OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

Philips FC9332/09 Review | 52 Data compared

Avg. price:~£90Suction power (AW):?Battery runtime:N/A minutesCapacity:1.5 LWeight:4.5 kg

Philips FC9332/09 Review: Compare 52 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Vacuum Cleaners category and whether it is worth buying.

6.0

Overall score

Score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the vacuum cleaner's quality, based on technical analysis and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference for identifying the best vacuum cleaners on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 95% of models
Score components

80%

6.0

Technical Score

20%

?

User score

▼Worse than 95% of vacuum-cleaners
6.0

Technical Score

Technical score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 86% of models
Score components

28%

6.0

Performance

22%

3.9

Battery

18%

9.4

Filtration

14%

6.5

Attachments

10%

5.5

Design

8%

4.0

Smart features

▼Worse than 86% of vacuum-cleaners
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £90
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The Philips PowerPro Compact FC9332/09 is a corded, bagless canister vacuum cleaner featuring a 900W motor, PowerCyclone 5 technology, and a 1.5-litre dust capacity. Main characteristics include a 6-metre power cord providing a 9-metre operating radius, large rubber wheels, and a multi-action TriActive nozzle capable of lifting 99.9% of fine dust. Key pros highlight its excellent suction power (16.8 kPa), lightweight 4.5 kg design, hygienic one-handed bin emptying, and an Allergy H13 HEPA filter suitable for sensitive users. However, notable cons include its relatively loud 79 dB noise level, a lack of electronic suction power regulation, and a dust container that fills up quickly in larger homes.

Technical Specifications of vacuum cleaner Philips FC9332/09

Technical Score
Technical score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 86% of models
Score components:

28%

6.0

Performance

22%

3.9

Battery

18%

9.4

Filtration

14%

6.5

Attachments

10%

5.5

Design

8%

4.0

Smart features

6.0
Philips FC9332/09 has a technical score of 6 points, which is lower than 85.9% of vacuum cleaners.
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you prefer a vacuum cleaner that has been chosen and reviewed by many other buyers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Philips FC9332/09 has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than 61.7% of vacuum cleaners.
1.0
Philips FC9332/09 has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than 61.7% of vacuum cleaners.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the vacuum cleaner's overall score with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a vacuum cleaner with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 92% of models
Score components:

60%

6.0

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.2
Philips FC9332/09 has a value-for-money score of 7.2 points, which is lower than 86.6% of vacuum cleaners.
Suction power (AW)
?
Suction power (kPa)
16.8 kPa
Suction power (kPa)
16.8 kPa
▼ Worse than 70% of models
Market range: <11 kPa – >30 kPa
This vacuum cleaner has a suction pressure of 16.8 kPa, which is lower than that of 70.1% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 1.6% of vacuum cleaners.
Airflow
27.8 L/s
Airflow
27.8 L/s
▼ Worse than 48% of models
Market range: <16.5 L/s – >52 L/s
This vacuum cleaner delivers 27.8 L/s airflow, which is higher than that of 46.9% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 5.1% of vacuum cleaners.
Motor type
brushed
Power consumption
900 W
Power consumption
900 W
▼ Worse than 89% of models
Market range: <165 W – >899 W
This vacuum cleaner draws 900 W, which is higher than the power consumption of 89% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 5.5% of vacuum cleaners.
Show more
Cordless
no
Cordless
no
▼ Worse than 50% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not work cordlessly. 49.5% of vacuum cleaners offer cordless operation.
Battery runtime
N/A
Charging time
N/A
Battery capacity
N/A
Battery voltage
N/A
Show more
Filter class
hepa 13
Filter class
hepa 13
▲ Better than 80% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses filter class hepa 13, which is more advanced than the class used by 80.4% of vacuum cleaners and the same as the class used by 18% of vacuum cleaners.
Minimum overall efficiency
99.95%
Minimum overall efficiency
99.95%
▼ Worse than 41% of models
Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
This vacuum cleaner reaches 99.95% minimum overall efficiency, which is higher than that of 32% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 26.9% of vacuum cleaners.
Suitable for allergy sufferers
yes
Suitable for allergy sufferers
yes
▲ Better than 18% of models
This vacuum cleaner is suitable for allergy sufferers. 82.4% of vacuum cleaners are allergy-friendly.
Capacity
1.5 L
Capacity
1.5 L
▲ Better than 60% of models
Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
This vacuum cleaner has a dust capacity of 1.5 L, which is larger than that of 60.1% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 6.3% of vacuum cleaners.
Bagless
yes
Bagless
yes
▲ Better than 21% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses a bagless design. 78.6% of vacuum cleaners use this setup.
Show more
Main brush type
classic
Roller type
none
Anti-tangle brush
no
Anti-tangle brush
no
▼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an anti-tangle brush. 25.7% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
Mini motorized brush
no
Mini motorized brush
no
▼ Worse than 27% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a mini motorized brush. 26.9% of vacuum cleaners include this attachment.
Suitable for pet owners
yes
Suitable for pet owners
yes
▲ Better than 28% of models
This vacuum cleaner is suitable for pet owners. 72% of vacuum cleaners handle pet hair well.
Show more
Vacuum type
canister
Weight
4.5 kg
Weight
4.5 kg
▼ Worse than 63% of models
Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
This vacuum cleaner weighs 4.5 kg, which is greater than the weight of 63.5% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 2.5% of vacuum cleaners.
2-in-1 design
no
2-in-1 design
no
▼ Worse than 53% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not offer a 2-in-1 design. 53% of vacuum cleaners offer this flexible format.
Self-standing
no
Self-standing
no
▼ Worse than 19% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not stand on its own. 18.9% of vacuum cleaners offer this convenience.
Adjustable tube height
yes
Adjustable tube height
yes
▲ Better than 53% of models
This vacuum cleaner includes adjustable tube height. 47.4% of vacuum cleaners offer this ergonomic feature.
Show more
Auto suction adjustment
no
Auto suction adjustment
no
▼ Worse than 20% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support automatic suction adjustment. 19.9% of vacuum cleaners support this feature.
Dust particle sensor
no
Dust particle sensor
no
▼ Worse than 8% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a dust particle sensor. 8% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
LED display
no
LED display
no
▼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an LED display. 25.9% of vacuum cleaners include this interface feature.
Nozzle light
no
Nozzle light
no
▼ Worse than 43% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a nozzle light. 43.4% of vacuum cleaners include this visibility feature.
Mopping support
no
Mopping support
no
▼ Worse than 4% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support mopping. 3.7% of vacuum cleaners support this multi-function feature.

