OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Microsoft Surface Pro X SQ1 4G (16GB + 256GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~ÂŁ1,290RAM capacity:16 GBInternal storage:256 GBScreen size:13 inchesChipset:Microsoft SQ1

Microsoft Surface Pro X SQ1 4G (16GB + 256GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

Microsoft Surface Pro X SQ1 4G (16GB + 256GB)
7.8/10

Overall score

Score
7.8/ 10
âś•
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–˛ Better than 81% of models
Score components

90%

7.8

Technical score

10%

8.1

User score

â–˛Better than 81% of tablets
6.6

Value for money

Value for money
6.6/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–Ľ Worse than 72% of models
Score components

70%

7.8

Overall score

30%

3.7

Price

â–ĽWorse than 72%
7.8

Technical score

Technical score
7.8/ 10
âś•
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–˛ Better than 81% of models
Score components

22%

8.8

Performance

20%

6.5

Display

16%

7.9

Camera

14%

8.1

Battery

12%

8.1

Connectivity

8%

9.3

Software & Features

5%

5.6

Design

3%

5.7

Audio & Multimedia

â–˛Better than 81%
8.1

User score

User score
8.1/ 10
âś•
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–˛ Better than 75% of models
Score components

70%

8.3

User ratings

30%

7.7

Number of reviews

â–˛Better than 75%
  • microsoft-surface-pro-x-sq1-16gb-256gb-4g
  • microsoft-surface-pro-x-sq1-16gb-256gb-4g
  • microsoft-surface-pro-x-sq1-16gb-256gb-4g
  • microsoft-surface-pro-x-sq1-16gb-256gb-4g
  • microsoft-surface-pro-x-sq1-16gb-256gb-4g
  • microsoft-surface-pro-x-sq1-16gb-256gb-4g
  • microsoft-surface-pro-x-sq1-16gb-256gb-4g
microsoft-surface-pro-x-sq1-16gb-256gb-4g
microsoft-surface-pro-x-sq1-16gb-256gb-4g
microsoft-surface-pro-x-sq1-16gb-256gb-4g
microsoft-surface-pro-x-sq1-16gb-256gb-4g
microsoft-surface-pro-x-sq1-16gb-256gb-4g
microsoft-surface-pro-x-sq1-16gb-256gb-4g
microsoft-surface-pro-x-sq1-16gb-256gb-4g
Where to buy
    N/A~ ÂŁ1,290
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
8GB + 128GBCheck price8GB + 256GBCheck price16GB + 512GBCheck price
Other versions:
16GB + 256GB
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Microsoft Surface Pro X SQ1 4G (16GB + 256GB)

Technical score
Technical score
7.8/ 10
âś•
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–˛ Better than 81% of models
Score components:

22%

8.8

Performance

20%

6.5

Display

16%

7.9

Camera

14%

8.1

Battery

12%

8.1

Connectivity

8%

9.3

Software & Features

5%

5.6

Design

3%

5.7

Audio & Multimedia

7.8
User score
User score
8.1/ 10
âś•
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–˛ Better than 75% of models
Score components

70%

8.3

User ratings

30%

7.7

Number of reviews

8.1
Popularity
Popularity
7.7/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–˛ Better than 75% of models
Popularity:
Microsoft Surface Pro X SQ1 4G (16GB + 256GB) has a user popularity of 7.7 points, which is lower than 74.9% of Tablets.
7.7
Value for money
Value for money
6.6/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–Ľ Worse than 72% of models
Score components:

70%

7.8

Overall score

30%

3.7

Price

6.6
RAM capacity
16 GB
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 16 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 96.2% of tablets and equal to that of 3.6% of tablets.
Process node
7 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 7 nm process node, which is smaller than the node size used in 70.2% of tablets and equal to the node used in 6.1% of tablets.
Internal storage
256 GB
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 256 GB which is larger than the storage of 76.5% of tablets and equal to that of 15.7% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
1,055 points
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scored 1,055 points in Geekbench 6 (single-core) which is higher than the score of 63.6% of tablets and equal to the score of 0.2% of tablets.
Chipset
Microsoft SQ1
This tablet uses the Microsoft SQ1 chipset, which is more advanced than the chipsets in 76.4% of tablets and equal to those in 0.1% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
2880Ă—1920
This tablet has a screen resolution of 2880Ă—1920 which is higher than that of 93.8% of tablets and equal to that of 0.6% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
LCD
This tablet uses a LCD display type. 83% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
267 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 267 ppi which is higher than that of 77.5% of tablets and equal to that of 1.5% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
This tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass display glass which is stronger than that on 45.4% of tablets and equal to that on 32.7% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
10 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 10 MP which is higher than that of 69% of tablets and equal to that of 0.3% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
5 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 5 MP which is higher than in 48.8% of tablets and equal to that in 19.6% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.0
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.0 which is wider than that of 57.5% of tablets and equal to that of 24.5% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
5,039 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 5,039 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 69.6% of tablets and equal to those in 0.1% of tablets.
Charging speed
60 W
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 60 W which is faster than in 90.7% of tablets and equal to speeds in 0.7% of tablets.
Battery life
15 hours
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 15 hours, which is longer than that of 85.6% of tablets and equal to that of 4.1% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 50.4% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
yes
This tablet supports LTE. 36.8% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Windows
This tablet uses the Windows operating system, which is less advanced than the one used by 84.1%.
Update support duration
long
This tablet offers long update support, which is longer than the support period of 80% of tablets and equal to that of 20% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
yes
This tablet supports on-device AI. 71.8% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
yes
This tablet includes app tracking protection. 71.8% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
774 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 774 g which is heavier than 92.8% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.2% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
yes
This tablet supports a backlit keyboard. 90.3% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
21 ms
Market range: <2 ms – >26 ms
This tablet has a pen latency of 21 ms, which is higher than that of 76% of tablets and equal to that of 4.9% of tablets.
Show more
Number of microphones
2
Market range: <0 – >5
This tablet includes 2 microphones, which is more than in 55.1% of tablets and equal to the number in 32.7% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
yes
This tablet supports Dolby Atmos. 68.6% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Microsoft Surface Pro X SQ1 4G (16GB + 256GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses NVMe storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    NVMe vs eMMC
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Microsoft SQ1 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Microsoft SQ1 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 12 GB more RAM
    This tablet has more RAM capacity than the average tablet (16 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    16 GB vs 4 GB
  • 5 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (15 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    15 hours vs 10 hours
  • Higher screen resolution
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (2880Ă—1920 vs 1920Ă—1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920Ă—1200.
    2880Ă—1920 vs 1920Ă—1200
  • 4x more storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (256 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    256 GB vs 64 GB
  • 3.33x faster charging speed
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (60 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    60 W vs 18 W
  • 2.9 inches larger screen size
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (13 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    13 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses NVMe storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    NVMe vs eMMC
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Microsoft SQ1 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Microsoft SQ1 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 12 GB more RAM
    This tablet has more RAM capacity than the average tablet (16 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    16 GB vs 4 GB
  • 4x more storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (256 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    256 GB vs 64 GB
  • 50% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    3 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • Better GPU
    This tablet uses the Adreno 685 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 685 vs Mali-G51
  • 4.58x higher memory bandwidth
    This tablet has a higher memory bandwidth than the average tablet (68.3 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    68.3 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 95.1% higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score than the average tablet (3,690 points vs 1,891 points). The average tablet scores 1,891 points in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    3,690 points vs 1,891 points
  • Newer DDR memory version
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3
  • 50% smaller process node
    This tablet uses a smaller process node than the average tablet (7 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    7 nm vs 14 nm
  • 2 more CPU threads
    This tablet has more CPU threads than the average tablet (8 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    8 vs 6
  • Includes neural engine
    This tablet includes a neural engine, the average tablet does not. 25.7% of tablets include a neural engine.
  • 44.7% higher Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a higher Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (1,055 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    1,055 points vs 729 points
  • Higher screen resolution
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (2880Ă—1920 vs 1920Ă—1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920Ă—1200.
    2880Ă—1920 vs 1920Ă—1200
  • 2.9 inches larger screen size
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (13 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    13 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 19.2% higher pixel density
    This tablet has a higher pixel density than the average tablet (267 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    267 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • 50 nits higher typical brightness
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (450 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    450 nits vs 400 nits
  • Higher contrast ratio
    This tablet has a higher contrast ratio than the average tablet (1400:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet contrast ratio is 1015:1.
    1,400:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 46 ppi higher screen sharpness
    This tablet has a higher screen sharpness than the average tablet (267 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    267 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 49 nits higher peak brightness
    This tablet has a higher peak brightness than the average tablet (450 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    450 nits vs 401 nits
  • 200 Hz higher PWM dimming frequency
    This tablet has a higher PWM dimming frequency than the average tablet (200 Hz vs 0 Hz). The average tablet has PWM dimming frequency of 0 Hz.
    At all brightness levels.
    200 Hz vs 0 Hz
  • Better main-camera video
    This tablet supports better main-camera video recording than the average tablet (2160x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    2160x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • Supports PDAF
    This tablet supports PDAF, the average tablet does not. 28.1% of tablets support PDAF.
  • Allows manual focus
    This tablet allows manual focus control, the average tablet does not. 37.2% of tablets include manual focus.
  • Allows manual ISO
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • 2 MP higher main camera megapixels
    This tablet has a higher main camera resolution than the average tablet (10 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet main camera has 8 MP megapixels.
    10 MP vs 8 MP
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This tablet has a better main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • 5 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (15 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    15 hours vs 10 hours
  • 3.33x faster charging speed
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (60 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    60 W vs 18 W
  • Supports fast charging
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • Supports DisplayPort over USB-C
    This tablet supports DisplayPort over USB-C, the average tablet does not. 21.5% of tablets support DisplayPort over USB-C.
  • Newer USB version
    This tablet supports a newer USB version than the average tablet (USB 3.2 Gen 2 vs USB 2). The average tablet uses USB USB 2.0.
    USB 3.2 Gen 2 vs USB 2.0
  • Supports eSIM
    This tablet supports eSIM, the average tablet does not. 11.5% of tablets support eSIM.
  • Longer update support
    This tablet offers longer update support than the average tablet (long vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    long vs medium
  • Includes on-device AI
    This tablet includes on-device AI, the average tablet does not. 28.3% of tablets include on-device AI.
  • Supports live text recognition
    This tablet supports live text recognition, the average tablet does not. 34.9% of tablets can recognize text from images.
  • Includes app tracking protection
    This tablet includes app tracking protection, the average tablet does not. 28.3% of tablets offer app tracking protection.
  • Allows app offloading
    This tablet allows app offloading, the average tablet does not. 26.4% of tablets support app offloading.
  • Supports dynamic theme
    This tablet features dynamic themes, the average tablet does not. 29% of tablets offer dynamic theming.
  • Supports extra dim mode
    This tablet features extra dim mode, the average tablet does not. 35.4% of tablets support extra diming.
  • Suitable for drawing
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, the average tablet is not. 41% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • Includes backlit keyboard
    This tablet has a backlit keyboard, the average tablet does not. 9.8% of tablets offer a backlit keyboard.
  • Supports stylus tilt
    This tablet supports stylus tilt, the average tablet does not. 33.6% of tablets support stylus tilt.
  • 0.7 mm thinner
    This tablet is thinner than the average tablet (7.3 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    7.3 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
    This tablet supports Dolby Atmos, the average tablet does not. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
  • 1 more microphone/s
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (2 vs 1). The average tablet has 1 microphones.
    2 vs 1
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • Inferior display type
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    LCD vs IPS LCD
  • 58% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (774 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    774 g vs 490 g
  • 23.4% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (5,039 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    5,039 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • No burst mode
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.5% of tablets support burst mode.
  • No 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This tablet does not have a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average tablet does. 72.9% of tablets include a headphone jack.
  • No timelapse video
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets include timelapse modes.
  • 4.96x more expensive
    Microsoft Surface Pro X SQ1 4G (16GB + 256GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (ÂŁ1,290 vs ÂŁ260).
    ÂŁ1,290 vs ÂŁ260
  • 4.96x more expensive
    Microsoft Surface Pro X SQ1 4G (16GB + 256GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (ÂŁ1,290 vs ÂŁ260).
    ÂŁ1,290 vs ÂŁ260
  • 7.8% worse value for money
    Microsoft Surface Pro X SQ1 4G (16GB + 256GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.59 vs 7.1).
    6.59 vs 7.1
  • Inferior display type
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    LCD vs IPS LCD
  • No burst mode
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.5% of tablets support burst mode.
  • No timelapse video
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets include timelapse modes.
  • 23.4% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (5,039 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    5,039 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • No HDMI output
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
    via USB-C video-out adapter
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • 58% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (774 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    774 g vs 490 g
  • 12 ms higher pen latency
    This tablet has higher pen latency than the average tablet (21 ms vs 9 ms). The average tablet has pen latency of 9 ms.
    21 ms vs 9 ms
  • 111.7 mm wider
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (287 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    287 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • No 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This tablet does not have a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average tablet does. 72.9% of tablets include a headphone jack.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

