OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Tablets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10 1 Sm T585 4G (2GB + 32GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£190RAM capacity:2 GBInternal storage:32 GBScreen size:10.1 inchesChipset:Exynos 7870 Octa

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10 1 Sm T585 4G (2GB + 32GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

6.3

Overall score

Score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 52% of models
Score components

90%

6.0

Technical score

10%

9.0

User score

â–²Better than 52% of tablets
6.0

Technical score

Technical score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
Score components

22%

5.2

Performance

20%

5.8

Display

16%

6.6

Camera

14%

6.3

Battery

12%

6.6

Connectivity

8%

6.5

Software & Features

5%

5.8

Design

3%

4.8

Audio & Multimedia

â–¼Worse than 53% of tablets
9.0

User score

User score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 87% of models
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

9.3

Number of reviews

Based on 1,802 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–²Better than 87% of tablets
  • samsung-galaxy-tab-a-10-1-sm-t585-2gb-32gb-4g
  • samsung-galaxy-tab-a-10-1-sm-t585-2gb-32gb-4g
samsung-galaxy-tab-a-10-1-sm-t585-2gb-32gb-4g
samsung-galaxy-tab-a-10-1-sm-t585-2gb-32gb-4g

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
2GB + 32GB2GB + 16GBCheck price
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10 1 Sm T585 4G (2GB + 32GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
Score components:

22%

5.2

Performance

20%

5.8

Display

16%

6.6

Camera

14%

6.3

Battery

12%

6.6

Connectivity

8%

6.5

Software & Features

5%

5.8

Design

3%

4.8

Audio & Multimedia

6.0
User score
User score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 87% of models
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

9.3

Number of reviews

Based on 1,802 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
9.0
Popularity
Popularity
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 87% of models
Popularity:
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10 1 Sm T585 4G (2GB + 32GB) has a user popularity of 9.3 points, which is lower than 87.4% of Tablets.
9.3
Value for money
Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 56% of models
Score components:

60%

6.3

Overall score

40%

9.5

Price

7.3
RAM capacity
2 GB
RAM capacity
2 GB
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 2 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 60.9% of tablets and equal to that of 15.6% of tablets.
Process node
14 nm
Process node
14 nm
â–¼ Worse than 46% of models
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 14 nm process node, which is smaller than the node size used in 45% of tablets and equal to the node used in 8.6% of tablets.
Internal storage
32 GB
Internal storage
32 GB
â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 32 GB which is smaller than the storage of 60.5% of tablets and equal to that of 18% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
172 points
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
172 points
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scored 172 points in Geekbench 6 (single-core) which is lower than the score of 95.2% of tablets and equal to the score of 0.3% of tablets.
Chipset
Exynos 7870 Octa
Chipset
Exynos 7870 Octa
â–² Better than 78% of models
This tablet uses the Exynos 7870 Octa chipset, which is more advanced than the chipsets in 78.5% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1920×1200
Screen resolution
1920×1200
â–¼ Worse than 42% of models
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1920×1200 which is higher than that of 39.2% of tablets and equal to that of 18.8% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Refresh rate
60 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
Display type
IPS LCD
â–² Better than 17% of models
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
224 ppi
Pixel density
224 ppi
â–² Better than 50% of models
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 224 ppi which is higher than that of 50% of tablets and equal to that of 11.6% of tablets.
Display glass type
Chemically Strengthened Glass
Display glass type
Chemically Strengthened Glass
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
This tablet uses Chemically Strengthened Glass display glass which is weaker than that on 65.1% of tablets and equal to that on 13% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
Category Benchmark
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
â–² Better than 37% of models
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than that of 36.5% of tablets and equal to that of 31.8% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
2 MP
Front camera megapixels
2 MP
â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 2 MP which is lower than in 53.6% of tablets and equal to that in 25.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/1.9
Main camera aperture
f/1.9
â–² Better than 82% of models
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/1.9 which is wider than that of 82.2% of tablets and equal to that of 3.7% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
Optical zoom
1xx
â–² Better than 18% of models
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
7,300 mAh
Battery capacity
7,300 mAh
â–² Better than 62% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 7,300 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 62.4% of tablets and equal to those in 0.6% of tablets.
Charging speed
15 W
Charging speed
15 W
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 15 W which is slower than in 52.2% of tablets and equal to speeds in 6.3% of tablets.
Battery life
13 hours
Battery life
13 hours
â–² Better than 76% of models
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 13 hours, which is longer than that of 76.1% of tablets and equal to that of 4.9% of tablets.
video playback
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
no
Fast charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This tablet does not support fast charging. 49.7% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
yes
LTE support
yes
â–² Better than 37% of models
This tablet supports LTE. 36.8% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 17% of models
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
5G connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
NFC
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
Operating system
Android
â–² Better than 23% of models
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
short
Update support duration
short
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.7% of tablets and equal to that of 47.3% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
no
Direct OS updates
no
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
This tablet does not receive direct OS updates. 79.7% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
On-device AI
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
App tracking protection
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
IP rating
not rated
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
525 g
Weight
525 g
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 525 g which is heavier than 61.1% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.6% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
Backlit keyboard
no
â–¼ Worse than 10% of models
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
Keyboard accessory
yes
â–² Better than 16% of models
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
1
Number of microphones
1
â–¼ Worse than 45% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This tablet includes 1 microphones, which is more than in 0.2% of tablets and equal to the number in 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
aptX Adaptive
no
â–¼ Worse than 7% of models
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
Dolby Atmos support
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
N. of speakers
2
â–¼ Worse than 29% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
FM radio
no
â–¼ Worse than 19% of models
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10 1 Sm T585 4G (2GB + 32GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Exynos 7870 Octa
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This tablet uses the Exynos 7870 Octa chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Exynos 7,870 Octa vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 3 hours longer battery life
    Battery life
    13 hours
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (13 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    13 hours vs 10 hours
  • 120 nits higher typical brightness
    Typical brightness
    520 nits
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    Market range: <300 nits – >600 nits
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (520 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    520 nits vs 400 nits
  • 143 nits higher peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    544 nits
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <320 nits – >750 nits
    This tablet has a higher peak brightness than the average tablet (544 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    544 nits vs 401 nits
  • Wider main camera aperture
    Main camera aperture
    f/1.9
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    This tablet has a better main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/1.9 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/1.9 vs f/2.2
  • Allows manual ISO
    Manual ISO
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • 2 more CPU threads
    CPU threads
    8
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This tablet has more CPU threads than the average tablet (8 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    8 vs 6
  • Supports slow-motion recording
    Slow-motion recording
    yes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, the average tablet does not. 37.5% of tablets offer slow-mo.
  • 11.9% higher user score
    User score
    9.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10 1 Sm T585 4G
    the average tablet
    Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10 1 Sm T585 4G (2GB + 32GB) has a higher user score than the average tablet (8.96 vs 8.000).
    8.96 vs 8
  • 93.8% more popular
    Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10 1 Sm T585 4G (2GB + 32GB) is more popular than the average tablet (9.32 vs 4.8).
    9.32 vs 4.81
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Exynos 7870 Octa
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This tablet uses the Exynos 7870 Octa chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Exynos 7,870 Octa vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 2 more CPU threads
    CPU threads
    8
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This tablet has more CPU threads than the average tablet (8 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    8 vs 6
  • 120 nits higher typical brightness
    Typical brightness
    520 nits
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    Market range: <300 nits – >600 nits
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (520 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    520 nits vs 400 nits
  • 143 nits higher peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    544 nits
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <320 nits – >750 nits
    This tablet has a higher peak brightness than the average tablet (544 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    544 nits vs 401 nits
  • Wider main camera aperture
    Main camera aperture
    f/1.9
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    This tablet has a better main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/1.9 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/1.9 vs f/2.2
  • Allows manual ISO
    Manual ISO
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • Supports slow-motion recording
    Slow-motion recording
    yes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, the average tablet does not. 37.5% of tablets offer slow-mo.
  • Includes flash
    Flash
    yes
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    This tablet features a built-in flash, the average tablet does not. 45.2% of tablets include a flash.
  • 3 hours longer battery life
    Battery life
    13 hours
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (13 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    13 hours vs 10 hours
  • 10.9% larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    7,300 mAh
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
    This tablet has a higher battery capacity than the average tablet (7300 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    7,300 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • Designed for kids
    Designed for kids
    yes
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    This tablet is suitable for kids, the average tablet is not. 23.7% of tablets are suitable for kids.
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • 3 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    2 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • Does not receive direct OS updates
    Direct OS updates
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    This tablet does not support direct OS updates, the average tablet does. 79.7% of tablets support direct OS updates.
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus in video
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • Worse GPU
    GPU model
    Mali-T830 MP1
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    This tablet uses the Mali-T830 MP1 GPU, while the average tablet uses the stronger Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Mali-T830 MP1 vs Mali-G51
  • 2 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    2 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (2 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    2 GB vs 4 GB
  • 76.4% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    172 points
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (172 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    172 points vs 729 points
  • Worse GPU
    GPU model
    Mali-T830 MP1
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    This tablet uses the Mali-T830 MP1 GPU, while the average tablet uses the stronger Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Mali-T830 MP1 vs Mali-G51
  • 2 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    2 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (2 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    2 GB vs 4 GB
  • 76.4% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    172 points
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (172 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    172 points vs 729 points
  • 20% lower CPU speed
    CPU speed
    1.6 GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    Market range: <1.2 GHz – >3.2 GHz
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.6 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 50% less storage
    Internal storage
    32 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (32 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    32 GB vs 64 GB
  • 43.6% lower memory bandwidth
    Memory bandwidth
    8.4 GB/s
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    Market range: <4.26 GB/s – >60 GB/s
    This tablet has a lower memory bandwidth than the average tablet (8.4 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    8.4 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 3 fewer GPU execution units
    GPU execution units
    1
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <2 – >24
    This tablet has less GPU execution units than the average tablet (1 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    1 vs 4
  • Less durable display glass
    Display glass type
    Chemically Strengthened Glass
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    This tablet uses weaker display glass than the average tablet (Chemically Strengthened Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Chemically Strengthened Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • Lower contrast ratio
    Contrast ratio
    916:1
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
    This tablet has a lower contrast ratio than the average tablet (916:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    916:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 50% lower touch sampling rate
    Touch sampling rate
    60 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    Market range: <60 Hz – >300 Hz
    This tablet has a lower touch sampling rate than the average tablet (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet has touch sampling rate of 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 3 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    2 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus in video
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • 16.7% slower charging speed
    Charging speed
    15 W
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <10 W – >60 W
    This tablet supports slower charging than the average tablet (15 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    15 W vs 18 W
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • No HDMI output
    HDMI output
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    4.2
    â–¼ Worse than 49% of models
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4.2 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    4.2 vs 5.0
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • Does not receive direct OS updates
    Direct OS updates
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    This tablet does not support direct OS updates, the average tablet does. 79.7% of tablets support direct OS updates.
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    Camera/mic privacy
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average tablet includes them. 56.2% of tablets offer these toggles.
  • No dark mode
    Dark mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    This tablet does not support dark mode, the average tablet does. 57.2% of tablets have dark mode.
  • No offline voice recognition
    Offline voice recognition
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    This tablet does not support offline voice recognition, the average tablet does. 76.1% of tablets support offline voice recognition.
  • 7.1% heavier
    Weight
    525 g
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <315 g – >730 g
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (525 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    525 g vs 490 g
  • 54.2 mm taller
    Width
    254.2 mm
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (254.2 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    254.2 mm vs 200.0 mm
  • 3 older release date
    Release date
    2016
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This tablet is an older model than the average tablet (2016 vs 2019).
    January 2016
    2016 vs 2019