Philips FC9332/09 vs the average vacuum cleaner

246810TotalPerformanceBatteryFiltrationAttachmentsDesignSmart features
  • Higher filter class
    Filter class
    hepa 13
    ▲ Better than 80% of models
    This vacuum cleaner uses a better filter class than the average vacuum cleaner (hepa 13 vs hepa).
    hepa 13 vs hepa
  • Adjustable tube height
    Adjustable tube height
    yes
    ▲ Better than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner has adjustable tube height, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 0.5 L larger dust container
    Capacity
    1.5 L
    ▲ Better than 60% of models
    Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
    This vacuum cleaner has a larger dust capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (1.5 L vs 1 L).
    1.5 L vs 1 L
  • 66.7% cheaper
    Philips FC9332/09 is cheaper than the average vacuum cleaner (£90 vs £150).
    £90 vs £150
  • 66.7% cheaper
    Philips FC9332/09 is cheaper than the average vacuum cleaner (£90 vs £150).
    £90 vs £150
  • Higher filter class
    Filter class
    hepa 13
    ▲ Better than 80% of models
    This vacuum cleaner uses a better filter class than the average vacuum cleaner (hepa 13 vs hepa).
    hepa 13 vs hepa
  • 0.5 L larger dust container
    Capacity
    1.5 L
    ▲ Better than 60% of models
    Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
    This vacuum cleaner has a larger dust capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (1.5 L vs 1 L).
    1.5 L vs 1 L
  • Adjustable tube height
    Adjustable tube height
    yes
    ▲ Better than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner has adjustable tube height, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • No handheld conversion
    2-in-1 design
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not have a 2-in-1 design, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 3.2 kPa lower suction pressure
    Suction power (kPa)
    16.8 kPa
    ▼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <11 kPa – >30 kPa
    This vacuum cleaner has lower suction pressure than the average vacuum cleaner (16.8 kPa vs 20 kPa).
    16.8 kPa vs 20 kPa
  • No upholstery nozzle
    Upholstery nozzle
    no
    ▼ Worse than 68% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not include an upholstery nozzle, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 300 W higher power consumption
    Power consumption
    900 W
    ▼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws more power than the average vacuum cleaner (900 W vs 600 W).
    900 W vs 600 W
  • More operating noise
    Noise level (Min-Max)
    76-79 dB
    ▼ Worse than 50% of models
    Market range: <65 dB – >83 dB
    This vacuum cleaner is noisier than the average vacuum cleaner (76-79 dB vs 77-77 dB).
    76-79 dB vs 77-77 dB
  • 24.3% higher weight
    Weight
    4.5 kg
    ▼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
    This vacuum cleaner is heavier than the average vacuum cleaner (4.5 kg vs 3.62 kg).
    4.5 kg vs 3.62 kg
  • 1 fewer power levels
    Number of speeds
    1
    ▼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <1 – >4
    This vacuum cleaner offers fewer speed levels than the average vacuum cleaner (1 vs 2).
    1 vs 2
  • 145 mm deeper body
    Depth
    410 mm
    ▼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <170 mm – >440 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is deeper than the average vacuum cleaner (410 mm vs 265 mm).
    410 mm vs 265 mm
  • 6.1% worse value for money
    Philips FC9332/09 offers worse value for money than the average vacuum cleaner (7.21 vs 7.6).
    7.21 vs 7.65
  • 3.2 kPa lower suction pressure
    Suction power (kPa)
    16.8 kPa
    ▼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <11 kPa – >30 kPa
    This vacuum cleaner has lower suction pressure than the average vacuum cleaner (16.8 kPa vs 20 kPa).
    16.8 kPa vs 20 kPa
  • 300 W higher power consumption
    Power consumption
    900 W
    ▼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws more power than the average vacuum cleaner (900 W vs 600 W).
    900 W vs 600 W
  • More operating noise
    Noise level (Min-Max)
    76-79 dB
    ▼ Worse than 50% of models
    Market range: <65 dB – >83 dB
    This vacuum cleaner is noisier than the average vacuum cleaner (76-79 dB vs 77-77 dB).
    76-79 dB vs 77-77 dB
  • 1 fewer power levels
    Number of speeds
    1
    ▼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <1 – >4
    This vacuum cleaner offers fewer speed levels than the average vacuum cleaner (1 vs 2).
    1 vs 2
  • 0.5 m shorter power cord
    Power cord length
    6 m
    ▼ Worse than 57% of models
    Market range: <5 m – >9.3 m
    This vacuum cleaner has a shorter power cord than the average vacuum cleaner (6 m vs 6.5 m).
    6 m vs 6.5 m
  • No upholstery nozzle
    Upholstery nozzle
    no
    ▼ Worse than 68% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not include an upholstery nozzle, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • No handheld conversion
    2-in-1 design
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not have a 2-in-1 design, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 24.3% higher weight
    Weight
    4.5 kg
    ▼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
    This vacuum cleaner is heavier than the average vacuum cleaner (4.5 kg vs 3.62 kg).
    4.5 kg vs 3.62 kg
  • 145 mm deeper body
    Depth
    410 mm
    ▼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <170 mm – >440 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is deeper than the average vacuum cleaner (410 mm vs 265 mm).
    410 mm vs 265 mm
  • Older release date
    Release date
    2018
    ▼ Worse than 77% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This vacuum cleaner has an older release date than the average vacuum cleaner (2018 vs 2021).
    Released in April 2018.
    2018 vs 2021
  • 16 mm wider body
    Width
    281 mm
    ▼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <229 mm – >350 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is wider than the average vacuum cleaner (281 mm vs 265 mm).
    281 mm vs 265 mm

