OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Tablets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10 1 Wi Fi 2019 4G (3GB + 128GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£190RAM capacity:3 GBInternal storage:128 GBScreen size:10.1 inchesChipset:Exynos 7904

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10 1 Wi Fi 2019 4G (3GB + 128GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

6.4

Overall score

Score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 57% of models
Score components

90%

6.1

Technical score

10%

9.4

User score

▲Better than 57% of tablets
6.1

Technical score

Technical score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 51% of models
Score components

22%

5.8

Performance

20%

5.0

Display

16%

6.7

Camera

14%

5.4

Battery

12%

7.1

Connectivity

8%

8.2

Software & Features

5%

6.3

Design

3%

5.9

Audio & Multimedia

▲Better than 51% of tablets
9.4

User score

User score
9.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 95% of models
Score components

70%

9.4

User ratings

30%

9.4

Number of reviews

No reviews for this version.

Check reviews from other versions.

★Better than 95% of tablets
  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £190

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
2GB + 32GBCheck price3GB + 64GBCheck price
Other versions:
3GB + 128GB3GB + 32GB
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10 1 Wi Fi 2019 4G (3GB + 128GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 51% of models
Score components:

22%

5.8

Performance

20%

5.0

Display

16%

6.7

Camera

14%

5.4

Battery

12%

7.1

Connectivity

8%

8.2

Software & Features

5%

6.3

Design

3%

5.9

Audio & Multimedia

6.1
User score
User score
9.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 95% of models
Score components

70%

9.4

User ratings

30%

9.4

Number of reviews

No reviews for this version.

Check reviews from other versions.

9.4
Popularity
Popularity
9.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 88% of models
Popularity:
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10 1 Wi Fi 2019 4G (3GB + 128GB) has a user popularity of 9.4 points, which is lower than 88.2% of Tablets.
9.4
Value for money
Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 61% of models
Score components:

60%

6.4

Overall score

40%

9.5

Price

7.4
RAM capacity
3 GB
RAM capacity
3 GB
▼ Worse than 52% of models
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 3 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 52.4% of tablets and equal to that of 8.5% of tablets.
Process node
14 nm
Process node
14 nm
▼ Worse than 46% of models
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 14 nm process node, which is smaller than the node size used in 45% of tablets and equal to the node used in 8.6% of tablets.
Internal storage
128 GB
Internal storage
128 GB
▲ Better than 57% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 128 GB which is larger than the storage of 56.7% of tablets and equal to that of 19.6% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
289 points
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
289 points
▼ Worse than 86% of models
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scored 289 points in Geekbench 6 (single-core) which is lower than the score of 86.3% of tablets and equal to the score of 0.3% of tablets.
Chipset
Exynos 7904
Chipset
Exynos 7904
▲ Better than 79% of models
This tablet uses the Exynos 7904 chipset, which is more advanced than the chipsets in 78.7% of tablets and equal to those in 0.5% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1920×1200
Screen resolution
1920×1200
▼ Worse than 42% of models
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1920×1200 which is higher than that of 39.2% of tablets and equal to that of 18.8% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Refresh rate
60 Hz
▼ Worse than 26% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
TFT LCD
Display type
TFT LCD
▼ Worse than 90% of models
This tablet uses a TFT LCD display type. 89.9% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
224 ppi
Pixel density
224 ppi
▲ Better than 50% of models
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 224 ppi which is higher than that of 50% of tablets and equal to that of 11.6% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass 3
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass 3
▲ Better than 80% of models
This tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass 3 display glass which is stronger than that on 80.1% of tablets and equal to that on 11.2% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
Category Benchmark
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
▲ Better than 37% of models
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than that of 36.5% of tablets and equal to that of 31.8% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
5 MP
Front camera megapixels
5 MP
▲ Better than 49% of models
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 5 MP which is higher than in 48.8% of tablets and equal to that in 19.6% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.0
Main camera aperture
f/2.0
▲ Better than 58% of models
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.0 which is wider than that of 57.5% of tablets and equal to that of 24.5% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
Optical zoom
1xx
▲ Better than 18% of models
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
6,150 mAh
Battery capacity
6,150 mAh
▼ Worse than 53% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 6,150 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 53.1% of tablets and equal to those in 0.4% of tablets.
Charging speed
10 W
Charging speed
10 W
▼ Worse than 61% of models
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 10 W which is slower than in 61% of tablets and equal to speeds in 33.2% of tablets.
Battery life
13 hours
Battery life
13 hours
▲ Better than 76% of models
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 13 hours, which is longer than that of 76.1% of tablets and equal to that of 4.9% of tablets.
internet usage
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
▼ Worse than 2% of models
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
no
Fast charging
no
▼ Worse than 50% of models
This tablet does not support fast charging. 49.7% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
?
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
▲ Better than 17% of models
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
5G connectivity
no
▼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
NFC
no
▼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
Operating system
Android
▲ Better than 23% of models
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
medium
Update support duration
medium
▲ Better than 47% of models
This tablet offers medium update support, which is longer than the support period of 47.3% of tablets and equal to that of 32.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
Direct OS updates
yes
▲ Better than 20% of models
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
On-device AI
no
▼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
App tracking protection
no
▼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
IP rating
not rated
▼ Worse than 16% of models
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
469 g
Weight
469 g
▲ Better than 58% of models
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 469 g which is lighter than 58.3% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.6% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
Backlit keyboard
no
▼ Worse than 10% of models
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
Keyboard accessory
yes
▲ Better than 16% of models
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
1
Number of microphones
1
▼ Worse than 45% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This tablet includes 1 microphones, which is more than in 0.2% of tablets and equal to the number in 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
aptX Adaptive
no
▼ Worse than 7% of models
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
yes
Dolby Atmos support
yes
▲ Better than 69% of models
This tablet supports Dolby Atmos. 68.6% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
N. of speakers
2
▼ Worse than 29% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
FM radio
no
▼ Worse than 19% of models
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10 1 Wi Fi 2019 4G (3GB + 128GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Exynos 7904
    ▲ Better than 79% of models
    This tablet uses the Exynos 7904 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Exynos 7,904 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 3 hours longer battery life
    Battery life
    13 hours
    ▲ Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (13 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    internet usage
    13 hours vs 10 hours
  • Allows manual ISO
    Manual ISO
    yes
    ▲ Better than 54% of models
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
    Dolby Atmos support
    yes
    ▲ Better than 69% of models
    This tablet supports Dolby Atmos, the average tablet does not. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
  • 2x more storage
    Internal storage
    128 GB
    ▲ Better than 57% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (128 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    128 GB vs 64 GB
  • 2 more CPU threads
    CPU threads
    8
    ▲ Better than 50% of models
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This tablet has more CPU threads than the average tablet (8 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    8 vs 6
  • Better GPU
    GPU model
    Mali-G71 MP2
    ▲ Better than 63% of models
    This tablet uses the Mali-G71 MP2 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Mali-G71 MP2 vs Mali-G51
  • Supports HDR10 support
    HDR10 support
    yes
    ▲ Better than 78% of models
    This tablet supports HDR10, the average tablet does not. 21.8% of tablets are HDR10 compatible.
  • 17.2% higher user score
    User score
    9.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10 1 Wi Fi 2019 4G
    the average tablet
    Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10 1 Wi Fi 2019 4G (3GB + 128GB) has a higher user score than the average tablet (9.38 vs 8.000).
    9.38 vs 8
  • 95.1% more popular
    Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10 1 Wi Fi 2019 4G (3GB + 128GB) is more popular than the average tablet (9.38 vs 4.8).
    9.38 vs 4.81
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Exynos 7904
    ▲ Better than 79% of models
    This tablet uses the Exynos 7904 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Exynos 7,904 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 2x more storage
    Internal storage
    128 GB
    ▲ Better than 57% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (128 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    128 GB vs 64 GB
  • 2 more CPU threads
    CPU threads
    8
    ▲ Better than 50% of models
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This tablet has more CPU threads than the average tablet (8 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    8 vs 6
  • Better GPU
    GPU model
    Mali-G71 MP2
    ▲ Better than 63% of models
    This tablet uses the Mali-G71 MP2 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Mali-G71 MP2 vs Mali-G51
  • Newer DDR memory version
    DDR memory version
    LPDDR4
    ▲ Better than 50% of models
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (LPDDR4 vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    LPDDR4 vs LPDDR3
  • Supports HDR10 support
    HDR10 support
    yes
    ▲ Better than 78% of models
    This tablet supports HDR10, the average tablet does not. 21.8% of tablets are HDR10 compatible.
  • More durable display glass
    Display glass type
    Corning Gorilla Glass 3
    ▲ Better than 80% of models
    This tablet uses better display glass than the average tablet (Corning Gorilla Glass 3 vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 3 vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • Allows manual ISO
