OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Se WiFi (4GB + 128GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£140RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:128 GBScreen size:11 inchesChipset:Qualcomm Snapdragon 680

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Se WiFi (4GB + 128GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Se WiFi (4GB + 128GB)
7.2/10

Overall score

Score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 71% of models
Score components

90%

6.9

Technical score

10%

9.5

User score

â–²Better than 71% of tablets
7.9

Value for money

Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 80% of models
Score components

70%

7.2

Overall score

30%

9.8

Price

â–²Better than 80%
6.9

Technical score

Technical score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 68% of models
Score components

22%

6.3

Performance

20%

6.2

Display

16%

7.0

Camera

14%

7.5

Battery

12%

6.8

Connectivity

8%

8.8

Software & Features

5%

6.7

Design

3%

8.2

Audio & Multimedia

â–²Better than 68%
9.5

User score

User score
9.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 96% of models
Score components

70%

9.2

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
★Better than 96%
  • xiaomi-redmi-pad-se-4gb-128gb-wifi
  • xiaomi-redmi-pad-se-4gb-128gb-wifi
  • xiaomi-redmi-pad-se-4gb-128gb-wifi
  • xiaomi-redmi-pad-se-4gb-128gb-wifi
xiaomi-redmi-pad-se-4gb-128gb-wifi
xiaomi-redmi-pad-se-4gb-128gb-wifi
xiaomi-redmi-pad-se-4gb-128gb-wifi
xiaomi-redmi-pad-se-4gb-128gb-wifi
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
4GB + 128GB4GB + 64GBCheck price6GB + 128GBCheck price8GB + 128GBCheck price8GB + 256GBCheck price
Loading category ranking...

Tablets model ranking

Ranked #147 of 1,145 models in Tablets (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of tablet Xiaomi Redmi Pad Se WiFi (4GB + 128GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 68% of models
Score components:

22%

6.3

Performance

20%

6.2

Display

16%

7.0

Camera

14%

7.5

Battery

12%

6.8

Connectivity

8%

8.8

Software & Features

5%

6.7

Design

3%

8.2

Audio & Multimedia

6.9
User score
User score
9.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 96% of models
Score components

70%

9.2

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
9.5
Popularity
Popularity
10/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models
Popularity:
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Se WiFi (4GB + 128GB) has a user popularity of 10 points, which is lower than 91.8% of Tablets.
10
Value for money
Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 80% of models
Score components:

70%

7.2

Overall score

30%

9.8

Price

7.9
RAM capacity
4 GB
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 4 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 47.6% of tablets and equal to that of 17.6% of tablets.
Process node
6 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 6 nm process node, which is smaller than the node size used in 76.4% of tablets and equal to the node used in 8.2% of tablets.
Internal storage
128 GB
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 128 GB which is larger than the storage of 56.7% of tablets and equal to that of 19.6% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
414 points
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scored 414 points in Geekbench 6 (single-core) which is lower than the score of 69.2% of tablets and equal to the score of 0.6% of tablets.
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 chipset, which is more advanced than the chipsets in 58.7% of tablets and equal to those in 1.8% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1920×1200
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1920×1200 which is higher than that of 39.2% of tablets and equal to that of 18.8% of tablets.
Refresh rate
90 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 90 Hz which is higher than in 73.8% of tablets and equal to that in 6.5% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
207 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 207 ppi which is lower than that of 59% of tablets and equal to that of 1.9% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass 5
This tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass 5 display glass which is stronger than that on 93.8% of tablets and equal to that on 5.8% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than that of 36.5% of tablets and equal to that of 31.8% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
5 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 5 MP which is higher than in 48.8% of tablets and equal to that in 19.6% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.0
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.0 which is wider than that of 57.5% of tablets and equal to that of 24.5% of tablets.
Optical zoom
N/A
Show more
Battery capacity
8,000 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 8,000 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 70.6% of tablets and equal to those in 3.9% of tablets.
Charging speed
18 W
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 18 W which is faster than in 48% of tablets and equal to speeds in 12.3% of tablets.
Battery life
14 hours
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 14 hours, which is longer than that of 81.5% of tablets and equal to that of 3.5% of tablets.
video playback
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 50.4% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
yes
This tablet supports LTE. 36.8% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
no
This tablet does not support GPS. 82.7% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
medium
This tablet offers medium update support, which is longer than the support period of 47.3% of tablets and equal to that of 32.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
yes
This tablet includes app tracking protection. 71.8% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
IP52
This tablet has an IP rating of IP52 which is higher than that of 85% of tablets and equal to that of 6.2% of tablets.
Weight
478 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 478 g which is lighter than 55% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.3% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
1
Market range: <0 – >5
This tablet includes 1 microphones, which is more than in 0.2% of tablets and equal to the number in 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
yes
This tablet supports Dolby Atmos. 68.6% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
4
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 4 speakers, which is more than in 70.9% of tablets and equal to the number in 22.7% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Se WiFi (4GB + 128GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • 4 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (14 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    14 hours vs 10 hours
  • 50% higher refresh rate
    This tablet has a higher refresh rate than the average tablet (90 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average tablet has refresh rate of 60 Hz.
    90 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Better GPU
    This tablet uses the Adreno 610 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 610 vs Mali-G51
  • Supports adaptive refresh rate
    This tablet has adaptive refresh rate, the average tablet does not. 17.6% of tablets support adaptive refresh rate.
  • Supports fast charging
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • 2 more speakers
    This tablet has more speakers than the average tablet (4 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    4 vs 2
  • Higher IP rating
    This tablet has a better IP rating than the average tablet (IP52 vs not rated). Water and dust protection are still uncommon on tablets.
    IP52 vs not rated
  • 18.3% higher user score
    User score
    9.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Xiaomi Redmi Pad Se WiFi
    the average tablet
    Xiaomi Redmi Pad Se WiFi (4GB + 128GB) has a higher user score than the average tablet (9.47 vs 8.000).
    9.47 vs 8
  • 2.08x more popular
    Xiaomi Redmi Pad Se WiFi (4GB + 128GB) is more popular than the average tablet (10 vs 4.8).
    10 vs 4.81
  • 85.7% cheaper
    Xiaomi Redmi Pad Se WiFi (4GB + 128GB) is cheaper than the average tablet (£140 vs £260).
    £140 vs £260
  • 11.9% better value for money
    Xiaomi Redmi Pad Se WiFi (4GB + 128GB) has better value for money than the average tablet (7.94 vs 7.1).
    7.94 vs 7.1
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Better GPU
    This tablet uses the Adreno 610 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 610 vs Mali-G51
  • 20% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 57.1% smaller process node
    This tablet uses a smaller process node than the average tablet (6 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    6 nm vs 14 nm
  • Newer DDR memory version
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3
  • 2x more storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (128 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    128 GB vs 64 GB
  • 2 more CPU threads
    This tablet has more CPU threads than the average tablet (8 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    8 vs 6
  • 50% higher refresh rate
    This tablet has a higher refresh rate than the average tablet (90 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average tablet has refresh rate of 60 Hz.
    90 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • Supports adaptive refresh rate
    This tablet has adaptive refresh rate, the average tablet does not. 17.6% of tablets support adaptive refresh rate.
  • 0.9 inches larger screen size
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (11 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    11 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Higher contrast ratio
    This tablet has a higher contrast ratio than the average tablet (1500:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet contrast ratio is 1015:1.
    1,500:1 vs 1,015:1
  • More durable display glass
    This tablet uses better display glass than the average tablet (Corning Gorilla Glass 5 vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 5 vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • 50% higher touch sampling rate
    This tablet has a higher touch sampling rate than the average tablet (180 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet has touch sampling rate of 120 Hz.
    180 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This tablet has a better main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Supports slow-motion recording
