OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v3.0
Tablets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Tablets Methodology v3.0

Nokia T20 4G (4GB + 64GB) review: 168 specs compared

Avg. price:~£210RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:10.4 inchesChipset:Unisoc T610

Nokia T20 4G (4GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and 38 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

Nokia T20 4G (4GB + 64GB)
6.9/10

Overall score

Score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
Score components

35%

6.6

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

6.6

Reviews score

10%

6.6

Sentiment score

â–¼Worse than 54% of tablets
7.7

Value for money

Value for money
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 57% of models
Score components

70%

6.9

Overall score

30%

9.4

Price

â–²Better than 57%
6.6

Technical score

Technical score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 61% of models
Score components

22%

5.7

Performance

20%

5.6

Display

16%

7.2

Camera

14%

7.4

Battery

12%

7.3

Connectivity

8%

8.5

Software

5%

6.8

Design

3%

6.1

Audio

â–²Better than 61%
6.6

Reviews score

Reviews score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models

6.6

Mark 7.8 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

7.5

Average grade

20%

9.0

Popularity

Grades by review (38)
24 reviews: 15 with a printed score, 9 estimated from the review. 14 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 61%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • nokia-t20-4gb-64gb-4g
  • nokia-t20-4gb-64gb-4g
  • nokia-t20-4gb-64gb-4g
  • nokia-t20-4gb-64gb-4g
  • nokia-t20-4gb-64gb-4g
nokia-t20-4gb-64gb-4g
nokia-t20-4gb-64gb-4g
nokia-t20-4gb-64gb-4g
nokia-t20-4gb-64gb-4g
nokia-t20-4gb-64gb-4g
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Nokia T20 4G (4GB + 64GB)

Based on 24 · 14

Reviewers love the long battery life and solid build, but criticize sluggish performance, slow charging and weak cameras.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the Nokia T20 4G (4GB + 64GB)

Based on 186 owners sharing their experience in online comments

37%positive9%mixed54%negative

Owners value the long battery life and price, while reliability failures, software glitches, and missing phone calls dominate complaints.

What owners dislike

  • The tablet cannot make voice calls or send text messages with a SIM card. It has no phone app, so it only supports data.14
  • Owners report a screen scratch out of the box, a display that shows only half the screen, and touch stopping in one area.12
  • Owners say the battery drains quickly after the Android 12 update, lasting about a day. Some report it dropping from 50% to off.10
  • Owners report no sound after the Android 12 update until a restart, and crackling on group calls. Some headphone jacks only play one channel.10
  • Owners say charging is very slow, and after an update some tablets stop charging at 85%. Some USB charging ports broke and were not covered by warranty.10
  • Some owners report the tablet won't turn on or boot, sometimes after a normal restart or a day switched off. Others say it shuts off unexpectedly.9
  • Owners report the Android 12 and 13 updates made the tablet slower and worsened battery life. Some say audio failed and needed restarts after updating.9
  • Owners say first-time setup takes over an hour because of large updates that install before use. Some say the updates feel endless.8
  • Owners say repair service is hard to get, with some told repairs are not covered. Some were refused a replacement after a screen scratch on arrival.8
  • Owners say scrolling is not smooth and the tablet lags, especially with 32GB storage. Some find it sluggish after updates.6

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Nokia T20 4G (4GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 61% of models
Score components:

22%

5.7

Performance

20%

5.6

Display

16%

7.2

Camera

14%

7.4

Battery

12%

7.3

Connectivity

8%

8.5

Software

5%

6.8

Design

3%

6.1

Audio

6.6
Reviews score
6.6
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 57% of models
Score components:

70%

6.9

Overall score

30%

9.4

Price

7.7
RAM capacity
4 GB
Market range: <1 GB – >8 GB
This tablet has 4 GB of RAM, which is more than 47.2% of tablets and equal to 17.8% of tablets.
Process node
12 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 12 nm process, which is smaller than 53.2% of tablets and equal to 13.9% of tablets.
Internal storage
64 GB
Market range: <16 GB – >256 GB
This tablet has 64 GB of internal storage, which is more than 39.1% of tablets and equal to 17% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core score
425 points
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scores 425 points in single-core tests, which is lower than 64% of tablets and equal to 0.6% of tablets.
Chipset
Unisoc T610
This tablet runs on Unisoc T610, which is less advanced than 60.3% of tablets and equal to 0.1% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen resolution
2000×1200
This tablet has a 2000×1200 screen, which is sharper than 58.1% of tablets and equal to 8.1% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet has a 60 Hz screen, which is smoother than 0.1% of tablets and equal to 73.4% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
224 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 224 ppi, which is higher than 50.1% of tablets and equal to 11.5% of tablets.
Display glass type
Tempered Glass
This tablet protects its screen with Tempered Glass, which is less durable than 78% of tablets and the same as 19.6% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical stabilisation. 0.4% of tablets offer this.
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a rear camera with 8 MP resolution, which is higher than 36.4% of tablets and equal to 31.9% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
5 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera with 5 MP resolution, which is higher than 48.6% of tablets and equal to 19.7% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.0
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.0, which is wider than 57.4% of tablets and equal to 24.7% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet has 1xx optical zoom, which is stronger than 18.2% of tablets and equal to 80.9% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery capacity
8,200 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has 8,200 mAh battery capacity, which is larger than 75.1% of tablets and equal to 0.9% of tablets.
Charging speed
15 W
Market range: <10 W – >45 W
This tablet charges at 15 W, which is slower than 52.1% of tablets and equal to 6.3% of tablets.
Battery life
15 hours
Market range: <7 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 15 hours, which is longer than that of 85.6% of tablets and equal to that of 4.1% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets offer this.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 43.2% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
LTE support
yes
This tablet has built-in LTE. 57.1% of tablets offer this.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet connects to Wi-Fi. 0.2% of tablets offer this.
GPS
yes
This tablet has built-in GPS. 17.1% of tablets offer this.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G. 8.1% of tablets offer this.
NFC
no
This tablet does not include NFC. 10.8% of tablets offer this.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.2%.
Update support duration
medium
This tablet offers medium update support, which is longer than the support period of 47.6% of tablets and equal to that of 32.4% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet supports direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets offer this.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not support app tracking protection. 28.4% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
IP rating
IP52
This tablet's IP rating is IP52, which is more protected than 84.8% of tablets and the same as 6.2% of tablets.
Weight
470 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 470 g, which is lighter than 57.6% of tablets and equal to 0.7% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.7% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
What reviewers say
Number of microphones
2
Market range: <1 – >3
This tablet has a microphone array of 2, which is more than 55.1% of tablets and equal to 32.7% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.3% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
Market range: <2 – >4
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.8% of tablets.
FM radio
yes
This tablet includes an FM radio. 81.1% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say

