OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v3.0
Tablets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Tablets Methodology v3.0

Lenovo ThinkPad Tablet 2 3G (2GB + 64GB) review: 168 specs compared

Avg. price:~£540RAM capacity:2 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:10.1 inchesChipset:Intel Atom Z2760

Lenovo ThinkPad Tablet 2 3G (2GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and 21 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

6.2/10

Overall score

Score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Score components

35%

5.6

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

5.6

Reviews score

10%

5.6

Sentiment score

â–¼Worse than 80% of tablets
6.6

Value for money

Value for money
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
Score components

70%

6.2

Overall score

30%

7.7

Price

â–¼Worse than 95%
5.6

Technical score

Technical score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
Score components

22%

4.8

Performance

20%

5.7

Display

16%

6.4

Camera

14%

3.8

Battery

12%

6.8

Connectivity

8%

7.0

Software

5%

6.3

Design

3%

5.7

Audio

â–¼Worse than 66%
5.6

Reviews score

Reviews score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 77% of models

5.6

Mark 7.8 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

7.6

Average grade

20%

8.4

Popularity

Grades by review (21)
17 reviews: 10 with a printed score, 7 estimated from the review. 4 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 77%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £540
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Lenovo ThinkPad Tablet 2 3G (2GB + 64GB)

Based on 16 · 4

Reviewers love the pen and light, portable design, but most complain about slow performance and too few USB ports.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Lenovo ThinkPad Tablet 2 3G (2GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
Score components:

22%

4.8

Performance

20%

5.7

Display

16%

6.4

Camera

14%

3.8

Battery

12%

6.8

Connectivity

8%

7.0

Software

5%

6.3

Design

3%

5.7

Audio

5.6
Reviews score
5.6
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
Score components:

70%

6.2

Overall score

30%

7.7

Price

6.6
RAM capacity
2 GB
Market range: <1 GB – >8 GB
This tablet has 2 GB of RAM, which is less than 61.3% of tablets and equal to 15.5% of tablets.
Process node
32 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 32 nm process, which is larger than 82.7% of tablets and equal to 4.2% of tablets.
Internal storage
64 GB
Market range: <16 GB – >256 GB
This tablet has 64 GB of internal storage, which is more than 39.1% of tablets and equal to 17% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core score
?
Chipset
Intel Atom Z2760
This tablet runs on Intel Atom Z2760, which is less advanced than 81.9% of tablets and equal to 1.1% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen resolution
1366×768
This tablet has a 1366×768 screen, which is less sharp than 65.6% of tablets and equal to 2.4% of tablets.
Refresh rate
?
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
155 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 155 ppi, which is lower than 84.5% of tablets and equal to 1.9% of tablets.
Display glass type
AGC Dragontrail Glass
This tablet protects its screen with AGC Dragontrail Glass, which is less durable than 54.6% of tablets and the same as 2.8% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical stabilisation. 0.4% of tablets offer this.
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a rear camera with 8 MP resolution, which is higher than 36.4% of tablets and equal to 31.9% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
2 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera with 2 MP resolution, which is lower than 53.8% of tablets and equal to 25.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
?
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet has 1xx optical zoom, which is stronger than 18.2% of tablets and equal to 80.9% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery capacity
3,250 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has 3,250 mAh battery capacity, which is smaller than 95.1% of tablets and equal to 0.5% of tablets.
Charging speed
10 W
Market range: <10 W – >45 W
This tablet charges at 10 W, which is slower than 60.9% of tablets and equal to 33.3% of tablets.
Battery life
10 hours
Market range: <7 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 10 hours, which is longer than that of 39.1% of tablets and equal to that of 20.5% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets offer this.
Fast charging
no
This tablet does not support fast charging. 56.9% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
LTE support
yes
This tablet has built-in LTE. 57.1% of tablets offer this.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet connects to Wi-Fi. 0.2% of tablets offer this.
GPS
yes
This tablet has built-in GPS. 17.1% of tablets offer this.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G. 8.1% of tablets offer this.
NFC
yes
This tablet includes NFC. 89.3% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Windows
This tablet uses the Windows operating system, which is less advanced than the one used by 84.2%.
Update support duration
long
This tablet offers long update support, which is longer than the support period of 80% of tablets and equal to that of 20% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
no
This tablet does not support direct OS updates. 79.8% of tablets offer this.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not support app tracking protection. 28.4% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
IP rating
not rated
This tablet's IP rating is not rated, which is less protected than 16.5% of tablets and the same as 83.6% of tablets.
Weight
600 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 600 g, which is heavier than 76.9% of tablets and equal to 0.7% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.7% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Number of microphones
2
Market range: <1 – >3
This tablet has a microphone array of 2, which is more than 55.1% of tablets and equal to 32.7% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.3% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
Market range: <2 – >4
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.8% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer this.
Show more

