OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 WiFi (8GB + 256GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£220RAM capacity:8 GBInternal storage:256 GBScreen size:11.2 inchesChipset:Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3

Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 WiFi (8GB + 256GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

8.4/10

Overall score

Score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 90% of models
Score components

90%

8.6

Technical score

10%

7.0

User score

★Better than 90% of tablets
8.7

Value for money

Value for money
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 99% of models
Score components

70%

8.4

Overall score

30%

9.4

Price

★Better than 99%
8.6

Technical score

Technical score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 93% of models
Score components

22%

9.5

Performance

20%

8.7

Display

16%

8.7

Camera

14%

8.2

Battery

12%

7.2

Connectivity

8%

8.9

Software & Features

5%

7.4

Design

3%

8.2

Audio & Multimedia

★Better than 93%
7.0

User score

User score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 85% of models
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

2.9

Number of reviews

▼Worse than 85%
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £220
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
8GB + 512GBCheck price
Other versions:
8GB + 256GB
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 WiFi (8GB + 256GB)

Technical score
Technical score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 93% of models
Score components:

22%

9.5

Performance

20%

8.7

Display

16%

8.7

Camera

14%

8.2

Battery

12%

7.2

Connectivity

8%

8.9

Software & Features

5%

7.4

Design

3%

8.2

Audio & Multimedia

8.6
User score
User score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 85% of models
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

2.9

Number of reviews

7.0
Popularity
Popularity
2.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 61% of models
Popularity:
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 WiFi (8GB + 256GB) has a popularity of 2.9 points, which is higher than 60.4% of Tablets.
2.9
Value for money
Value for money
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 99% of models
Score components:

70%

8.4

Overall score

30%

9.4

Price

8.7
RAM capacity
8 GB
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 8 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 72.3% of tablets and equal to that of 17.8% of tablets.
Process node
4 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 4 nm process node, which is smaller than the node size used in 88.2% of tablets and equal to the node used in 8.5% of tablets.
Internal storage
256 GB
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 256 GB which is larger than the storage of 76.5% of tablets and equal to that of 15.7% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
1,873 points
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scored 1,873 points in Geekbench 6 (single-core) which is higher than the score of 81% of tablets.
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 chipset, which is more advanced than the chipsets in 92.6% of tablets and equal to those in 0.2% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
3200×2136
This tablet has a screen resolution of 3200×2136 which is higher than that of 98.5% of tablets and equal to that of 1.1% of tablets.
Refresh rate
144 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 144 Hz which is higher than in 91.2% of tablets and equal to that in 7.5% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
345 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 345 ppi which is higher than that of 97.7% of tablets and equal to that of 0.5% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass 3
This tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass 3 display glass which is stronger than that on 80.1% of tablets and equal to that on 11.2% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
13 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 13 MP which is higher than that of 74% of tablets and equal to that of 21.6% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
8 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than in 69.7% of tablets and equal to that in 19.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.2
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.2 which is wider than that of 30.2% of tablets and equal to that of 27.3% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
8,850 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 8,850 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 82.5% of tablets and equal to those in 0.2% of tablets.
Charging speed
45 W
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 45 W which is faster than in 83.8% of tablets and equal to speeds in 6.7% of tablets.
Battery life
11 hours
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 11 hours, which is longer than that of 60.7% of tablets and equal to that of 3.9% of tablets.
video playback
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 50.4% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
no
This tablet does not support LTE. 63.3% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
no
This tablet does not support GPS. 82.7% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
HyperOS 2
This tablet uses the HyperOS 2 operating system, which is less advanced than the one used by 77%.
Update support duration
?
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
yes
This tablet supports on-device AI. 71.8% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
500 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 500 g which is heavier than 53.5% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.9% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
yes
This tablet supports a backlit keyboard. 90.3% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
10 ms
Market range: <2 ms – >26 ms
This tablet has a pen latency of 10 ms, which is higher than that of 56.8% of tablets and equal to that of 7.8% of tablets.
Show more
Number of microphones
?
aptX Adaptive
yes
This tablet supports aptX Adaptive. 93.1% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
yes
This tablet supports Dolby Atmos. 68.6% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
4
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 4 speakers, which is more than in 70.9% of tablets and equal to the number in 22.7% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 WiFi (8GB + 256GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 2.4x higher refresh rate
    This tablet has a higher refresh rate than the average tablet (144 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average tablet has refresh rate of 60 Hz.
    144 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • Higher screen resolution
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (3200×2136 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    3200×2136 vs 1920×1200
  • 4x more storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (256 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    256 GB vs 64 GB
  • 399 nits higher peak brightness
    This tablet has a higher peak brightness than the average tablet (800 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    800 nits vs 401 nits
  • Better GPU
    This tablet uses the Adreno 732 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 732 vs Mali-G51
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses UFS storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    UFS vs eMMC
  • 2.5x faster charging speed
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (45 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    45 W vs 18 W
  • 22.5% better value for money
    Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 WiFi (8GB + 256GB) has better value for money than the average tablet (8.7 vs 7.1).
    8.7 vs 7.1
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 4x more storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (256 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    256 GB vs 64 GB
  • Better GPU
    This tablet uses the Adreno 732 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 732 vs Mali-G51
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses UFS storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    UFS vs eMMC
  • 2.72x higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score than the average tablet (5,149 points vs 1,891 points). The average tablet scores 1,891 points in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    5,149 points vs 1,891 points
  • 40% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (2.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    2.8 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • Newer DDR memory version
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (LPDDR5X vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    LPDDR5X vs LPDDR3
  • 4 GB more RAM
    This tablet has more RAM capacity than the average tablet (8 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    8 GB vs 4 GB
  • 6,667 MHz faster RAM speed
    This tablet has a higher RAM speed than the average tablet (8,533 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    8,533 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 2.57x higher Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a higher Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (1,873 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    1,873 points vs 729 points
  • 71.4% smaller process node
    This tablet uses a smaller process node than the average tablet (4 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    4 nm vs 14 nm
  • 2 more CPU threads
    This tablet has more CPU threads than the average tablet (8 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    8 vs 6
  • Includes neural engine
    This tablet includes a neural engine, the average tablet does not. 25.7% of tablets include a neural engine.
  • 46.2% faster GPU clock
    This tablet has a higher GPU frequency than the average tablet (950 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet has GPU frequency of 650 MHz.
    950 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 2.4x higher refresh rate
    This tablet has a higher refresh rate than the average tablet (144 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average tablet has refresh rate of 60 Hz.
    144 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • Higher screen resolution
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (3200×2136 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    3200×2136 vs 1920×1200
  • 399 nits higher peak brightness
    This tablet has a higher peak brightness than the average tablet (800 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    800 nits vs 401 nits
  • 54% higher pixel density
    This tablet has a higher pixel density than the average tablet (345 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    345 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • Supports adaptive refresh rate
    This tablet has adaptive refresh rate, the average tablet does not. 17.6% of tablets support adaptive refresh rate.
  • Wider color gamut
    This tablet supports a wider color gamut than the average tablet (DCI-P3 vs sRGB). The average tablet covers sRGB color gamut.
    3% DCI-P3 coverage reported.
    DCI-P3 vs sRGB
  • 1.1 inches larger screen size
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (11.2 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    11.2 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 124 ppi higher screen sharpness
    This tablet has a higher screen sharpness than the average tablet (345 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    345 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Higher contrast ratio
    This tablet has a higher contrast ratio than the average tablet (1500:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet contrast ratio is 1015:1.
    1,500:1 vs 1,015:1
  • Supports HDR10 support
    This tablet supports HDR10, the average tablet does not. 21.8% of tablets are HDR10 compatible.
  • More durable display glass
