OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 LTE (4GB + 64GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£130RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:8.7 inchesChipset:Mediatek Helio G99

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 LTE (4GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 LTE (4GB + 64GB)
6.7/10

Overall score

Score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 61% of models
Score components

90%

6.4

Technical score

10%

9.1

User score

▲Better than 61% of tablets
7.6

Value for money

Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 67% of models
Score components

70%

6.7

Overall score

30%

9.8

Price

▲Better than 67%
6.4

Technical score

Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 58% of models
Score components

22%

6.1

Performance

20%

5.3

Display

16%

6.6

Camera

14%

6.1

Battery

12%

7.4

Connectivity

8%

8.7

Software & Features

5%

7.0

Design

3%

6.9

Audio & Multimedia

▲Better than 58%
9.1

User score

User score
9.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 89% of models
Score components

70%

8.9

User ratings

30%

9.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▲Better than 89%
  • samsung-galaxy-tab-a9-4gb-64gb-lte
  • samsung-galaxy-tab-a9-4gb-64gb-lte
  • samsung-galaxy-tab-a9-4gb-64gb-lte
  • samsung-galaxy-tab-a9-4gb-64gb-lte
  • samsung-galaxy-tab-a9-4gb-64gb-lte
samsung-galaxy-tab-a9-4gb-64gb-lte
samsung-galaxy-tab-a9-4gb-64gb-lte
samsung-galaxy-tab-a9-4gb-64gb-lte
samsung-galaxy-tab-a9-4gb-64gb-lte
samsung-galaxy-tab-a9-4gb-64gb-lte
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
4GB + 64GB8GB + 128GBCheck price
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 LTE (4GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 58% of models
Score components:

22%

6.1

Performance

20%

5.3

Display

16%

6.6

Camera

14%

6.1

Battery

12%

7.4

Connectivity

8%

8.7

Software & Features

5%

7.0

Design

3%

6.9

Audio & Multimedia

6.4
User score
User score
9.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 89% of models
Score components

70%

8.9

User ratings

30%

9.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
9.1
Popularity
Popularity
9.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 88% of models
Popularity:
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 LTE (4GB + 64GB) has a user popularity of 9.4 points, which is lower than 88.2% of Tablets.
9.4
Value for money
Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 67% of models
Score components:

70%

6.7

Overall score

30%

9.8

Price

7.6
RAM capacity
4 GB
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 4 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 47.6% of tablets and equal to that of 17.6% of tablets.
Process node
6 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 6 nm process node, which is smaller than the node size used in 76.4% of tablets and equal to the node used in 8.2% of tablets.
Internal storage
64 GB
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 64 GB which is larger than the storage of 39.5% of tablets and equal to that of 17.1% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
735 points
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scored 735 points in Geekbench 6 (single-core) which is higher than the score of 51% of tablets.
Chipset
Mediatek Helio G99
This tablet uses the Mediatek Helio G99 chipset, which is less advanced than the chipsets in 50.9% of tablets and equal to those in 2.9% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1340×800
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1340×800 which is lower than that of 64.2% of tablets and equal to that of 1.3% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
TFT LCD
This tablet uses a TFT LCD display type. 89.9% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
179 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 179 ppi which is lower than that of 74.8% of tablets and equal to that of 0.8% of tablets.
Display glass type
Tempered Glass
This tablet uses Tempered Glass display glass which is weaker than that on 78.1% of tablets and equal to that on 19.5% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than that of 36.5% of tablets and equal to that of 31.8% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
2 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 2 MP which is lower than in 53.6% of tablets and equal to that in 25.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.0
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.0 which is wider than that of 57.5% of tablets and equal to that of 24.5% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
5,100 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 5,100 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 63.4% of tablets and equal to those in 4.6% of tablets.
Charging speed
15 W
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 15 W which is slower than in 52.2% of tablets and equal to speeds in 6.3% of tablets.
Battery life
12 hours
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 12 hours, which is longer than that of 65.7% of tablets and equal to that of 9.3% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 50.4% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
yes
This tablet supports LTE. 36.8% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
medium
This tablet offers medium update support, which is longer than the support period of 47.3% of tablets and equal to that of 32.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
333 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 333 g which is lighter than 86.3% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.1% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
2
Market range: <0 – >5
This tablet includes 2 microphones, which is more than in 55.1% of tablets and equal to the number in 32.7% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
yes
This tablet supports Dolby Atmos. 68.6% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 LTE (4GB + 64GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • 169 nits higher peak brightness
    This tablet has a higher peak brightness than the average tablet (570 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    570 nits vs 401 nits
  • Supports fast charging
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Mediatek Helio G99 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Mediatek Helio G99 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 2 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (12 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    12 hours vs 10 hours
  • 32% lighter
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (333 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    333 g vs 490 g
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • 57.1% smaller process node
    This tablet uses a smaller process node than the average tablet (6 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    6 nm vs 14 nm
  • Allows manual ISO
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • 13.1% higher user score
    User score
    9.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 LTE
    the average tablet
    Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 LTE (4GB + 64GB) has a higher user score than the average tablet (9.05 vs 8.000).
    9.05 vs 8
  • 2x cheaper
    Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 LTE (4GB + 64GB) is cheaper than the average tablet (£130 vs £260).
    £130 vs £260
  • 96.5% more popular
    Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 LTE (4GB + 64GB) is more popular than the average tablet (9.45 vs 4.8).
    9.45 vs 4.81
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Mediatek Helio G99 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Mediatek Helio G99 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 57.1% smaller process node
    This tablet uses a smaller process node than the average tablet (6 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    6 nm vs 14 nm
  • Newer DDR memory version
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3
  • 2 more CPU threads
    This tablet has more CPU threads than the average tablet (8 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    8 vs 6
  • 46.2% faster GPU clock
    This tablet has a higher GPU frequency than the average tablet (950 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet has GPU frequency of 650 MHz.
    950 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 10% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • Better GPU
    This tablet uses the Mali-G57 MC2 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Mali-G57 MC2 vs Mali-G51
  • 169 nits higher peak brightness
    This tablet has a higher peak brightness than the average tablet (570 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    570 nits vs 401 nits
  • Higher contrast ratio
    This tablet has a higher contrast ratio than the average tablet (1203:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet contrast ratio is 1015:1.
    1,203:1 vs 1,015:1
  • Allows manual ISO
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This tablet has a better main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Supports slow-motion recording
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, the average tablet does not. 37.5% of tablets offer slow-mo.
  • Supports fast charging
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • 2 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (12 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    12 hours vs 10 hours
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    This tablet supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average tablet (5.3 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    5.3 vs 5.0
  • Supports live text recognition
    This tablet supports live text recognition, the average tablet does not. 34.9% of tablets can recognize text from images.
  • Supports dynamic theme
    This tablet features dynamic themes, the average tablet does not. 29% of tablets offer dynamic theming.
  • Supports extra dim mode
    This tablet features extra dim mode, the average tablet does not. 35.4% of tablets support extra diming.
  • Includes clipboard warnings
    This tablet has clipboard warnings, the average tablet does not. 39.9% of tablets include clipboard warnings.
  • 32% lighter
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (333 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    333 g vs 490 g
  • 50.6 mm narrower
    This tablet is narrower than the average tablet (124.7 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    124.7 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • Designed for kids
    This tablet is suitable for kids, the average tablet is not. 23.7% of tablets are suitable for kids.
  • 4 newer release date
    This tablet has a newer release date than the average tablet (2023 vs 2019).
    October 2023
    2023 vs 2019
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
    This tablet supports Dolby Atmos, the average tablet does not. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
  • 1 more microphone/s
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (2 vs 1). The average tablet has 1 microphones.
    2 vs 1
  • Inferior display type
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (TFT LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    TFT LCD vs IPS LCD
  • 3 MP lower front camera megapixels
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • Less durable display glass
    This tablet uses weaker display glass than the average tablet (Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • 20.1% lower pixel density
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (179 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    179 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • 22.5% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (5,100 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    5,100 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • No panorama mode
    This tablet does not have a panorama mode, the average tablet does. 78.6% of tablets include panorama features.
  • 1.4 inches smaller screen size
    This tablet has a lower screen size than the average tablet (8.7 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    8.7 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • No BSI sensor
    This tablet lacks a BSI sensor, the average tablet has one. 52.6% of tablets use BSI sensors for better low-light shots.
  • 2 fewer GPU execution units
    This tablet has less GPU execution units than the average tablet (2 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    2 vs 4
  • Inferior display type
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (TFT LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    TFT LCD vs IPS LCD
  • Less durable display glass
    This tablet uses weaker display glass than the average tablet (Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • 20.1% lower pixel density
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (179 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    179 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • 1.4 inches smaller screen size
    This tablet has a lower screen size than the average tablet (8.7 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    8.7 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Lower screen resolution
    This tablet has a lower screen resolution than the average tablet (1340×800 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet has a resolution of 1920×1200.
    1340×800 vs 1920×1200
  • 42 ppi lower screen sharpness
    This tablet has a lower screen sharpness than the average tablet (179 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    179 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 3 MP lower front camera megapixels
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • No panorama mode
    This tablet does not have a panorama mode, the average tablet does. 78.6% of tablets include panorama features.
  • No BSI sensor
    This tablet lacks a BSI sensor, the average tablet has one. 52.6% of tablets use BSI sensors for better low-light shots.
  • 22.5% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (5,100 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    5,100 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • 16.7% slower charging speed
    This tablet supports slower charging than the average tablet (15 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    15 W vs 18 W
  • No HDMI output
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
OLEMROCKADOO
≈ estimated
31/12/2024
Unboxing and first impressions · battery and camera tests
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 LTE is a good entry-level tablet for small, affordable use, though battery life and camera hold it back.
9.0
GADGETMIX
≈ estimated
21/08/2024
Hands-on review · daily use and accessories
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 LTE is a compact, fast and reliable tablet that's easy to recommend despite its average camera.
8.0
Shane Symonds
≈ estimated
05/06/2024
Long-term review · 1.5 months of daily use, battery and cameras
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 LTE is an enjoyable compact tablet despite its modest hardware, though battery, charging and cameras are only average.
8.0
My Next Tablet
≈ estimated
14/03/2024
Hands-on review · tests of games, battery and cameras
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 LTE is a good choice for an affordable small tablet, but not for pen users or heavy gamers.
7.0
FishBee Productions
≈ estimated
28/11/2023
First look · unboxing, battery and speaker tests
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 LTE is headed in the right direction, with better build and storage, though screen resolution still falls short.
9.0
Team AG
≈ estimated
06/09/2025
Hands-on review · months of use, battery and value
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 LTE is an entry-level tablet with solid all-round performance; the camera is its weak point, but value is strong.
Not graded
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
techadvisor.com
12/12/2023
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Review: Compact & Competent
M
mynexttablet.com
03/03/2024
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 Review: Why It Beats Most Competitors
T
tuxoche.com
31/07/2025
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 long term review - My Blog
P
pcwelt.de
09/01/2024
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 im Test: Gutes Budget-Tablet für 179 Euro
(Translated)Show original
I
imtest.de
26/06/2024
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 LTE im Test: Was bekommt man für den günstigen Preis?
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.biz
13/02/2024
Summary of the review
Test de la Samsung Galaxy Tab A9: entrée de gamme avec GPS, LTE et 4 ans de mises à jour
(Translated)Show original
Q
quechoisir.org
22/03/2024
Summary of the review
Test Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 - Tablette tactile - UFC-Que Choisir
(Translated)Show original
T
tuttoandroid.net
15/12/2023
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9: prezzo, caratteristiche, uscita e notizie in Italia
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.nl
13/02/2024
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 review - Handige instaptablet met GPS, LTE en 4 jaar update
(Translated)Show original
T
test-aankoop.be
07/03/2024
Summary of the review
Test van de nieuwe tablet van Samsung, de Galaxy Tab A9
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: November 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 LTE (4GB + 64GB)

