OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Vacuum Cleaners Methodology v1.0
Vacuum Cleaners Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Vacuum Cleaners Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Vacuum Cleaners Methodology v1.0

Shark IZ300EU Review | 52 Data compared

Avg. price:~£270Suction power (AW):121 AWBattery runtime:60 minutesCapacity:0.7 LWeight:4.58 kg

Shark IZ300EU Review: Compare 52 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Vacuum Cleaners category and whether it is worth buying.

7.7

Overall score

Score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the vacuum cleaner's quality, based on technical analysis and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference for identifying the best vacuum cleaners on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 83% of models
Score components

80%

7.6

Technical Score

20%

8.3

User score

â–²Better than 83% of vacuum-cleaners
7.6

Technical Score

Technical score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 80% of models
Score components

28%

6.8

Performance

22%

9.3

Battery

18%

8.1

Filtration

14%

7.6

Attachments

10%

6.6

Design

8%

6.1

Smart features

â–²Better than 80% of vacuum-cleaners
8.3

User score

User score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 75% of models
Score components

70%

8.6

User ratings

30%

7.6

Number of reviews

Based on 474 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–²Better than 75% of vacuum-cleaners
  • shark-iz300eu
  • shark-iz300eu
  • shark-iz300eu
  • shark-iz300eu
  • shark-iz300eu
  • shark-iz300eu
  • shark-iz300eu
  • shark-iz300eu
  • shark-iz300eu
  • shark-iz300eu
shark-iz300eu
shark-iz300eu
shark-iz300eu
shark-iz300eu
shark-iz300eu
shark-iz300eu
shark-iz300eu
shark-iz300eu
shark-iz300eu
shark-iz300eu

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of vacuum cleaner Shark IZ300EU

Technical Score
Technical score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 80% of models
Score components:

28%

6.8

Performance

22%

9.3

Battery

18%

8.1

Filtration

14%

7.6

Attachments

10%

6.6

Design

8%

6.1

Smart features

7.6
User score
User score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 75% of models
Score components

70%

8.6

User ratings

30%

7.6

Number of reviews

Based on 474 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.3
Popularity
Popularity
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you prefer a vacuum cleaner that has been chosen and reviewed by many other buyers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 68% of models
Popularity:
Shark IZ300EU has a popularity score of 7.6 points, which is higher than 67.6% of vacuum cleaners.
7.6
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the vacuum cleaner's overall score with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a vacuum cleaner with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 83% of models
Score components:

60%

7.7

Overall score

40%

9.1

Price

8.2
Suction power (AW)
121 AW
Suction power (AW)
121 AW
â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
Market range: <40 AW – >280 AW
This vacuum cleaner has a suction power of 121 AW, which is lower than that of 65.6% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 0.5% of vacuum cleaners.
Suction power (kPa)
?
Airflow
?
Motor type
brushless
Power consumption
309 W
Power consumption
309 W
â–² Better than 74% of models
Market range: <165 W – >899 W
This vacuum cleaner draws 309 W, which is lower than the power consumption of 73.8% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 1.1% of vacuum cleaners.
Show more
Cordless
yes
Cordless
yes
â–² Better than 51% of models
This vacuum cleaner works cordlessly. 49.5% of vacuum cleaners offer cordless operation.
Battery runtime
60 minutes
Battery runtime
60 minutes
â–² Better than 63% of models
Market range: <30 minutes – >70 minutes
This vacuum cleaner offers a battery runtime of 60 minutes, which is longer than that of 62.8% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 22.8% of vacuum cleaners.
Charging time
4 hours
Charging time
4 hours
â–² Better than 42% of models
Market range: <3 hours – >5 hours
This vacuum cleaner charges in 4 hours, which is faster than 42.4% of vacuum cleaners and equal to 25.6% of vacuum cleaners.
Battery capacity
3,500 mAh
Battery capacity
3,500 mAh
â–² Better than 87% of models
Market range: <2k mAh – >3.6k mAh
This vacuum cleaner has a battery capacity of 3,500 mAh, which is larger than that of 87% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 1% of vacuum cleaners.
Battery voltage
25.2 V
Battery voltage
25.2 V
â–² Better than 56% of models
Market range: <18 V – >28.8 V
This vacuum cleaner uses a battery voltage of 25.2 V, which is higher than that of 56.5% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 23.5% of vacuum cleaners.
Show more
Filter class
hepa
Filter class
hepa
â–¼ Worse than 38% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses filter class hepa, which is more advanced than the class used by 16% of vacuum cleaners and the same as the class used by 46% of vacuum cleaners.
Minimum overall efficiency
99.5%
Minimum overall efficiency
99.5%
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
This vacuum cleaner reaches 99.5% minimum overall efficiency, which is lower than that of 79.7% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 7.8% of vacuum cleaners.
Suitable for allergy sufferers
yes
Suitable for allergy sufferers
yes
â–² Better than 18% of models
This vacuum cleaner is suitable for allergy sufferers. 82.4% of vacuum cleaners are allergy-friendly.
Capacity
0.7 L
Capacity
0.7 L
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
This vacuum cleaner has a dust capacity of 0.7 L, which is smaller than that of 62.8% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 5.9% of vacuum cleaners.
Bagless
yes
Bagless
yes
â–² Better than 21% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses a bagless design. 78.6% of vacuum cleaners use this setup.
Show more
Main brush type
soft roller
Roller type
multi-surface
Anti-tangle brush
yes
Anti-tangle brush
yes
â–² Better than 74% of models
This vacuum cleaner includes an anti-tangle brush. 25.7% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
Mini motorized brush
no
Mini motorized brush
no
â–¼ Worse than 27% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a mini motorized brush. 26.9% of vacuum cleaners include this attachment.
Suitable for pet owners
yes
Suitable for pet owners
yes
â–² Better than 28% of models
This vacuum cleaner is suitable for pet owners. 72% of vacuum cleaners handle pet hair well.
Show more
Vacuum type
stick
Weight
4.58 kg
Weight
4.58 kg
â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
This vacuum cleaner weighs 4.58 kg, which is greater than the weight of 66.3% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 0.2% of vacuum cleaners.
2-in-1 design
yes
2-in-1 design
yes
â–² Better than 47% of models
This vacuum cleaner offers a 2-in-1 design. 53% of vacuum cleaners offer this flexible format.
Self-standing
no
Self-standing
no
â–¼ Worse than 19% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not stand on its own. 18.9% of vacuum cleaners offer this convenience.
Adjustable tube height
no
Adjustable tube height
no
â–¼ Worse than 47% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include adjustable tube height. 47.4% of vacuum cleaners offer this ergonomic feature.
Show more
Auto suction adjustment
no
Auto suction adjustment
no
â–¼ Worse than 20% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support automatic suction adjustment. 19.9% of vacuum cleaners support this feature.
Dust particle sensor
no
Dust particle sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 8% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a dust particle sensor. 8% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
LED display
yes
LED display
yes
â–² Better than 74% of models
This vacuum cleaner includes an LED display. 25.9% of vacuum cleaners include this interface feature.
Nozzle light
yes
Nozzle light
yes
â–² Better than 57% of models
This vacuum cleaner includes a nozzle light. 43.4% of vacuum cleaners include this visibility feature.
Mopping support
no
Mopping support
no
â–¼ Worse than 4% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support mopping. 3.7% of vacuum cleaners support this multi-function feature.