Lenovo ThinkPad Tablet 2 3G (2GB + 64GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftwareDesignAudio
  • Supports LTE
    This tablet supports LTE, while the average tablet does not. 42.9% of tablets support LTE.
  • Longer update support
    This tablet offers longer update support than the average tablet (long vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    long vs medium
  • Includes NFC
    This tablet includes NFC, while the average tablet does not. 10.8% of tablets include NFC.
  • Includes anti-reflection coating
    This tablet has anti-reflection coating, the average tablet does not. 24.6% of tablets use anti-reflection coating.
  • Monitors battery health
    This tablet monitors battery health, while the average tablet does not. 36.7% of tablets monitor battery health.
  • Stylus included
    This tablet includes a stylus, while the average tablet does not. 17.2% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports drawing
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, while the average tablet is not. 40% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • Supports multithreading
    This tablet supports multithreading, while the average tablet does not. 9.9% of tablets support multithreading.
  • Supports multithreading
    This tablet supports multithreading, while the average tablet does not. 9.9% of tablets support multithreading.
  • Includes anti-reflection coating
    This tablet has anti-reflection coating, the average tablet does not. 24.6% of tablets use anti-reflection coating.
  • Built-in camera flash
    This tablet has a camera flash, while the average tablet does not. 45.5% of tablets have one.
  • Monitors battery health
    This tablet monitors battery health, while the average tablet does not. 36.7% of tablets monitor battery health.
  • Supports LTE
    This tablet supports LTE, while the average tablet does not. 42.9% of tablets support LTE.
  • Includes NFC
    This tablet includes NFC, while the average tablet does not. 10.8% of tablets include NFC.
  • Supports cellular data
    This tablet supports cellular data, while the average tablet does not. 47.4% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports HDMI output
    This tablet supports HDMI output, while the average tablet does not. 49.8% of tablets offer this.
    mini-HDMI port
  • Longer update support
    This tablet offers longer update support than the average tablet (long vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    long vs medium
  • Supports dynamic themes
    This tablet supports dynamic themes, while the average tablet does not. 29.5% of tablets offer this.
  • Stylus included
    This tablet includes a stylus, while the average tablet does not. 17.2% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports drawing
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, while the average tablet is not. 40% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • 1 more microphones
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (2 vs 1). The average tablet's microphone count is 1.
    2 vs 1
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    4 vs 8
  • 50.8% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a smaller battery capacity than the average tablet (3,250 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    3,250 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • No fast charging
    This tablet does not support fast charging, while the average tablet does. 56.8% of tablets support fast charging.
  • 3 MP lower front resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution front camera than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • No direct OS updates
    This tablet does not support direct OS updates, while the average tablet does. 79.7% of tablets offer this.
  • 20.0% lower review score
    Reviews score
    5.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models

    5.6

    Mark 7.8 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.6

    Average grade

    20%

    8.4

    Popularity

    Grades by review (21)
    17 reviews: 10 with a printed score, 7 estimated from the review. 4 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    5.6 vs 7.0
  • 20.0% lower review score
    Reviews score
    5.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models