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, the average tablet does not. 37.5% of tablets offer slow-mo.
  • 4 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (14 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    14 hours vs 10 hours
  • Supports fast charging
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • 21.6% larger battery capacity
    This tablet has a higher battery capacity than the average tablet (8,000 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    8,000 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • Supports live text recognition
    This tablet supports live text recognition, the average tablet does not. 34.9% of tablets can recognize text from images.
  • Includes app tracking protection
    This tablet includes app tracking protection, the average tablet does not. 28.3% of tablets offer app tracking protection.
  • Supports dynamic theme
    This tablet features dynamic themes, the average tablet does not. 29% of tablets offer dynamic theming.
  • Supports extra dim mode
    This tablet features extra dim mode, the average tablet does not. 35.4% of tablets support extra diming.
  • Includes clipboard warnings
    This tablet has clipboard warnings, the average tablet does not. 39.9% of tablets include clipboard warnings.
  • Higher IP rating
    This tablet has a better IP rating than the average tablet (IP52 vs not rated). Water and dust protection are still uncommon on tablets.
    IP52 vs not rated
  • 4 newer release date
    This tablet has a newer release date than the average tablet (2023 vs 2019).
    August 2023
    2023 vs 2019
  • 0.64 mm thinner
    This tablet is thinner than the average tablet (7.4 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    7.36 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • 2 more speakers
    This tablet has more speakers than the average tablet (4 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    4 vs 2
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
    This tablet supports Dolby Atmos, the average tablet does not. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
  • Supports LDAC
    This tablet supports LDAC, the average tablet does not. 25.2% of tablets support LDAC.
  • No GPS
    This tablet does not have GPS, the average tablet does. 82.7% of tablets feature GPS.
  • No cellular module
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • Narrower color gamut
    This tablet supports a narrower color gamut than the average tablet (NTSC vs sRGB). The average tablet covers sRGB color gamut.
    70% NTSC coverage reported.
    NTSC vs sRGB
  • 43.2% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (414 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    414 points vs 729 points
  • No HDMI output
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
  • 7.6% lower pixel density
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (207 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    207 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • 25.1% lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score than the average tablet (1,417 points vs 1,891 points). The average tablet scores 1,891 points in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    1,417 points vs 1,891 points
  • 55.53 mm taller
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (255.5 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    255.53 mm vs 200.0 mm
  • 43.2% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (414 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    414 points vs 729 points
  • 25.1% lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score than the average tablet (1,417 points vs 1,891 points). The average tablet scores 1,891 points in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    1,417 points vs 1,891 points
  • Narrower color gamut
    This tablet supports a narrower color gamut than the average tablet (NTSC vs sRGB). The average tablet covers sRGB color gamut.
    70% NTSC coverage reported.
    NTSC vs sRGB
  • 7.6% lower pixel density
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (207 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    207 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • 1 nits lower peak brightness
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (400 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    400 nits vs 401 nits
  • 14 ppi lower screen sharpness
    This tablet has a lower screen sharpness than the average tablet (207 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    207 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • No GPS
    This tablet does not have GPS, the average tablet does. 82.7% of tablets feature GPS.
  • No cellular module
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • No HDMI output
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
  • 55.53 mm taller
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (255.5 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    255.53 mm vs 200.0 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
Technolobe
≈ estimated
26/05/2024
Hands-on review · two weeks of use, display, audio and accessories
Verdict
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE WiFi is definitely worth it for light use like classes and streaming, but not for heavy multitasking.
8.0
My Next Tablet
≈ estimated
25/09/2023
Hands-on review · battery test, gaming and display
Verdict
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE WiFi is a good entertainment tablet for streaming, but not for gaming or heavy work.
8.0
Typical Tech Lad
≈ estimated
12/09/2023
Unboxing and review · stylus, battery and gaming tests
Verdict
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE WiFi is a good budget tablet for media and light use, recommended if you want to keep costs low.
6.0
FishBee Productions
≈ estimated
12/05/2025
Hands-on review · performance, games, battery and camera tests
Verdict
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE WiFi is a nice entry-level option with good battery life, but performance is low and software updates are limited.
7.0
My Next Tablet
≈ estimated
17/08/2023
Unboxing · benchmarks, gaming and software
Verdict
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE WiFi is a decent tablet, but the standard Redmi Pad is a little better, mainly on graphics.
Overview video
Overview video
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
trustedreviews.com
02/03/2026
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Review
A
androidpolice.com
02/03/2026
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE tablet review: Budget champion
M
mynexttablet.com
02/03/2026
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Review: The Truth About This Budget Tablet
N
nextpit.de
27/08/2023
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE im Test: Das Android-Tablet für den schmalen Geldbeutel
(Translated)Show original
K
kulturechronik.fr
08/10/2023
Summary of the review
Test Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE : Mon Avis sur la Tablette
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.biz
13/01/2024
Summary of the review
Test de la Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE : une régression au lieu d'une amélioration ?
(Translated)Show original
T
test-achats.be
29/09/2023
Summary of the review
Test XIAOMI REDMI PAD SE - Testachats
(Translated)Show original
T
tuttoandroid.net
16/12/2024
Summary of the review
Recensione REDMI Pad SE 8.7: compatto ed economico ma da rivedere
(Translated)Show original
T
thegeekerz.it
01/11/2024
Summary of the review
Redmi Pad SE 8.7, la recensione @TheGeekerz
(Translated)Show original
M
multiplayer.it
19/09/2023
Summary of the review
Redmi Pad SE, la recensione del tablet Android economico di Xiaomi con qualche asso nella manica
(Translated)Show original
A
androidplanet.nl
06/11/2023
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE review: luxe looks, maar vervelend traag
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: November 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Xiaomi Redmi Pad Se WiFi (4GB + 128GB)