Shark IZ300EU vs the average vacuum cleaner

246810TotalPerformanceBatteryFiltrationAttachmentsDesignSmart features
  • Cordless operation
    Cordless
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This vacuum cleaner works cordlessly, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Includes anti-tangle brush
    Anti-tangle brush
    yes
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes an anti-tangle brush, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 1,000 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    3,500 mAh
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    Market range: <2k mAh – >3.6k mAh
    This vacuum cleaner has a larger battery capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (3500 mAh vs 2500 mAh).
    3,500 mAh vs 2,500 mAh
  • Includes removable battery
    Removable battery
    yes
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a removable battery, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 10 minutes longer runtime
    Battery runtime
    60 minutes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    Market range: <30 minutes – >70 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers longer battery runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (60 minutes vs 50 minutes).
    60 minutes vs 50 minutes
  • Includes nozzle light
    Nozzle light
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a nozzle light, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Includes foldable tube
    Foldable tube
    yes
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a foldable tube, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Includes LED display
    LED display
    yes
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes an LED display, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 3.8% higher user score
    User score
    8.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Shark IZ300EU
    the average vacuum cleaner
    Shark IZ300EU has a higher user score than the average vacuum cleaner (8.30 vs 8.000).
    8.3 vs 8
  • 6.6% better value for money
    Shark IZ300EU offers better value for money than the average vacuum cleaner (8.15 vs 7.6).
    8.15 vs 7.65
  • 291 W lower power consumption
    Power consumption
    309 W
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws less power than the average vacuum cleaner (309 W vs 600 W).
    309 W vs 600 W
  • 1 more power levels
    Number of speeds
    3
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    Market range: <1 – >4
    This vacuum cleaner offers more speed levels than the average vacuum cleaner (3 vs 2).
    3 vs 2
  • Cordless operation
    Cordless
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This vacuum cleaner works cordlessly, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 1,000 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    3,500 mAh
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    Market range: <2k mAh – >3.6k mAh
    This vacuum cleaner has a larger battery capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (3500 mAh vs 2500 mAh).
    3,500 mAh vs 2,500 mAh
  • Includes removable battery
    Removable battery
    yes
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a removable battery, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 10 minutes longer runtime
    Battery runtime
    60 minutes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    Market range: <30 minutes – >70 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers longer battery runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (60 minutes vs 50 minutes).
    60 minutes vs 50 minutes
  • Includes battery indicator
    Battery level indicator
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a battery level indicator, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 3 V higher voltage
    Battery voltage
    25.2 V
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    Market range: <18 V – >28.8 V
    This vacuum cleaner has a higher battery voltage than the average vacuum cleaner (25.2 V vs 22.2 V).
    25.2 V vs 22.2 V
  • Includes anti-tangle brush
    Anti-tangle brush
    yes
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes an anti-tangle brush, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Includes foldable tube
    Foldable tube
    yes
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a foldable tube, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Includes nozzle light
    Nozzle light
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a nozzle light, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Includes LED display
    LED display
    yes
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes an LED display, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • More operating noise
    Noise level (Min-Max)
    80-85 dB
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <65 dB – >83 dB
    This vacuum cleaner is noisier than the average vacuum cleaner (80-85 dB vs 77-77 dB).
    80-85 dB vs 77-77 dB
  • 0.45 % lower filtration efficiency
    Minimum overall efficiency
    99.5 %
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
    This vacuum cleaner has lower filtration efficiency than the average vacuum cleaner (99.5 % vs 99.95 %).
    99.5 % vs 99.95 %
  • No soft dusting brush
    Soft dusting brush
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not include a soft dusting brush, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 0.3 L smaller dust container
    Capacity
    0.7 L
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
    This vacuum cleaner has a smaller dust capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (0.7 L vs 1 L).
    0.7 L vs 1 L
  • 29 AW lower suction power
    Suction power (AW)
    121 AW
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <40 AW – >280 AW
    This vacuum cleaner has lower suction power than the average vacuum cleaner (121 AW vs 150 AW).
    121 AW vs 150 AW
  • 26.5% higher weight
    Weight
    4.58 kg
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
    This vacuum cleaner is heavier than the average vacuum cleaner (4.6 kg vs 3.62 kg).
    4.58 kg vs 3.62 kg
  • 49 mm narrower cleaning path
    Cleaning path width
    211 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <230 mm – >309 mm
    This vacuum cleaner has a narrower cleaning path than the average vacuum cleaner (211 mm vs 260 mm).
    211 mm vs 260 mm
  • 2 minutes shorter turbo runtime
    Turbo mode runtime
    10 minutes
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    Market range: <6 minutes – >20 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers shorter turbo runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (10 minutes vs 12 minutes).
    10 minutes vs 12 minutes
  • 80% more expensive
    Shark IZ300EU is more expensive than the average vacuum cleaner (£270 vs £150).
    £270 vs £150
  • More operating noise
    Noise level (Min-Max)
    80-85 dB
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <65 dB – >83 dB
    This vacuum cleaner is noisier than the average vacuum cleaner (80-85 dB vs 77-77 dB).
    80-85 dB vs 77-77 dB
  • 29 AW lower suction power
    Suction power (AW)
    121 AW
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <40 AW – >280 AW
    This vacuum cleaner has lower suction power than the average vacuum cleaner (121 AW vs 150 AW).
    121 AW vs 150 AW
  • 49 mm narrower cleaning path
    Cleaning path width
    211 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <230 mm – >309 mm
    This vacuum cleaner has a narrower cleaning path than the average vacuum cleaner (211 mm vs 260 mm).
    211 mm vs 260 mm
  • 2 minutes shorter turbo runtime
    Turbo mode runtime
    10 minutes
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    Market range: <6 minutes – >20 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers shorter turbo runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (10 minutes vs 12 minutes).
    10 minutes vs 12 minutes
  • 0.45 % lower filtration efficiency
    Minimum overall efficiency
    99.5 %
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
    This vacuum cleaner has lower filtration efficiency than the average vacuum cleaner (99.5 % vs 99.95 %).
    99.5 % vs 99.95 %
  • 0.3 L smaller dust container
    Capacity
    0.7 L
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
    This vacuum cleaner has a smaller dust capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (0.7 L vs 1 L).
    0.7 L vs 1 L
  • No soft dusting brush
    Soft dusting brush
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not include a soft dusting brush, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 26.5% higher weight
    Weight
    4.58 kg
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
    This vacuum cleaner is heavier than the average vacuum cleaner (4.6 kg vs 3.62 kg).
    4.58 kg vs 3.62 kg
  • 80 mm taller body
    Height
    1,180 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <290 mm – >1.2k mm
    This vacuum cleaner is taller than the average vacuum cleaner (1180 mm vs 1100 mm).
    1,180 mm vs 1,100 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