    This tablet uses better display glass than the average tablet (Corning Gorilla Glass 3 vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 3 vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • Better main-camera video
    This tablet supports better main-camera video recording than the average tablet (2160x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    2160x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • 5 MP higher main camera megapixels
    This tablet has a higher main camera resolution than the average tablet (13 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet main camera has 8 MP megapixels.
    13 MP vs 8 MP
  • 3 MP higher front camera megapixels
    This tablet has more front camera megapixels than the average tablet (8 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    8 MP vs 5 MP
  • Supports PDAF
    This tablet supports PDAF, the average tablet does not. 28.1% of tablets support PDAF.
  • Allows manual shutter speed
    This tablet allows manual shutter speed control, the average tablet does not. 21.9% of tablets offer manual shutter speed control.
  • Allows manual focus
    This tablet allows manual focus control, the average tablet does not. 37.2% of tablets include manual focus.
  • Allows manual ISO
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • Includes flash
    This tablet features a built-in flash, the average tablet does not. 45.2% of tablets include a flash.
  • 2.5x faster charging speed
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (45 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    45 W vs 18 W
  • 34.5% larger battery capacity
    This tablet has a higher battery capacity than the average tablet (8,850 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    8,850 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • Supports fast charging
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • 1 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (11 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    11 hours vs 10 hours
  • Supports DisplayPort over USB-C
    This tablet supports DisplayPort over USB-C, the average tablet does not. 21.5% of tablets support DisplayPort over USB-C.
  • Newer Wi-Fi version
    This tablet supports a newer Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • More Wi-Fi bands
    This tablet supports more Wi-Fi bands than the average tablet (2.4GHz/5GHz/6GHz vs 2.4GHz/5GHz). The average tablet supports 2.4GHz/5GHz Wi-Fi bands.
    2.4GHz/5GHz/6GHz vs 2.4GHz/5GHz
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    This tablet supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average tablet (5.4 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    5.4 vs 5.0
  • Newer USB version
    This tablet supports a newer USB version than the average tablet (USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2). The average tablet uses USB USB 2.0.
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2.0
  • Includes on-device AI
    This tablet includes on-device AI, the average tablet does not. 28.3% of tablets include on-device AI.
  • Supports live text recognition
    This tablet supports live text recognition, the average tablet does not. 34.9% of tablets can recognize text from images.
  • Supports dynamic theme
    This tablet features dynamic themes, the average tablet does not. 29% of tablets offer dynamic theming.
  • Includes clipboard warnings
    This tablet has clipboard warnings, the average tablet does not. 39.9% of tablets include clipboard warnings.
  • Suitable for drawing
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, the average tablet is not. 41% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • 1.82 mm thinner
    This tablet is thinner than the average tablet (6.2 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    6.18 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • Includes backlit keyboard
    This tablet has a backlit keyboard, the average tablet does not. 9.8% of tablets offer a backlit keyboard.
  • Supports stylus tilt
    This tablet supports stylus tilt, the average tablet does not. 33.6% of tablets support stylus tilt.
  • 6 newer release date
    This tablet has a newer release date than the average tablet (2025 vs 2019).
    November 2025
    2025 vs 2019
  • 2 more speakers
    This tablet has more speakers than the average tablet (4 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    4 vs 2
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
    This tablet supports Dolby Atmos, the average tablet does not. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
  • Supports LDAC
    This tablet supports LDAC, the average tablet does not. 25.2% of tablets support LDAC.
  • Supports aptX Adaptive
    This tablet supports aptX Adaptive, the average tablet does not. 6.9% of tablets include aptX Adaptive support.
  • Supports aptX Lossless
    This tablet supports aptX Lossless, the average tablet does not. 1.7% of tablets include aptX Lossless support.
  • No LTE support
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • No GPS
    This tablet does not have GPS, the average tablet does. 82.7% of tablets feature GPS.
  • No cellular module
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (HyperOS 2 vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    HyperOS 2 vs Android
  • No 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This tablet does not have a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average tablet does. 72.9% of tablets include a headphone jack.
  • No timelapse video
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets include timelapse modes.
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    This tablet has a worse front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.28 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.28 vs f/2.2
  • 13.9% lower user score
    User score
    7.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 WiFi
    the average tablet
    Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 WiFi (8GB + 256GB) has a lower user score than the average tablet (7.02 vs 8.000).
    7.02 vs 8
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • No timelapse video
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets include timelapse modes.
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    This tablet has a worse front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.28 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.28 vs f/2.2
  • No LTE support
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • No GPS
    This tablet does not have GPS, the average tablet does. 82.7% of tablets feature GPS.
  • No cellular module
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • No HDMI output
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (HyperOS 2 vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    HyperOS 2 vs Android
  • No offline voice recognition
    This tablet does not support offline voice recognition, the average tablet does. 76.1% of tablets support offline voice recognition.
  • 51.22 mm taller
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (251.2 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    251.22 mm vs 200.0 mm
  • 1 ms higher pen latency
    This tablet has higher pen latency than the average tablet (10 ms vs 9 ms). The average tablet has pen latency of 9 ms.
    10 ms vs 9 ms
  • No 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This tablet does not have a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average tablet does. 72.9% of tablets include a headphone jack.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
Now & Then Tech
≈ estimated
10/01/2026
Full review · display, gaming and battery tests
Verdict
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 WiFi has a strong display and performance, but limited availability and no fingerprint sensor hold it back.
9.0
HansTechTalk
≈ estimated
23/12/2025
Review · daily use, gaming and display tests
Verdict
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 WiFi is a strong mid-range tablet with a smooth display, steady performance and reliable battery life.
7.0
Flossy Carter
≈ estimated
05/12/2025
Long review · unboxing, impressions and daily use
Verdict
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 WiFi is good value for social media and video at its price, though rotation and performance glitches appear.
9.0
AndroTag
≈ estimated
01/12/2025
Hands-on review · weeks of use, benchmarks and battery
Verdict
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 WiFi is not perfect, but a strong all-round workhorse for work and entertainment.
8.5
Reign Manguerra
✓ explicit
28/11/2025
Detailed review · display, camera, audio and battery tests
Verdict
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 WiFi is very good overall, with a strong display, audio and battery, though not the best in its class.
8.0
Tech Spurt
≈ estimated
27/11/2025
Hands-on review · several days of use, gaming and battery tests
Verdict
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 WiFi is a decent budget tablet with solid performance and battery life.
8.5
TECH DYARYO
✓ explicit
27/11/2025
Unboxing · gaming, camera and battery tests
Verdict
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 WiFi is a very good, solid tablet, recommended for its performance, reliable display and battery.
9.0
ben's gadget reviews
≈ estimated
26/11/2025
Hands-on review · a week of daily work use and gaming
Verdict
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 WiFi is a very capable productivity tablet at its price, with a great keyboard and strong battery life.
9.0
YugaTech
≈ estimated
26/11/2025
Full review · benchmarks, gaming, battery and camera tests
Verdict
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 WiFi is a good pick, as performance, battery life and audio outweigh its minor drawbacks.
Brand video
Not graded
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

