OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

Philips SpeedPro FC6724/01 Review | 52 Data compared

Avg. price:~£260Suction power (AW):31 AWBattery runtime:40 minutesCapacity:0.4 LWeight:2.48 kg

Philips SpeedPro FC6724/01 Review: Compare 52 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Vacuum Cleaners category and whether it is worth buying.

5.8

Overall score

Score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the vacuum cleaner's quality, based on technical analysis and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference for identifying the best vacuum cleaners on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
Score components

80%

5.3

Technical Score

20%

7.8

User score

â–¼Worse than 98% of vacuum-cleaners
5.3

Technical Score

Technical score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components

28%

4.0

Performance

22%

5.8

Battery

18%

5.8

Filtration

14%

5.1

Attachments

10%

7.2

Design

8%

5.2

Smart features

â–¼Worse than 99% of vacuum-cleaners
7.8

User score

User score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Score components

70%

7.8

User ratings

30%

7.7

Number of reviews

Based on 1,020 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 80% of vacuum-cleaners
  • philips-speedpro-fc672401
  • philips-speedpro-fc672401
philips-speedpro-fc672401
philips-speedpro-fc672401

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The Philips SpeedPro FC6724/01 is a bagless, 2-in-1 cordless stick and handheld vacuum cleaner featuring a 21.6V lithium-ion battery, a 0.4-litre dust capacity, and PowerCyclone 7 filtration with a washable filter. Key advantages include its 180-degree suction nozzle that captures up to 98% of dust and dirt from both the front and sides in a single stroke, an airflow performance of up to 800 l/min powered by a PowerBlade motor, a lightweight design of 2.48 kg, and a flexible layout that can lie completely flat to reach under low furniture. The battery delivers a decent runtime of up to 40 minutes in normal mode and 20 minutes in turbo mode across two speed settings. However, notable drawbacks include a long 5-hour charging time and a relatively loud maximum noise level of 80 dB during operation.

Technical Specifications of vacuum cleaner Philips SpeedPro FC6724/01

Technical Score
Technical score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components:

28%

4.0

Performance

22%

5.8

Battery

18%

5.8

Filtration

14%

5.1

Attachments

10%

7.2

Design

8%

5.2

Smart features

5.3
Philips SpeedPro FC6724/01 has a technical score of 5.3 points, which is lower than 99.3% of vacuum cleaners.
User score
User score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Score components

70%

7.8

User ratings

30%

7.7

Number of reviews

Based on 1,020 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.8
Philips SpeedPro FC6724/01 has a user score of 7.77 points, which is lower than 79.9% of vacuum cleaners.
Popularity
Popularity
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you prefer a vacuum cleaner that has been chosen and reviewed by many other buyers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 69% of models
Popularity:
Philips SpeedPro FC6724/01 has a popularity score of 7.7 points, which is higher than 68.7% of vacuum cleaners.
7.7
Philips SpeedPro FC6724/01 has a popularity score of 7.7 points, which is higher than 68.7% of vacuum cleaners.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the vacuum cleaner's overall score with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a vacuum cleaner with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components:

60%

5.8

Overall score

40%

9.2

Price

6.8
Philips SpeedPro FC6724/01 has a value-for-money score of 6.8 points, which is lower than 99.1% of vacuum cleaners.
Suction power (AW)
31 AW
Suction power (AW)
31 AW
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Market range: <40 AW – >280 AW
This vacuum cleaner has a suction power of 31 AW, which is lower than that of 91.2% of vacuum cleaners.
Suction power (kPa)
18.3 kPa
Suction power (kPa)
18.3 kPa
â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
Market range: <11 kPa – >30 kPa
This vacuum cleaner has a suction pressure of 18.3 kPa, which is lower than that of 59.8% of vacuum cleaners.
Airflow
13.33 L/s
Airflow
13.33 L/s
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
Market range: <16.5 L/s – >52 L/s
This vacuum cleaner delivers 13.33 L/s airflow, which is lower than that of 94.9% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 1.1% of vacuum cleaners.
Motor type
digital
Power consumption
120 W
Power consumption
120 W
★ Better than 93% of models
Market range: <165 W – >899 W
This vacuum cleaner draws 120 W, which is lower than the power consumption of 93.5% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 1.5% of vacuum cleaners.
Show more
Cordless
yes
Cordless
yes
â–² Better than 51% of models
This vacuum cleaner works cordlessly. 49.5% of vacuum cleaners offer cordless operation.
Battery runtime
40 minutes
Battery runtime
40 minutes
â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
Market range: <30 minutes – >70 minutes
This vacuum cleaner offers a battery runtime of 40 minutes, which is shorter than that of 64.1% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 18.6% of vacuum cleaners.
Charging time
5 hours
Charging time
5 hours
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
Market range: <3 hours – >5 hours
This vacuum cleaner charges in 5 hours, which is slower than 73.8% of vacuum cleaners and equal to 20.4% of vacuum cleaners.
Battery capacity
2,400 mAh
Battery capacity
2,400 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
Market range: <2k mAh – >3.6k mAh
This vacuum cleaner has a battery capacity of 2,400 mAh, which is smaller than that of 53.2% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 2.5% of vacuum cleaners.
Battery voltage
21.6 V
Battery voltage
21.6 V
â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
Market range: <18 V – >28.8 V
This vacuum cleaner uses a battery voltage of 21.6 V, which is lower than that of 59.8% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 16.5% of vacuum cleaners.
Show more
Filter class
hepa
Filter class
hepa
â–¼ Worse than 38% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses filter class hepa, which is more advanced than the class used by 16% of vacuum cleaners and the same as the class used by 46% of vacuum cleaners.
Minimum overall efficiency
85%
Minimum overall efficiency
85%
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
This vacuum cleaner reaches 85% minimum overall efficiency, which is lower than that of 94.6% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 5.4% of vacuum cleaners.
Suitable for allergy sufferers
yes
Suitable for allergy sufferers
yes
â–² Better than 18% of models
This vacuum cleaner is suitable for allergy sufferers. 82.4% of vacuum cleaners are allergy-friendly.
Capacity
0.4 L
Capacity
0.4 L
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
This vacuum cleaner has a dust capacity of 0.4 L, which is smaller than that of 90.7% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 4.5% of vacuum cleaners.
Bagless
yes
Bagless
yes
â–² Better than 21% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses a bagless design. 78.6% of vacuum cleaners use this setup.
Show more
Main brush type
roll brush
Roller type
bristled
Anti-tangle brush
no
Anti-tangle brush
no
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an anti-tangle brush. 25.7% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
Mini motorized brush
no
Mini motorized brush
no
â–¼ Worse than 27% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a mini motorized brush. 26.9% of vacuum cleaners include this attachment.
Suitable for pet owners
no
Suitable for pet owners
no
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for pet owners. 72% of vacuum cleaners handle pet hair well.
Show more
Vacuum type
stick
Weight
2.48 kg
Weight
2.48 kg
â–² Better than 81% of models
Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
This vacuum cleaner weighs 2.48 kg, which is lower than the weight of 80.5% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 0.2% of vacuum cleaners.
2-in-1 design
yes
2-in-1 design
yes
â–² Better than 47% of models
This vacuum cleaner offers a 2-in-1 design. 53% of vacuum cleaners offer this flexible format.
Self-standing
no
Self-standing
no
â–¼ Worse than 19% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not stand on its own. 18.9% of vacuum cleaners offer this convenience.
Adjustable tube height
no
Adjustable tube height
no
â–¼ Worse than 47% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include adjustable tube height. 47.4% of vacuum cleaners offer this ergonomic feature.
Show more
Auto suction adjustment
no
Auto suction adjustment
no
â–¼ Worse than 20% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support automatic suction adjustment. 19.9% of vacuum cleaners support this feature.
Dust particle sensor
no
Dust particle sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 8% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a dust particle sensor. 8% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
LED display
no
LED display
no
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an LED display. 25.9% of vacuum cleaners include this interface feature.
Nozzle light
yes
Nozzle light
yes
â–² Better than 57% of models
This vacuum cleaner includes a nozzle light. 43.4% of vacuum cleaners include this visibility feature.
Mopping support
no
Mopping support
no
â–¼ Worse than 4% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support mopping. 3.7% of vacuum cleaners support this multi-function feature.

