OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v3.0
Tablets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Tablets Methodology v3.0

Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro (12GB + 256GB) review: 168 specs compared

Avg. price:~£270RAM capacity:12 GBInternal storage:256 GBScreen size:12.7 inchesChipset:MediaTek Dimensity 8300

Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro (12GB + 256GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications, 18 expert and video reviews and 2 best-of lists to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

8.2/10

Overall score

Score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 94% of models
Score components

35%

8.4

Technical score

30%

8.1

List score

25%

8.4

Reviews score

10%

7.5

Sentiment score

★Better than 94% of tablets
8.5

Value for money

Value for money
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 98% of models
Score components

70%

8.2

Overall score

30%

9.1

Price

★Better than 98%
8.4

Technical score

Technical score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 89% of models
Score components

22%

9.1

Performance

20%

7.4

Display

16%

8.7

Camera

14%

9.2

Battery

12%

7.2

Connectivity

8%

8.8

Software

5%

7.5

Design

3%

8.9

Audio

▲Better than 89%
8.4

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 86% of models

80%

8.4

Average grade

20%

8.3

Popularity

Grades by review (18)
8 reviews: 4 with a printed score, 4 estimated from the review. 10 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
▲Better than 86%
8.1

List score

List score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (2)
List score: in 2 of 135 lists (1%)
★Better than 93%
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £270
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Other versions:
12GB + 256GB8GB + 128GB

What reviewers say about the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro (12GB + 256GB)

Based on 8 · 12

Reviewers praise the included stylus and solid battery, but most criticize the software and are disappointed by the display.
Praised
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro (12GB + 256GB)

Based on 151 owners sharing their experience in online comments

38%positive10%mixed52%negative

Owners praise the bright, roomy screen, pen and value, while crashes, overheating and battery drain cause the most frustration.

What owners dislike

  • Several owners report the tablet gets noticeably hot during setup, note-taking, gaming, and while charging.12
  • Owners report the battery drains faster than expected, with some lasting only about five to six hours; lowering the refresh rate from 144Hz to 60Hz helps.10
  • After the Android 15 update, some owners find Bluetooth earbuds connect but play no audio, while other Bluetooth devices may still connect.9
  • Owners report lag in demanding apps, video playback, and video editing, and say the processor struggles with heavier tasks.9
  • Owners report Supercell games such as Clash of Clans, Clash Royale and Brawl Stars crash on launch or fail to open, while other games run fine.8
  • Owners report the Moto Pen stays on and keeps draining its battery even after Bluetooth disconnects, and they cannot find a clear way to turn it off.5
  • Owners report replacement pen nibs are hard to find, with one nib costing around 3,000 to 4,000 rupees.5
  • Owners report the System UI crashes and forces a restart when apps that only support portrait mode are used in landscape orientation.5
  • Owners report the pen sometimes fails to register strokes and double-tap actions, and that tilt is not always accurate.5
  • Owners report slow or unhelpful customer service, including delays with replacements and damaged-seal deliveries.5

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro (12GB + 256GB)

Technical score
Technical score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 89% of models
Score components:

22%

9.1

Performance

20%

7.4

Display

16%

8.7

Camera

14%

9.2

Battery

12%

7.2

Connectivity

8%

8.8

Software

5%

7.5

Design

3%

8.9

Audio

8.4
Reviews score
8.4
List score
8.1
Value for money
Value for money
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 98% of models
Score components:

70%

8.2

Overall score

30%

9.1

Price

8.5
RAM capacity
12 GB
Market range: <1 GB – >8 GB
This tablet has 12 GB of RAM, which is more than 90.1% of tablets and equal to 6.1% of tablets.
Process node
4 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 4 nm process, which is smaller than 88.1% of tablets and equal to 8.5% of tablets.
Internal storage
256 GB
Market range: <16 GB – >256 GB
This tablet has 256 GB of internal storage, which is more than 76.4% of tablets and equal to 15.8% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core score
1,407 points
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scores 1,407 points in single-core tests, which is higher than 76% of tablets and equal to 0.1% of tablets.
Chipset
MediaTek Dimensity 8300
This tablet runs on MediaTek Dimensity 8300, which is more advanced than 83% of tablets and equal to 0.2% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen resolution
2944×1840
This tablet has a 2944×1840 screen, which is sharper than 91.2% of tablets and equal to 0.5% of tablets.
Refresh rate
144 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet has a 144 Hz screen, which is smoother than 91.2% of tablets and equal to 7.4% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
273 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 273 ppi, which is higher than 79.4% of tablets and equal to 0.9% of tablets.
Display glass type
Tempered Glass
This tablet protects its screen with Tempered Glass, which is less durable than 78% of tablets and the same as 19.6% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical stabilisation. 0.4% of tablets offer this.
Main camera megapixels
?
Front camera megapixels
8 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera with 8 MP resolution, which is higher than 69.6% of tablets and equal to 19.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.2
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.2, which is wider than 30.1% of tablets and equal to 27.3% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet has 1xx optical zoom, which is stronger than 18.2% of tablets and equal to 80.9% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery capacity
10,200 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has 10,200 mAh battery capacity, which is larger than 93.7% of tablets and equal to 0.9% of tablets.
Charging speed
45 W
Market range: <10 W – >45 W
This tablet charges at 45 W, which is faster than 83.8% of tablets and equal to 6.7% of tablets.
Battery life
36 hours
Market range: <7 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 36 hours, which is longer than that of 99.9% of tablets.
video playback
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets offer this.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 43.2% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
LTE support
no
This tablet does not have built-in LTE. 42.9% of tablets offer this.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet connects to Wi-Fi. 0.2% of tablets offer this.
GPS
yes
This tablet has built-in GPS. 17.1% of tablets offer this.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G. 8.1% of tablets offer this.
NFC
no
This tablet does not include NFC. 10.8% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.2%.
Update support duration
medium
This tablet offers medium update support, which is longer than the support period of 47.6% of tablets and equal to that of 32.4% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet supports direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets offer this.
On-device AI
yes
This tablet supports on-device AI. 71.7% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not support app tracking protection. 28.4% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
IP rating
IP52
This tablet's IP rating is IP52, which is more protected than 84.8% of tablets and the same as 6.2% of tablets.
Weight
620 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 620 g, which is heavier than 80.2% of tablets and equal to 0.2% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.7% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Number of microphones
2
Market range: <1 – >3
This tablet has a microphone array of 2, which is more than 55.1% of tablets and equal to 32.7% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this.
Dolby Atmos support
yes
This tablet supports Dolby Atmos. 68.7% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
4
Market range: <2 – >4
This tablet includes 4 speakers, which is more than in 70.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 22.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer this.
Show more

Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro (12GB + 256GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftwareDesignAudio
  • 2.4x faster refresh rate
    This tablet has a faster refresh rate than the average tablet (144 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average tablet has a 60 Hz refresh rate.
    144 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (MediaTek Dimensity 8300 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    MediaTek Dimensity 8,300 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 26 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (36 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    36 hours vs 10 hours
  • 67.5% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (3.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    3.35 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 8 GB more RAM
    This tablet has more RAM than the average tablet (12 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    12 GB vs 4 GB
  • 4x more internal storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (256 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet has 64 GB of internal storage.
    256 GB vs 64 GB
  • Sharper display
    This tablet has a sharper screen than the average tablet (2944×1840 vs 1920×1200).
    2,944×1,840 vs 1,920×1,200
  • 2.6 inches larger screen
    This tablet has a larger screen than the average tablet (12.7 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet measures 10.1 inches.
    12.7 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 20.0% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▲ Better than 86% of models

