OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

Rowenta RH6543 Review | 52 Data compared

Avg. price:~£90Suction power (AW):?Battery runtime:30 minutesCapacity:0.65 LWeight:2.32 kg

Rowenta RH6543 Review: Compare 52 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Vacuum Cleaners category and whether it is worth buying.

6.1

Overall score

Score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the vacuum cleaner's quality, based on technical analysis and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference for identifying the best vacuum cleaners on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Score components

80%

5.9

Technical Score

20%

6.9

User score

â–¼Worse than 90% of vacuum-cleaners
5.9

Technical Score

Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Score components

28%

7.6

Performance

22%

4.1

Battery

18%

6.8

Filtration

14%

4.0

Attachments

10%

6.9

Design

8%

5.2

Smart features

â–¼Worse than 90% of vacuum-cleaners
6.9

User score

User score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

4.5

Number of reviews

Based on 24 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 95% of vacuum-cleaners
  • rowenta-rh6543
  • rowenta-rh6543
  • rowenta-rh6543
  • rowenta-rh6543
  • rowenta-rh6543
  • rowenta-rh6543
  • rowenta-rh6543
  • rowenta-rh6543
rowenta-rh6543
rowenta-rh6543
rowenta-rh6543
rowenta-rh6543
rowenta-rh6543
rowenta-rh6543
rowenta-rh6543
rowenta-rh6543

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The Rowenta Air Force Light RH6543 is a lightweight 2.3 kg cordless stick vacuum cleaner powered by a 14.4V lithium-ion battery that delivers a maximum runtime of 30 minutes on its minimum setting. It features a bagless design with a 0.65-litre dust capacity, a cyclonic separation system for consistent airflow, a foam filter, and a rectangular POWER LIGHT suction head equipped with integrated LEDs for enhanced visibility. Main advantages include its ultra-lightweight build, excellent maneuverability, a standalone parking position for easy storage, and 2 adjustable power speeds. However, notable drawbacks include a relatively long recharging time of 4 to 5 hours, a high operating noise level of 80 dB, and lack of a handheld conversion option.

Technical Specifications of vacuum cleaner Rowenta RH6543

Technical Score
Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Score components:

28%

7.6

Performance

22%

4.1

Battery

18%

6.8

Filtration

14%

4.0

Attachments

10%

6.9

Design

8%

5.2

Smart features

5.9
Rowenta RH6543 has a technical score of 5.9 points, which is lower than 90% of vacuum cleaners.
User score
User score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

4.5

Number of reviews

Based on 24 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
6.9
Rowenta RH6543 has a user score of 6.94 points, which is lower than 95.2% of vacuum cleaners.
Popularity
Popularity
4.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you prefer a vacuum cleaner that has been chosen and reviewed by many other buyers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
Popularity:
Rowenta RH6543 has a popularity score of 4.5 points, which is lower than 56.3% of vacuum cleaners.
4.5
Rowenta RH6543 has a popularity score of 4.5 points, which is lower than 56.3% of vacuum cleaners.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the vacuum cleaner's overall score with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a vacuum cleaner with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Score components:

60%

6.1

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.3
Rowenta RH6543 has a value-for-money score of 7.3 points, which is lower than 78.9% of vacuum cleaners.
Suction power (AW)
?
Suction power (kPa)
?
Airflow
?
Motor type
dc
Power consumption
180 W
Power consumption
180 W
â–² Better than 87% of models
Market range: <165 W – >899 W
This vacuum cleaner draws 180 W, which is lower than the power consumption of 87.1% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 0.6% of vacuum cleaners.
Show more
Cordless
yes
Cordless
yes
â–² Better than 51% of models
This vacuum cleaner works cordlessly. 49.5% of vacuum cleaners offer cordless operation.
Battery runtime
30 minutes
Battery runtime
30 minutes
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
Market range: <30 minutes – >70 minutes
This vacuum cleaner offers a battery runtime of 30 minutes, which is shorter than that of 89.1% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 6.4% of vacuum cleaners.
Charging time
5 hours
Charging time
5 hours
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
Market range: <3 hours – >5 hours
This vacuum cleaner charges in 5 hours, which is slower than 73.8% of vacuum cleaners and equal to 20.4% of vacuum cleaners.
Battery capacity
2000 mAh
Battery capacity
2000 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Market range: <2k mAh – >3.6k mAh
This vacuum cleaner has a battery capacity of 2000 mAh, which is smaller than that of 79.6% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 18.1% of vacuum cleaners.
Battery voltage
14.4 V
Battery voltage
14.4 V
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
Market range: <18 V – >28.8 V
This vacuum cleaner uses a battery voltage of 14.4 V, which is lower than that of 96.9% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 2.2% of vacuum cleaners.
Show more
Filter class
hepa 11
Filter class
hepa 11
â–² Better than 68% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses filter class hepa 11, which is more advanced than the class used by 68.2% of vacuum cleaners and the same as the class used by 2.2% of vacuum cleaners.
Minimum overall efficiency
95%
Minimum overall efficiency
95%
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
This vacuum cleaner reaches 95% minimum overall efficiency, which is lower than that of 89.4% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 5% of vacuum cleaners.
Suitable for allergy sufferers
no
Suitable for allergy sufferers
no
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for allergy sufferers. 82.4% of vacuum cleaners are allergy-friendly.
Capacity
0.65 L
Capacity
0.65 L
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
This vacuum cleaner has a dust capacity of 0.65 L, which is smaller than that of 68.9% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 2.3% of vacuum cleaners.
Bagless
yes
Bagless
yes
â–² Better than 21% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses a bagless design. 78.6% of vacuum cleaners use this setup.
Show more
Main brush type
roll brush
Roller type
bristled
Anti-tangle brush
no
Anti-tangle brush
no
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an anti-tangle brush. 25.7% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
Mini motorized brush
no
Mini motorized brush
no
â–¼ Worse than 27% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a mini motorized brush. 26.9% of vacuum cleaners include this attachment.
Suitable for pet owners
no
Suitable for pet owners
no
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for pet owners. 72% of vacuum cleaners handle pet hair well.
Show more
Vacuum type
stick
Weight
2.32 kg
Weight
2.32 kg
â–² Better than 84% of models
Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
This vacuum cleaner weighs 2.32 kg, which is lower than the weight of 84.3% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 0.2% of vacuum cleaners.
2-in-1 design
no
2-in-1 design
no
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not offer a 2-in-1 design. 53% of vacuum cleaners offer this flexible format.
Self-standing
yes
Self-standing
yes
â–² Better than 81% of models
This vacuum cleaner stands on its own. 18.9% of vacuum cleaners offer this convenience.
Adjustable tube height
no
Adjustable tube height
no
â–¼ Worse than 47% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include adjustable tube height. 47.4% of vacuum cleaners offer this ergonomic feature.
Show more
Auto suction adjustment
no
Auto suction adjustment
no
â–¼ Worse than 20% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support automatic suction adjustment. 19.9% of vacuum cleaners support this feature.
Dust particle sensor
no
Dust particle sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 8% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a dust particle sensor. 8% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
LED display
no
LED display
no
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an LED display. 25.9% of vacuum cleaners include this interface feature.
Nozzle light
yes
Nozzle light
yes
â–² Better than 57% of models
This vacuum cleaner includes a nozzle light. 43.4% of vacuum cleaners include this visibility feature.
Mopping support
no
Mopping support
no
â–¼ Worse than 4% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support mopping. 3.7% of vacuum cleaners support this multi-function feature.

