OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

Philips FC6826/01 Review | 52 Data compared

Avg. price:~£210Suction power (AW):?Battery runtime:65 minutesCapacity:0.6 LWeight:2.73 kg

Philips FC6826/01 Review: Compare 52 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Vacuum Cleaners category and whether it is worth buying.

6.9

Overall score

Score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the vacuum cleaner's quality, based on technical analysis and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference for identifying the best vacuum cleaners on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 54% of models
Score components

80%

6.9

Technical Score

20%

?

User score

â–²Better than 54% of vacuum-cleaners
6.9

Technical Score

Technical score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 64% of models
Score components

28%

6.1

Performance

22%

8.0

Battery

18%

7.2

Filtration

14%

6.5

Attachments

10%

7.1

Design

8%

6.1

Smart features

â–²Better than 64% of vacuum-cleaners
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £210
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The Philips FC6826/01 SpeedPro Max is a 2-in-1 cordless stick and handheld vacuum cleaner powered by a 25.2V lithium-ion battery that generates a high airflow exceeding 1,000 litres per minute via its digital PowerBlade motor and PowerCyclone 8 bagless technology. Main characteristics and pros include an integrated 0.6-litre dust bucket, a smart digital status display, an LED-lighted 360-degree suction nozzle designed to capture dirt from all sides in every stroke, and a solid 65-minute eco runtime (21 minutes in turbo mode) optimized by a triple filtration system. However, cons include a relatively loud noise level of 84 dB, a long 5-hour full battery charging time, and user feedback noting that the nozzle can occasionally brake or resist smooth movement when pulling it backward on thick carpets.

Technical Specifications of vacuum cleaner Philips FC6826/01

Technical Score
Technical score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 64% of models
Score components:

28%

6.1

Performance

22%

8.0

Battery

18%

7.2

Filtration

14%

6.5

Attachments

10%

7.1

Design

8%

6.1

Smart features

6.9
Philips FC6826/01 has a technical score of 6.9 points, which is higher than 64% of vacuum cleaners.
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you prefer a vacuum cleaner that has been chosen and reviewed by many other buyers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Philips FC6826/01 has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than 61.7% of vacuum cleaners.
1.0
Philips FC6826/01 has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than 61.7% of vacuum cleaners.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the vacuum cleaner's overall score with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a vacuum cleaner with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Score components:

60%

6.9

Overall score

40%

9.4

Price

7.6
Philips FC6826/01 has a value-for-money score of 7.6 points, which is higher than 39.2% of vacuum cleaners.
Suction power (AW)
?
Suction power (kPa)
?
Airflow
16.67 L/s
Airflow
16.67 L/s
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
Market range: <16.5 L/s – >52 L/s
This vacuum cleaner delivers 16.67 L/s airflow, which is lower than that of 88.6% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 1.1% of vacuum cleaners.
Motor type
brushless
Power consumption
900 W
Power consumption
900 W
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
Market range: <165 W – >899 W
This vacuum cleaner draws 900 W, which is higher than the power consumption of 89% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 5.5% of vacuum cleaners.
Show more
Cordless
yes
Cordless
yes
â–² Better than 51% of models
This vacuum cleaner works cordlessly. 49.5% of vacuum cleaners offer cordless operation.
Battery runtime
65 minutes
Battery runtime
65 minutes
â–² Better than 86% of models
Market range: <30 minutes – >70 minutes
This vacuum cleaner offers a battery runtime of 65 minutes, which is longer than that of 85.8% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 2% of vacuum cleaners.
Charging time
5 hours
Charging time
5 hours
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
Market range: <3 hours – >5 hours
This vacuum cleaner charges in 5 hours, which is slower than 73.8% of vacuum cleaners and equal to 20.4% of vacuum cleaners.
Battery capacity
?
Battery voltage
25.2 V
Battery voltage
25.2 V
â–² Better than 56% of models
Market range: <18 V – >28.8 V
This vacuum cleaner uses a battery voltage of 25.2 V, which is higher than that of 56.5% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 23.5% of vacuum cleaners.
Show more
Filter class
washable foam
Filter class
washable foam
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses filter class washable foam, which is less advanced than the class used by 90.8% of vacuum cleaners and the same as the class used by 0.7% of vacuum cleaners.
Minimum overall efficiency
?
Suitable for allergy sufferers
yes
Suitable for allergy sufferers
yes
â–² Better than 18% of models
This vacuum cleaner is suitable for allergy sufferers. 82.4% of vacuum cleaners are allergy-friendly.
Capacity
0.6 L
Capacity
0.6 L
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
This vacuum cleaner has a dust capacity of 0.6 L, which is smaller than that of 71.3% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 6.8% of vacuum cleaners.
Bagless
yes
Bagless
yes
â–² Better than 21% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses a bagless design. 78.6% of vacuum cleaners use this setup.
Show more
Main brush type
roll brush
Roller type
bristled
Anti-tangle brush
no
Anti-tangle brush
no
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an anti-tangle brush. 25.7% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
Mini motorized brush
no
Mini motorized brush
no
â–¼ Worse than 27% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a mini motorized brush. 26.9% of vacuum cleaners include this attachment.
Suitable for pet owners
yes
Suitable for pet owners
yes
â–² Better than 28% of models
This vacuum cleaner is suitable for pet owners. 72% of vacuum cleaners handle pet hair well.
Show more
Vacuum type
stick
Weight
2.73 kg
Weight
2.73 kg
â–² Better than 69% of models
Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
This vacuum cleaner weighs 2.73 kg, which is lower than the weight of 69.4% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 0.2% of vacuum cleaners.
2-in-1 design
yes
2-in-1 design
yes
â–² Better than 47% of models
This vacuum cleaner offers a 2-in-1 design. 53% of vacuum cleaners offer this flexible format.
Self-standing
no
Self-standing
no
â–¼ Worse than 19% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not stand on its own. 18.9% of vacuum cleaners offer this convenience.
Adjustable tube height
no
Adjustable tube height
no
â–¼ Worse than 47% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include adjustable tube height. 47.4% of vacuum cleaners offer this ergonomic feature.
Show more
Auto suction adjustment
no
Auto suction adjustment
no
â–¼ Worse than 20% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support automatic suction adjustment. 19.9% of vacuum cleaners support this feature.
Dust particle sensor
no
Dust particle sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 8% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a dust particle sensor. 8% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
LED display
yes
LED display
yes
â–² Better than 74% of models
This vacuum cleaner includes an LED display. 25.9% of vacuum cleaners include this interface feature.
Nozzle light
yes
Nozzle light
yes
â–² Better than 57% of models
This vacuum cleaner includes a nozzle light. 43.4% of vacuum cleaners include this visibility feature.
Mopping support
no
Mopping support
no
â–¼ Worse than 4% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support mopping. 3.7% of vacuum cleaners support this multi-function feature.

