OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

Fakir Starky HSA 222 Review | 52 Data compared

Avg. price:~£120Suction power (AW):?Battery runtime:35 minutesCapacity:0.3 LWeight:1.9 kg

Fakir Starky HSA 222 Review: Compare 52 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Vacuum Cleaners category and whether it is worth buying.

5.8

Overall score

Score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the vacuum cleaner's quality, based on technical analysis and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference for identifying the best vacuum cleaners on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
Score components

80%

5.8

Technical Score

20%

?

User score

â–¼Worse than 97% of vacuum-cleaners
5.8

Technical Score

Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
Score components

28%

4.5

Performance

22%

5.7

Battery

18%

6.8

Filtration

14%

6.5

Attachments

10%

7.8

Design

8%

5.2

Smart features

â–¼Worse than 93% of vacuum-cleaners
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £120
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The Fakir Starky HSA 222 is a 2-in-1 cordless and bagless upright vacuum cleaner featuring a 120W motor and Cyclone Full-Power technology, which ensures consistent suction power across its 0.3-liter dust container. Powered by a 22.2V Lithium-Ion battery, it delivers up to 35 minutes of operating time for dry cleaning and operates quietly below 66 dB. Key advantages include its lightweight 1.9 kg ergonomic design, a detachable handheld unit for flexible use in tight spots, a freestanding storage structure, and an electronic suction brush efficient at capturing pet hair. However, its small 0.3-liter dust capacity requires frequent emptying, and the 35-minute runtime may restrict comprehensive cleaning sessions for larger households.

Technical Specifications of vacuum cleaner Fakir Starky HSA 222

Technical Score
Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
Score components:

28%

4.5

Performance

22%

5.7

Battery

18%

6.8

Filtration

14%

6.5

Attachments

10%

7.8

Design

8%

5.2

Smart features

5.8
Fakir Starky HSA 222 has a technical score of 5.8 points, which is lower than 92.5% of vacuum cleaners.
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you prefer a vacuum cleaner that has been chosen and reviewed by many other buyers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Fakir Starky HSA 222 has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than 61.7% of vacuum cleaners.
1.0
Fakir Starky HSA 222 has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than 61.7% of vacuum cleaners.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the vacuum cleaner's overall score with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a vacuum cleaner with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components:

60%

5.8

Overall score

40%

9.9

Price

7.1
Fakir Starky HSA 222 has a value-for-money score of 7.1 points, which is lower than 92.5% of vacuum cleaners.
Suction power (AW)
?
Suction power (kPa)
6 kPa
Suction power (kPa)
6 kPa
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Market range: <11 kPa – >30 kPa
This vacuum cleaner has a suction pressure of 6 kPa, which is lower than that of 98.6% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 0.5% of vacuum cleaners.
Airflow
10.83 L/s
Airflow
10.83 L/s
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
Market range: <16.5 L/s – >52 L/s
This vacuum cleaner delivers 10.83 L/s airflow, which is lower than that of 97.1% of vacuum cleaners.
Motor type
brushed
Power consumption
120 W
Power consumption
120 W
★ Better than 93% of models
Market range: <165 W – >899 W
This vacuum cleaner draws 120 W, which is lower than the power consumption of 93.5% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 1.5% of vacuum cleaners.
Show more
Cordless
yes
Cordless
yes
â–² Better than 51% of models
This vacuum cleaner works cordlessly. 49.5% of vacuum cleaners offer cordless operation.
Battery runtime
35 minutes
Battery runtime
35 minutes
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
Market range: <30 minutes – >70 minutes
This vacuum cleaner offers a battery runtime of 35 minutes, which is shorter than that of 82.9% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 6% of vacuum cleaners.
Charging time
4.25 hours
Charging time
4.25 hours
â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
Market range: <3 hours – >5 hours
This vacuum cleaner charges in 4.25 hours, which is slower than 57.9% of vacuum cleaners and equal to 6.5% of vacuum cleaners.
Battery capacity
2,150 mAh
Battery capacity
2,150 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
Market range: <2k mAh – >3.6k mAh
This vacuum cleaner has a battery capacity of 2,150 mAh, which is smaller than that of 77.1% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 0.8% of vacuum cleaners.
Battery voltage
22.2 V
Battery voltage
22.2 V
â–² Better than 45% of models
Market range: <18 V – >28.8 V
This vacuum cleaner uses a battery voltage of 22.2 V, which is higher than that of 45.1% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 11% of vacuum cleaners.
Show more
Filter class
hepa
Filter class
hepa
â–¼ Worse than 38% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses filter class hepa, which is more advanced than the class used by 16% of vacuum cleaners and the same as the class used by 46% of vacuum cleaners.
Minimum overall efficiency
95%
Minimum overall efficiency
95%
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
This vacuum cleaner reaches 95% minimum overall efficiency, which is lower than that of 89.4% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 5% of vacuum cleaners.
Suitable for allergy sufferers
yes
Suitable for allergy sufferers
yes
â–² Better than 18% of models
This vacuum cleaner is suitable for allergy sufferers. 82.4% of vacuum cleaners are allergy-friendly.
Capacity
0.3 L
Capacity
0.3 L
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
This vacuum cleaner has a dust capacity of 0.3 L, which is smaller than that of 96% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 3.1% of vacuum cleaners.
Bagless
yes
Bagless
yes
â–² Better than 21% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses a bagless design. 78.6% of vacuum cleaners use this setup.
Show more
Main brush type
roll brush
Roller type
bristled
Anti-tangle brush
no
Anti-tangle brush
no
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an anti-tangle brush. 25.7% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
Mini motorized brush
no
Mini motorized brush
no
â–¼ Worse than 27% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a mini motorized brush. 26.9% of vacuum cleaners include this attachment.
Suitable for pet owners
yes
Suitable for pet owners
yes
â–² Better than 28% of models
This vacuum cleaner is suitable for pet owners. 72% of vacuum cleaners handle pet hair well.
Show more
Vacuum type
stick
Weight
1.9 kg
Weight
1.9 kg
★ Better than 93% of models
Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
This vacuum cleaner weighs 1.9 kg, which is lower than the weight of 93% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 0.4% of vacuum cleaners.
2-in-1 design
yes
2-in-1 design
yes
â–² Better than 47% of models
This vacuum cleaner offers a 2-in-1 design. 53% of vacuum cleaners offer this flexible format.
Self-standing
yes
Self-standing
yes
â–² Better than 81% of models
This vacuum cleaner stands on its own. 18.9% of vacuum cleaners offer this convenience.
Adjustable tube height
no
Adjustable tube height
no
â–¼ Worse than 47% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include adjustable tube height. 47.4% of vacuum cleaners offer this ergonomic feature.
Show more
Auto suction adjustment
no
Auto suction adjustment
no
â–¼ Worse than 20% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support automatic suction adjustment. 19.9% of vacuum cleaners support this feature.
Dust particle sensor
no
Dust particle sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 8% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a dust particle sensor. 8% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
LED display
no
LED display
no
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an LED display. 25.9% of vacuum cleaners include this interface feature.
Nozzle light
yes
Nozzle light
yes
â–² Better than 57% of models
This vacuum cleaner includes a nozzle light. 43.4% of vacuum cleaners include this visibility feature.
Mopping support
no
Mopping support
no
â–¼ Worse than 4% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support mopping. 3.7% of vacuum cleaners support this multi-function feature.