Rowenta RH6543 vs the average vacuum cleaner

246810TotalPerformanceBatteryFiltrationAttachmentsDesignSmart features
  • Cordless operation
    Cordless
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This vacuum cleaner works cordlessly, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Self-standing design
    Self-standing
    yes
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    This vacuum cleaner stands on its own, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 35.9% lower weight
    Weight
    2.32 kg
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
    This vacuum cleaner is lighter than the average vacuum cleaner (2.3 kg vs 3.62 kg).
    2.32 kg vs 3.62 kg
  • Higher filter class
    Filter class
    hepa 11
    â–² Better than 68% of models
    This vacuum cleaner uses a better filter class than the average vacuum cleaner (hepa 11 vs hepa).
    hepa 11 vs hepa
  • 420 W lower power consumption
    Power consumption
    180 W
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws less power than the average vacuum cleaner (180 W vs 600 W).
    180 W vs 600 W
  • Includes nozzle light
    Nozzle light
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a nozzle light, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Includes battery indicator
    Battery level indicator
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a battery level indicator, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 45 mm narrower body
    Width
    220 mm
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <229 mm – >350 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is narrower than the average vacuum cleaner (220 mm vs 265 mm).
    220 mm vs 265 mm
  • 66.7% cheaper
    Rowenta RH6543 is cheaper than the average vacuum cleaner (£90 vs £150).
    £90 vs £150
  • 420 W lower power consumption
    Power consumption
    180 W
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws less power than the average vacuum cleaner (180 W vs 600 W).
    180 W vs 600 W
  • Cordless operation
    Cordless
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This vacuum cleaner works cordlessly, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Includes battery indicator
    Battery level indicator
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a battery level indicator, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Higher filter class
    Filter class
    hepa 11
    â–² Better than 68% of models
    This vacuum cleaner uses a better filter class than the average vacuum cleaner (hepa 11 vs hepa).
    hepa 11 vs hepa
  • Self-standing design
    Self-standing
    yes
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    This vacuum cleaner stands on its own, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 35.9% lower weight
    Weight
    2.32 kg
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
    This vacuum cleaner is lighter than the average vacuum cleaner (2.3 kg vs 3.62 kg).
    2.32 kg vs 3.62 kg
  • 45 mm narrower body
    Width
    220 mm
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <229 mm – >350 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is narrower than the average vacuum cleaner (220 mm vs 265 mm).
    220 mm vs 265 mm
  • Includes nozzle light
    Nozzle light
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a nozzle light, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 20 minutes shorter runtime
    Battery runtime
    30 minutes
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <30 minutes – >70 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers shorter battery runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (30 minutes vs 50 minutes).
    30 minutes vs 50 minutes
  • 1 hours slower charging
    Charging time
    5 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <3 hours – >5 hours
    This vacuum cleaner charges slower than the average vacuum cleaner (5 hours vs 4 hours).
    5 hours vs 4 hours
  • Not pet-hair friendly
    Suitable for pet owners
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for pet owners, the average vacuum cleaner is.
  • 500 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    2000 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <2k mAh – >3.6k mAh
    This vacuum cleaner has a smaller battery capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (2000 mAh vs 2500 mAh).
    2,000 mAh vs 2,500 mAh
  • No handheld conversion
    2-in-1 design
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not have a 2-in-1 design, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • More operating noise
    Noise level (Min-Max)
    80-80 dB
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    Market range: <65 dB – >83 dB
    This vacuum cleaner is noisier than the average vacuum cleaner (80-80 dB vs 77-77 dB).
    80-80 dB vs 77-77 dB
  • 4.95 % lower filtration efficiency
    Minimum overall efficiency
    95 %
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
    This vacuum cleaner has lower filtration efficiency than the average vacuum cleaner (95 % vs 99.95 %).
    95 % vs 99.95 %
  • Not allergy-friendly
    Suitable for allergy sufferers
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for allergy sufferers, the average vacuum cleaner is.
  • 15.3% lower user score
    User score
    6.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Rowenta RH6543
    the average vacuum cleaner
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    Rowenta RH6543 has a lower user score than the average vacuum cleaner (6.94 vs 8.000).
    6.94 vs 8
  • 4.9% worse value for money
    Rowenta RH6543 offers worse value for money than the average vacuum cleaner (7.29 vs 7.6).
    7.29 vs 7.65
  • More operating noise
    Noise level (Min-Max)
    80-80 dB
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    Market range: <65 dB – >83 dB
    This vacuum cleaner is noisier than the average vacuum cleaner (80-80 dB vs 77-77 dB).
    80-80 dB vs 77-77 dB
  • 40 mm narrower cleaning path
    Cleaning path width
    220 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <230 mm – >309 mm
    This vacuum cleaner has a narrower cleaning path than the average vacuum cleaner (220 mm vs 260 mm).
    220 mm vs 260 mm
  • 20 minutes shorter runtime
    Battery runtime
    30 minutes
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <30 minutes – >70 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers shorter battery runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (30 minutes vs 50 minutes).
    30 minutes vs 50 minutes
  • 1 hours slower charging
    Charging time
    5 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <3 hours – >5 hours
    This vacuum cleaner charges slower than the average vacuum cleaner (5 hours vs 4 hours).
    5 hours vs 4 hours
  • 500 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    2000 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <2k mAh – >3.6k mAh
    This vacuum cleaner has a smaller battery capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (2000 mAh vs 2500 mAh).
    2,000 mAh vs 2,500 mAh
  • 7.8 V lower voltage
    Battery voltage
    14.4 V
    â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
    Market range: <18 V – >28.8 V
    This vacuum cleaner has a lower battery voltage than the average vacuum cleaner (14.4 V vs 22.2 V).
    14.4 V vs 22.2 V
  • 4.95 % lower filtration efficiency
    Minimum overall efficiency
    95 %
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
    This vacuum cleaner has lower filtration efficiency than the average vacuum cleaner (95 % vs 99.95 %).
    95 % vs 99.95 %
  • Not allergy-friendly
    Suitable for allergy sufferers
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for allergy sufferers, the average vacuum cleaner is.
  • 0.35 L smaller dust container
    Capacity
    0.65 L
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
    This vacuum cleaner has a smaller dust capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (0.7 L vs 1 L).
    0.65 L vs 1 L
  • Not pet-hair friendly
    Suitable for pet owners
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for pet owners, the average vacuum cleaner is.
  • No upholstery nozzle
    Upholstery nozzle
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not include an upholstery nozzle, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • No soft dusting brush
    Soft dusting brush
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not include a soft dusting brush, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • No crevice nozzle
    Flat crevice nozzle
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not include a crevice nozzle, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • No handheld conversion
    2-in-1 design
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not have a 2-in-1 design, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • Older release date
    Release date
    2018
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This vacuum cleaner has an older release date than the average vacuum cleaner (2018 vs 2021).
    2018 vs 2021

