OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

Philips 9000 Series Bagless Review | 52 Data compared

Avg. price:~£250Suction power (AW):?Battery runtime:N/A minutesCapacity:2.2 LWeight:6.2 kg

Philips 9000 Series Bagless Review: Compare 52 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Vacuum Cleaners category and whether it is worth buying.

6.7

Overall score

Score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the vacuum cleaner's quality, based on technical analysis and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference for identifying the best vacuum cleaners on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
Score components

80%

6.7

Technical Score

20%

?

User score

â–¼Worse than 59% of vacuum-cleaners
6.7

Technical Score

Technical score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 55% of models
Score components

28%

7.7

Performance

22%

4.6

Battery

18%

9.4

Filtration

14%

7.1

Attachments

10%

4.7

Design

8%

4.0

Smart features

â–²Better than 55% of vacuum-cleaners
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £250
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The Philips 9000 Series Bagless vacuum cleaner (such as the XB9154/09) is a high-performance corded cylinder vacuum featuring an 899W to 900W motor, a generous 2.2-litre dust capacity, and an Allergy H13 filtration system that captures 99.9% of fine dust. Driven by advanced PowerCyclone 10 technology and a TriActive Ultra nozzle, it delivers exceptional, long-lasting suction power across all floor types. Notable pros include its hygienic, one-handed NanoClean dust-disposal system, a built-in handle brush, and convenient remote control power adjustments right on the handle. However, notable cons include its relatively heavy metal telescopic wand that can cause user fatigue, a bulky cleaning head that limits tight-space maneuverability, and a loud operating noise level of up to 78 decibels.

Technical Specifications of vacuum cleaner Philips 9000 Series Bagless

Technical Score
Technical score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 55% of models
Score components:

28%

7.7

Performance

22%

4.6

Battery

18%

9.4

Filtration

14%

7.1

Attachments

10%

4.7

Design

8%

4.0

Smart features

6.7
Philips 9000 Series Bagless has a technical score of 6.7 points, which is higher than 54.6% of vacuum cleaners.
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you prefer a vacuum cleaner that has been chosen and reviewed by many other buyers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Philips 9000 Series Bagless has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than 61.7% of vacuum cleaners.
1.0
Philips 9000 Series Bagless has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than 61.7% of vacuum cleaners.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the vacuum cleaner's overall score with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a vacuum cleaner with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
Score components:

60%

6.7

Overall score

40%

9.2

Price

7.4
Philips 9000 Series Bagless has a value-for-money score of 7.4 points, which is lower than 69.9% of vacuum cleaners.
Suction power (AW)
?
Suction power (kPa)
?
Airflow
?
Motor type
Universal motor
Power consumption
900 W
Power consumption
900 W
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
Market range: <165 W – >899 W
This vacuum cleaner draws 900 W, which is higher than the power consumption of 89% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 5.5% of vacuum cleaners.
Show more
Cordless
no
Cordless
no
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not work cordlessly. 49.5% of vacuum cleaners offer cordless operation.
Battery runtime
N/A
Charging time
N/A
Battery capacity
N/A
Battery voltage
N/A
Show more
Filter class
hepa 13
Filter class
hepa 13
â–² Better than 80% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses filter class hepa 13, which is more advanced than the class used by 80.4% of vacuum cleaners and the same as the class used by 18% of vacuum cleaners.
Minimum overall efficiency
99.95%
Minimum overall efficiency
99.95%
â–¼ Worse than 41% of models
Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
This vacuum cleaner reaches 99.95% minimum overall efficiency, which is higher than that of 32% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 26.9% of vacuum cleaners.
Suitable for allergy sufferers
yes
Suitable for allergy sufferers
yes
â–² Better than 18% of models
This vacuum cleaner is suitable for allergy sufferers. 82.4% of vacuum cleaners are allergy-friendly.
Capacity
2.2 L
Capacity
2.2 L
â–² Better than 75% of models
Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
This vacuum cleaner has a dust capacity of 2.2 L, which is larger than that of 74.8% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 0.6% of vacuum cleaners.
Bagless
yes
Bagless
yes
â–² Better than 21% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses a bagless design. 78.6% of vacuum cleaners use this setup.
Show more
Main brush type
classic
Roller type
none
Anti-tangle brush
no
Anti-tangle brush
no
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an anti-tangle brush. 25.7% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
Mini motorized brush
no
Mini motorized brush
no
â–¼ Worse than 27% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a mini motorized brush. 26.9% of vacuum cleaners include this attachment.
Suitable for pet owners
yes
Suitable for pet owners
yes
â–² Better than 28% of models
This vacuum cleaner is suitable for pet owners. 72% of vacuum cleaners handle pet hair well.
Show more
Vacuum type
canister
Weight
6.2 kg
Weight
6.2 kg
â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
This vacuum cleaner weighs 6.2 kg, which is greater than the weight of 82.1% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 0.7% of vacuum cleaners.
2-in-1 design
no
2-in-1 design
no
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not offer a 2-in-1 design. 53% of vacuum cleaners offer this flexible format.
Self-standing
no
Self-standing
no
â–¼ Worse than 19% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not stand on its own. 18.9% of vacuum cleaners offer this convenience.
Adjustable tube height
yes
Adjustable tube height
yes
â–² Better than 53% of models
This vacuum cleaner includes adjustable tube height. 47.4% of vacuum cleaners offer this ergonomic feature.
Show more
Auto suction adjustment
no
Auto suction adjustment
no
â–¼ Worse than 20% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support automatic suction adjustment. 19.9% of vacuum cleaners support this feature.
Dust particle sensor
no
Dust particle sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 8% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a dust particle sensor. 8% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
LED display
no
LED display
no
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an LED display. 25.9% of vacuum cleaners include this interface feature.
Nozzle light
no
Nozzle light
no
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a nozzle light. 43.4% of vacuum cleaners include this visibility feature.
Mopping support
no
Mopping support
no
â–¼ Worse than 4% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support mopping. 3.7% of vacuum cleaners support this multi-function feature.