P
phonearena.com
28/11/2025
Summary of the review
Poco Pad X1 Review: Your workhorse tablet
T
techradar.com
18/12/2025
Summary of the review
The Poco Pad X1 is an excellent budget tablet - TechRadar
T
trustedreviews.com
03/12/2025
Summary of the review
Poco Pad X1 Review - Trusted Reviews
N
notebookcheck.biz
09/02/2026
Summary of the review
Test de la Xiaomi Poco Pad X1: tablette tout-en-un puissante pour les utilisateurs avisés
(Translated)Show original
T
technoinfo.ma
20/12/2025
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1: test complet, fiche technique et avis (2025)
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.biz
10/12/2025
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 - Notebookcheck.fr (Synthèse de tests)
(Translated)Show original
T
topesdegama.com
16/03/2026
Summary of the review
Tablet POCO Pad: opiniones y dónde comprar (Incluye comparativa X1)
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 WiFi (8GB + 256GB)

  • Excellent 3.2K resolution 144Hz display with natural colors and high sharpness
  • Strong mid-range performance powered by the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 chipset
  • Immersive quad-speaker system with Dolby Atmos and a 200% volume boost feature
  • Premium and sturdy aluminum unibody build quality
  • Fast 45W wired charging that can fully charge the 8850mAh battery in roughly 90 minutes
  • Useful productivity features like 'Workstation Mode' for multi-window multitasking

What customers don't like about Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 WiFi (8GB + 256GB)

  • No fingerprint sensor or secure facial recognition; limited to PIN or basic 2D face unlock
  • Productivity accessories like the Floating Keyboard and Focus Pen are sold separately and are quite expensive
  • Camera quality is basic and largely limited to document scanning and video calls
  • No 3.5mm headphone jack and no expandable microSD storage slot
  • 3:2 display aspect ratio leads to large black bars when watching standard widescreen video content
  • Software experience (HyperOS) is described by some as cluttered or overly similar to iOS

Verdict

The Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 WiFi (8GB + 256GB) is a high-performance mid-range tablet featuring a 11.2-inch 3.2K IPS LCD display with a 144Hz refresh rate, 800 nits peak brightness, and a productivity-friendly 3:2 aspect ratio. It is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 chipset and 8GB of LPDDR5X RAM, paired with 256GB of fast UFS 4.0 storage and an 8,850mAh battery that supports 45W fast charging. Key pros include its smooth performance for gaming and multitasking, a crisp and color-accurate display with Dolby Vision support, and a premium aluminum unibody design. However, its main cons include the lack of a microSD card slot for storage expansion, no fingerprint sensor (relying solely on face unlock), the absence of a 3.5mm headphone jack, and slightly shorter battery life compared to some flagship competitors.

Compare Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 WiFi (8GB + 256GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 WiFi (8GB + 256GB) and other tablets

No results found