OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

Cecotec Conga ThunderBrush 820 Review | 52 Data compared

Avg. price:~£80Suction power (AW):?Battery runtime:65 minutesCapacity:0.7 LWeight:3.8 kg

Cecotec Conga ThunderBrush 820 Review: Compare 52 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Vacuum Cleaners category and whether it is worth buying.

7.5

Overall score

Score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the vacuum cleaner's quality, based on technical analysis and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference for identifying the best vacuum cleaners on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 77% of models
Score components

80%

7.5

Technical Score

20%

?

User score

â–²Better than 77% of vacuum-cleaners
7.5

Technical Score

Technical score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 78% of models
Score components

28%

7.2

Performance

22%

8.8

Battery

18%

8.2

Filtration

14%

6.6

Attachments

10%

6.9

Design

8%

6.1

Smart features

â–²Better than 78% of vacuum-cleaners
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £80
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The Cecotec Conga ThunderBrush 820 is a 3-in-1 cordless vacuum cleaner featuring vertical, broom, and handheld capabilities powered by a 29.6 V lithium-ion battery and 130 W motor. Main characteristics include a bagless design with cyclonic technology, a high-efficiency HEPA cartridge filter, a 0.7-litre dust capacity, and an integrated motorized central brush. Notable pros are its ergonomic 360-degree balanced design for high surfaces, a relatively long runtime of up to 65 minutes on Eco mode, and an operating noise level capped at 78 dB. However, major cons include a substantial weight of 3.84 kg that can cause hand fatigue, a standard 4-to-5-hour recharge cycle, and reduced runtime on Turbo mode.

Technical Specifications of vacuum cleaner Cecotec Conga ThunderBrush 820

Technical Score
Technical score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 78% of models
Score components:

28%

7.2

Performance

22%

8.8

Battery

18%

8.2

Filtration

14%

6.6

Attachments

10%

6.9

Design

8%

6.1

Smart features

7.5
Cecotec Conga ThunderBrush 820 has a technical score of 7.5 points, which is higher than 78% of vacuum cleaners.
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you prefer a vacuum cleaner that has been chosen and reviewed by many other buyers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Cecotec Conga ThunderBrush 820 has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than 61.7% of vacuum cleaners.
1.0
Cecotec Conga ThunderBrush 820 has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than 61.7% of vacuum cleaners.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the vacuum cleaner's overall score with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a vacuum cleaner with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 88% of models
Score components:

60%

7.5

Overall score

40%

10

Price

8.3
Cecotec Conga ThunderBrush 820 has a value-for-money score of 8.3 points, which is higher than 88% of vacuum cleaners.
Suction power (AW)
?
Suction power (kPa)
16 kPa
Suction power (kPa)
16 kPa
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Market range: <11 kPa – >30 kPa
This vacuum cleaner has a suction pressure of 16 kPa, which is lower than that of 72.4% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 2.1% of vacuum cleaners.
Airflow
?
Motor type
brushed
Power consumption
130 W
Power consumption
130 W
★ Better than 93% of models
Market range: <165 W – >899 W
This vacuum cleaner draws 130 W, which is lower than the power consumption of 92.5% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 0.7% of vacuum cleaners.
Show more
Cordless
yes
Cordless
yes
â–² Better than 51% of models
This vacuum cleaner works cordlessly. 49.5% of vacuum cleaners offer cordless operation.
Battery runtime
65 minutes
Battery runtime
65 minutes
â–² Better than 86% of models
Market range: <30 minutes – >70 minutes
This vacuum cleaner offers a battery runtime of 65 minutes, which is longer than that of 85.8% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 2% of vacuum cleaners.
Charging time
3 hours
Charging time
3 hours
â–² Better than 88% of models
Market range: <3 hours – >5 hours
This vacuum cleaner charges in 3 hours, which is faster than 87.7% of vacuum cleaners and equal to 6.7% of vacuum cleaners.
Battery capacity
2,200 mAh
Battery capacity
2,200 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
Market range: <2k mAh – >3.6k mAh
This vacuum cleaner has a battery capacity of 2,200 mAh, which is smaller than that of 57.5% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 19.3% of vacuum cleaners.
Battery voltage
29.6 V
Battery voltage
29.6 V
★ Better than 91% of models
Market range: <18 V – >28.8 V
This vacuum cleaner uses a battery voltage of 29.6 V, which is higher than that of 91.2% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 5.9% of vacuum cleaners.
Show more
Filter class
hepa
Filter class
hepa
â–¼ Worse than 38% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses filter class hepa, which is more advanced than the class used by 16% of vacuum cleaners and the same as the class used by 46% of vacuum cleaners.
Minimum overall efficiency
99.97%
Minimum overall efficiency
99.97%
â–² Better than 59% of models
Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
This vacuum cleaner reaches 99.97% minimum overall efficiency, which is higher than that of 59.1% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 19.4% of vacuum cleaners.
Suitable for allergy sufferers
yes
Suitable for allergy sufferers
yes
â–² Better than 18% of models
This vacuum cleaner is suitable for allergy sufferers. 82.4% of vacuum cleaners are allergy-friendly.
Capacity
0.7 L
Capacity
0.7 L
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
This vacuum cleaner has a dust capacity of 0.7 L, which is smaller than that of 62.8% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 5.9% of vacuum cleaners.
Bagless
yes
Bagless
yes
â–² Better than 21% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses a bagless design. 78.6% of vacuum cleaners use this setup.
Show more
Main brush type
roll brush
Roller type
bristled
Anti-tangle brush
no
Anti-tangle brush
no
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an anti-tangle brush. 25.7% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
Mini motorized brush
no
Mini motorized brush
no
â–¼ Worse than 27% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a mini motorized brush. 26.9% of vacuum cleaners include this attachment.
Suitable for pet owners
yes
Suitable for pet owners
yes
â–² Better than 28% of models
This vacuum cleaner is suitable for pet owners. 72% of vacuum cleaners handle pet hair well.
Show more
Vacuum type
stick
Weight
3.8 kg
Weight
3.8 kg
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
This vacuum cleaner weighs 3.8 kg, which is greater than the weight of 52.8% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 1.1% of vacuum cleaners.
2-in-1 design
yes
2-in-1 design
yes
â–² Better than 47% of models
This vacuum cleaner offers a 2-in-1 design. 53% of vacuum cleaners offer this flexible format.
Self-standing
no
Self-standing
no
â–¼ Worse than 19% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not stand on its own. 18.9% of vacuum cleaners offer this convenience.
Adjustable tube height
no
Adjustable tube height
no
â–¼ Worse than 47% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include adjustable tube height. 47.4% of vacuum cleaners offer this ergonomic feature.
Show more
Auto suction adjustment
no
Auto suction adjustment
no
â–¼ Worse than 20% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support automatic suction adjustment. 19.9% of vacuum cleaners support this feature.
Dust particle sensor
no
Dust particle sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 8% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a dust particle sensor. 8% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
LED display
yes
LED display
yes
â–² Better than 74% of models
This vacuum cleaner includes an LED display. 25.9% of vacuum cleaners include this interface feature.
Nozzle light
yes
Nozzle light
yes
â–² Better than 57% of models
This vacuum cleaner includes a nozzle light. 43.4% of vacuum cleaners include this visibility feature.
Mopping support
no
Mopping support
no
â–¼ Worse than 4% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support mopping. 3.7% of vacuum cleaners support this multi-function feature.