  • Excellent value for money in the budget tablet segment
  • Long-lasting battery life, often cited to last up to two days
  • High-quality quad speakers with Dolby Atmos support
  • Premium feel with a sleek aluminum unibody design
  • Smooth 90Hz refresh rate display for better scrolling and UI experience
  • Expandable storage support up to 1TB via microSD card
  • Includes a 3.5mm headphone jack

What customers don't like about Xiaomi Redmi Pad Se WiFi (4GB + 128GB)

  • Very slow charging speeds (10W inbox charger takes ~3 hours for a full charge)
  • Underwhelming camera quality, especially in low-light conditions
  • Performance lag during intensive multitasking or demanding 3D gaming
  • Lacks a fingerprint sensor for secure unlocking
  • Presence of pre-installed bloatware in the MIUI/HyperOS software
  • Boot-up times can be slow, sometimes taking up to a minute
  • Display can be difficult to read under direct bright sunlight (400 nits)

Verdict

The Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE WiFi (4GB + 128GB) is an 11-inch budget-friendly tablet featuring a 1920x1200 FHD+ LCD display with a smooth 90Hz refresh rate and a metal unibody design. Powered by a Snapdragon 680 octa-core processor and an 8,000mAh battery, it includes 128GB of eMMC 5.1 storage expandable up to 1TB via microSD, alongside quad stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos support and a 3.5mm headphone jack. Main pros include its premium build quality, exceptional battery life that can last several days, and smooth scrolling for media consumption. However, notable cons include very slow 10W charging that takes approximately 3 hours for a full cycle, a lacks of a fingerprint sensor, and 4GB of RAM which can limit multitasking performance compared to higher-spec variants.

Compare Xiaomi Redmi Pad Se WiFi (4GB + 128GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Xiaomi Redmi Pad Se WiFi (4GB + 128GB) and other tablets

No results found