OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

GRUNDIG VCH 9932 Review | 52 Data compared

Avg. price:~£80Suction power (AW):25 AWBattery runtime:75 minutesCapacity:0.5 LWeight:2.79 kg

GRUNDIG VCH 9932 Review: Compare 52 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Vacuum Cleaners category and whether it is worth buying.

6.8

Overall score

Score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the vacuum cleaner's quality, based on technical analysis and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference for identifying the best vacuum cleaners on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
Score components

80%

6.4

Technical Score

20%

8.1

User score

â–¼Worse than 53% of vacuum-cleaners
6.4

Technical Score

Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
Score components

28%

6.1

Performance

22%

7.4

Battery

18%

6.1

Filtration

14%

5.7

Attachments

10%

7.6

Design

8%

5.2

Smart features

â–¼Worse than 59% of vacuum-cleaners
8.1

User score

User score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 68% of models
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

8.3

Number of reviews

Based on 917 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–²Better than 68% of vacuum-cleaners
  • grundig-vch-9932
  • grundig-vch-9932
  • grundig-vch-9932
grundig-vch-9932
grundig-vch-9932
grundig-vch-9932

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The GRUNDIG VCH 9932 is a versatile 2-in-1 cordless stick and handheld vacuum cleaner featuring a 120-watt motor, a 21.6V lithium-ion battery, and two adjustable suction speeds. Its core characteristics include a 0.5-liter bagless dust container, cyclone separation technology, and a built-in HEPA-10 filtration system. The main pros are its exceptionally long runtime of up to 75 minutes on minimum mode, a space-saving folding handle, integrated accessory storage, and a high-performance motorized turbo brush equipped with LED headlights for dark corners. On the downside, some cons reported by users include a relatively lengthy 5-hour charging time, a loud 83 dB noise emission level, and a suction power that may struggle with heavier debris or deep carpets compared to premium models.

Technical Specifications of vacuum cleaner GRUNDIG VCH 9932

Technical Score
Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
Score components:

28%

6.1

Performance

22%

7.4

Battery

18%

6.1

Filtration

14%

5.7

Attachments

10%

7.6

Design

8%

5.2

Smart features

6.4
GRUNDIG VCH 9932 has a technical score of 6.4 points, which is lower than 59% of vacuum cleaners.
User score
User score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 68% of models
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

8.3

Number of reviews

Based on 917 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.1
GRUNDIG VCH 9932 has a user score of 8.1 points, which is higher than 68.2% of vacuum cleaners.
Popularity
Popularity
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you prefer a vacuum cleaner that has been chosen and reviewed by many other buyers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 75% of models
Popularity:
GRUNDIG VCH 9932 has a popularity score of 8.3 points, which is higher than 75.5% of vacuum cleaners.
8.3
GRUNDIG VCH 9932 has a popularity score of 8.3 points, which is higher than 75.5% of vacuum cleaners.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the vacuum cleaner's overall score with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a vacuum cleaner with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 50% of models
Score components:

60%

6.8

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.7
GRUNDIG VCH 9932 has a value-for-money score of 7.7 points, which is higher than 50.4% of vacuum cleaners.
Suction power (AW)
25 AW
Suction power (AW)
25 AW
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
Market range: <40 AW – >280 AW
This vacuum cleaner has a suction power of 25 AW, which is lower than that of 94.7% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 2.1% of vacuum cleaners.
Suction power (kPa)
25 kPa
Suction power (kPa)
25 kPa
â–² Better than 78% of models
Market range: <11 kPa – >30 kPa
This vacuum cleaner has a suction pressure of 25 kPa, which is higher than that of 78.3% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 3.9% of vacuum cleaners.
Airflow
?
Motor type
brushed
Power consumption
130 W
Power consumption
130 W
★ Better than 93% of models
Market range: <165 W – >899 W
This vacuum cleaner draws 130 W, which is lower than the power consumption of 92.5% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 0.7% of vacuum cleaners.
Show more
Cordless
yes
Cordless
yes
â–² Better than 51% of models
This vacuum cleaner works cordlessly. 49.5% of vacuum cleaners offer cordless operation.
Battery runtime
75 minutes
Battery runtime
75 minutes
★ Better than 90% of models
Market range: <30 minutes – >70 minutes
This vacuum cleaner offers a battery runtime of 75 minutes, which is longer than that of 90.5% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 0.2% of vacuum cleaners.
Charging time
5 hours
Charging time
5 hours
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
Market range: <3 hours – >5 hours
This vacuum cleaner charges in 5 hours, which is slower than 73.8% of vacuum cleaners and equal to 20.4% of vacuum cleaners.
Battery capacity
2000 mAh
Battery capacity
2000 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Market range: <2k mAh – >3.6k mAh
This vacuum cleaner has a battery capacity of 2000 mAh, which is smaller than that of 79.6% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 18.1% of vacuum cleaners.
Battery voltage
21.6 V
Battery voltage
21.6 V
â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
Market range: <18 V – >28.8 V
This vacuum cleaner uses a battery voltage of 21.6 V, which is lower than that of 59.8% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 16.5% of vacuum cleaners.
Show more
Filter class
hepa 10
Filter class
hepa 10
â–² Better than 65% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses filter class hepa 10, which is more advanced than the class used by 65.1% of vacuum cleaners and the same as the class used by 1.4% of vacuum cleaners.
Minimum overall efficiency
85%
Minimum overall efficiency
85%
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
This vacuum cleaner reaches 85% minimum overall efficiency, which is lower than that of 94.6% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 5.4% of vacuum cleaners.
Suitable for allergy sufferers
yes
Suitable for allergy sufferers
yes
â–² Better than 18% of models
This vacuum cleaner is suitable for allergy sufferers. 82.4% of vacuum cleaners are allergy-friendly.
Capacity
0.5 L
Capacity
0.5 L
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
This vacuum cleaner has a dust capacity of 0.5 L, which is smaller than that of 79.8% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 7.5% of vacuum cleaners.
Bagless
yes
Bagless
yes
â–² Better than 21% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses a bagless design. 78.6% of vacuum cleaners use this setup.
Show more
Main brush type
roll brush
Roller type
bristled
Anti-tangle brush
no
Anti-tangle brush
no
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an anti-tangle brush. 25.7% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
Mini motorized brush
no
Mini motorized brush
no
â–¼ Worse than 27% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a mini motorized brush. 26.9% of vacuum cleaners include this attachment.
Suitable for pet owners
no
Suitable for pet owners
no
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for pet owners. 72% of vacuum cleaners handle pet hair well.
Show more
Vacuum type
stick
Weight
2.79 kg
Weight
2.79 kg
â–² Better than 68% of models
Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
This vacuum cleaner weighs 2.79 kg, which is lower than the weight of 68.4% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 0.1% of vacuum cleaners.
2-in-1 design
yes
2-in-1 design
yes
â–² Better than 47% of models
This vacuum cleaner offers a 2-in-1 design. 53% of vacuum cleaners offer this flexible format.
Self-standing
yes
Self-standing
yes
â–² Better than 81% of models
This vacuum cleaner stands on its own. 18.9% of vacuum cleaners offer this convenience.
Adjustable tube height
no
Adjustable tube height
no
â–¼ Worse than 47% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include adjustable tube height. 47.4% of vacuum cleaners offer this ergonomic feature.
Show more
Auto suction adjustment
no
Auto suction adjustment
no
â–¼ Worse than 20% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support automatic suction adjustment. 19.9% of vacuum cleaners support this feature.
Dust particle sensor
no
Dust particle sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 8% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a dust particle sensor. 8% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
LED display
no
LED display
no
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an LED display. 25.9% of vacuum cleaners include this interface feature.
Nozzle light
yes
Nozzle light
yes
â–² Better than 57% of models
This vacuum cleaner includes a nozzle light. 43.4% of vacuum cleaners include this visibility feature.
Mopping support
no
Mopping support
no
â–¼ Worse than 4% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support mopping. 3.7% of vacuum cleaners support this multi-function feature.

