.67x more expensive
    Shark IZ320UKT is more expensive than the average vacuum cleaner (£550 vs £150).
    £550 vs £150
  • 49 mm narrower cleaning path
    Cleaning path width
    211 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <230 mm – >309 mm
    This vacuum cleaner has a narrower cleaning path than the average vacuum cleaner (211 mm vs 260 mm).
    211 mm vs 260 mm
  • 0.3 L smaller dust container
    Capacity
    0.7 L
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
    This vacuum cleaner has a smaller dust capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (0.7 L vs 1 L).
    0.7 L vs 1 L
  • 26.5% higher weight
    Weight
    4.58 kg
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
    This vacuum cleaner is heavier than the average vacuum cleaner (4.6 kg vs 3.62 kg).
    4.58 kg vs 3.62 kg
  • 80 mm taller body
    Height
    1,180 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <290 mm – >1.2k mm
    This vacuum cleaner is taller than the average vacuum cleaner (1180 mm vs 1100 mm).
    1,180 mm vs 1,100 mm

Graphic comparison of Shark IZ320UKT and other vacuum cleaners

No results found

Third-party reviews

Based on 478 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What customers like about Shark IZ320UKT?

  • Excellent suction power across both hard floors and carpets
  • Dual battery system provides a long combined runtime of up to 120 minutes
  • Flexology wand bends easily to clean under low furniture and folds for compact storage
  • Effective Anti Hair Wrap technology prevents hair from tangling around the brush roll
  • DuoClean floorhead transitions smoothly between different floor types without changing heads
  • Useful array of accessories including a dedicated motorised pet tool
  • Clear and intuitive LED smart display showing battery percentage and suction modes

What customers dislike about Shark IZ320UKT?

  • Top-heavy design means the vacuum cannot stand upright on its own when fully extended
  • Noticeably heavier and bulkier than some competing cordless stick models
  • Dust container capacity requires frequent emptying during heavy cleaning sessions
  • Can experience significant resistance and feel harder to push or pull on thick carpets
  • Power button requires a deliberate, slightly delayed press to activate rather than responding instantly
  • The tall profile of the roller head prevents it from fitting under very low-clearance furniture gaps
  • Lacks a dedicated wall mount or accessory clips, requiring storage in a separate fabric bag

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
trustedreviews.com
06/09/2021
Summary of the review
Shark IZ320UKT Review: Power and longevity
W
whatsthebest.co.uk
30/09/2022
Summary of the review
Shark IZ320UKT anti hair wrap cordless pet vacuum review
S
smarthomeassistent.de
15/11/2023
Summary of the review
Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320EUT | REVIEW | Powerful for pet owners!
(Translated)Show original
S
smarthomeassistent.de
15/11/2023
Summary of the review
Shark Anti Hair Wrap IZ320EU | REVIEW | Long-Term Vacuuming Test
(Translated)Show original
A
akku-und-roboter-staubsauger.de
31/07/2026
Summary of the review
Shark IZ320EUT Review: Cordless Vacuum with Removable Battery and Pet Tool in a 4-Week Practical Test
(Translated)Show original
S
staubsauger-berater.de
30/07/2026
Summary of the review
Shark IZ320EUT Anti Hair Wrap Cordless Vacuum Cleaner Review
(Translated)Show original
T
testsiegertv.com
15/07/2023
Summary of the review
Shark IZ320EUT Anti Hair Wrap Cordless Vacuum with PowerFins Review
(Translated)Show original
T
techprincess.it
22/11/2022
Summary of the review
SharkNinja Cordless Vacuum Review: Design, Power, and Versatility
(Translated)Show original
A
akku-und-roboter-staubsauger.de
31/07/2026
Summary of the review
Shark IZ320EUT Review: Cordless Vacuum Cleaner with Removable Battery and PowerFins
(Translated)Show original

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Compare Shark IZ320UKT with other vacuum cleaners

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)