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
thetechnologyman.com
29/08/2016
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1" 2016 Review
N
notebookcheck.net
24/08/2016
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 Notebookcheck Review
C
computerbild.de
17/07/2016
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016): Android-6-Tablet im Test
(Translated)Show original
T
techtest.org
18/11/2016
Summary of the review
Das Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 2016 T585/T580 im Test, die solide Tablet Mittelklasse!
(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
25/01/2017
Summary of the review
Test Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10,1" (2016)(www.frandroid.com) | 16 juin 2016 | Test de la Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016) : une tablette milieu de gamme...
(Translated)Show original
X
xataka.com
29/08/2016
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016), análisis: una opción interesante sobre todo para niños
(Translated)Show original
C
codegeek.es
10/08/2018
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A Review en Español (Análisis completo)
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.nl
06/09/2016
Summary of the review
Kort testrapport Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016) Tablet
(Translated)Show original
F
fwd.nl
24/10/2016
Summary of the review
Review: Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2016) en Galaxy Tab A 7.0 (2016)
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on 1,802 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
Based on 3,232 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10 1 Sm T585 4G (2GB + 32GB)

  • Long-lasting battery life, often cited as lasting over 10 hours of active use
  • High-quality 10.1-inch WUXGA (1920x1200) display with good brightness and vivid colors
  • Responsive performance for everyday tasks like web browsing and video streaming
  • Good value for money, frequently described as an affordable alternative to premium tablets
  • Sturdy build quality that feels more expensive than its plastic casing suggests
  • Expandable storage via a dedicated microSD card slot (up to 200GB/256GB)

What we don't like about Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10 1 Sm T585 4G (2GB + 32GB)

  • Extremely limited 16GB internal storage, with much of it occupied by the operating system
  • Slow charging times due to the large battery and lack of fast-charging support
  • Speakers are positioned only on one side (bottom), resulting in poor stereo effect in landscape mode
  • Average camera performance, particularly in low-light conditions
  • Lack of ambient light sensor for automatic brightness in some regional variants
  • No NFC support or notification LED
  • Occasional software lag when running demanding 3D games

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 SM-T585 (2016) is a versatile 4G LTE tablet featuring a 10.1-inch WUXGA PLS LCD display with a 1920 x 1200 resolution and a 16:10 aspect ratio. It is powered by a 1.6 GHz Exynos 7870 octa-core processor paired with 2GB of RAM and 32GB of internal storage, which is expandable up to 256GB via a dedicated microSD slot. Key characteristics include a substantial 7,300mAh battery providing up to 13 hours of video playback, an 8MP rear camera with f/1.9 aperture and LED flash, and a 2MP front camera. Main pros highlighted by users and experts include its sharp and bright display, excellent battery endurance, and solid build quality for a mid-range device. However, some cons include slow charging speeds of approximately 5 hours for a full charge, average multitasking performance due to limited RAM, and bottom-firing speakers that lack a stereo effect in landscape orientation.

Compare Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10 1 Sm T585 4G (2GB + 32GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10 1 Sm T585 4G (2GB + 32GB) and other tablets

No results found