OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

Samsung VS15A6031R4/ET Review | 52 Data compared

Avg. price:~£200Suction power (AW):150 AWBattery runtime:40 minutesCapacity:0.8 LWeight:2.3 kg

Samsung VS15A6031R4/ET Review: Compare 52 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Vacuum Cleaners category and whether it is worth buying.

7.2

Overall score

Score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the vacuum cleaner's quality, based on technical analysis and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference for identifying the best vacuum cleaners on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 70% of models
Score components

80%

6.9

Technical Score

20%

8.4

User score

â–²Better than 70% of vacuum-cleaners
6.9

Technical Score

Technical score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 65% of models
Score components

28%

7.0

Performance

22%

6.5

Battery

18%

8.4

Filtration

14%

6.6

Attachments

10%

7.8

Design

8%

4.0

Smart features

â–²Better than 65% of vacuum-cleaners
8.4

User score

User score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 78% of models
Score components

70%

8.6

User ratings

30%

8.0

Number of reviews

Based on 709 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–²Better than 78% of vacuum-cleaners
  • samsung-vs15a6031r4et
  • samsung-vs15a6031r4et
  • samsung-vs15a6031r4et
  • samsung-vs15a6031r4et
  • samsung-vs15a6031r4et
  • samsung-vs15a6031r4et
samsung-vs15a6031r4et
samsung-vs15a6031r4et
samsung-vs15a6031r4et
samsung-vs15a6031r4et
samsung-vs15a6031r4et
samsung-vs15a6031r4et

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The Samsung Jet 60 Turbo (VS15A6031R4/ET) is a lightweight bagless cordless stick vacuum cleaner powered by a 410W Digital Inverter Motor that delivers up to 150W of suction power. Key specifications include a 21.6V removable lithium-ion battery providing up to a 40-minute runtime, a 3.5-hour charge time, a 0.8-litre fully washable dust bin, and a 5-layer filtration system that captures 99.999% of microdust and allergens. Its primary advantages are an ultra-lightweight handheld body weighing just 1.48kg (2.3kg total weight) for easy maneuverability, a 180-degree swivel Jet Fit Brush, and a versatile 2-in-1 wall-mountable charging station. On the downside, the vacuum operates with a relatively loud maximum noise level of 86 dBA, lacks a brushroll on/off switch or automatic floorhead height adjustments, and its compact dust container requires frequent emptying during larger cleaning sessions.

Technical Specifications of vacuum cleaner Samsung VS15A6031R4/ET

Technical Score
Technical score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 65% of models
Score components:

28%

7.0

Performance

22%

6.5

Battery

18%

8.4

Filtration

14%

6.6

Attachments

10%

7.8

Design

8%

4.0

Smart features

6.9
Samsung VS15A6031R4/ET has a technical score of 6.9 points, which is higher than 65.2% of vacuum cleaners.
User score
User score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 78% of models
Score components

70%

8.6

User ratings

30%

8.0

Number of reviews

Based on 709 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.4
Samsung VS15A6031R4/ET has a user score of 8.43 points, which is higher than 78.5% of vacuum cleaners.
Popularity
Popularity
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you prefer a vacuum cleaner that has been chosen and reviewed by many other buyers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 72% of models
Popularity:
Samsung VS15A6031R4/ET has a popularity score of 8 points, which is higher than 71.5% of vacuum cleaners.
8.0
Samsung VS15A6031R4/ET has a popularity score of 8 points, which is higher than 71.5% of vacuum cleaners.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the vacuum cleaner's overall score with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a vacuum cleaner with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 67% of models
Score components:

60%

7.2

Overall score

40%

9.5

Price

7.9
Samsung VS15A6031R4/ET has a value-for-money score of 7.9 points, which is higher than 66.9% of vacuum cleaners.
Suction power (AW)
150 AW
Suction power (AW)
150 AW
â–¼ Worse than 45% of models
Market range: <40 AW – >280 AW
This vacuum cleaner has a suction power of 150 AW, which is higher than that of 43.9% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 11.1% of vacuum cleaners.
Suction power (kPa)
?
Airflow
?
Motor type
digital
Power consumption
410 W
Power consumption
410 W
â–² Better than 65% of models
Market range: <165 W – >899 W
This vacuum cleaner draws 410 W, which is lower than the power consumption of 65.5% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 0.7% of vacuum cleaners.
Show more
Cordless
yes
Cordless
yes
â–² Better than 51% of models
This vacuum cleaner works cordlessly. 49.5% of vacuum cleaners offer cordless operation.
Battery runtime
40 minutes
Battery runtime
40 minutes
â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
Market range: <30 minutes – >70 minutes
This vacuum cleaner offers a battery runtime of 40 minutes, which is shorter than that of 64.1% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 18.6% of vacuum cleaners.
Charging time
3.5 hours
Charging time
3.5 hours
â–² Better than 69% of models
Market range: <3 hours – >5 hours
This vacuum cleaner charges in 3.5 hours, which is faster than 69.1% of vacuum cleaners and equal to 16.8% of vacuum cleaners.
Battery capacity
2000 mAh
Battery capacity
2000 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Market range: <2k mAh – >3.6k mAh
This vacuum cleaner has a battery capacity of 2000 mAh, which is smaller than that of 79.6% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 18.1% of vacuum cleaners.
Battery voltage
21.6 V
Battery voltage
21.6 V
â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
Market range: <18 V – >28.8 V
This vacuum cleaner uses a battery voltage of 21.6 V, which is lower than that of 59.8% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 16.5% of vacuum cleaners.
Show more
Filter class
hepa
Filter class
hepa
â–¼ Worse than 38% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses filter class hepa, which is more advanced than the class used by 16% of vacuum cleaners and the same as the class used by 46% of vacuum cleaners.
Minimum overall efficiency
99.999%
Minimum overall efficiency
99.999%
★ Better than 94% of models
Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
This vacuum cleaner reaches 99.999% minimum overall efficiency, which is higher than that of 94% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 6% of vacuum cleaners.
Suitable for allergy sufferers
yes
Suitable for allergy sufferers
yes
â–² Better than 18% of models
This vacuum cleaner is suitable for allergy sufferers. 82.4% of vacuum cleaners are allergy-friendly.
Capacity
0.8 L
Capacity
0.8 L
â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
This vacuum cleaner has a dust capacity of 0.8 L, which is smaller than that of 54.2% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 7% of vacuum cleaners.
Bagless
yes
Bagless
yes
â–² Better than 21% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses a bagless design. 78.6% of vacuum cleaners use this setup.
Show more
Main brush type
roll brush
Roller type
bristled
Anti-tangle brush
no
Anti-tangle brush
no
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an anti-tangle brush. 25.7% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
Mini motorized brush
no
Mini motorized brush
no
â–¼ Worse than 27% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a mini motorized brush. 26.9% of vacuum cleaners include this attachment.
Suitable for pet owners
yes
Suitable for pet owners
yes
â–² Better than 28% of models
This vacuum cleaner is suitable for pet owners. 72% of vacuum cleaners handle pet hair well.
Show more
Vacuum type
stick
Weight
2.3 kg
Weight
2.3 kg
â–² Better than 85% of models
Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
This vacuum cleaner weighs 2.3 kg, which is lower than the weight of 84.6% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 2.2% of vacuum cleaners.
2-in-1 design
yes
2-in-1 design
yes
â–² Better than 47% of models
This vacuum cleaner offers a 2-in-1 design. 53% of vacuum cleaners offer this flexible format.
Self-standing
no
Self-standing
no
â–¼ Worse than 19% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not stand on its own. 18.9% of vacuum cleaners offer this convenience.
Adjustable tube height
no
Adjustable tube height
no
â–¼ Worse than 47% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include adjustable tube height. 47.4% of vacuum cleaners offer this ergonomic feature.
Show more
Auto suction adjustment
no
Auto suction adjustment
no
â–¼ Worse than 20% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support automatic suction adjustment. 19.9% of vacuum cleaners support this feature.
Dust particle sensor
no
Dust particle sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 8% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a dust particle sensor. 8% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
LED display
no
LED display
no
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an LED display. 25.9% of vacuum cleaners include this interface feature.
Nozzle light
no
Nozzle light
no
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a nozzle light. 43.4% of vacuum cleaners include this visibility feature.
Mopping support
no
Mopping support
no
â–¼ Worse than 4% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support mopping. 3.7% of vacuum cleaners support this multi-function feature.

