OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v3.0
Tablets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Tablets Methodology v3.0

Lenovo Tab M8 FHD Cellular (3GB + 32GB) review: 168 specs compared

Avg. price:~£140RAM capacity:3 GBInternal storage:32 GBScreen size:8 inchesChipset:MediaTek Helio P22T

Lenovo Tab M8 FHD Cellular (3GB + 32GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and 11 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

Lenovo Tab M8 FHD Cellular (3GB + 32GB)
6.2/10

Overall score

Score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
Score components

35%

5.6

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

5.6

Reviews score

10%

5.6

Sentiment score

â–¼Worse than 81% of tablets
7.2

Value for money

Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Score components

70%

6.2

Overall score

30%

9.8

Price

â–¼Worse than 72%
5.6

Technical score

Technical score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
Score components

22%

5.0

Performance

20%

4.8

Display

16%

6.2

Camera

14%

4.8

Battery

12%

6.6

Connectivity

8%

6.9

Software

5%

7.4

Design

3%

3.9

Audio

â–¼Worse than 68%
5.6

Reviews score

Reviews score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 77% of models

5.6

Mark 7.7 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

7.7

Average grade

20%

7.8

Popularity

Grades by review (11)
6 reviews: 4 with a printed score, 2 estimated from the review. 5 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 77%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • lenovo-tab-m8-fhd-3gb-32gb-cellular
lenovo-tab-m8-fhd-3gb-32gb-cellular
Where to buy
    N/A~ £140
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Other versions:
3GB + 32GB4GB + 64GB

What reviewers say about the Lenovo Tab M8 FHD Cellular (3GB + 32GB)

Based on 6 · 6

Reviewers praise the long battery life, sharp screen and solid build, but dislike the camera and slow charging.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Lenovo Tab M8 FHD Cellular (3GB + 32GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
Score components:

22%

5.0

Performance

20%

4.8

Display

16%

6.2

Camera

14%

4.8

Battery

12%

6.6

Connectivity

8%

6.9

Software

5%

7.4

Design

3%

3.9

Audio

5.6
Reviews score
5.6
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Score components:

70%

6.2

Overall score

30%

9.8

Price

7.2
RAM capacity
3 GB
Market range: <1 GB – >8 GB
This tablet has 3 GB of RAM, which is less than 52.9% of tablets and equal to 8.4% of tablets.
Process node
12 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 12 nm process, which is smaller than 53.2% of tablets and equal to 13.9% of tablets.
Internal storage
32 GB
Market range: <16 GB – >256 GB
This tablet has 32 GB of internal storage, which is less than 60.9% of tablets and equal to 17.9% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core score
332 points
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scores 332 points in single-core tests, which is lower than 79.5% of tablets and equal to 0.6% of tablets.
Chipset
MediaTek Helio P22T
This tablet runs on MediaTek Helio P22T, which is less advanced than 58% of tablets and equal to 1% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen resolution
1920×1200
This tablet has a 1920×1200 screen, which is sharper than 39.1% of tablets and equal to 18.8% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet has a 60 Hz screen, which is smoother than 0.1% of tablets and equal to 73.4% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
283 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 283 ppi, which is higher than 84.4% of tablets and equal to 3% of tablets.
Display glass type
Tempered Glass
This tablet protects its screen with Tempered Glass, which is less durable than 78% of tablets and the same as 19.6% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical stabilisation. 0.4% of tablets offer this.
Main camera megapixels
?
Front camera megapixels
5 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera with 5 MP resolution, which is higher than 48.6% of tablets and equal to 19.7% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.2
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.2, which is wider than 30.1% of tablets and equal to 27.3% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet has 1xx optical zoom, which is stronger than 18.2% of tablets and equal to 80.9% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery capacity
5,100 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has 5,100 mAh battery capacity, which is smaller than 63.6% of tablets and equal to 4.5% of tablets.
Charging speed
10 W
Market range: <10 W – >45 W
This tablet charges at 10 W, which is slower than 60.9% of tablets and equal to 33.3% of tablets.
Battery life
?
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets offer this.
Fast charging
no
This tablet does not support fast charging. 56.9% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
LTE support
yes
This tablet has built-in LTE. 57.1% of tablets offer this.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet connects to Wi-Fi. 0.2% of tablets offer this.
GPS
yes
This tablet has built-in GPS. 17.1% of tablets offer this.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G. 8.1% of tablets offer this.
NFC
no
This tablet does not include NFC. 10.8% of tablets offer this.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.2%.
Update support duration
short
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.4% of tablets and equal to that of 47.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
no
This tablet does not support direct OS updates. 79.8% of tablets offer this.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
?
Show more
IP rating
IP52
This tablet's IP rating is IP52, which is more protected than 84.8% of tablets and the same as 6.2% of tablets.
Weight
305 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 305 g, which is lighter than 92.9% of tablets and equal to 0.5% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.7% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
1
Market range: <1 – >3
This tablet has a microphone array of 1, which is more than 0.2% of tablets and equal to 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.3% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
1
Market range: <2 – >4
This tablet includes 1 speakers, which is fewer than in 90.3% of tablets and equal to the number in 9.6% of tablets.
FM radio
yes
This tablet includes an FM radio. 81.1% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say