    Manual ISO
    yes
    ▲ Better than 54% of models
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • Wider main camera aperture
    Main camera aperture
    f/2.0
    ▲ Better than 58% of models
    This tablet has a better main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • 3 hours longer battery life
    Battery life
    13 hours
    ▲ Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (13 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    internet usage
    13 hours vs 10 hours
  • Includes clipboard warnings
    Clipboard warnings
    yes
    ▲ Better than 60% of models
    This tablet has clipboard warnings, the average tablet does not. 39.9% of tablets include clipboard warnings.
  • Designed for kids
    Designed for kids
    yes
    ▲ Better than 76% of models
    This tablet is suitable for kids, the average tablet is not. 23.7% of tablets are suitable for kids.
  • 25.9 mm narrower
    Width
    149.4 mm
    ▲ Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is narrower than the average tablet (149.4 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    149.4 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
    Dolby Atmos support
    yes
    ▲ Better than 69% of models
    This tablet supports Dolby Atmos, the average tablet does not. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
  • Inferior display type
    Display type
    TFT LCD
    ▼ Worse than 90% of models
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (TFT LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    TFT LCD vs IPS LCD
  • No touch autofocus
    Touch autofocus
    no
    ▼ Worse than 83% of models
    This tablet does not support touch autofocus, the average tablet does. 82.8% of tablets allow touch-to-focus.
  • 44.4% slower charging speed
    Charging speed
    10 W
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <10 W – >60 W
    This tablet supports slower charging than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • 60.4% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    289 points
    ▼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (289 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    289 points vs 729 points
  • 49.5% lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    955 points
    ▼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <725 points – >6.8k points
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score than the average tablet (955 points vs 1891 points). The average tablet scores 1891 points in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    955 points vs 1,891 points
  • No BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a BSI sensor, the average tablet has one. 52.6% of tablets use BSI sensors for better low-light shots.
  • 1 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    3 GB
    ▼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (3 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    3 GB vs 4 GB
  • Lower contrast ratio
    Contrast ratio
    916:1
    ▼ Worse than 77% of models
    This tablet has a lower contrast ratio than the average tablet (916:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    916:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 49.5% lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    955 points
    ▼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <725 points – >6.8k points
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score than the average tablet (955 points vs 1891 points). The average tablet scores 1891 points in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    955 points vs 1,891 points
  • 60.4% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    289 points
    ▼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (289 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    289 points vs 729 points
  • 1 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    3 GB
    ▼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (3 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    3 GB vs 4 GB
  • 10% lower CPU speed
    CPU speed
    1.8 GHz
    ▼ Worse than 62% of models
    Market range: <1.2 GHz – >3.2 GHz
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.8 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 2 fewer GPU execution units
    GPU execution units
    2
    ▼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <2 – >24
    This tablet has less GPU execution units than the average tablet (2 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    2 vs 4
  • Inferior display type
    Display type
    TFT LCD
    ▼ Worse than 90% of models
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (TFT LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    TFT LCD vs IPS LCD
  • Lower contrast ratio
    Contrast ratio
    916:1
    ▼ Worse than 77% of models
    This tablet has a lower contrast ratio than the average tablet (916:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    916:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 50% lower touch sampling rate
    Touch sampling rate
    60 Hz
    ▼ Worse than 58% of models
    Market range: <60 Hz – >300 Hz
    This tablet has a lower touch sampling rate than the average tablet (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet has touch sampling rate of 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 1 nits lower peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    400 nits
    ▼ Worse than 50% of models
    Market range: <320 nits – >750 nits
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (400 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    400 nits vs 401 nits
  • No touch autofocus
    Touch autofocus
    no
    ▼ Worse than 83% of models
    This tablet does not support touch autofocus, the average tablet does. 82.8% of tablets allow touch-to-focus.
  • No BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a BSI sensor, the average tablet has one. 52.6% of tablets use BSI sensors for better low-light shots.
  • 44.4% slower charging speed
    Charging speed
    10 W
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <10 W – >60 W
    This tablet supports slower charging than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • 6.5% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    6,150 mAh
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (6150 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    6,150 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • No HDMI output
    HDMI output
    no
    ▼ Worse than 50% of models
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
  • No face recognition
    Face recognition
    no
    ▼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56% of tablets support face recognition.
  • 45.2 mm taller
    Width
    245.2 mm
    ▲ Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (245.2 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    245.2 mm vs 200.0 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
trustedreviews.com
10/12/2019
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 Review
T
techadvisor.com
04/12/2019
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) Review: Best Budget Tablet
C
consumerreports.org
Undated (Archived)
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 2019 (4G) Tablet Review
N
nextpit.com
15/02/2019
Summary of the review
Hands-on with the pleasantly affordable Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019)
N
nasilemaktech.com
13/05/2019
Summary of the review
Review - Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) - Nasi Lemak Tech
M
mynexttablet.com
30/04/2019
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 Review: Is It Really A Good Value?
R
root-nation.com
14/06/2019
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) review
N
notebookcheck.net
21/06/2019
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) Tablet Review
C
computerbild.de
17/05/2019
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A (2019): Test, Preis, kaufen
(Translated)Show original
N
netzwelt.de
15/02/2019
Summary of the review
Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) im ersten Test: Das "Ervolks-Tablet"
(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
30/04/2019
Summary of the review
Test Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10,1" (2019): un rapport qualité/prix imbattable
(Translated)Show original
F
fr.root-nation.com
22/10/2026
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Test de la Tab A 10.1 (2019) -- Tablette multimédia ordinaire
(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
21/03/2019
Summary of the review
Prise en main de la nouvelle tablette Samsung Galaxy Tab A (2019)(www.frandroid.com) | 07/07/2019 | Test de la Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) : la t...
(Translated)Show original
F
forum.lesnumeriques.com
30/04/2019
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10,1" (2019) : un rapport qualité/prix imbattable Would you like a summary of the technical differences between the Wi-Fi and 4G...
(Translated)Show original
N
nl.root-nation.com
14/06/2019
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) recensie
(Translated)Show original
P
pcactive.nl
23/04/2020
Summary of the review
Review Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (SM-T510): stevig en handzaam
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.nl
01/06/2019
Summary of the review
Kort testrapport Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) Tablet
(Translated)Show original
F
fwd.nl
12/06/2019
Summary of the review
Review: Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) – Android Pie rechtvaardigt upgrade
(Translated)Show original
I
id.nl
10/07/2019
Summary of the review
Review: Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019)
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What we like about Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10 1 Wi Fi 2019 4G (3GB + 128GB)