Philips SpeedPro FC6724/01 vs the average vacuum cleaner

246810TotalPerformanceBatteryFiltrationAttachmentsDesignSmart features
  • Cordless operation
    Cordless
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This vacuum cleaner works cordlessly, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 480 W lower power consumption
    Power consumption
    120 W
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws less power than the average vacuum cleaner (120 W vs 600 W).
    120 W vs 600 W
  • 31.5% lower weight
    Weight
    2.48 kg
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
    This vacuum cleaner is lighter than the average vacuum cleaner (2.5 kg vs 3.62 kg).
    2.48 kg vs 3.62 kg
  • 8 minutes longer turbo runtime
    Turbo mode runtime
    20 minutes
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <6 minutes – >20 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers longer turbo runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (20 minutes vs 12 minutes).
    20 minutes vs 12 minutes
  • Includes nozzle light
    Nozzle light
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a nozzle light, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Includes battery indicator
    Battery level indicator
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a battery level indicator, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Includes wall bracket
    Wall-mounted bracket
    yes
    â–² Better than 64% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a wall-mounted bracket, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 85 mm shallower body
    Depth
    180 mm
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    Market range: <170 mm – >440 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is less deep than the average vacuum cleaner (180 mm vs 265 mm).
    180 mm vs 265 mm
  • 480 W lower power consumption
    Power consumption
    120 W
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws less power than the average vacuum cleaner (120 W vs 600 W).
    120 W vs 600 W
  • Cordless operation
    Cordless
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This vacuum cleaner works cordlessly, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 8 minutes longer turbo runtime
    Turbo mode runtime
    20 minutes
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <6 minutes – >20 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers longer turbo runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (20 minutes vs 12 minutes).
    20 minutes vs 12 minutes
  • Includes battery indicator
    Battery level indicator
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a battery level indicator, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 31.5% lower weight
    Weight
    2.48 kg
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
    This vacuum cleaner is lighter than the average vacuum cleaner (2.5 kg vs 3.62 kg).
    2.48 kg vs 3.62 kg
  • Includes wall bracket
    Wall-mounted bracket
    yes
    â–² Better than 64% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a wall-mounted bracket, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 85 mm shallower body
    Depth
    180 mm
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    Market range: <170 mm – >440 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is less deep than the average vacuum cleaner (180 mm vs 265 mm).
    180 mm vs 265 mm
  • Includes nozzle light
    Nozzle light
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a nozzle light, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 119 AW lower suction power
    Suction power (AW)
    31 AW
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <40 AW – >280 AW
    This vacuum cleaner has lower suction power than the average vacuum cleaner (31 AW vs 150 AW).
    31 AW vs 150 AW
  • 14.47 L/s lower airflow
    Airflow
    13.33 L/s
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <16.5 L/s – >52 L/s
    This vacuum cleaner delivers lower airflow than the average vacuum cleaner (13.3 L/s vs 27.8 L/s).
    13.33 L/s vs 27.8 L/s
  • 0.6 L smaller dust container
    Capacity
    0.4 L
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
    This vacuum cleaner has a smaller dust capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (0.4 L vs 1 L).
    0.4 L vs 1 L
  • 14.95 % lower filtration efficiency
    Minimum overall efficiency
    85 %
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
    This vacuum cleaner has lower filtration efficiency than the average vacuum cleaner (85 % vs 99.95 %).
    85 % vs 99.95 %
  • 1 hours slower charging
    Charging time
    5 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <3 hours – >5 hours
    This vacuum cleaner charges slower than the average vacuum cleaner (5 hours vs 4 hours).
    5 hours vs 4 hours
  • Not pet-hair friendly
    Suitable for pet owners
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for pet owners, the average vacuum cleaner is.
  • 10 minutes shorter runtime
    Battery runtime
    40 minutes
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    Market range: <30 minutes – >70 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers shorter battery runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (40 minutes vs 50 minutes).
    40 minutes vs 50 minutes
  • More operating noise
    Noise level (Min-Max)
    80-80 dB
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    Market range: <65 dB – >83 dB
    This vacuum cleaner is noisier than the average vacuum cleaner (80-80 dB vs 77-77 dB).
    80-80 dB vs 77-77 dB
  • 12.5% worse value for money
    Philips SpeedPro FC6724/01 offers worse value for money than the average vacuum cleaner (6.8 vs 7.6).
    6.8 vs 7.65
  • 73.3% more expensive
    Philips SpeedPro FC6724/01 is more expensive than the average vacuum cleaner (£260 vs £150).
    £260 vs £150
  • 3% lower user score
    User score
    7.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Philips SpeedPro FC6724/01
    the average vacuum cleaner
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    Philips SpeedPro FC6724/01 has a lower user score than the average vacuum cleaner (7.77 vs 8.000).
    7.77 vs 8
  • 119 AW lower suction power
    Suction power (AW)
    31 AW
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <40 AW – >280 AW
    This vacuum cleaner has lower suction power than the average vacuum cleaner (31 AW vs 150 AW).
    31 AW vs 150 AW
  • 14.47 L/s lower airflow
    Airflow
    13.33 L/s
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <16.5 L/s – >52 L/s
    This vacuum cleaner delivers lower airflow than the average vacuum cleaner (13.3 L/s vs 27.8 L/s).
    13.33 L/s vs 27.8 L/s
  • More operating noise
    Noise level (Min-Max)
    80-80 dB
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    Market range: <65 dB – >83 dB
    This vacuum cleaner is noisier than the average vacuum cleaner (80-80 dB vs 77-77 dB).
    80-80 dB vs 77-77 dB
  • 1.7 kPa lower suction pressure
    Suction power (kPa)
    18.3 kPa
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    Market range: <11 kPa – >30 kPa
    This vacuum cleaner has lower suction pressure than the average vacuum cleaner (18.3 kPa vs 20 kPa).
    18.3 kPa vs 20 kPa
  • 1 hours slower charging
    Charging time
    5 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <3 hours – >5 hours
    This vacuum cleaner charges slower than the average vacuum cleaner (5 hours vs 4 hours).
    5 hours vs 4 hours
  • 10 minutes shorter runtime
    Battery runtime
    40 minutes
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    Market range: <30 minutes – >70 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers shorter battery runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (40 minutes vs 50 minutes).
    40 minutes vs 50 minutes
  • 100 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    2,400 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    Market range: <2k mAh – >3.6k mAh
    This vacuum cleaner has a smaller battery capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (2400 mAh vs 2500 mAh).
    2,400 mAh vs 2,500 mAh
  • 0.6 V lower voltage
    Battery voltage
    21.6 V
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    Market range: <18 V – >28.8 V
    This vacuum cleaner has a lower battery voltage than the average vacuum cleaner (21.6 V vs 22.2 V).
    21.6 V vs 22.2 V
  • 0.6 L smaller dust container
    Capacity
    0.4 L
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
    This vacuum cleaner has a smaller dust capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (0.4 L vs 1 L).
    0.4 L vs 1 L
  • 14.95 % lower filtration efficiency
    Minimum overall efficiency
    85 %
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
    This vacuum cleaner has lower filtration efficiency than the average vacuum cleaner (85 % vs 99.95 %).
    85 % vs 99.95 %
  • Not pet-hair friendly
    Suitable for pet owners
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for pet owners, the average vacuum cleaner is.
  • No upholstery nozzle
    Upholstery nozzle
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not include an upholstery nozzle, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 119 mm wider body
    Width
    384 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <229 mm – >350 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is wider than the average vacuum cleaner (384 mm vs 265 mm).
    384 mm vs 265 mm
  • 80 mm taller body
    Height
    1,180 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <290 mm – >1.2k mm
    This vacuum cleaner is taller than the average vacuum cleaner (1180 mm vs 1100 mm).
    1,180 mm vs 1,100 mm
  • Older release date
    Release date
    2019
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This vacuum cleaner has an older release date than the average vacuum cleaner (2019 vs 2021).
    Released in March 2019.
    2019 vs 2021