E
expertreviews.co.uk
12/10/2023
Summary of the review
Shark Anti Hair Wrap Cordless Stick Vacuum Cleaner with PowerFins, Flexology & TruePet IZ300UKT review: Should I buy it?
I
idealhome.co.uk
27/10/2021
Summary of the review
Shark IZ300UK Anti Hair Wrap Cordless Stick Vacuum Cleaner review
T
techradar.com
17/06/2024
Summary of the review
Shark Vertex Pro IZ662H / Anti Hair Wrap Cordless Vacuum (IZ300UK) review
T
test-aankoop.be
Onbekend
Summary of the review
SHARK IZ300EUT test and review - Testaankoop
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on 474 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Shark IZ300EU

  • Strong suction power across multiple floor types
  • Effective anti-hair wrap technology that prevents tangles
  • Flexology wand bends easily to reach under low furniture
  • Folds in half for compact, freestanding storage
  • Clear LED smart display showing real-time battery life and suction level
  • DuoClean floorhead transitions seamlessly between carpets and hard floors
  • Removable battery allows for convenient charging anywhere

What we don't like about Shark IZ300EU

  • Battery drains quickly when used continuously on boost mode
  • Omission of a mini turbo tool in the standard non-pet version
  • High operating noise levels compared to some competitor models
  • Relatively small dust container capacity that requires frequent emptying
  • Bulky floorhead design can restrict reach against tight baseboards
  • Cannot stand fully upright on its own when the wand is extended

Verdict

The Shark IZ300EU is a 2-in-1 cordless stick and handheld vacuum cleaner weighing 4.58 kg and powered by a 309 W motor and a removable 25.2V lithium-ion battery. It provides up to 60 minutes of runtime from a 4-hour charge, featuring a 0.7-litre dust capacity, a 3-speed LED smart display, and an Anti-Allergen Complete Seal. Its major benefits include DuoClean and PowerFins technologies for deep cleaning carpets and hard floors, Anti Hair Wrap technology to prevent roller tangles, LED headlights, and a flexible Flexology wand that bends to reach under low furniture. However, it is noted for being quite heavy for a stick vacuum, operating with a loud 80 dB noise level, and having a tendency to get stuck on certain thick carpets.

Compare Shark IZ300EU with other vacuum cleaners

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Shark IZ300EU and other vacuum cleaners

No results found