Nokia T20 4G (4GB + 64GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftwareDesignAudio
  • 5 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (15 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    15 hours vs 10 hours
  • More vivid contrast
    This tablet has more contrast than the average tablet (1786:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    1,786:1 vs 1,015:1
  • Supports LTE
    This tablet supports LTE, while the average tablet does not. 42.9% of tablets support LTE.
  • Supports PDAF
    This tablet supports PDAF, the average tablet does not. 28% of tablets support PDAF.
  • More dust and water protection
    This tablet offers better dust and water protection than the average tablet (IP52 vs not rated).
    IP52 vs not rated
  • 24.2% larger battery capacity
    This tablet has a larger battery capacity than the average tablet (8,200 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    8,200 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Unisoc T610 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Unisoc T610 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • More advanced memory type
    This tablet uses more advanced memory than the average tablet (LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3).
    LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Unisoc T610 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Unisoc T610 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • More advanced memory type
    This tablet uses more advanced memory than the average tablet (LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3).
    LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3
  • 14.3% smaller process node
    This tablet has a smaller process node than the average tablet (12 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet is built on 14 nm.
    12 nm vs 14 nm
  • More vivid contrast
    This tablet has more contrast than the average tablet (1786:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    1,786:1 vs 1,015:1
  • Supports HDR10
    This tablet supports HDR10, while the average tablet does not. 21.7% of tablets support HDR10.
  • 0.3 inches larger screen
    This tablet has a larger screen than the average tablet (10.4 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet measures 10.1 inches.
    10.4 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Sharper display
    This tablet has a sharper screen than the average tablet (2000×1200 vs 1920×1200).
    2,000×1,200 vs 1,920×1,200
  • Supports PDAF
    This tablet supports PDAF, the average tablet does not. 28% of tablets support PDAF.
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This tablet has a wider main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's main camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Built-in camera flash
    This tablet has a camera flash, while the average tablet does not. 45.5% of tablets have one.
  • 5 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (15 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    15 hours vs 10 hours
  • 24.2% larger battery capacity
    This tablet has a larger battery capacity than the average tablet (8,200 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    8,200 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • Supports LTE
    This tablet supports LTE, while the average tablet does not. 42.9% of tablets support LTE.
  • Supports cellular data
    This tablet supports cellular data, while the average tablet does not. 47.4% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports dynamic themes
    This tablet supports dynamic themes, while the average tablet does not. 29.5% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports extra dim mode
    This tablet supports extra dim mode, while the average tablet does not. 35.9% of tablets offer this.
  • Includes clipboard warnings
    This tablet has clipboard warnings, the average tablet does not. 40.3% of tablets include clipboard warnings.
  • More dust and water protection
    This tablet offers better dust and water protection than the average tablet (IP52 vs not rated).
    IP52 vs not rated
  • 42.5 mm shorter
    This tablet is shorter than the average tablet (157.5 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200 mm tall.
    157.5 mm vs 200 mm
  • 1 more microphones
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (2 vs 1). The average tablet's microphone count is 1.
    2 vs 1
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    This tablet has a narrower front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's front camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • Less durable glass
    This tablet has less durable glass than the average tablet (Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). The average tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass.
    Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • 31% lower multi-core score
    This tablet has a lower multi-core score than the average tablet (1,305 points vs 1,891 points). The average tablet scores 1,891 points in multi-core tests.
    1,305 points vs 1,891 points
  • No timelapse video
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, while the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets support timelapse video.
  • 41.7% lower single-core score
    This tablet has a lower single-core score than the average tablet (425 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in single-core tests.
    425 points vs 729 points
  • 5.7% lower review score
    Reviews score
    6.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models

    6.6

    Mark 7.8 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.5

    Average grade

    20%

    9.0

    Popularity

    Grades by review (38)
    24 reviews: 15 with a printed score, 9 estimated from the review. 14 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    6.6 vs 7.0
  • 16.7% slower charging
    This tablet charges slower than the average tablet (15 W vs 18 W). The average tablet charges at 18 W.
    15 W vs 18 W
  • 12.0% lower sentiment score
    6.6 vs 7.5
  • 5.7% lower review score
    Reviews score
    6.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models

    6.6

    Mark 7.8 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.5

    Average grade

    20%

    9.0

    Popularity

    Grades by review (38)
    24 reviews: 15 with a printed score, 9 estimated from the review. 14 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    6.6 vs 7.0
  • 12.0% lower sentiment score
    6.6 vs 7.5
  • 31% lower multi-core score
    This tablet has a lower multi-core score than the average tablet (1,305 points vs 1,891 points). The average tablet scores 1,891 points in multi-core tests.
    1,305 points vs 1,891 points
  • 41.7% lower single-core score
    This tablet has a lower single-core score than the average tablet (425 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in single-core tests.
    425 points vs 729 points
  • 2 fewer GPU execution units
    This tablet has less GPU execution units than the average tablet (2 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    2 vs 4
  • 14.1% less memory bandwidth
    This tablet has less memory bandwidth than the average tablet (12.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has 14.9 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
    12.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • Less durable glass
    This tablet has less durable glass than the average tablet (Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). The average tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass.
    Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    This tablet has a narrower front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's front camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • No timelapse video
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, while the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets support timelapse video.
  • 16.7% slower charging
    This tablet charges slower than the average tablet (15 W vs 18 W). The average tablet charges at 18 W.
    15 W vs 18 W