    5.6

    Mark 7.8 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.6

    Average grade

    20%

    8.4

    Popularity

    Grades by review (21)
    17 reviews: 10 with a printed score, 7 estimated from the review. 4 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    5.6 vs 7.0
  • 25.3% lower sentiment score
    5.6 vs 7.5
  • 13.8% worse value for money
    Lenovo ThinkPad Tablet 2 3G (2GB + 64GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.63 vs 7.6).
    6.63 vs 7.55
  • 2.08x more expensive
    Lenovo ThinkPad Tablet 2 3G (2GB + 64GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£540 vs £260).
    £540 vs £260
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    4 vs 8
  • 2 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM than the average tablet (2 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    2 GB vs 4 GB
  • 2.29x larger process node
    This tablet has a larger process node than the average tablet (32 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet is built on 14 nm.
    32 nm vs 14 nm
  • 1,066 MHz slower RAM speed
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (800 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    800 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • More basic graphics
    This tablet has less advanced graphics than the average tablet (PowerVR SGX545 vs Mali-G51).
    PowerVR SGX545 vs Mali-G51
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not support big.LITTLE architecture, while the average tablet does. 51.7% of tablets support big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 57% less memory bandwidth
    This tablet has less memory bandwidth than the average tablet (6.4 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has 14.9 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
    6.4 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 10% lower CPU speed
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.8 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 7 years older
    This tablet was released earlier than the average tablet (2012 vs 2019). The average tablet was released in 2019.
    October 2012
    2012 vs 2019
  • More basic memory type
    This tablet uses less advanced memory than the average tablet (LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3).
    LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3
  • 18% slower GPU clock
    This tablet runs its GPU slower than the average tablet (533 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet runs its GPU at 650 MHz.
    533 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 29.9% softer screen detail
    This tablet has softer screen detail than the average tablet (155 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    155 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Less vivid contrast
    This tablet has less contrast than the average tablet (500:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    500:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 24 nits dimmer screen
    This tablet is dimmer than the average tablet (377 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits.
    377 nits vs 401 nits
  • Less sharp display
    This tablet has a less sharp screen than the average tablet (1366×768 vs 1920×1200).
    1,366×768 vs 1,920×1,200
  • 50% slower touch response
    This tablet samples touch more slowly than the average tablet (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet samples touch at 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Less durable glass
    This tablet has less durable glass than the average tablet (AGC Dragontrail Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). The average tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass.
    AGC Dragontrail Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • 3 MP lower front resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution front camera than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not support manual white balance, while the average tablet does. 51.5% of tablets support manual white balance.
  • No timelapse video
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, while the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets support timelapse video.
  • 50.8% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a smaller battery capacity than the average tablet (3,250 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    3,250 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • No fast charging
    This tablet does not support fast charging, while the average tablet does. 56.8% of tablets support fast charging.
  • 44.4% slower charging
    This tablet charges slower than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet charges at 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • Older Wi-Fi standard
    This tablet has an older Wi-Fi standard than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet has an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4 vs 5).
    4 vs 5
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • No direct OS updates
    This tablet does not support direct OS updates, while the average tablet does. 79.7% of tablets offer this.
  • No camera and mic privacy
    This tablet does not support camera and mic privacy, while the average tablet does. 56.6% of tablets offer this.
  • No full-page screenshots
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 53% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No dark mode
    This tablet does not support dark mode, while the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets offer this.
  • 22.4% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (600 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    600 g vs 490 g
  • 1.8 mm thicker
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (9.8 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8 mm thick.
    9.8 mm vs 8 mm
  • 87.3 mm wider
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (262.6 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    262.6 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 62.6 mm taller
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (262.6 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200 mm tall.
    262.6 mm vs 200 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
Landis Technologies
≈ estimated
20/04/2013
Hands-on review · build, stylus, keyboard and app tests
Verdict
The Lenovo ThinkPad Tablet 2 3G works well as a small communication device, though its momentary power switch is the main complaint.
8.0
HotHardware
≈ estimated
28/02/2013
Hands-on look · display, pen, ports and video playback
Verdict
The Lenovo ThinkPad Tablet 2 3G is well built and comfortable to hold, with a good display and decent speakers.
9.5
Laptop Mag
≈ estimated
22/02/2013
Hands-on review · battery, pen, keyboard and price
Verdict
The Lenovo ThinkPad Tablet 2 3G is lightweight, with strong battery life and a useful pen, the best Windows 8 tablet so far.
8.0
MobileTechReview
≈ estimated
14/02/2013
Hands-on review · drawing, media and note-taking tests
Verdict
The Lenovo ThinkPad Tablet 2 3G is the most compact tablet of its kind, but Atom performance limits serious graphics work.
Not graded
Overview video
Hands-on video, no verdict
Not graded
Overview video
Hands-on video, no verdict