Lenovo Tab M8 FHD Cellular (3GB + 32GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftwareDesignAudio
  • 28.1% sharper screen detail
    This tablet has sharper screen detail than the average tablet (283 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    283 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Supports LTE
    This tablet supports LTE, while the average tablet does not. 42.9% of tablets support LTE.
  • 37.8% lighter
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (305 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    305 g vs 490 g
  • More dust and water protection
    This tablet offers better dust and water protection than the average tablet (IP52 vs not rated).
    IP52 vs not rated
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (MediaTek Helio P22T vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    MediaTek Helio P22T vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 15% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (2.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    2.3 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • Supports cellular data
    This tablet supports cellular data, while the average tablet does not. 47.4% of tablets offer this.
  • Built-in camera flash
    This tablet has a camera flash, while the average tablet does not. 45.5% of tablets have one.
  • 85.7% cheaper
    Lenovo Tab M8 FHD Cellular (3GB + 32GB) is cheaper than the average tablet (£140 vs £260).
    £140 vs £260
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (MediaTek Helio P22T vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    MediaTek Helio P22T vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 15% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (2.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    2.3 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 14.3% smaller process node
    This tablet has a smaller process node than the average tablet (12 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet is built on 14 nm.
    12 nm vs 14 nm
  • 28.1% sharper screen detail
    This tablet has sharper screen detail than the average tablet (283 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    283 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Built-in camera flash
    This tablet has a camera flash, while the average tablet does not. 45.5% of tablets have one.
  • Supports LTE
    This tablet supports LTE, while the average tablet does not. 42.9% of tablets support LTE.
  • Supports cellular data
    This tablet supports cellular data, while the average tablet does not. 47.4% of tablets offer this.
  • 37.8% lighter
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (305 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    305 g vs 490 g
  • More dust and water protection
    This tablet offers better dust and water protection than the average tablet (IP52 vs not rated).
    IP52 vs not rated
  • 52.7 mm narrower
    This tablet is narrower than the average tablet (122.6 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    122.6 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No fast charging
    This tablet does not support fast charging, while the average tablet does. 56.8% of tablets support fast charging.
  • No direct OS updates
    This tablet does not support direct OS updates, while the average tablet does. 79.7% of tablets offer this.
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • 20.0% lower review score
    Reviews score
    5.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models

    5.6

    Mark 7.7 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.7

    Average grade

    20%

    7.8

    Popularity

    Grades by review (11)
    6 reviews: 4 with a printed score, 2 estimated from the review. 5 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    5.6 vs 7.0
  • Less durable glass
    This tablet has less durable glass than the average tablet (Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). The average tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass.
    Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • No tap-to-focus
    This tablet does not support touch autofocus, while the average tablet does. 83% of tablets support touch autofocus.
  • 20.0% lower review score
    Reviews score
    5.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models