Graphic comparison of Philips SpeedPro FC6724/01 and other vacuum cleaners

No results found

Third-party reviews

Based on 1,020 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What customers like about Philips SpeedPro FC6724/01?

  • Lightweight design makes it easy to lift and carry around the house.
  • Highly maneuverable with a flexible neck that reaches easily under low furniture.
  • Convenient 2-in-1 design easily transitions between a stick vacuum and a handheld unit.
  • Integrated accessories like the built-in brush on the tube prevent losing parts.
  • Hygienic dust bin is straightforward to remove and empty without creating dust clouds.
  • 180-degree suction nozzle efficiently captures dirt from both the front and sides.

What customers dislike about Philips SpeedPro FC6724/01?

  • Maximum noise level is relatively loud, reaching up to 80-82 dB during operation.
  • Long 5-hour charging time required to completely refill the battery.
  • Battery life drops significantly down to 20 minutes when running continuously in turbo mode.
  • Small dust bin capacity of 0.4 litres requires frequent emptying during larger cleaning sessions.
  • Lacks integrated LED headlights on the main nozzle which are standard on higher-tier models.
  • Suction power can feel insufficient for deep-pile carpets, making it better suited for hard floors or light dusting.

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

Q
quel-aspirateurs.fr
15/09/2025
Summary of the review
Philips FC6724/01 Vacuum Cleaner Review & Test
(Translated)Show original
Q
quechoisir.org
02/03/2021
Summary of the review
Philips FC6724/01 SpeedPro Cordless Stick Vacuum Review
(Translated)Show original
Q
quechoisir.org
02/03/2021
Summary of the review
Philips FC6724/01 SpeedPro Cordless Vacuum Cleaner Review
(Translated)Show original
C
consumentenbond.nl
Onbekend / Doorlopend lab-testrapport
Summary of the review
Philips FC6724/01 SpeedPro - Test, Reviews & Prices
(Translated)Show original

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Compare Philips SpeedPro FC6724/01 with other vacuum cleaners

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)