Graphic comparison of Philips FC9332/09 and other vacuum cleaners

No results found

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Philips FC9332/09?

  • Strong and effective suction power on hard floors and low-pile carpets
  • Compact, lightweight, and easy to store in small spaces
  • Bagless design with a transparent dust container that is very easy and hygienic to empty
  • Cleverly integrated brush attachment right on the telescopic handle so it cannot be lost
  • Effective H13 allergy filter that captures fine dust, pet dander, and hair
  • Affordable and offers great value for the price

What customers dislike about Philips FC9332/09?

  • Suction can sometimes be too strong on thick carpets, making it physically difficult to maneuver
  • The 1.5-liter dust container is small and fills up quickly in larger homes
  • Operating noise level is relatively loud
  • The translucent plastic container gets visibly dirty inside and can look unappealing
  • The side wheels and certain attachments feel thin, plasticky, or less durable than the main body
  • Foam filters degrade fairly quickly and require frequent washing or regular replacement to maintain airflow

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

S
staubsauger-berater.de
29/07/2026
Summary of the review
Philips FC9332/09 PowerPro Compact Cylinder Vacuum Cleaner
(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
19/12/2018
Summary of the review
Philips PowerPro Compact FC9332/09 review: Designed for small spaces
(Translated)Show original
G
guide-aspirateur.net
02/03/2022
Summary of the review
Philips FC9332/09 Review: An Affordable Vacuum Cleaner with High Performance - Vacuum Guide
(Translated)Show original
O
ocu.org
16/04/2024
Summary of the review
PHILIPS FC9332/09 PowerPro Compact: Reviews - OCU
(Translated)Show original
A
altroconsumo.it
16/09/2017
Summary of the review
PHILIPS FC9332/09 PowerPro Compact Bagless Vacuum Cleaner
(Translated)Show original
C
consumentenbond.nl
14/08/2017
Summary of the review
Philips PowerPro Compact FC9332/09 - Test, Reviews & Prices
(Translated)Show original
T
test-aankoop.be
18/10/2017
Summary of the review
PHILIPS FC9332/09 PowerPro Compact test and review
(Translated)Show original
V
vacuumtester.nl
14/04/2024
Summary of the review
Philips PowerPro Compact review: little powerhouse
(Translated)Show original

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Compare Philips FC9332/09 with other vacuum cleaners

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)