GRUNDIG VCH 9932 vs the average vacuum cleaner

246810TotalPerformanceBatteryFiltrationAttachmentsDesignSmart features
  • 25 minutes longer runtime
    Battery runtime
    75 minutes
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    Market range: <30 minutes – >70 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers longer battery runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (75 minutes vs 50 minutes).
    75 minutes vs 50 minutes
  • Cordless operation
    Cordless
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This vacuum cleaner works cordlessly, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 5 kPa higher suction pressure
    Suction power (kPa)
    25 kPa
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <11 kPa – >30 kPa
    This vacuum cleaner has higher suction pressure than the average vacuum cleaner (25 kPa vs 20 kPa).
    25 kPa vs 20 kPa
  • Includes removable battery
    Removable battery
    yes
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a removable battery, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Self-standing design
    Self-standing
    yes
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    This vacuum cleaner stands on its own, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 470 W lower power consumption
    Power consumption
    130 W
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws less power than the average vacuum cleaner (130 W vs 600 W).
    130 W vs 600 W
  • 9 minutes longer turbo runtime
    Turbo mode runtime
    21 minutes
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Market range: <6 minutes – >20 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers longer turbo runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (21 minutes vs 12 minutes).
    21 minutes vs 12 minutes
  • Higher filter class
    Filter class
    hepa 10
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    This vacuum cleaner uses a better filter class than the average vacuum cleaner (hepa 10 vs hepa).
    hepa 10 vs hepa
  • 87.5% cheaper
    GRUNDIG VCH 9932 is cheaper than the average vacuum cleaner (£80 vs £150).
    £80 vs £150
  • 5 kPa higher suction pressure
    Suction power (kPa)
    25 kPa
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <11 kPa – >30 kPa
    This vacuum cleaner has higher suction pressure than the average vacuum cleaner (25 kPa vs 20 kPa).
    25 kPa vs 20 kPa
  • 470 W lower power consumption
    Power consumption
    130 W
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws less power than the average vacuum cleaner (130 W vs 600 W).
    130 W vs 600 W
  • 25 minutes longer runtime
    Battery runtime
    75 minutes
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    Market range: <30 minutes – >70 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers longer battery runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (75 minutes vs 50 minutes).
    75 minutes vs 50 minutes
  • Cordless operation
    Cordless
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This vacuum cleaner works cordlessly, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Includes removable battery
    Removable battery
    yes
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a removable battery, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 9 minutes longer turbo runtime
    Turbo mode runtime
    21 minutes
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Market range: <6 minutes – >20 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers longer turbo runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (21 minutes vs 12 minutes).
    21 minutes vs 12 minutes
  • Includes battery indicator
    Battery level indicator
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a battery level indicator, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Higher filter class
    Filter class
    hepa 10
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    This vacuum cleaner uses a better filter class than the average vacuum cleaner (hepa 10 vs hepa).
    hepa 10 vs hepa
  • Self-standing design
    Self-standing
    yes
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    This vacuum cleaner stands on its own, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 22.9% lower weight
    Weight
    2.79 kg
    â–² Better than 68% of models
    Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
    This vacuum cleaner is lighter than the average vacuum cleaner (2.8 kg vs 3.62 kg).
    2.79 kg vs 3.62 kg
  • Includes nozzle light
    Nozzle light
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a nozzle light, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 125 AW lower suction power
    Suction power (AW)
    25 AW
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <40 AW – >280 AW
    This vacuum cleaner has lower suction power than the average vacuum cleaner (25 AW vs 150 AW).
    25 AW vs 150 AW
  • 14.95 % lower filtration efficiency
    Minimum overall efficiency
    85 %
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
    This vacuum cleaner has lower filtration efficiency than the average vacuum cleaner (85 % vs 99.95 %).
    85 % vs 99.95 %
  • 1 hours slower charging
    Charging time
    5 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <3 hours – >5 hours
    This vacuum cleaner charges slower than the average vacuum cleaner (5 hours vs 4 hours).