Graphic comparison of Rowenta RH6543 and other vacuum cleaners

No results found

Third-party reviews

Based on 24 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What customers like about Rowenta RH6543?

  • Extremely lightweight (only 2.3 kg), making it easy to carry around and use on stairs.
  • Integrated LED lights on the floor nozzle provide excellent visibility in dark spots and corners.
  • Freestanding vertical park position allows it to stand upright on its own without needing a wall mount.
  • Equipped with an motorized brush that moves forward smoothly and glides easily over short-pile carpets and hard floors.
  • The 0.65L bagless dust container is very simple to detach, empty, and clean.
  • Very quiet operation compared to traditional corded or older cordless models.
  • Good value for money as an affordable primary tool for smaller homes or a quick secondary cleaner.

What customers dislike about Rowenta RH6543?

  • Battery life is short on the highest setting, dropping down to around 13 minutes on turbo power.
  • Suction power is inadequate for deep-cleaning plush, thick, or high-pile carpets.
  • Long charging time, requiring up to 5 hours to reach a full charge cycle.
  • Lack of secondary handheld conversion or attachments makes it difficult to clean upholstery, cars, or tight above-floor crevices.
  • A few instances of early hardware issues reported by users, such as faulty chargers or power issues.

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

K
kieskeurig.nl
18/06/2018
Summary of the review
Want to buy the Rowenta RH6543? | Kieskeurig.nl
(Translated)Show original

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Compare Rowenta RH6543 with other vacuum cleaners

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)