OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

Rowenta RO2932EA Review | 52 Data compared

Avg. price:~£70Suction power (AW):?Battery runtime:N/A minutesCapacity:1.2 LWeight:5.1 kg

Rowenta RO2932EA Review: Compare 52 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Vacuum Cleaners category and whether it is worth buying.

6.2

Overall score

Score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the vacuum cleaner's quality, based on technical analysis and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference for identifying the best vacuum cleaners on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
Score components

80%

6.0

Technical Score

20%

6.9

User score

â–¼Worse than 87% of vacuum-cleaners
6.0

Technical Score

Technical score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Score components

28%

6.7

Performance

22%

3.5

Battery

18%

9.2

Filtration

14%

6.0

Attachments

10%

5.5

Design

8%

4.0

Smart features

â–¼Worse than 85% of vacuum-cleaners
6.9

User score

User score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
Score components

70%

7.8

User ratings

30%

4.9

Number of reviews

Based on 38 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 95% of vacuum-cleaners
  • rowenta-ro2932ea
  • rowenta-ro2932ea
  • rowenta-ro2932ea
  • rowenta-ro2932ea
  • rowenta-ro2932ea
  • rowenta-ro2932ea
rowenta-ro2932ea
rowenta-ro2932ea
rowenta-ro2932ea
rowenta-ro2932ea
rowenta-ro2932ea
rowenta-ro2932ea

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The Rowenta Swift Power Cyclonic RO2932EA is a compact, bagless cylinder vacuum cleaner featuring a highly efficient 750W Effitech motor (900W maximum) that delivers a strong 21 kPa suction power and a 24 L/s airflow. It comes equipped with advanced cyclonic technology, an operating radius of 7.55 metres via a 5-metre power cord, a 1.2-litre dust capacity container, and a 3-level filtration system designed to capture up to 99.98% of dust particles. Key advantages include its lightweight design (approximately 3.6 to 5.1 kg), an easy-to-empty dust tank, a telescopic metal tube, and quiet performance operating at 77 dB. However, notable drawbacks include a relatively short power cord length that limits overall reach, a lack of electronic suction power regulation, and a multi-part dust canister design that can make emptying slightly cumbersome.

Technical Specifications of vacuum cleaner Rowenta RO2932EA

Technical Score
Technical score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Score components:

28%

6.7

Performance

22%

3.5

Battery

18%

9.2

Filtration

14%

6.0

Attachments

10%

5.5

Design

8%

4.0

Smart features

6.0
Rowenta RO2932EA has a technical score of 6 points, which is lower than 85.4% of vacuum cleaners.
User score
User score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
Score components

70%

7.8

User ratings

30%

4.9

Number of reviews

Based on 38 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
6.9
Rowenta RO2932EA has a user score of 6.94 points, which is lower than 95.1% of vacuum cleaners.
Popularity
Popularity
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you prefer a vacuum cleaner that has been chosen and reviewed by many other buyers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
Popularity:
Rowenta RO2932EA has a popularity score of 4.9 points, which is lower than 54.3% of vacuum cleaners.
4.9
Rowenta RO2932EA has a popularity score of 4.9 points, which is lower than 54.3% of vacuum cleaners.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the vacuum cleaner's overall score with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a vacuum cleaner with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Score components:

60%

6.2

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.3
Rowenta RO2932EA has a value-for-money score of 7.3 points, which is lower than 78.9% of vacuum cleaners.
Suction power (AW)
?
Suction power (kPa)
21 kPa
Suction power (kPa)
21 kPa
â–² Better than 62% of models
Market range: <11 kPa – >30 kPa
This vacuum cleaner has a suction pressure of 21 kPa, which is higher than that of 61.6% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 2.7% of vacuum cleaners.
Airflow
24 L/s
Airflow
24 L/s
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Market range: <16.5 L/s – >52 L/s
This vacuum cleaner delivers 24 L/s airflow, which is lower than that of 70.9% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 2.9% of vacuum cleaners.
Motor type
effitech
Power consumption
750 W
Power consumption
750 W
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
Market range: <165 W – >899 W
This vacuum cleaner draws 750 W, which is higher than the power consumption of 69.3% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 6.6% of vacuum cleaners.
Show more
Cordless
no
Cordless
no
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not work cordlessly. 49.5% of vacuum cleaners offer cordless operation.
Battery runtime
N/A
Charging time
N/A
Battery capacity
N/A
Battery voltage
N/A
Show more
Filter class
hepa 12
Filter class
hepa 12
â–² Better than 74% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses filter class hepa 12, which is more advanced than the class used by 74.4% of vacuum cleaners and the same as the class used by 5% of vacuum cleaners.
Minimum overall efficiency
99.5%
Minimum overall efficiency
99.5%
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
This vacuum cleaner reaches 99.5% minimum overall efficiency, which is lower than that of 79.7% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 7.8% of vacuum cleaners.
Suitable for allergy sufferers
yes
Suitable for allergy sufferers
yes
â–² Better than 18% of models
This vacuum cleaner is suitable for allergy sufferers. 82.4% of vacuum cleaners are allergy-friendly.
Capacity
1.2 L
Capacity
1.2 L
â–² Better than 55% of models
Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
This vacuum cleaner has a dust capacity of 1.2 L, which is larger than that of 55.5% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 3% of vacuum cleaners.
Bagless
yes
Bagless
yes
â–² Better than 21% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses a bagless design. 78.6% of vacuum cleaners use this setup.
Show more
Main brush type
classic
Roller type
none
Anti-tangle brush
no
Anti-tangle brush
no
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an anti-tangle brush. 25.7% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
Mini motorized brush
no
Mini motorized brush
no
â–¼ Worse than 27% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a mini motorized brush. 26.9% of vacuum cleaners include this attachment.
Suitable for pet owners
no
Suitable for pet owners
no
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for pet owners. 72% of vacuum cleaners handle pet hair well.
Show more
Vacuum type
canister
Weight
5.1 kg
Weight
5.1 kg
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
This vacuum cleaner weighs 5.1 kg, which is greater than the weight of 71.5% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 0.3% of vacuum cleaners.
2-in-1 design
no
2-in-1 design
no
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not offer a 2-in-1 design. 53% of vacuum cleaners offer this flexible format.
Self-standing
no
Self-standing
no
â–¼ Worse than 19% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not stand on its own. 18.9% of vacuum cleaners offer this convenience.
Adjustable tube height
yes
Adjustable tube height
yes
â–² Better than 53% of models
This vacuum cleaner includes adjustable tube height. 47.4% of vacuum cleaners offer this ergonomic feature.
Show more
Auto suction adjustment
no
Auto suction adjustment
no
â–¼ Worse than 20% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support automatic suction adjustment. 19.9% of vacuum cleaners support this feature.
Dust particle sensor
no
Dust particle sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 8% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a dust particle sensor. 8% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
LED display
no
LED display
no
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an LED display. 25.9% of vacuum cleaners include this interface feature.
Nozzle light
no
Nozzle light
no
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a nozzle light. 43.4% of vacuum cleaners include this visibility feature.
Mopping support
no
Mopping support
no
â–¼ Worse than 4% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support mopping. 3.7% of vacuum cleaners support this multi-function feature.