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
Lim Reviews
≈ estimated
28/03/2022
Hands-on review · a few weeks of daily use
Verdict
Nokia T20 4G is not a powerhouse, but it is a decent everyday tablet for browsing, video and light gaming.
6.0
My Next Tablet
≈ estimated
04/02/2022
Hands-on review · benchmarks, gaming and battery test
Verdict
Nokia T20 4G is a solid tablet with a good build, but Samsung rivals are a bit better at a similar price.
8.0
Shaan Haider
≈ estimated
16/01/2022
Gaming test · frame rate, heat and battery checks
Verdict
Nokia T20 4G runs games playably with minor lag and weak graphics, though its performance is good for the price.
7.0
9to5Google
≈ estimated
22/12/2021
Hands-on review · gaming, battery, screen and build
Verdict
Nokia T20 4G offers good value for the price and a well built body, but performance is below average and it is not ideal for kids.
5.0
Techno Ruhez
≈ estimated
23/11/2021
Hands-on review · battery, camera and connectivity tests
Verdict
Nokia T20 4G has a fine battery and build, but the camera and connectivity disappoint; other tablets may suit you better.
8.0
Gupta Information Systems in Hindi
≈ estimated
13/11/2021
Durability test · water, scratch and bend tests
Verdict
Nokia T20 4G has good construction and water resistance, but it flexes noticeably under bending.
8.0
Critical Tech
≈ estimated
14/04/2022
Hands-on review · display, performance, camera and battery tests
Verdict
Nokia T20 4G is a great budget tablet for media and light tasks, but not for gaming, editing or photos.
9.0
Nokiapoweruser
≈ estimated
27/01/2022
First look · unboxing and first impressions
Verdict
Nokia T20 4G makes a very positive first impression: well built, with a bright display and snappy software.
9.0
TheMrNokia I Abdulla Zaki
≈ estimated
14/10/2021
Hands-on review · design, screen, speakers and battery
Verdict
Nokia T20 4G is easy to recommend for media and work, with clear limits for content creation and stylus users.
Not graded
Not graded
Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