    5 hours vs 4 hours
  • Not pet-hair friendly
    Suitable for pet owners
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for pet owners, the average vacuum cleaner is.
  • 500 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    2000 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <2k mAh – >3.6k mAh
    This vacuum cleaner has a smaller battery capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (2000 mAh vs 2500 mAh).
    2,000 mAh vs 2,500 mAh
  • 0.5 L smaller dust container
    Capacity
    0.5 L
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
    This vacuum cleaner has a smaller dust capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (0.5 L vs 1 L).
    0.5 L vs 1 L
  • More operating noise
    Noise level (Min-Max)
    80-80 dB
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    Market range: <65 dB – >83 dB
    This vacuum cleaner is noisier than the average vacuum cleaner (80-80 dB vs 77-77 dB).
    80-80 dB vs 77-77 dB
  • 0.6 V lower voltage
    Battery voltage
    21.6 V
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    Market range: <18 V – >28.8 V
    This vacuum cleaner has a lower battery voltage than the average vacuum cleaner (21.6 V vs 22.2 V).
    21.6 V vs 22.2 V
  • 125 AW lower suction power
    Suction power (AW)
    25 AW
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <40 AW – >280 AW
    This vacuum cleaner has lower suction power than the average vacuum cleaner (25 AW vs 150 AW).
    25 AW vs 150 AW
  • More operating noise
    Noise level (Min-Max)
    80-80 dB
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    Market range: <65 dB – >83 dB
    This vacuum cleaner is noisier than the average vacuum cleaner (80-80 dB vs 77-77 dB).
    80-80 dB vs 77-77 dB
  • 1 hours slower charging
    Charging time
    5 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <3 hours – >5 hours
    This vacuum cleaner charges slower than the average vacuum cleaner (5 hours vs 4 hours).
    5 hours vs 4 hours
  • 500 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    2000 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <2k mAh – >3.6k mAh
    This vacuum cleaner has a smaller battery capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (2000 mAh vs 2500 mAh).
    2,000 mAh vs 2,500 mAh
  • 0.6 V lower voltage
    Battery voltage
    21.6 V
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    Market range: <18 V – >28.8 V
    This vacuum cleaner has a lower battery voltage than the average vacuum cleaner (21.6 V vs 22.2 V).
    21.6 V vs 22.2 V
  • 14.95 % lower filtration efficiency
    Minimum overall efficiency
    85 %
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
    This vacuum cleaner has lower filtration efficiency than the average vacuum cleaner (85 % vs 99.95 %).
    85 % vs 99.95 %
  • 0.5 L smaller dust container
    Capacity
    0.5 L
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
    This vacuum cleaner has a smaller dust capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (0.5 L vs 1 L).
    0.5 L vs 1 L
  • Not pet-hair friendly
    Suitable for pet owners
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for pet owners, the average vacuum cleaner is.
  • 120 mm taller body
    Height
    1,220 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <290 mm – >1.2k mm
    This vacuum cleaner is taller than the average vacuum cleaner (1220 mm vs 1100 mm).
    1,220 mm vs 1,100 mm
  • 80 mm deeper body
    Depth
    345 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    Market range: <170 mm – >440 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is deeper than the average vacuum cleaner (345 mm vs 265 mm).
    345 mm vs 265 mm
  • Older release date
    Release date
    2019
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This vacuum cleaner has an older release date than the average vacuum cleaner (2019 vs 2021).
    Released in August 2019.
    2019 vs 2021

Graphic comparison of GRUNDIG VCH 9932 and other vacuum cleaners

No results found

Third-party reviews

Based on 917 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What customers like about GRUNDIG VCH 9932?

  • Lightweight and easy to handle
  • Convenient 2-in-1 design with an integrated handheld unit
  • Stands upright independently without needing a wall mount
  • Good battery life and decent runtime for small apartments
  • Practical LED lights on the nozzle to see hidden dirt
  • Easy to clean and empty the dust container
  • Reasonable and affordable price point

What customers dislike about GRUNDIG VCH 9932?

  • Suction power can feel weak or insufficient for heavy dirt
  • Does not fold flat enough to comfortably fit deep under low furniture
  • Plastic body components can crack or break fairly easily
  • Small dust collection bin capacity requires frequent emptying
  • Replacement HEPA filters can be difficult to find and expensive
  • Minimal accessories and attachments included in the box

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
tweakers.net
27/10/2024
Summary of the review
Grundig VCH 9932 - twoerden - Product reviews
T
tweakers.net
27/10/2024
Summary of the review
Grundig VCH 9932 - Reviews - Product reviews - Tweakers
(Translated)Show original

Compare GRUNDIG VCH 9932 with other vacuum cleaners

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)