Fakir Starky HSA 222 vs the average vacuum cleaner

246810TotalPerformanceBatteryFiltrationAttachmentsDesignSmart features
  • Cordless operation
    Cordless
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This vacuum cleaner works cordlessly, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 47.5% lower weight
    Weight
    1.9 kg
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
    This vacuum cleaner is lighter than the average vacuum cleaner (1.9 kg vs 3.62 kg).
    1.9 kg vs 3.62 kg
  • Self-standing design
    Self-standing
    yes
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    This vacuum cleaner stands on its own, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 480 W lower power consumption
    Power consumption
    120 W
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws less power than the average vacuum cleaner (120 W vs 600 W).
    120 W vs 600 W
  • 13 minutes longer turbo runtime
    Turbo mode runtime
    25 minutes
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Market range: <6 minutes – >20 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers longer turbo runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (25 minutes vs 12 minutes).
    25 minutes vs 12 minutes
  • Includes nozzle light
    Nozzle light
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a nozzle light, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Includes battery indicator
    Battery level indicator
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a battery level indicator, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 480 W lower power consumption
    Power consumption
    120 W
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws less power than the average vacuum cleaner (120 W vs 600 W).
    120 W vs 600 W
  • Cordless operation
    Cordless
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This vacuum cleaner works cordlessly, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 13 minutes longer turbo runtime
    Turbo mode runtime
    25 minutes
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Market range: <6 minutes – >20 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers longer turbo runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (25 minutes vs 12 minutes).
    25 minutes vs 12 minutes
  • Includes battery indicator
    Battery level indicator
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a battery level indicator, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 47.5% lower weight
    Weight
    1.9 kg
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
    This vacuum cleaner is lighter than the average vacuum cleaner (1.9 kg vs 3.62 kg).
    1.9 kg vs 3.62 kg
  • Self-standing design
    Self-standing
    yes
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    This vacuum cleaner stands on its own, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Includes nozzle light
    Nozzle light
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a nozzle light, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 14 kPa lower suction pressure
    Suction power (kPa)
    6 kPa
    â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
    Market range: <11 kPa – >30 kPa
    This vacuum cleaner has lower suction pressure than the average vacuum cleaner (6 kPa vs 20 kPa).
    6 kPa vs 20 kPa
  • 15 minutes shorter runtime
    Battery runtime
    35 minutes
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <30 minutes – >70 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers shorter battery runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (35 minutes vs 50 minutes).
    35 minutes vs 50 minutes
  • 16.97 L/s lower airflow
    Airflow
    10.83 L/s
    â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
    Market range: <16.5 L/s – >52 L/s
    This vacuum cleaner delivers lower airflow than the average vacuum cleaner (10.8 L/s vs 27.8 L/s).
    10.83 L/s vs 27.8 L/s
  • 0.7 L smaller dust container
    Capacity
    0.3 L
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
    This vacuum cleaner has a smaller dust capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (0.3 L vs 1 L).
    0.3 L vs 1 L
  • 4.95 % lower filtration efficiency
    Minimum overall efficiency
    95 %
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
    This vacuum cleaner has lower filtration efficiency than the average vacuum cleaner (95 % vs 99.95 %).
    95 % vs 99.95 %
  • 350 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    2,150 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
    Market range: <2k mAh – >3.6k mAh
    This vacuum cleaner has a smaller battery capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (2150 mAh vs 2500 mAh).
    2,150 mAh vs 2,500 mAh
  • No upholstery nozzle
    Upholstery nozzle
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not include an upholstery nozzle, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • More operating noise
    Noise level (Min-Max)
    66-80 dB
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    Market range: <65 dB – >83 dB
    This vacuum cleaner is noisier than the average vacuum cleaner (66-80 dB vs 77-77 dB).
    66-80 dB vs 77-77 dB