    5.6

    Mark 7.7 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.7

    Average grade

    20%

    7.8

    Popularity

    Grades by review (11)
    6 reviews: 4 with a printed score, 2 estimated from the review. 5 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    5.6 vs 7.0
  • 25.3% lower sentiment score
    5.6 vs 7.5
  • 4.2% worse value for money
    Lenovo Tab M8 FHD Cellular (3GB + 32GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (7.24 vs 7.6).
    7.24 vs 7.55
  • 61.8% lower multi-core score
    This tablet has a lower multi-core score than the average tablet (723 points vs 1,891 points). The average tablet scores 1,891 points in multi-core tests.
    723 points vs 1,891 points
  • 54.5% lower single-core score
    This tablet has a lower single-core score than the average tablet (332 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in single-core tests.
    332 points vs 729 points
  • More basic graphics
    This tablet has less advanced graphics than the average tablet (IMG PowerVR GE8320 vs Mali-G51).
    IMG PowerVR GE8320 vs Mali-G51
  • 50% less internal storage
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (32 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet has 64 GB of internal storage.
    32 GB vs 64 GB
  • 1 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM than the average tablet (3 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    3 GB vs 4 GB
  • 266 MHz slower RAM speed
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (1,600 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    1,600 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 2 fewer GPU execution units
    This tablet has less GPU execution units than the average tablet (2 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    2 vs 4
  • Less durable glass
    This tablet has less durable glass than the average tablet (Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). The average tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass.
    Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • 2.1 inches smaller screen
    This tablet has a smaller screen than the average tablet (8 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet measures 10.1 inches.
    8 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 51 nits dimmer screen
    This tablet is dimmer than the average tablet (350 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits.
    350 nits vs 401 nits
  • 50 nits lower typical brightness
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (350 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    350 nits vs 400 nits
  • Less vivid contrast
    This tablet has less contrast than the average tablet (1000:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    1,000:1 vs 1,015:1
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • No tap-to-focus
    This tablet does not support touch autofocus, while the average tablet does. 83% of tablets support touch autofocus.
  • No HDR photo mode
    This tablet does not have HDR photo mode, the average tablet does. 79.8% of tablets support HDR photo mode.
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not support manual white balance, while the average tablet does. 51.5% of tablets support manual white balance.
  • No burst mode
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.6% of tablets support burst mode.
  • No panorama mode
    This tablet does not support panorama mode, while the average tablet does. 78.6% of tablets support panorama mode.
  • No fast charging
    This tablet does not support fast charging, while the average tablet does. 56.8% of tablets support fast charging.
  • 44.4% slower charging
    This tablet charges slower than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet charges at 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • 22.7% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a smaller battery capacity than the average tablet (5,100 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    5,100 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No direct OS updates
    This tablet does not support direct OS updates, while the average tablet does. 79.7% of tablets offer this.
  • No offline voice recognition
    This tablet does not support offline voice recognition, the average tablet does. 76.4% of tablets support offline voice recognition.
  • 1 fewer speakers
    This tablet has less speakers than the average tablet (1 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    1 vs 2

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Arun Srinath
≈ estimated
20/07/2021
Hands-on review · display, speakers and gaming performance
Verdict
Lenovo Tab M8 FHD Cellular is one of the best budget tablets available, with a good display and decent performance.
9.0
BFB MTB
≈ estimated
01/11/2020
Overview and gaming test · MOBA, shooter and battle royale
Verdict
Lenovo Tab M8 FHD Cellular is a good buy overall, with bloatware and a micro USB port as its main drawbacks.
7.0
Zi Reviews Tech
≈ estimated
17/09/2020
Hands-on review · reading, battery, camera and gaming tests
Verdict
Lenovo Tab M8 FHD Cellular is flawed, but a good pick for reading manga and comics thanks to its long battery life.
5.0
ETA PRIME
≈ estimated
27/01/2020
Hands-on review · benchmarks, gaming, emulation and streaming
Verdict
Lenovo Tab M8 FHD Cellular is hard to recommend at its price, except as a cheap game-streaming option.
9.0
Tigersteve Tech
≈ estimated
10/04/2022
Long-term test · almost a year of daily use
Verdict
Lenovo Tab M8 FHD Cellular is one of the best budget tablets, with a good build and screen, though its speakers, camera and gaming are weak.
6.0
Zi Reviews Tech
≈ estimated
03/07/2020
Unboxing and quick review · speed, screen and audio tests
Verdict
Lenovo Tab M8 FHD Cellular has a sharp screen and playable games, but sluggish speed and weak audio hold it back.