Samsung VS15A6031R4/ET vs the average vacuum cleaner

246810TotalPerformanceBatteryFiltrationAttachmentsDesignSmart features
  • 0.05 % higher filtration efficiency
    Minimum overall efficiency
    99.999 %
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
    This vacuum cleaner has higher filtration efficiency than the average vacuum cleaner (100 % vs 99.95 %).
    99.999 % vs 99.95 %
  • Cordless operation
    Cordless
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This vacuum cleaner works cordlessly, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Includes removable battery
    Removable battery
    yes
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a removable battery, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 36.5% lower weight
    Weight
    2.3 kg
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
    This vacuum cleaner is lighter than the average vacuum cleaner (2.3 kg vs 3.62 kg).
    2.3 kg vs 3.62 kg
  • 0.5 hours faster charging
    Charging time
    3.5 hours
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    Market range: <3 hours – >5 hours
    This vacuum cleaner charges faster than the average vacuum cleaner (3.5 hours vs 4 hours).
    3.5 hours vs 4 hours
  • Includes battery indicator
    Battery level indicator
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a battery level indicator, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Includes wall bracket
    Wall-mounted bracket
    yes
    â–² Better than 64% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a wall-mounted bracket, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 1 more power levels
    Number of speeds
    3
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    Market range: <1 – >4
    This vacuum cleaner offers more speed levels than the average vacuum cleaner (3 vs 2).
    3 vs 2
  • 5.4% higher user score
    User score
    8.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Samsung VS15A6031R4/ET
    the average vacuum cleaner
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Samsung VS15A6031R4/ET has a higher user score than the average vacuum cleaner (8.43 vs 8.000).
    8.43 vs 8
  • 1 more power levels
    Number of speeds
    3
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    Market range: <1 – >4
    This vacuum cleaner offers more speed levels than the average vacuum cleaner (3 vs 2).
    3 vs 2
  • 190 W lower power consumption
    Power consumption
    410 W
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws less power than the average vacuum cleaner (410 W vs 600 W).
    410 W vs 600 W
  • Cordless operation
    Cordless
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This vacuum cleaner works cordlessly, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Includes removable battery
    Removable battery
    yes
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a removable battery, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 0.5 hours faster charging
    Charging time
    3.5 hours
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    Market range: <3 hours – >5 hours
    This vacuum cleaner charges faster than the average vacuum cleaner (3.5 hours vs 4 hours).
    3.5 hours vs 4 hours
  • Includes battery indicator
    Battery level indicator
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a battery level indicator, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 0.05 % higher filtration efficiency
    Minimum overall efficiency
    99.999 %
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
    This vacuum cleaner has higher filtration efficiency than the average vacuum cleaner (100 % vs 99.95 %).
    99.999 % vs 99.95 %
  • 36.5% lower weight
    Weight
    2.3 kg
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
    This vacuum cleaner is lighter than the average vacuum cleaner (2.3 kg vs 3.62 kg).
    2.3 kg vs 3.62 kg
  • Includes wall bracket
    Wall-mounted bracket
    yes
    â–² Better than 64% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a wall-mounted bracket, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 62 mm shallower body
    Depth
    203 mm
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    Market range: <170 mm – >440 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is less deep than the average vacuum cleaner (203 mm vs 265 mm).
    203 mm vs 265 mm
  • 15 mm narrower body
    Width
    250 mm
    â–² Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <229 mm – >350 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is narrower than the average vacuum cleaner (250 mm vs 265 mm).
    250 mm vs 265 mm
  • More operating noise
    Noise level (Min-Max)
    86-86 dB
    â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
    Market range: <65 dB – >83 dB
    This vacuum cleaner is noisier than the average vacuum cleaner (86-86 dB vs 77-77 dB).
    86-86 dB vs 77-77 dB
  • 500 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    2000 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <2k mAh – >3.6k mAh
    This vacuum cleaner has a smaller battery capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (2000 mAh vs 2500 mAh).
    2,000 mAh vs 2,500 mAh
  • 10 minutes shorter runtime
    Battery runtime
    40 minutes
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    Market range: <30 minutes – >70 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers shorter battery runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (40 minutes vs 50 minutes).
    40 minutes vs 50 minutes
  • No soft dusting brush
    Soft dusting brush
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not include a soft dusting brush, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 7 minutes shorter turbo runtime
    Turbo mode runtime
    5 minutes
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <6 minutes – >20 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers shorter turbo runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (5 minutes vs 12 minutes).
    5 minutes vs 12 minutes
  • 0.2 L smaller dust container
    Capacity
    0.8 L
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
    This vacuum cleaner has a smaller dust capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (0.8 L vs 1 L).
    0.8 L vs 1 L
  • 0.6 V lower voltage
    Battery voltage
    21.6 V
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    Market range: <18 V – >28.8 V
    This vacuum cleaner has a lower battery voltage than the average vacuum cleaner (21.6 V vs 22.2 V).
    21.6 V vs 22.2 V
  • 10 mm narrower cleaning path
    Cleaning path width
    250 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <230 mm – >309 mm
    This vacuum cleaner has a narrower cleaning path than the average vacuum cleaner (250 mm vs 260 mm).
    250 mm vs 260 mm
  • 33.3% more expensive
    Samsung VS15A6031R4/ET is more expensive than the average vacuum cleaner (£200 vs £150).
    £200 vs £150
  • More operating noise
    Noise level (Min-Max)
    86-86 dB
    â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
    Market range: <65 dB – >83 dB
    This vacuum cleaner is noisier than the average vacuum cleaner (86-86 dB vs 77-77 dB).
    86-86 dB vs 77-77 dB
  • 10 mm narrower cleaning path
    Cleaning path width
    250 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <230 mm – >309 mm
    This vacuum cleaner has a narrower cleaning path than the average vacuum cleaner (250 mm vs 260 mm).
    250 mm vs 260 mm
  • 10 minutes shorter runtime
    Battery runtime
    40 minutes
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    Market range: <30 minutes – >70 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers shorter battery runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (40 minutes vs 50 minutes).
    40 minutes vs 50 minutes
  • 500 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    2000 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <2k mAh – >3.6k mAh
    This vacuum cleaner has a smaller battery capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (2000 mAh vs 2500 mAh).
    2,000 mAh vs 2,500 mAh
  • 7 minutes shorter turbo runtime
    Turbo mode runtime
    5 minutes
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <6 minutes – >20 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers shorter turbo runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (5 minutes vs 12 minutes).
    5 minutes vs 12 minutes
  • 0.6 V lower voltage
    Battery voltage
    21.6 V
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    Market range: <18 V – >28.8 V
    This vacuum cleaner has a lower battery voltage than the average vacuum cleaner (21.6 V vs 22.2 V).
    21.6 V vs 22.2 V
  • 0.2 L smaller dust container
    Capacity
    0.8 L
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
    This vacuum cleaner has a smaller dust capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (0.8 L vs 1 L).
    0.8 L vs 1 L
  • No soft dusting brush
    Soft dusting brush
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not include a soft dusting brush, the average vacuum cleaner does.