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

7.0
pcmag.com
✓ explicit
22/02/2013
Lab test · Slate tablet
Verdict
The ThinkPad Tablet 2 is a light, all-day Windows 8 tablet for office work, but its slow Atom chip and weak USB port put it behind rivals.
7.8
cnet.com
✓ explicit
15/02/2013
Hands-on review · Atom tablet
Verdict
The ThinkPad Tablet 2 is the best-looking Atom tablet, with a strong keyboard dock and all-day battery, but its 64GB storage and slow Atom chip make it expensive.
7.0
trustedreviews.com
✓ explicit
03/09/2012
Hands-on review · Windows 8 tablet
Verdict
The ThinkPad Tablet 2 is well-made with a useful stylus, but sluggish performance means it's hard to recommend without its keyboard.
8.0
slashgear.com
≈ estimated
12/02/2013
Hands-on review · Windows 8 tablet
Verdict
The ThinkPad Tablet 2 is a light, comfortable Windows 8 tablet for everyday use, but its Atom chip trails the Surface Pro and the keyboard can slide off.
8.0
arstechnica.com
≈ estimated
02/04/2013
Lab review · Windows 8 tablet
Verdict
The ThinkPad Tablet 2 brings solid ThinkPad build and a useful pen to Windows 8, but its Atom chip only suits lightweight desktop apps.
7.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
02/03/2013
Hands-on review · Windows 8 hybrid
Verdict
The ThinkPad Tablet 2 is a sleek, all-day travel tablet with a good keyboard, but its Atom chip and loose dock make it a poor choice as your only computer.
9.0
mobiletechreview.com
≈ estimated
12/03/2013
Hands-on review · Windows 8 tablet
Verdict
The Lenovo ThinkPad Tablet 2 is a light, long-lasting Windows 8 tablet with a sharp pen, but its weak USB port cannot power portable hard drives.
7.0
wired.com
✓ explicit
25/02/2013
Hands-on review · Budget Atom tablet
Verdict
The Lenovo ThinkPad Tablet 2 is the cheapest 10-inch Atom slate tested, light with long battery life, but its USB port and slow charging are real drawbacks.
8.5
techspot.com
✓ explicit
10/07/2013
Benchmark review · Windows 8 tablet
Verdict
The Lenovo ThinkPad Tablet 2 is a silent Windows 8 tablet that handles web, email and Office smoothly, but it struggles with games and video editing.
6.0
expertreviews.co.uk
✓ explicit
16/08/2013
Lab-tested review · Business Windows slate
Verdict
The Lenovo ThinkPad Tablet 2 is a light, good-looking business tablet with a responsive pen, but its slow processor makes the Dell Latitude 10 the better buy.
8.0
laptopmag.com
✓ explicit
08/02/2013
Lab-tested review · Pen and keyboard
Verdict
The Lenovo ThinkPad Tablet 2 is a long-lasting, light tablet with an accurate pen and optional keyboard, though its performance is not enough to replace a main PC.
5.0
ubergizmo.com
≈ estimated
11/04/2013
Hands-on review · Ultra-light Windows tablet
Verdict
The Lenovo ThinkPad Tablet 2 is very light and lasts about 10 hours, but its weak processor and very slow charging leave it behind better Windows 8 tablets.
Z
zdnet.com
05/02/2013
≈ estimated
7.0
Summary of the review
Lenovo ThinkPad Tablet 2: First impressions (review) Would you like to find more information regarding compatible accessories such as the Bluetooth ke...
8.7
notebookcheck.com
✓ explicit
12/03/2013
Lab test · Display and performance
Verdict
The Lenovo ThinkPad Tablet 2 has a very precise grayscale screen with wide viewing angles, but its glossy surface and off colors limit outdoor and color work.
6.0
computerwoche.de
≈ estimated
03/03/2013
Hands-on test · Business Windows tablet
Verdict
The Lenovo ThinkPad Tablet 2 suits running existing Windows programs on the go, but its netbook-level power and 16:9 screen mean plenty of compromises.
7.0
hardware.info
≈ estimated
29/06/2013
Hands-on review · Business Windows tablet
Verdict
The ThinkPad Tablet 2 is a business Windows 8 tablet with a stylus stored in its body, but its modest Atom chip means you should pick 64GB storage.
7.0
fwd.nl
✓ explicit
09/08/2013
Video review · Windows 8 tablet
Verdict
The ThinkPad Tablet 2 is a light, well-built Windows 8 tablet with long battery life, but its slow Atom chip suits light work rather than heavy tasks.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Lenovo ThinkPad Tablet 2 3G (2GB + 64GB)