Philips FC6826/01 vs the average vacuum cleaner

246810TotalPerformanceBatteryFiltrationAttachmentsDesignSmart features
  • 15 minutes longer runtime
    Battery runtime
    65 minutes
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    Market range: <30 minutes – >70 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers longer battery runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (65 minutes vs 50 minutes).
    65 minutes vs 50 minutes
  • Cordless operation
    Cordless
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This vacuum cleaner works cordlessly, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 9 minutes longer turbo runtime
    Turbo mode runtime
    21 minutes
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Market range: <6 minutes – >20 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers longer turbo runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (21 minutes vs 12 minutes).
    21 minutes vs 12 minutes
  • Includes nozzle light
    Nozzle light
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a nozzle light, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Includes LED display
    LED display
    yes
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes an LED display, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Includes battery indicator
    Battery level indicator
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a battery level indicator, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Includes wall bracket
    Wall-mounted bracket
    yes
    â–² Better than 64% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a wall-mounted bracket, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 124 mm wider cleaning path
    Cleaning path width
    384 mm
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    Market range: <230 mm – >309 mm
    This vacuum cleaner has a wider cleaning path than the average vacuum cleaner (384 mm vs 260 mm).
    384 mm vs 260 mm
  • 124 mm wider cleaning path
    Cleaning path width
    384 mm
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    Market range: <230 mm – >309 mm
    This vacuum cleaner has a wider cleaning path than the average vacuum cleaner (384 mm vs 260 mm).
    384 mm vs 260 mm
  • 1 more power levels
    Number of speeds
    3
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    Market range: <1 – >4
    This vacuum cleaner offers more speed levels than the average vacuum cleaner (3 vs 2).
    3 vs 2
  • 15 minutes longer runtime
    Battery runtime
    65 minutes
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    Market range: <30 minutes – >70 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers longer battery runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (65 minutes vs 50 minutes).
    65 minutes vs 50 minutes
  • Cordless operation
    Cordless
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This vacuum cleaner works cordlessly, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 9 minutes longer turbo runtime
    Turbo mode runtime
    21 minutes
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Market range: <6 minutes – >20 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers longer turbo runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (21 minutes vs 12 minutes).
    21 minutes vs 12 minutes
  • Includes battery indicator
    Battery level indicator
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a battery level indicator, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 3 V higher voltage
    Battery voltage
    25.2 V
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    Market range: <18 V – >28.8 V
    This vacuum cleaner has a higher battery voltage than the average vacuum cleaner (25.2 V vs 22.2 V).
    25.2 V vs 22.2 V
  • Includes wall bracket
    Wall-mounted bracket
    yes
    â–² Better than 64% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a wall-mounted bracket, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 24.6% lower weight
    Weight
    2.73 kg
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
    This vacuum cleaner is lighter than the average vacuum cleaner (2.7 kg vs 3.62 kg).
    2.73 kg vs 3.62 kg
  • 100 mm shallower body
    Depth
    165 mm
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <170 mm – >440 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is less deep than the average vacuum cleaner (165 mm vs 265 mm).
    165 mm vs 265 mm
  • Includes nozzle light
    Nozzle light
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a nozzle light, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Includes LED display
    LED display
    yes
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes an LED display, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • More operating noise
    Noise level (Min-Max)
    84-84 dB
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <65 dB – >83 dB
    This vacuum cleaner is noisier than the average vacuum cleaner (84-84 dB vs 77-77 dB).
    84-84 dB vs 77-77 dB
  • 11.13 L/s lower airflow
    Airflow
    16.67 L/s
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <16.5 L/s – >52 L/s
    This vacuum cleaner delivers lower airflow than the average vacuum cleaner (16.7 L/s vs 27.8 L/s).
    16.67 L/s vs 27.8 L/s
  • 1 hours slower charging
    Charging time
    5 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <3 hours – >5 hours