  • 8.4% worse value for money
    Fakir Starky HSA 222 offers worse value for money than the average vacuum cleaner (7.06 vs 7.6).
    7.06 vs 7.65
  • 14 kPa lower suction pressure
    Suction power (kPa)
    6 kPa
    â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
    Market range: <11 kPa – >30 kPa
    This vacuum cleaner has lower suction pressure than the average vacuum cleaner (6 kPa vs 20 kPa).
    6 kPa vs 20 kPa
  • 16.97 L/s lower airflow
    Airflow
    10.83 L/s
    â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
    Market range: <16.5 L/s – >52 L/s
    This vacuum cleaner delivers lower airflow than the average vacuum cleaner (10.8 L/s vs 27.8 L/s).
    10.83 L/s vs 27.8 L/s
  • More operating noise
    Noise level (Min-Max)
    66-80 dB
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    Market range: <65 dB – >83 dB
    This vacuum cleaner is noisier than the average vacuum cleaner (66-80 dB vs 77-77 dB).
    66-80 dB vs 77-77 dB
  • 1 fewer power levels
    Number of speeds
    1
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <1 – >4
    This vacuum cleaner offers fewer speed levels than the average vacuum cleaner (1 vs 2).
    1 vs 2
  • 48 mm narrower cleaning path
    Cleaning path width
    212 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <230 mm – >309 mm
    This vacuum cleaner has a narrower cleaning path than the average vacuum cleaner (212 mm vs 260 mm).
    212 mm vs 260 mm
  • 15 minutes shorter runtime
    Battery runtime
    35 minutes
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <30 minutes – >70 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers shorter battery runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (35 minutes vs 50 minutes).
    35 minutes vs 50 minutes
  • 350 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    2,150 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
    Market range: <2k mAh – >3.6k mAh
    This vacuum cleaner has a smaller battery capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (2150 mAh vs 2500 mAh).
    2,150 mAh vs 2,500 mAh
  • 0.25 hours slower charging
    Charging time
    4.25 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    Market range: <3 hours – >5 hours
    This vacuum cleaner charges slower than the average vacuum cleaner (4.3 hours vs 4 hours).
    4.25 hours vs 4 hours
  • 0.7 L smaller dust container
    Capacity
    0.3 L
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
    This vacuum cleaner has a smaller dust capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (0.3 L vs 1 L).
    0.3 L vs 1 L
  • 4.95 % lower filtration efficiency
    Minimum overall efficiency
    95 %
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
    This vacuum cleaner has lower filtration efficiency than the average vacuum cleaner (95 % vs 99.95 %).
    95 % vs 99.95 %
  • No upholstery nozzle
    Upholstery nozzle
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not include an upholstery nozzle, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 35 mm wider body
    Width
    300 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <229 mm – >350 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is wider than the average vacuum cleaner (300 mm vs 265 mm).
    300 mm vs 265 mm
  • Older release date
    Release date
    2018
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This vacuum cleaner has an older release date than the average vacuum cleaner (2018 vs 2021).
    2018 vs 2021
  • 35 mm deeper body
    Depth
    300 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <170 mm – >440 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is deeper than the average vacuum cleaner (300 mm vs 265 mm).
    300 mm vs 265 mm

Graphic comparison of Fakir Starky HSA 222 and other vacuum cleaners

No results found

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Fakir Starky HSA 222?

  • Convenient 2-in-1 design easily converts from a stick to a handheld vacuum cleaner.
  • Lightweight build making it easy to maneuver around the house or inside cars.
  • Effective at picking up pet hair using the specialized motorized electric suction brush.
  • Bagless dust bin is straightforward to detach, empty, and clean.
  • Self-standing design allows it to be stored upright in corners without needing a wall mount.
  • Cyclone technology provides consistent suction power even as the dust bin fills up.
  • Includes helpful accessories like a 2-in-1 crevice tool and a soft-bristled floor nozzle for hard surfaces.

What customers dislike about Fakir Starky HSA 222?

  • Battery runtime of around 35 minutes can be insufficient for deep cleaning larger homes.
  • Relatively long battery charging time of approximately 4 to 5 hours.
  • Dust container capacity is quite small at only 0.3 to 0.5 liters, requiring frequent emptying.
  • The 80 dBA noise level can feel somewhat loud during operation.
  • Some long-term users report concerns regarding the build quality of plastic parts and difficulty sourcing official replacement components.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Compare Fakir Starky HSA 222 with other vacuum cleaners

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)