U
uk.pcmag.com
20/11/2019
Summary of the review
Microsoft Surface Pro X Review - PCMag UK
T
theguardian.com
12/03/2020
Summary of the review
Microsoft Surface Pro X review: not yet ready for prime time - The Guardian
P
pcworld.com
03/12/2019
Summary of the review
Microsoft Surface Pro X review: This isn't the long-lasting... - PCWorld
W
wired.com
11/11/2019
Summary of the review
Review: Microsoft Surface Pro X - WIRED
N
nytimes.com
05/11/2019
Summary of the review
Microsoft Surface Pro X Review: Powerful Computer, but So... - The New York Times
N
neowin.net
23/11/2019
Summary of the review
Microsoft Surface Pro X review: It's the perfect portable PC...for me - Neowin(laptopmedia.com) | October 12, 2020 | Microsoft Surface Pro X review –...
R
reviewed.com
02/09/2021
Summary of the review
Microsoft Surface Pro X: powerful, but limited - Reviewed
D
debugger.medium.com
22/10/2020
Summary of the review
Microsoft's New Surface Pro X: An Imperfect Taste of the Future - Medium Are you looking for performance benchmarks specifically for x86 app emulation...
T
tomshardware.com
12/11/2019
Summary of the review
Microsoft Surface Pro X Review: We’re Just Not Compatible - Tom's Hardware
L
laptopmag.com
18/11/2019
Summary of the review
Microsoft Surface Pro X Review - Laptop Mag
E
expertreviews.co.uk
13/10/2022
Summary of the review
Microsoft Surface Pro X review: Perfectly imperfect - Expert Reviews
C
creativebloq.com
30/03/2022
Summary of the review
Surface Pro X review - Creative Bloq
T
techradar.com
24/09/2024
Summary of the review
Microsoft Surface Pro X review - TechRadar
T
theverge.com
28/01/2020
Summary of the review
Microsoft’s Surface Pro X is the world’s most extravagant Chromebook Would you like to see a comparison of battery life results from these specific te...
C
cnetfrance.fr
20/11/2019
Summary of the review
Test de la Microsoft Surface Pro X: une tablette élégante mais limitée
(Translated)Show original
L
lemondeinformatique.fr
07/12/2019
Summary of the review
Test Microsoft Surface Pro X: Pas vraiment la tablette que l'on attendait
(Translated)Show original
Q
quechoisir.org
Date non spécifiée
Summary of the review
Test Microsoft Surface Pro X 4G - Tablette tactile - Que Choisir
(Translated)Show original
T
tf1info.fr
04/10/2019
Summary of the review
TEST - Surface Pro X : la réponse tout en puissance de Microsoft à l'iPad Pro
(Translated)Show original
D
digitec.ch
12/12/2019
Summary of the review
Surface Pro X à l'essai : des performances à la traîne
(Translated)Show original
G
global.techradar.com
28/01/2020
Summary of the review
Microsoft Surface Pro X review
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Microsoft Surface Pro X SQ1 4G (16GB + 256GB)