  • Affordable price point offering high value for money
  • Vibrant 10.1-inch display with 1920 x 1200 resolution is great for media and reading
  • Long-lasting battery life that easily handles a full day of moderate use
  • Lightweight and slim aluminum build makes it portable and easy to hold
  • Expandable storage support via microSD card up to 512GB
  • Inclusion of a 3.5mm headphone jack and modern USB-C charging
  • Good sound quality with Dolby Atmos support from the dual speakers

What we don't like about Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10 1 Wi Fi 2019 4G (3GB + 128GB)

  • Limited 2GB RAM on the 32GB model can lead to sluggish performance and app reloading
  • Dual speakers are both located on the bottom, negating stereo separation in landscape mode
  • Charging speed is slow with the provided power brick and lacks fast charging support
  • Missing ambient light sensor requires manual brightness adjustments
  • No hall effect sensor, meaning smart flip cases cannot automatically wake or sleep the screen
  • Lacks support for Samsung's S-Pen or other active styluses
  • Gaming performance is restricted to low or medium settings for demanding titles like PUBG

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) SM-T515 is a versatile mid-range tablet featuring a 10.1-inch WUXGA TFT LCD display with a 1920 x 1200 resolution and a slim 7.5mm metal unibody design. Powered by an Exynos 7904 octa-core processor, this specific 4G LTE-enabled model is equipped with 3GB of RAM and 128GB of internal storage, expandable up to 512GB via microSD. Main pros include its premium build quality, long-lasting 6,150mAh battery providing up to 13 hours of use, and immersive Dolby Atmos dual speakers. However, notable cons include the lack of a fingerprint scanner, slow charging speeds via USB-C, and limited performance for high-end gaming or intensive multitasking due to the mid-range GPU.

Compare Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10 1 Wi Fi 2019 4G (3GB + 128GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10 1 Wi Fi 2019 4G (3GB + 128GB) and other tablets

No results found