    80%

    8.4

    Average grade

    20%

    8.3

    Popularity

    Grades by review (18)
    8 reviews: 4 with a printed score, 4 estimated from the review. 10 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.4 vs 7.0
  • 12.2% better value for money
    Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro (12GB + 256GB) has better value for money than the average tablet (8.48 vs 7.6).
    8.48 vs 7.55
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (MediaTek Dimensity 8300 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    MediaTek Dimensity 8,300 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 67.5% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (3.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    3.35 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 8 GB more RAM
    This tablet has more RAM than the average tablet (12 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    12 GB vs 4 GB
  • 4x more internal storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (256 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet has 64 GB of internal storage.
    256 GB vs 64 GB
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses UFS storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    UFS vs eMMC
  • More advanced memory type
    This tablet uses more advanced memory than the average tablet (LPDDR5X vs LPDDR3).
    LPDDR5X vs LPDDR3
  • 4.58x more memory bandwidth
    This tablet has more memory bandwidth than the average tablet (68.3 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has 14.9 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
    68.3 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 6,667 MHz faster RAM speed
    This tablet has a higher RAM speed than the average tablet (8,533 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    8,533 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 71.4% smaller process node
    This tablet has a smaller process node than the average tablet (4 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet is built on 14 nm.
    4 nm vs 14 nm
  • 2.15x faster GPU clock
    This tablet runs its GPU faster than the average tablet (1,400 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet runs its GPU at 650 MHz.
    1,400 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 93% higher single-core score
    This tablet has a higher single-core score than the average tablet (1,407 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in single-core tests.
    1,407 points vs 729 points
  • Includes neural engine
    This tablet includes a neural engine, the average tablet does not. 25.6% of tablets include a neural engine.
  • 6 years newer
    This tablet was released more recently than the average tablet (2025 vs 2019). The average tablet was released in 2019.
    April 2025
    2025 vs 2019
  • 2.4x faster refresh rate
    This tablet has a faster refresh rate than the average tablet (144 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average tablet has a 60 Hz refresh rate.
    144 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • Sharper display
    This tablet has a sharper screen than the average tablet (2944×1840 vs 1920×1200).
    2,944×1,840 vs 1,920×1,200
  • 2.6 inches larger screen
    This tablet has a larger screen than the average tablet (12.7 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet measures 10.1 inches.
    12.7 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Supports adaptive refresh rate
    This tablet has adaptive refresh rate, the average tablet does not. 17.7% of tablets support adaptive refresh rate.
  • 23.5% sharper screen detail
    This tablet has sharper screen detail than the average tablet (273 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    273 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Supports HDR10
    This tablet supports HDR10, while the average tablet does not. 21.7% of tablets support HDR10.
  • 2x faster touch response
    This tablet samples touch faster than the average tablet (240 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet samples touch at 120 Hz.
    240 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Better main-camera video
    This tablet supports better main-camera video recording than the average tablet (2160x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    2160x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • 3 MP higher front resolution
    This tablet has a higher-resolution front camera than the average tablet (8 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    8 MP vs 5 MP
  • Supports PDAF
    This tablet supports PDAF, the average tablet does not. 28% of tablets support PDAF.
  • Supports manual shutter speed
    This tablet supports manual shutter speed, while the average tablet does not. 21.8% of tablets support manual shutter speed.
  • Manual focus control
    This tablet supports manual focus, while the average tablet does not. 36.9% of tablets support manual focus.
  • Supports manual ISO
    This tablet supports manual ISO, while the average tablet does not. 45.9% of tablets support manual ISO.
  • Built-in camera flash
    This tablet has a camera flash, while the average tablet does not. 45.5% of tablets have one.
  • 26 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (36 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    36 hours vs 10 hours
  • 54.5% larger battery capacity
    This tablet has a larger battery capacity than the average tablet (10,200 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    10,200 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • 2.5x faster charging
    This tablet charges faster than the average tablet (45 W vs 18 W). The average tablet charges at 18 W.
    45 W vs 18 W
  • Newer Wi-Fi standard
    This tablet has a newer Wi-Fi standard than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)).
    Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • More Wi-Fi bands
    This tablet supports more Wi-Fi bands than the average tablet (2.4GHz/5GHz/6GHz vs 2.4GHz/5GHz). The average tablet supports 2.4GHz/5GHz Wi-Fi bands.
    2.4GHz/5GHz/6GHz vs 2.4GHz/5GHz
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    This tablet has a newer Bluetooth version than the average tablet (5.3 vs 5).
    5.3 vs 5
  • Faster USB ports
    This tablet has faster USB ports than the average tablet (USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2).
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2.0
  • Fingerprint unlocking
    This tablet supports fingerprint unlocking, while the average tablet does not. 16% of tablets offer this.
    Side-mounted fingerprint scanner.
  • Includes on-device AI
    This tablet includes on-device AI, the average tablet does not. 28.3% of tablets include on-device AI.
  • Supports app offloading
    This tablet supports app offloading, while the average tablet does not. 26.3% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports dynamic themes
    This tablet supports dynamic themes, while the average tablet does not. 29.5% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports extra dim mode
    This tablet supports extra dim mode, while the average tablet does not. 35.9% of tablets offer this.
  • Includes clipboard warnings
    This tablet has clipboard warnings, the average tablet does not. 40.3% of tablets include clipboard warnings.
    paste warning
  • More dust and water protection
    This tablet offers better dust and water protection than the average tablet (IP52 vs not rated).
    IP52 vs not rated
  • Stylus included
    This tablet includes a stylus, while the average tablet does not. 17.2% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports drawing
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, while the average tablet is not. 40% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • Supports stylus tilt
    This tablet supports stylus tilt, the average tablet does not. 33.5% of tablets support stylus tilt.
  • 1.1 mm thinner
    This tablet is thinner than the average tablet (6.9 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8 mm thick.
    6.9 mm vs 8 mm
  • 2 more speakers
    This tablet has more speakers than the average tablet (4 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    4 vs 2
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
    This tablet supports Dolby Atmos, the average tablet does not. 31.3% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
  • 1 more microphones
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (2 vs 1). The average tablet's microphone count is 1.
    2 vs 1
  • Supports Bluetooth LE Audio
    This tablet supports Bluetooth LE Audio, the average tablet does not. 11.4% of tablets support Bluetooth LE Audio.
  • Less durable glass
    This tablet has less durable glass than the average tablet (Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). The average tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass.
    Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • 26.5% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (620 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    620 g vs 490 g
  • No panorama mode
    This tablet does not support panorama mode, while the average tablet does. 78.6% of tablets support panorama mode.
  • Less vivid contrast
    This tablet has less contrast than the average tablet (918:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    918:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 91.8 mm taller
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (291.8 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200 mm tall.
    291.8 mm vs 200 mm
  • 1 nits dimmer screen
    This tablet is dimmer than the average tablet (400 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits.
    400 nits vs 401 nits
  • Less durable glass
    This tablet has less durable glass than the average tablet (Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). The average tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass.
    Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • Less vivid contrast
    This tablet has less contrast than the average tablet (918:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    918:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 1 nits dimmer screen
    This tablet is dimmer than the average tablet (400 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits.
    400 nits vs 401 nits
  • No panorama mode
    This tablet does not support panorama mode, while the average tablet does. 78.6% of tablets support panorama mode.
  • 26.5% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (620 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    620 g vs 490 g
  • 91.8 mm taller
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (291.8 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200 mm tall.
    291.8 mm vs 200 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