Philips 9000 Series Bagless vs the average vacuum cleaner

246810TotalPerformanceBatteryFiltrationAttachmentsDesignSmart features
  • Higher filter class
    Filter class
    hepa 13
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    This vacuum cleaner uses a better filter class than the average vacuum cleaner (hepa 13 vs hepa).
    hepa 13 vs hepa
  • 3 more power levels
    Number of speeds
    5
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    Market range: <1 – >4
    This vacuum cleaner offers more speed levels than the average vacuum cleaner (5 vs 2).
    5 vs 2
  • Adjustable tube height
    Adjustable tube height
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner has adjustable tube height, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 800 mm shorter body
    Height
    300 mm
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <290 mm – >1.2k mm
    This vacuum cleaner is shorter than the average vacuum cleaner (300 mm vs 1100 mm).
    300 mm vs 1,100 mm
  • 1.2 L larger dust container
    Capacity
    2.2 L
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
    This vacuum cleaner has a larger dust capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (2.2 L vs 1 L).
    2.2 L vs 1 L
  • 1.5 m longer power cord
    Power cord length
    8 m
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <5 m – >9.3 m
    This vacuum cleaner has a longer power cord than the average vacuum cleaner (8 m vs 6.5 m).
    8 m vs 6.5 m
  • 30 mm wider cleaning path
    Cleaning path width
    290 mm
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    Market range: <230 mm – >309 mm
    This vacuum cleaner has a wider cleaning path than the average vacuum cleaner (290 mm vs 260 mm).
    290 mm vs 260 mm
  • 3 more power levels
    Number of speeds
    5
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    Market range: <1 – >4
    This vacuum cleaner offers more speed levels than the average vacuum cleaner (5 vs 2).
    5 vs 2
  • 30 mm wider cleaning path
    Cleaning path width
    290 mm
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    Market range: <230 mm – >309 mm
    This vacuum cleaner has a wider cleaning path than the average vacuum cleaner (290 mm vs 260 mm).
    290 mm vs 260 mm
  • 1.5 m longer power cord
    Power cord length
    8 m
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <5 m – >9.3 m
    This vacuum cleaner has a longer power cord than the average vacuum cleaner (8 m vs 6.5 m).
    8 m vs 6.5 m
  • Higher filter class
    Filter class
    hepa 13
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    This vacuum cleaner uses a better filter class than the average vacuum cleaner (hepa 13 vs hepa).
    hepa 13 vs hepa
  • 1.2 L larger dust container
    Capacity
    2.2 L
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
    This vacuum cleaner has a larger dust capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (2.2 L vs 1 L).
    2.2 L vs 1 L
  • Adjustable tube height
    Adjustable tube height
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner has adjustable tube height, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 800 mm shorter body
    Height
    300 mm
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <290 mm – >1.2k mm
    This vacuum cleaner is shorter than the average vacuum cleaner (300 mm vs 1100 mm).
    300 mm vs 1,100 mm
  • No handheld conversion
    2-in-1 design
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not have a 2-in-1 design, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 71.3% higher weight
    Weight
    6.2 kg
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
    This vacuum cleaner is heavier than the average vacuum cleaner (6.2 kg vs 3.62 kg).
    6.2 kg vs 3.62 kg
  • 300 W higher power consumption
    Power consumption
    900 W
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws more power than the average vacuum cleaner (900 W vs 600 W).
    900 W vs 600 W
  • 235 mm deeper body
    Depth
    500 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