Graphic comparison of Samsung VS15A6031R4/ET and other vacuum cleaners

No results found

Third-party reviews

Based on 709 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What customers like about Samsung VS15A6031R4/ET?

  • Extremely lightweight and highly maneuverable in tight spaces
  • Strong, adjustable suction power that efficiently handles smaller debris and fine dust
  • Highly efficient 5-layer filtration system that effectively traps microdust and allergens
  • Convenient, fully washable 0.8L dustbin and multi-cyclone components
  • Versatile 2-in-1 charging station that functions as both a standalone or wall-mounted dock
  • Removable, independent battery that is very easy to detach and charge

What customers dislike about Samsung VS15A6031R4/ET?

  • Disappointing battery life on maximum power settings, often draining in about 10 minutes
  • Floorhead design tends to 'snowplow' or push around larger debris instead of sucking it up
  • Lacks a digital display or LCD screen for viewing active cleaning modes and battery status
  • The 86 dB noise level is higher than the average cordless vacuum cleaner
  • Hair can easily become tightly wrapped around the brushroll and require manual removal
  • Struggles with short pet hairs on upholstery and requires multiple passes

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

R
rtings.com
18/01/2024
Summary of the review
Samsung Jet 60 Vacuum Review
A
altroconsumo.it
N/A
Summary of the review
Review of SAMSUNG VS15A6031R4 Stick Vacuums Archive
(Translated)Show original

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Compare Samsung VS15A6031R4/ET with other vacuum cleaners

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)