Cecotec Conga ThunderBrush 820 vs the average vacuum cleaner

246810TotalPerformanceBatteryFiltrationAttachmentsDesignSmart features
  • 15 minutes longer runtime
    Battery runtime
    65 minutes
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    Market range: <30 minutes – >70 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers longer battery runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (65 minutes vs 50 minutes).
    65 minutes vs 50 minutes
  • Cordless operation
    Cordless
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This vacuum cleaner works cordlessly, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 1 hours faster charging
    Charging time
    3 hours
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    Market range: <3 hours – >5 hours
    This vacuum cleaner charges faster than the average vacuum cleaner (3 hours vs 4 hours).
    3 hours vs 4 hours
  • Includes removable battery
    Removable battery
    yes
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a removable battery, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 470 W lower power consumption
    Power consumption
    130 W
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws less power than the average vacuum cleaner (130 W vs 600 W).
    130 W vs 600 W
  • 7.4 V higher voltage
    Battery voltage
    29.6 V
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <18 V – >28.8 V
    This vacuum cleaner has a higher battery voltage than the average vacuum cleaner (29.6 V vs 22.2 V).
    29.6 V vs 22.2 V
  • Includes nozzle light
    Nozzle light
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a nozzle light, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Includes LED display
    LED display
    yes
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes an LED display, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 8.1% better value for money
    Cecotec Conga ThunderBrush 820 offers better value for money than the average vacuum cleaner (8.27 vs 7.6).
    8.27 vs 7.65
  • 87.5% cheaper
    Cecotec Conga ThunderBrush 820 is cheaper than the average vacuum cleaner (£80 vs £150).
    £80 vs £150
  • 470 W lower power consumption
    Power consumption
    130 W
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws less power than the average vacuum cleaner (130 W vs 600 W).
    130 W vs 600 W
  • 15 minutes longer runtime
    Battery runtime
    65 minutes
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    Market range: <30 minutes – >70 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers longer battery runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (65 minutes vs 50 minutes).
    65 minutes vs 50 minutes
  • Cordless operation
    Cordless
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This vacuum cleaner works cordlessly, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 1 hours faster charging
    Charging time
    3 hours
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    Market range: <3 hours – >5 hours
    This vacuum cleaner charges faster than the average vacuum cleaner (3 hours vs 4 hours).
    3 hours vs 4 hours
  • Includes removable battery
    Removable battery
    yes
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a removable battery, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 7.4 V higher voltage
    Battery voltage
    29.6 V
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <18 V – >28.8 V
    This vacuum cleaner has a higher battery voltage than the average vacuum cleaner (29.6 V vs 22.2 V).
    29.6 V vs 22.2 V
  • Includes battery indicator
    Battery level indicator
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a battery level indicator, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 3 minutes longer turbo runtime
    Turbo mode runtime
    15 minutes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    Market range: <6 minutes – >20 minutes
    This vacuum cleaner offers longer turbo runtime than the average vacuum cleaner (15 minutes vs 12 minutes).
    15 minutes vs 12 minutes
  • 0.02 % higher filtration efficiency
    Minimum overall efficiency
    99.97 %
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
    This vacuum cleaner has higher filtration efficiency than the average vacuum cleaner (100 % vs 99.95 %).
    99.97 % vs 99.95 %
  • Includes wall bracket
    Wall-mounted bracket
    yes
    â–² Better than 64% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a wall-mounted bracket, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 72 mm shallower body
    Depth
    193 mm
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <170 mm – >440 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is less deep than the average vacuum cleaner (193 mm vs 265 mm).
    193 mm vs 265 mm
  • Includes nozzle light
    Nozzle light
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a nozzle light, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Includes LED display
    LED display
    yes
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes an LED display, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 4 kPa lower suction pressure
    Suction power (kPa)
    16 kPa
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <11 kPa – >30 kPa
    This vacuum cleaner has lower suction pressure than the average vacuum cleaner (16 kPa vs 20 kPa).
    16 kPa vs 20 kPa
  • 300 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    2,200 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    Market range: <2k mAh – >3.6k mAh
    This vacuum cleaner has a smaller battery capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (2200 mAh vs 2500 mAh).
    2,200 mAh vs 2,500 mAh
  • No soft dusting brush
    Soft dusting brush
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not include a soft dusting brush, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 0.3 L smaller dust container
    Capacity
    0.7 L
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
    This vacuum cleaner has a smaller dust capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (0.7 L vs 1 L).
    0.7 L vs 1 L
  • More operating noise
    Noise level (Min-Max)
    78-78 dB
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    Market range: <65 dB – >83 dB
    This vacuum cleaner is noisier than the average vacuum cleaner (78-78 dB vs 77-77 dB).
    78-78 dB vs 77-77 dB
  • Older release date
    Release date
    2018
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This vacuum cleaner has an older release date than the average vacuum cleaner (2018 vs 2021).
    2018 vs 2021
  • 4 kPa lower suction pressure
    Suction power (kPa)
    16 kPa
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <11 kPa – >30 kPa
    This vacuum cleaner has lower suction pressure than the average vacuum cleaner (16 kPa vs 20 kPa).
    16 kPa vs 20 kPa
  • More operating noise
    Noise level (Min-Max)
    78-78 dB
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    Market range: <65 dB – >83 dB
    This vacuum cleaner is noisier than the average vacuum cleaner (78-78 dB vs 77-77 dB).
    78-78 dB vs 77-77 dB
  • 300 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    2,200 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    Market range: <2k mAh – >3.6k mAh
    This vacuum cleaner has a smaller battery capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (2200 mAh vs 2500 mAh).
    2,200 mAh vs 2,500 mAh
  • 0.3 L smaller dust container
    Capacity
    0.7 L
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
    This vacuum cleaner has a smaller dust capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (0.7 L vs 1 L).
    0.7 L vs 1 L
  • No soft dusting brush
    Soft dusting brush
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not include a soft dusting brush, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • Older release date
    Release date
    2018
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This vacuum cleaner has an older release date than the average vacuum cleaner (2018 vs 2021).
    2018 vs 2021

Graphic comparison of Cecotec Conga ThunderBrush 820 and other vacuum cleaners

No results found

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Cecotec Conga ThunderBrush 820?

  • Good suction power on hard floors and basic rugs
  • Highly affordable and budget-friendly pricing
  • Versatile 3-in-1 design working as an upright, broom, and handheld vacuum
  • Lightweight and highly maneuverable with its 360-degree head rotation
  • Bagless design makes it quick and easy to empty the dust container

What customers dislike about Cecotec Conga ThunderBrush 820?

  • Battery life degrades quickly over time and rarely reaches the advertised runtime
  • Long battery charging cycles relative to the actual operational cleaning time
  • Dust container filter clogs easily with fine particles and requires frequent cleaning
  • Emptying the dust bin can be messy and accidentally disperse dust back into the air
  • Customer support and warranty repairs from the manufacturer can be slow or unhelpful

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Compare Cecotec Conga ThunderBrush 820 with other vacuum cleaners

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)