Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Microsoft Surface 3 WiFi (4GB + 128GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£60RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:128 GBScreen size:10.8 inchesChipset:Intel Atom x7-Z8700

Microsoft Surface 3 WiFi (4GB + 128GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

Microsoft Surface 3 WiFi (4GB + 128GB)
6.2/10

Overall score

Score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

6.0

Technical score

10%

8.2

User score

â–²Better than 50% of tablets
7.4

Value for money

Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.2

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–²Better than 61%
6.0

Technical score

Technical score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

22%

5.8

Performance

20%

5.3

Display

16%

6.7

Camera

14%

5.2

Battery

12%

6.6

Connectivity

8%

8.0

Software & Features

5%

5.9

Design

3%

4.8

Audio & Multimedia

â–¼Worse than 52%
8.2

User score

User score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.9

User ratings

30%

8.8

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–²Better than 75%
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Microsoft Surface 3 WiFi (4GB + 128GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

22%

5.8

Performance

20%

5.3

Display

16%

6.7

Camera

14%

5.2

Battery

12%

6.6

Connectivity

8%

8.0

Software & Features

5%

5.9

Design

3%

4.8

Audio & Multimedia

6.0
User score
User score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.9

User ratings

30%

8.8

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.2
Popularity
Popularity
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Microsoft Surface 3 WiFi (4GB + 128GB) has a user popularity of 8.8 points, which is lower than 84.5% of Tablets.
8.8
Value for money
Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

6.2

Overall score

30%

10

Price

7.4
RAM capacity
4 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 4 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 47.6% of tablets and equal to that of 17.6% of tablets.
Process node
14 nm
This tablet is built on a 14 nm process node, which is smaller than the node size used in 45% of tablets and equal to the node used in 8.6% of tablets.
Internal storage
128 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 128 GB which is larger than the storage of 56.7% of tablets and equal to that of 19.6% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
178 points
This tablet scored 178 points in Geekbench 6 (single-core) which is lower than the score of 94.7% of tablets and equal to the score of 0.2% of tablets.
Chipset
Intel Atom x7-Z8700
This tablet uses the Intel Atom x7-Z8700 chipset, which is less advanced than the chipsets in 73.4% of tablets and equal to those in 0.2% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1920×1280
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1920×1280 which is higher than that of 66.4% of tablets and equal to that of 1.1% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
LCD
This tablet uses a LCD display type. 83% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
214 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 214 ppi which is lower than that of 56.2% of tablets and equal to that of 0.1% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass 3
This tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass 3 display glass which is stronger than that on 80.1% of tablets and equal to that on 11.2% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than that of 36.5% of tablets and equal to that of 31.8% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
3.5 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 3.5 MP which is lower than in 51.2% of tablets and equal to that in 0.2% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.0
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.0 which is wider than that of 57.5% of tablets and equal to that of 24.5% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
7,270 mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 7,270 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 62.2% of tablets and equal to those in 0.1% of tablets.
Charging speed
13 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 13 W which is slower than in 58.5% of tablets and equal to speeds in 0.3% of tablets.
Battery life
10 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 10 hours, which is longer than that of 39.1% of tablets and equal to that of 20.5% of tablets.
video playback
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
no
This tablet does not support fast charging. 49.7% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
yes
This tablet supports LTE. 36.8% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Windows
This tablet uses the Windows operating system, which is less advanced than the one used by 84.1%.
Update support duration
long
This tablet offers long update support, which is longer than the support period of 80% of tablets and equal to that of 20% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
622 g
This tablet weighs 622 g which is heavier than 80.5% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.1% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
yes
This tablet supports a backlit keyboard. 90.3% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
?
Show more
Number of microphones
1
This tablet includes 1 microphones, which is more than in 0.2% of tablets and equal to the number in 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Microsoft Surface 3 WiFi (4GB + 128GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • Longer update support
    This tablet offers longer update support than the average tablet (long vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    long vs medium
  • Allows manual shutter speed
    This tablet allows manual shutter speed control, the average tablet does not. 21.9% of tablets offer manual shutter speed control.
  • Allows manual focus
    This tablet allows manual focus control, the average tablet does not. 37.2% of tablets include manual focus.
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • 20% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • Allows manual ISO
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • Newer USB version
    This tablet supports a newer USB version than the average tablet (USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2). The average tablet uses USB USB 2.0.
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2.0
  • 2x more storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (128 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    128 GB vs 64 GB
  • 4.33x cheaper
    Microsoft Surface 3 WiFi (4GB + 128GB) is cheaper than the average tablet (£60 vs £260).
    £60 vs £260
  • 82.3% more popular
    Microsoft Surface 3 WiFi (4GB + 128GB) is more popular than the average tablet (8.77 vs 4.8).
    8.77 vs 4.81
  • 20% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 2x more storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (128 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    128 GB vs 64 GB
  • 12 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (16 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    16 vs 4
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Intel Atom x7-Z8700 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Intel Atom x7-Z8700 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 0.7 inches larger screen size
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (10.8 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    10.8 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Higher screen resolution
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (1920×1280 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    1920×1280 vs 1920×1200
  • More durable display glass
    This tablet uses better display glass than the average tablet (Corning Gorilla Glass 3 vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 3 vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • Allows manual shutter speed
    This tablet allows manual shutter speed control, the average tablet does not. 21.9% of tablets offer manual shutter speed control.
  • Allows manual focus
    This tablet allows manual focus control, the average tablet does not. 37.2% of tablets include manual focus.
  • Allows manual ISO
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This tablet has a better main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • 10.5% larger battery capacity
    This tablet has a higher battery capacity than the average tablet (7,270 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    7,270 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • Newer USB version
    This tablet supports a newer USB version than the average tablet (USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2). The average tablet uses USB USB 2.0.
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2.0
  • Longer update support
    This tablet offers longer update support than the average tablet (long vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    long vs medium
  • Allows app offloading
    This tablet allows app offloading, the average tablet does not. 26.4% of tablets support app offloading.
  • Includes backlit keyboard
    This tablet has a backlit keyboard, the average tablet does not. 9.8% of tablets offer a backlit keyboard.
  • No USB Type-C
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • Inferior display type
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    LCD vs IPS LCD
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • No HDR photo mode
    This tablet does not have HDR photo mode, the average tablet does. 79.6% of tablets support HDR photo mode.
  • 75.6% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (178 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    178 points vs 729 points
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    4.0 vs 5.0
  • 75.6% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (178 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    178 points vs 729 points
  • 2 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    4 vs 6
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not use a big.LITTLE architecture, the average tablet does. 51.3% of tablets use a big.LITTLE architecture.
  • Worse GPU
    This tablet uses the Intel HD Graphics GPU, while the average tablet uses the stronger Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Intel HD Graphics vs Mali-G51
  • 266 MHz slower RAM speed
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (1,600 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    1,600 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 14.1% lower memory bandwidth
    This tablet has a lower memory bandwidth than the average tablet (12.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    12.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • Inferior display type
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    LCD vs IPS LCD
  • 6 nits lower peak brightness
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (395 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    395 nits vs 401 nits
  • Lower contrast ratio
    This tablet has a lower contrast ratio than the average tablet (963:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    963:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 4.5% lower pixel density
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (214 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    214 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • 5 nits lower typical brightness
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (395 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    395 nits vs 400 nits
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • No HDR photo mode
    This tablet does not have HDR photo mode, the average tablet does. 79.6% of tablets support HDR photo mode.
  • No timelapse video
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets include timelapse modes.
  • 1.5 MP lower front camera megapixels
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (3.5 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    3.5 MP vs 5 MP
  • 27.8% slower charging speed
    This tablet supports slower charging than the average tablet (13 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    13 W vs 18 W
  • No USB Type-C
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    4.0 vs 5.0
  • No face recognition
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56% of tablets support face recognition.
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No full-page screenshots
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 52.5% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • 26.9% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (622 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    622 g vs 490 g
  • 91.7 mm wider
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (267 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    267 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 0.7 mm thicker
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (8.7 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    8.7 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • 4 older release date
    This tablet is an older model than the average tablet (2015 vs 2019).
    May 2015
    2015 vs 2019