  • Exceptional 'all-day' battery life, often exceeding 10 hours of video playback.
  • Extremely thin and lightweight design (approx. 600g), making it highly portable.
  • High-quality IPS display with vibrant colours and wide viewing angles.
  • Integrated Wacom digitizer and stylus silo for precise note-taking and navigation.
  • Standard Micro-USB charging port allows for convenient charging with common mobile cables.
  • Strong build quality and durable 'ThinkPad' industrial design.

What customers don't like about Lenovo ThinkPad Tablet 2 3G (2GB + 64GB)

  • Slow performance from the Intel Atom processor, especially during multitasking or heavy web browsing.
  • Underpowered full-size USB 2.0 port that cannot drive most external hard drives.
  • Extremely slow charging times via Micro-USB, sometimes taking over 12 hours for a full charge.
  • Limited 2GB of RAM and 64GB storage, which is quickly consumed by the Windows OS.
  • Expensive total cost when including 'must-have' accessories like the keyboard dock.
  • Lack of USB 3.0 support and relatively low screen resolution (1366x768) compared to rivals.

Verdict

The Lenovo ThinkPad Tablet 2 is a professional-grade Windows 8 Pro device powered by a 1.8GHz dual-core Intel Atom Z2760 processor, 2GB of LPDDR2 RAM, and 64GB of eMMC storage. It features a 10.1-inch IPS five-finger multitouch display with a 1366x768 resolution and includes built-in 3G connectivity for mobile productivity. Key characteristics include its extremely lightweight 565g chassis, an integrated digitizer stylus with dedicated internal storage, and a comprehensive port selection including full-size USB 2.0 and mini-HDMI. Its main advantages are an exceptional battery life of up to 10 hours and a high-quality, durable build that aligns with the ThinkPad legacy. However, it is limited by sluggish performance under heavy multitasking, a low-powered USB port that cannot drive external hard drives, and significantly slow charging times via its micro-USB port.

Compare Lenovo ThinkPad Tablet 2 3G (2GB + 64GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Lenovo ThinkPad Tablet 2 3G (2GB + 64GB) and other tablets

No results found