    Market range: <170 mm – >440 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is deeper than the average vacuum cleaner (500 mm vs 265 mm).
    500 mm vs 265 mm
  • 35 mm wider body
    Width
    300 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <229 mm – >350 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is wider than the average vacuum cleaner (300 mm vs 265 mm).
    300 mm vs 265 mm
  • 66.7% more expensive
    Bagless
    £250
    â–² Better than 21% of models
    This vacuum cleaner is more expensive than the average vacuum cleaner (£250 vs £150).
    £250 vs £150
  • 3.1% worse value for money
    Bagless
    7.42
    â–² Better than 21% of models
    This vacuum cleaner offers worse value for money than the average vacuum cleaner (7.42 vs 7.6).
    7.42 vs 7.65
  • 66.7% more expensive
    Bagless
    £250
    â–² Better than 21% of models
    This vacuum cleaner is more expensive than the average vacuum cleaner (£250 vs £150).
    £250 vs £150
  • 3.1% worse value for money
    Bagless
    7.42
    â–² Better than 21% of models
    This vacuum cleaner offers worse value for money than the average vacuum cleaner (7.42 vs 7.6).
    7.42 vs 7.65
  • 300 W higher power consumption
    Power consumption
    900 W
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws more power than the average vacuum cleaner (900 W vs 600 W).
    900 W vs 600 W
  • No handheld conversion
    2-in-1 design
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not have a 2-in-1 design, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 71.3% higher weight
    Weight
    6.2 kg
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
    This vacuum cleaner is heavier than the average vacuum cleaner (6.2 kg vs 3.62 kg).
    6.2 kg vs 3.62 kg
  • 235 mm deeper body
    Depth
    500 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
    Market range: <170 mm – >440 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is deeper than the average vacuum cleaner (500 mm vs 265 mm).
    500 mm vs 265 mm
  • 35 mm wider body
    Width
    300 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <229 mm – >350 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is wider than the average vacuum cleaner (300 mm vs 265 mm).
    300 mm vs 265 mm

Graphic comparison of Philips 9000 Series Bagless and other vacuum cleaners

No results found

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Philips 9000 Series Bagless?

  • Extremely powerful suction performance driven by PowerCyclone 10 technology
  • Highly efficient TriActive Ultra nozzle that pulls in dirt from all sides in a single pass
  • Excellent multi-surface capability on both hard floors and carpets
  • Super Turbo brush attachment effectively removes embedded pet hair and lint
  • H13 Allergy Filter system captures 99.9% of fine dust, pollen, and pet allergens
  • Convenient suction controls located directly on the ergonomic handle
  • Long power cord reduces the need to frequently switch wall outlets
  • Transparent dust container is straightforward to remove and empty hygienically

What customers dislike about Philips 9000 Series Bagless?

  • The heavy metal wand can cause user shoulder strain during extended cleaning sessions
  • Noticeably bulky and heavy canister design makes it harder to lift or carry up stairs
  • Operational noise level is quite loud during high-power suction modes
  • The large nozzle head can sometimes push a massive pile of debris rather than instantly sucking it up
  • Can be difficult to maneuver or slide smoothly on deeper, thicker pile carpets

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

H
haus-garten-test.de
09/10/2020
Summary of the review
9 canister vacuums tested in 2020
(Translated)Show original
C
consumentenbond.nl
No date available
Summary of the review
Philips 9000 series XB9154/09 - Test, Reviews & Prices
(Translated)Show original

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Compare Philips 9000 Series Bagless with other vacuum cleaners

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)