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
theverge.com
14/04/2015
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
13/04/2015
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
14/04/2015
Summary of the review
L
laptopmag.com
28/04/2015
Summary of the review
T
techadvisor.com
12/05/2015
Summary of the review
U
ultrabookreview.com
21/07/2015
Summary of the review
F
financialpost.com
01/05/2015
Summary of the review
E
expertreviews.co.uk
05/05/2015
Summary of the review
L
linkedin.com
18/07/2015
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
13/04/2015
Summary of the review
T
theguardian.com
01/05/2015
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
05/05/2015
Summary of the review
M
mobiletechreview.com
13/05/2015
Summary of the review
P
pcwelt.de
08/05/2015
Summary of the review
S
spiegel.de
11/05/2015
Summary of the review
H
hardwareluxx.de
13/05/2015
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
22/05/2015
Summary of the review
C
connect.de
26/06/2015
Summary of the review
C
curved.de
23/01/2023
Summary of the review
C
computerwoche.de
15/05/2015
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: November 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Microsoft Surface 3 WiFi (4GB + 128GB)

  • Sleek and attractive design with a premium build quality
  • Highly portable and lightweight, making it an excellent travel companion
  • Vivid, high-resolution PixelSense display with great color accuracy
  • Quiet and fanless operation due to the Intel Atom processor
  • Versatile integrated 3-position kickstand for different viewing angles
  • Impressive battery life, typically lasting up to 10 hours for video playback

What customers don't like about Microsoft Surface 3 WiFi (4GB + 128GB)

  • Essential accessories like the Type Cover and Surface Pen are sold separately, increasing the total cost
  • Computing performance is limited to lightweight tasks and may struggle with heavy multitasking
  • Small and sometimes awkward touchpad on the optional keyboard cover
  • Limited port selection, often featuring only one full-size USB port
  • The 10.8-inch screen can feel too small for extensive productivity work
  • Keyboard cover material may show signs of wear and scuffing over time

Verdict

The Microsoft Surface 3 WiFi (4GB + 128GB) is a compact 10.8-inch tablet designed for portability and everyday tasks, featuring a 1920x1280 ClearType Full HD Plus touchscreen with a 3:2 aspect ratio. It is powered by a quad-core Intel Atom x7-Z8700 processor and includes a versatile 3-position kickstand, a full-size USB 3.0 port, and a microSD card reader for expandable storage. Main pros include its premium magnesium build, fanless silent operation, and a sharp, vibrant display that supports the Surface Pen for natural writing and drawing. However, its performance is limited to lightweight duties like web browsing and office work, with notable cons including extremely slow charging via micro-USB and the additional cost of essential accessories like the Type Cover and Pen.

Compare Microsoft Surface 3 WiFi (4GB + 128GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Microsoft Surface 3 WiFi (4GB + 128GB) and other tablets

No results found