  • Sleek and ultra-thin design with minimal bezels and a high-quality 13-inch PixelSense display.
  • Exceptional portability due to its lightweight build (approx. 1.7 lbs).
  • Integrated 4G LTE connectivity for consistent internet access on the go.
  • Long-lasting battery life for productivity tasks, with many users reporting 8-10 hours of real-world use.
  • Silent, fanless operation and cool-running hardware during standard web and office tasks.
  • Excellent front and rear cameras for high-quality video conferencing (up to 4K on the rear).

What customers don't like about Microsoft Surface Pro X SQ1 4G (16GB + 256GB)

  • Major app compatibility issues; cannot run many 64-bit (x64) apps and some third-party drivers.
  • Performance lag or sluggishness when running non-native apps through emulation.
  • Inadequate for gaming or intensive professional work like heavy video/photo editing.
  • Lack of standard ports, featuring only two USB-C ports with no headphone jack or microSD slot.
  • High total cost once the necessary Signature Keyboard and Slim Pen are purchased separately.
  • Matte black aluminum finish is a significant 'fingerprint magnet' and prone to visible scratches.

Verdict

The Microsoft Surface Pro X is an ultra-slim 2-in-1 tablet featuring a custom 3.0GHz Microsoft SQ1 ARM-based processor, 16GB of LPDDR4x RAM, and a removable 256GB SSD. It boasts a high-resolution 13-inch PixelSense touchscreen (2880 x 1920) with thin bezels and integrated 4G LTE connectivity for constant mobile access. Main pros include its premium, lightweight design (774g), a vibrant edge-to-edge display, and silent fanless operation. However, notable cons include potential software compatibility issues with non-ARM Windows applications, the absence of a 3.5mm headphone jack, and the fact that the keyboard and Slim Pen are typically sold separately.

Compare Microsoft Surface Pro X SQ1 4G (16GB + 256GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Microsoft Surface Pro X SQ1 4G (16GB + 256GB) and other tablets

No results found