  • Excellent value for money and affordable pricing
  • Compact and lightweight 8.7-inch design, making it highly portable and easy to hold
  • Surprisingly robust performance for a budget device, capable of multitasking and light gaming
  • Expandable storage via microSD card slot (up to 1TB)
  • Solid build quality with a premium-feeling metal body
  • LTE connectivity allows for on-the-go internet access and calls

What customers don't like about Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 LTE (4GB + 64GB)

  • Lower display resolution (WXGA+) can result in icons and text appearing blurry to some users
  • Slow 15W charging speed, with a full charge taking several hours
  • Poor camera quality from both the 8MP rear and 2MP front sensors
  • No Samsung DeX support, unlike the larger A9+ model
  • Lacks a fingerprint sensor, relying instead on less secure face unlock
  • Noticeable bezels around the display, which some users find dated

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 LTE (4GB + 64GB) is a compact 8.7-inch tablet featuring a 1340 x 800 TFT LCD display and a sleek metal unibody design. It is powered by a MediaTek Helio G99 octa-core processor and includes 4G LTE connectivity, dual speakers with Dolby Atmos, and a 5,100mAh battery supporting 15W charging. Key advantages include its highly portable 333g lightweight build, smooth performance for everyday multitasking, and expandable storage up to 1TB via microSD. However, notable drawbacks include its low-resolution screen compared to premium models, subpar 8MP rear and 2MP front cameras, and the absence of a fingerprint scanner and included wall charger.

Compare Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 LTE (4GB + 64GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 LTE (4GB + 64GB) and other tablets

No results found