Rowenta RO2932EA vs the average vacuum cleaner

246810TotalPerformanceBatteryFiltrationAttachmentsDesignSmart features
  • Higher filter class
    Filter class
    hepa 12
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    This vacuum cleaner uses a better filter class than the average vacuum cleaner (hepa 12 vs hepa).
    hepa 12 vs hepa
  • Includes parquet brush
    Parquet brush
    yes
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a parquet brush, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Adjustable tube height
    Adjustable tube height
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner has adjustable tube height, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 796 mm shorter body
    Height
    304 mm
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <290 mm – >1.2k mm
    This vacuum cleaner is shorter than the average vacuum cleaner (304 mm vs 1100 mm).
    304 mm vs 1,100 mm
  • 1 kPa higher suction pressure
    Suction power (kPa)
    21 kPa
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    Market range: <11 kPa – >30 kPa
    This vacuum cleaner has higher suction pressure than the average vacuum cleaner (21 kPa vs 20 kPa).
    21 kPa vs 20 kPa
  • 2.14x cheaper
    Rowenta RO2932EA is cheaper than the average vacuum cleaner (£70 vs £150).
    £70 vs £150
  • 2.14x cheaper
    Rowenta RO2932EA is cheaper than the average vacuum cleaner (£70 vs £150).
    £70 vs £150
  • 1 kPa higher suction pressure
    Suction power (kPa)
    21 kPa
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    Market range: <11 kPa – >30 kPa
    This vacuum cleaner has higher suction pressure than the average vacuum cleaner (21 kPa vs 20 kPa).
    21 kPa vs 20 kPa
  • Higher filter class
    Filter class
    hepa 12
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    This vacuum cleaner uses a better filter class than the average vacuum cleaner (hepa 12 vs hepa).
    hepa 12 vs hepa
  • Includes parquet brush
    Parquet brush
    yes
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a parquet brush, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Adjustable tube height
    Adjustable tube height
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner has adjustable tube height, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 796 mm shorter body
    Height
    304 mm
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <290 mm – >1.2k mm
    This vacuum cleaner is shorter than the average vacuum cleaner (304 mm vs 1100 mm).
    304 mm vs 1,100 mm
  • Not pet-hair friendly
    Suitable for pet owners
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for pet owners, the average vacuum cleaner is.
  • No handheld conversion
    2-in-1 design
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not have a 2-in-1 design, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 0.45 % lower filtration efficiency
    Minimum overall efficiency
    99.5 %
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
    This vacuum cleaner has lower filtration efficiency than the average vacuum cleaner (99.5 % vs 99.95 %).
    99.5 % vs 99.95 %
  • 3.8 L/s lower airflow
    Airflow
    24 L/s
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    Market range: <16.5 L/s – >52 L/s
    This vacuum cleaner delivers lower airflow than the average vacuum cleaner (24 L/s vs 27.8 L/s).
    24 L/s vs 27.8 L/s
  • No soft dusting brush
    Soft dusting brush
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not include a soft dusting brush, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 40.9% higher weight
    Weight
    5.1 kg
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
    This vacuum cleaner is heavier than the average vacuum cleaner (5.1 kg vs 3.62 kg).
    5.1 kg vs 3.62 kg
  • 1.5 m shorter power cord
    Power cord length
    5 m
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
    Market range: <5 m – >9.3 m
    This vacuum cleaner has a shorter power cord than the average vacuum cleaner (5 m vs 6.5 m).
    5 m vs 6.5 m
  • 150 W higher power consumption
    Power consumption
    750 W
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws more power than the average vacuum cleaner (750 W vs 600 W).
    750 W vs 600 W
  • 15.3% lower user score
    User score
    6.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Rowenta RO2932EA
    the average vacuum cleaner
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    Rowenta RO2932EA has a lower user score than the average vacuum cleaner (6.94 vs 8.000).
    6.94 vs 8
  • 4.2% worse value for money
    Rowenta RO2932EA offers worse value for money than the average vacuum cleaner (7.34 vs 7.6).
    7.34 vs 7.65
  • 3.8 L/s lower airflow
    Airflow
    24 L/s
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    Market range: <16.5 L/s – >52 L/s
    This vacuum cleaner delivers lower airflow than the average vacuum cleaner (24 L/s vs 27.8 L/s).
    24 L/s vs 27.8 L/s
  • 150 W higher power consumption
    Power consumption
    750 W
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws more power than the average vacuum cleaner (750 W vs 600 W).
    750 W vs 600 W
  • 1.5 m shorter power cord
    Power cord length
    5 m
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
    Market range: <5 m – >9.3 m
    This vacuum cleaner has a shorter power cord than the average vacuum cleaner (5 m vs 6.5 m).
    5 m vs 6.5 m
  • 0.45 % lower filtration efficiency
    Minimum overall efficiency
    99.5 %
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
    This vacuum cleaner has lower filtration efficiency than the average vacuum cleaner (99.5 % vs 99.95 %).
    99.5 % vs 99.95 %
  • Not pet-hair friendly
    Suitable for pet owners
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for pet owners, the average vacuum cleaner is.
  • No soft dusting brush
    Soft dusting brush
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not include a soft dusting brush, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • No handheld conversion
    2-in-1 design
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not have a 2-in-1 design, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 40.9% higher weight
    Weight
    5.1 kg
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
    This vacuum cleaner is heavier than the average vacuum cleaner (5.1 kg vs 3.62 kg).
    5.1 kg vs 3.62 kg
  • 105 mm deeper body
    Depth
    370 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <170 mm – >440 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is deeper than the average vacuum cleaner (370 mm vs 265 mm).
    370 mm vs 265 mm
  • Older release date
    Release date
    2019
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This vacuum cleaner has an older release date than the average vacuum cleaner (2019 vs 2021).
    Released in October 2019.
    2019 vs 2021

Graphic comparison of Rowenta RO2932EA and other vacuum cleaners

No results found

Third-party reviews

Based on 38 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What customers like about Rowenta RO2932EA?

  • Strong suction power on both hard floors and carpets
  • Lightweight and very easy to handle
  • Compact design that takes up minimal storage space
  • Simple and mess-free dust container emptying process
  • Effective 3-stage filtration system
  • Good value for money

What customers dislike about Rowenta RO2932EA?

  • Short power cable requires frequent socket switching
  • Hose and attachment joints tend to disconnect too easily during use
  • Emptying the dust container requires removing the central portion, which can be tedious
  • Lacks electronic power adjustment on the body (only has a manual slide on the handle)
  • Rigid parquet nozzle lacks a flexible swivel joint
  • Telescopic wand can feel too short or uncomfortable for taller users

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

S
stofzuiger-informatie.nl
08/01/2026
Summary of the review
Top 3 best Rowenta vacuum cleaners 2026 [19 compared]
(Translated)Show original

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Compare Rowenta RO2932EA with other vacuum cleaners

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)