7.0
trustedreviews.com
✓ explicit
06/10/2021
Review · Durable budget tablet
Verdict
The Nokia T20 is a great-looking, durable family tablet with a sharp screen, but its camera quality and performance let it down.
6.0
t3.com
✓ explicit
11/10/2021
Hands-on review · Family-friendly tablet
Verdict
The Nokia T20 is a solid family tablet with a large, clear screen and Kids Space, but it lacks the power for heavy workloads.
8.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
22/10/2021
Review · Value Android tablet
Verdict
The Nokia T20 is a good-value Android tablet for basic tasks, with a bright screen and solid build, but slow performance limits heavier use.
7.0
techadvisor.com
✓ explicit
12/11/2021
Review · Stylish budget tablet
Verdict
The Nokia T20 is a great-looking, bright Android tablet for light use, but its sluggish performance doesn't match the design.
6.0
pcmag.com
✓ explicit
25/01/2022
Lab test · Budget Android tablet
Verdict
The Nokia T20 is a sturdy, long-lasting budget tablet, but its cool, blue-leaning screen with poor viewing angles makes the Lenovo Tab P11 Plus the better pick.
7.9
stuff.co.za
✓ explicit
24/03/2022
Written review · Entertainment tablet
Verdict
The Nokia T20 is a long-lasting entertainment tablet that suits streaming and light use, though its weak chip struggles with heavier tasks.
8.0
techstomper.com
✓ explicit
01/07/2022
Hands-on review · Style and battery
Verdict
The Nokia T20 is a striking, solid budget tablet with a huge battery and clear speakers, but weak cameras and slow charging hold it back.
6.0
androidcentral.com
✓ explicit
20/07/2022
Real-world test · Budget Android tablet
Verdict
The Nokia T20 is an adequate budget tablet with a sharp screen, but slow software updates and frequent 480p streaming hold it back.
6.0
expertreviews.co.uk
✓ explicit
06/12/2022
Tested review · Stock Android tablet
Verdict
The Nokia T20 is a sturdy, well-equipped budget tablet with clean stock Android, but its 2K screen can't show HD Netflix video.
6.0
uk.pcmag.com
✓ explicit
25/01/2022
Test results · Affordable Android tablet
Verdict
The Nokia T20 offers strong battery life and long updates for the money, but its weak screen keeps it behind the Lenovo Tab P11 Plus.
7.0
pocket-lint.com
✓ explicit
14/02/2022
Hands-on test · Budget Android tablet
Verdict
The Nokia T20 is a well-built, affordable Android tablet with Google Play access, but its 480p streaming cap limits entertainment.
8.0
express.co.uk
✓ explicit
11/02/2022
Hands-on review · Budget iPad alternative
Verdict
The Nokia T20 is a premium-feeling budget tablet for video and kids, but its slow processor and washed-out screen rule out demanding use.
7.0
heise.de
✓ explicit
19/03/2022
Hands-on test · Budget Android tablet
Verdict
The Nokia T20 is a stylish, solid budget Android tablet with long battery life, but streaming services like Netflix cap out at standard definition.
8.0
futurezone.at
≈ estimated
30/11/2021
Hands-on test · Family tablet
Verdict
The Nokia T20 is a sturdy family tablet for movies, series and video calls, but its processor and Android tablet software hold it back.
8.0
ugeek.fr
≈ estimated
20/03/2022
Hands-on test · Budget family tablet
Verdict
The Nokia T20 is a solid, affordable family tablet with clean Android and long updates, though its photos look grainy in every light.
7.0
zdnet.fr
≈ estimated
25/04/2024
Buying guide · Budget Android tablet
Verdict
The Nokia T20 is a well-built tablet with a sharp screen that suits basic tasks, but its slow processor and 10W charger hold back everyday use.
6.0
quechoisir.org
≈ estimated
14/12/2021
Expert review · Entry-level tablet
Verdict
The Nokia T20 is a sturdy entry-level tablet with good battery life and multi-user accounts, but its screen, photos and Wi-Fi let it down.
7.9
androidworld.nl
✓ explicit
11/02/2022
Hands-on review · Family tablet
Verdict
The Nokia T20 is a stylish tablet with a strong battery and long updates, ideal for streaming and kids, though slow charging and average cameras hold it back.
8.0
id.nl
≈ estimated
07/01/2022
Quick review · Affordable Android tablet
Verdict
The Nokia T20 is a budget Android tablet with an aluminum build and three years of updates, but its cameras are basic and charging takes hours.
7.9
androidworld.be
✓ explicit
11/02/2022
Hands-on review · Budget tablet
Verdict
The Nokia T20 suits streaming, light games and kids in the back seat, with long battery life, but struggles with demanding games and cameras.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Nokia T20 4G (4GB + 64GB)

  • Sturdy aluminum unibody design that feels more premium than the price suggests
  • Excellent 8200mAh battery life, often lasting several days with intermittent use
  • Bright 10.4-inch 2K resolution display suitable for reading and general browsing
  • Clean, near-stock Android experience with a multi-year software update guarantee
  • Includes a 3.5mm headphone jack and microSD card expansion
  • Loud stereo speakers with OZO Playback technology

What customers don't like about Nokia T20 4G (4GB + 64GB)

  • Lack of Widevine L1 certification restricts streaming on Netflix and Prime Video to 480p resolution
  • Unisoc T610 chipset can be sluggish during multitasking or heavy gaming
  • No fingerprint sensor, relying instead on sometimes inconsistent face unlock
  • Very slow charging with the included 10W power brick
  • Lack of HDR support and limited color vibrancy on the LCD panel
  • Reports of software bugs and battery drain issues following certain OS updates

Verdict

The Nokia T20 4G (4GB + 64GB) is a budget-friendly 10.4-inch tablet featuring a 2K (2000 x 1200) IPS display and a robust sandblasted aluminium chassis. It is powered by an octa-core Unisoc T610 processor, includes 4GB of RAM and 64GB of expandable storage, and runs a clean, bloatware-free version of Android 11. Key strengths include its long-lasting 8,200mAh battery providing up to 15 hours of web surfing, stereo speakers with OZO Playback, and a commitment to two years of OS upgrades with three years of security updates. However, it is limited by a lack of HD streaming support on major platforms due to Widevine L3 certification, slow 10W in-box charging, and mediocre camera performance in low-light conditions.

Compare Nokia T20 4G (4GB + 64GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Nokia T20 4G (4GB + 64GB) and other tablets

No results found