    This vacuum cleaner charges slower than the average vacuum cleaner (5 hours vs 4 hours).
    5 hours vs 4 hours
  • 0.4 L smaller dust container
    Capacity
    0.6 L
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
    This vacuum cleaner has a smaller dust capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (0.6 L vs 1 L).
    0.6 L vs 1 L
  • No upholstery nozzle
    Upholstery nozzle
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not include an upholstery nozzle, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • Lower filter class
    Filter class
    washable foam
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    This vacuum cleaner uses a lower filter class than the average vacuum cleaner (washable foam vs hepa).
    washable foam vs hepa
  • 300 W higher power consumption
    Power consumption
    900 W
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws more power than the average vacuum cleaner (900 W vs 600 W).
    900 W vs 600 W
  • 119 mm wider body
    Width
    384 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <229 mm – >350 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is wider than the average vacuum cleaner (384 mm vs 265 mm).
    384 mm vs 265 mm
  • 40% more expensive
    Philips FC6826/01 is more expensive than the average vacuum cleaner (£210 vs £150).
    £210 vs £150
  • More operating noise
    Noise level (Min-Max)
    84-84 dB
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <65 dB – >83 dB
    This vacuum cleaner is noisier than the average vacuum cleaner (84-84 dB vs 77-77 dB).
    84-84 dB vs 77-77 dB
  • 11.13 L/s lower airflow
    Airflow
    16.67 L/s
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <16.5 L/s – >52 L/s
    This vacuum cleaner delivers lower airflow than the average vacuum cleaner (16.7 L/s vs 27.8 L/s).
    16.67 L/s vs 27.8 L/s
  • 300 W higher power consumption
    Power consumption
    900 W
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws more power than the average vacuum cleaner (900 W vs 600 W).
    900 W vs 600 W
  • 1 hours slower charging
    Charging time
    5 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <3 hours – >5 hours
    This vacuum cleaner charges slower than the average vacuum cleaner (5 hours vs 4 hours).
    5 hours vs 4 hours
  • 0.4 L smaller dust container
    Capacity
    0.6 L
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
    This vacuum cleaner has a smaller dust capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (0.6 L vs 1 L).
    0.6 L vs 1 L
  • Lower filter class
    Filter class
    washable foam
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    This vacuum cleaner uses a lower filter class than the average vacuum cleaner (washable foam vs hepa).
    washable foam vs hepa
  • No upholstery nozzle
    Upholstery nozzle
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not include an upholstery nozzle, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 119 mm wider body
    Width
    384 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <229 mm – >350 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is wider than the average vacuum cleaner (384 mm vs 265 mm).
    384 mm vs 265 mm
  • Older release date
    Release date
    2018
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This vacuum cleaner has an older release date than the average vacuum cleaner (2018 vs 2021).
    Released in April 2018.
    2018 vs 2021
  • 70 mm taller body
    Height
    1,170 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
    Market range: <290 mm – >1.2k mm
    This vacuum cleaner is taller than the average vacuum cleaner (1170 mm vs 1100 mm).
    1,170 mm vs 1,100 mm

Graphic comparison of Philips FC6826/01 and other vacuum cleaners

No results found

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Philips FC6826/01?

  • Powerful suction performance across both hard floors and carpets
  • Excellent battery runtime that easily covers large apartments on a single charge
  • Innovative 360-degree suction nozzle that captures dirt from all sides and angles
  • Convenient LED lights integrated into the nozzle to reveal hidden dust
  • Clear smart digital display showing precise remaining battery percentage
  • Highly flexible design that allows the vacuum to lay completely flat under low furniture
  • Hygienic and straightforward dust container emptying process

What customers dislike about Philips FC6826/01?

  • Top-heavy design makes the vacuum feel heavy and tiring on the hands and wrists during long cleaning sessions
  • Long-term battery and motor reliability issues reported by some users after months of use
  • Main brush head can judder or vibrate unevenly when pulled backward
  • Long repair times and slow customer service responses when claiming warranty support
  • Noisy operation at maximum power levels, reaching up to 84 decibels
  • High premium price point compared to some other cordless alternatives

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
techadvisor.com
21/11/2018
Summary of the review
Philips SpeedPro Max review: A True Dyson Alternative - Tech Advisor
L
labofnac.com
05/06/2018
Summary of the review
Lab Test: Philips SpeedPro Max FC6826/01, a balanced and efficient cordless vacuum
(Translated)Show original

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Compare Philips FC6826/01 with other vacuum cleaners

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)