9.0
thehindu.com
≈ estimated
05/05/2025
Review · Pen-bundled mid-range tablet
Verdict
The Moto Pad 60 Pro suits entertainment and note-taking with its 144 Hz screen, JBL speakers and included Moto Pen Pro, but it lacks voice calling.
8.0
t2online.in
≈ estimated
27/05/2025
Review · Motorola ecosystem tablet
Verdict
The Moto Pad 60 Pro is a smooth tablet with long battery life, strong audio and tight Motorola device links, though it ships with Android 14.
9.0
deccanherald.com
✓ explicit
25/06/2025
Review · Mid-range pen tablet
Verdict
The Moto Pad 60 Pro is a mid-range tablet with solid build, smooth performance and a versatile stylus, though its glossy screen reflects outdoors.
9.0
itmatterss.in
≈ estimated
09/05/2025
Full review · Mid-range tablet
Verdict
The Moto Pad 60 Pro is a solid mid-range tablet with a smooth 144Hz screen, strong audio and fast charging, but it lacks voice calling.
9.0
t2online.in
≈ estimated
28/05/2025
Hands-on review · Mid-range tablet
Verdict
The Moto Pad 60 Pro is a solid mid-range 12.7-inch tablet that suits people already using Motorola devices, though its screen is not bright enough outdoors.
8.3
notebookcheck.net
✓ explicit
10/09/2025
Lab test · Design-focused tablet
Verdict
The Moto Pad 60 Pro is a sturdy, stylish tablet with fast Wi-Fi 6E and strong performance, but its screen could be brighter and its cameras are basic.
8.0
notebookcheck.com
✓ explicit
10/09/2025
Lab test · Mid-range stylus tablet
Verdict
The Moto Pad 60 Pro is a stylish, affordable tablet with a pen included and fast Wi-Fi 6E, but its screen could be brighter and its cameras are only a stopgap.
8.3
notebookcheck.nl
✓ explicit
11/09/2025
Lab test · Affordable designer tablet
Verdict
The Moto Pad 60 Pro is a designer-style, affordable tablet with a pen included and fast Wi-Fi 6E, though its screen could be brighter and its cameras are a stopgap.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro (12GB + 256GB)

  • High-performance MediaTek Dimensity 8300 chipset provides smooth daily use and gaming.
  • Large 12.7-inch 3K display with a fluid 144Hz refresh rate.
  • Excellent battery life from the 10,200 mAh cell, often lasting over a full day.
  • Includes the Moto Pen Pro stylus in the box, which features low latency and palm rejection.
  • Premium build quality with a metal unibody and IP52 splash resistance.
  • Immersive audio from four JBL speakers tuned with Dolby Atmos.

What customers don't like about Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro (12GB + 256GB)

  • Maximum screen brightness of ~400 nits can make outdoor visibility difficult.
  • Software optimization issues, specifically reported lag in some apps and crashes in games like Clash of Clans.
  • Lack of voice calling support despite its high-end features.
  • Limited global availability; primarily released for the Indian and Asian markets.
  • Camera quality is considered average and not on par with modern smartphones.
  • Updates may be slow or limited, with some units still lacking regular security patches.

Verdict

The Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro is a high-performance tablet featuring a massive 12.7-inch 3K LTPS display with a 144Hz refresh rate, powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 8300 chipset paired with 12GB of LPDDR5X RAM and 256GB of fast UFS 4.0 storage. Its core strengths include a premium metal unibody design, an immersive quad JBL speaker system with Dolby Atmos, and a substantial 10,200mAh battery that supports 45W fast charging and includes a 68W adapter in the box. Users benefit from the included Moto Pen Pro stylus, which offers 4096 levels of pressure sensitivity for creative tasks, alongside practical features like IP52 splash resistance and a side-mounted fingerprint sensor. However, notable drawbacks include the lack of cellular connectivity (Wi-Fi only), a display that can struggle in direct sunlight due to a peak brightness of 400 nits, and limited software longevity with updates only confirmed up to Android 16.

Compare Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro (12GB + 256GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro (12GB + 256GB) and other tablets

No results found