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

7.0
heise.de
✓ explicit
06/03/2021
Full review · Bargain 8-inch tablet
Verdict
The Lenovo Tab M8 FHD is a bargain 8-inch tablet with a sharp screen and long battery life, but it cannot stream Netflix or Prime Video in HD.
7.0
quechoisir.org
≈ estimated
25/08/2021
Expert review · Family 8-inch tablet
Verdict
The Lenovo Tab M8 FHD is a family tablet with good processor performance and battery life, held back by a disappointing screen and average cameras.
7.3
test-achats.be
✓ explicit
01/01/2020
Lab test · Compact 8-inch tablet
Verdict
The Lenovo Tab M8 FHD suits most people, with strong hardware and battery life, though its screen and front camera fall short.
8.0
sotactile.fr
≈ estimated
19/03/2021
Full review · Screen-focused 8-inch tablet
Verdict
The Lenovo Tab M8 FHD has an excellent screen and elegant metal design, but it cannot stream Netflix or Prime Video in full HD.
7.3
test-achats.be
✓ explicit
Not Dated
Lab test · Compact 8-inch tablet
Verdict
The Lenovo Tab M8 FHD suits most people, with strong hardware and battery life, though its screen and rear camera fall short.
7.3
test-aankoop.be
✓ explicit
Not Dated
Expert review · Compact 8-inch tablet
Verdict
The Lenovo Tab M8 FHD is a powerful, easy-to-use tablet with excellent battery life, though its screen is only decent and its cameras are weak.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Lenovo Tab M8 FHD Cellular (3GB + 32GB)

  • High-resolution FHD display offers excellent clarity and vibrant colors compared to standard HD models
  • Long-lasting battery life, with some users reporting it lasting multiple days on a single charge
  • Premium build quality featuring a sleek, durable metal chassis instead of cheap plastic
  • Highly portable and lightweight design, making it a good Kindle alternative for e-reading
  • Easy and straightforward setup process with a user-friendly interface
  • Good value for money, often described as an impressive tablet for its price point

What customers don't like about Lenovo Tab M8 FHD Cellular (3GB + 32GB)

  • Sluggish performance and lag, particularly when multitasking or running demanding applications
  • Limited internal storage (typically 32GB) with some restrictions on moving apps to external SD cards
  • Low-quality cameras that often produce blurry or unclear photos
  • Slow charging times compared to modern standards
  • Lack of advanced hardware features like a built-in compass for navigation or wireless charging
  • Inconsistent touch sensitivity reported by some users, requiring firm presses

Verdict

The Lenovo Tab M8 FHD (2nd Gen) Cellular is a compact 8-inch tablet featuring a high-resolution 1920 x 1200 IPS display, a MediaTek Helio P22T octa-core processor, 3GB of RAM, and 32GB of expandable storage. Its premium metal construction and slim 8.15mm profile make it highly portable, while the built-in 4G LTE connectivity ensures internet access on the go. Key advantages include its crisp Full HD screen, which is significantly sharper than the standard HD model, a long-lasting 5000 mAh battery providing up to 12-18 hours of usage, and solid build quality. However, users may experience sluggish performance during intensive multitasking or modern 3D gaming, and the 5MP rear and 2MP front cameras are generally considered low-quality for detailed photography.

Compare Lenovo Tab M8 FHD Cellular (3GB + 32GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Lenovo Tab M8 FHD Cellular (3GB + 32GB) and other tablets

No results found