OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v3.0
Tablets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Tablets Methodology v3.0

Blackview Tab 9 4G (4GB + 64GB) review: 168 specs compared

Avg. price:~£150RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:10.1 inchesChipset:Unisoc Tiger T610

Blackview Tab 9 4G (4GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and 9 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

Blackview Tab 9 4G (4GB + 64GB)
6.9/10

Overall score

Score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
Score components

35%

5.8

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

8.0

Reviews score

10%

5.8

Sentiment score

â–¼Worse than 55% of tablets
7.7

Value for money

Value for money
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 57% of models
Score components

70%

6.9

Overall score

30%

9.7

Price

â–²Better than 57%
5.8

Technical score

Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
Score components

22%

5.5

Performance

20%

5.1

Display

16%

7.5

Camera

14%

3.3

Battery

12%

7.4

Connectivity

8%

7.0

Software

5%

5.5

Design

3%

5.3

Audio

â–¼Worse than 60%
8.0

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 60% of models

80%

8.2

Average grade

20%

7.6

Popularity

Grades by review (9)
1 review, its grade estimated from the review text. 8 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 60%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • blackview-tab-9-4gb-64gb-4g
  • blackview-tab-9-4gb-64gb-4g
  • blackview-tab-9-4gb-64gb-4g
  • blackview-tab-9-4gb-64gb-4g
  • blackview-tab-9-4gb-64gb-4g
  • blackview-tab-9-4gb-64gb-4g
  • blackview-tab-9-4gb-64gb-4g
  • blackview-tab-9-4gb-64gb-4g
blackview-tab-9-4gb-64gb-4g
blackview-tab-9-4gb-64gb-4g
blackview-tab-9-4gb-64gb-4g
blackview-tab-9-4gb-64gb-4g
blackview-tab-9-4gb-64gb-4g
blackview-tab-9-4gb-64gb-4g
blackview-tab-9-4gb-64gb-4g
blackview-tab-9-4gb-64gb-4g
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Blackview Tab 9 4G (4GB + 64GB)

Based on 1 · 8

Reviewers like the solid build and smooth everyday performance, but complain about slow charging and weak cameras.
Praised
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the Blackview Tab 9 4G (4GB + 64GB)

Based on 31 owners sharing their experience in online comments

32%positive16%mixed52%negative

Battery life and value earn praise, but charging problems and freezing make experiences uneven.

What owners dislike

  • Owners say the original charger can take all night or days, while a phone charger reportedly fills it in about 3 hours.10
  • Owners report random reboots, often at the lock screen, and sometimes freezing; boot-up can take about 12 minutes.5

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Blackview Tab 9 4G (4GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
Score components:

22%

5.5

Performance

20%

5.1

Display

16%

7.5

Camera

14%

3.3

Battery

12%

7.4

Connectivity

8%

7.0

Software

5%

5.5

Design

3%

5.3

Audio

5.8
Reviews score
8.0
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 57% of models
Score components:

70%

6.9

Overall score

30%

9.7

Price

7.7
RAM capacity
4 GB
Market range: <1 GB – >8 GB
This tablet has 4 GB of RAM, which is more than 47.2% of tablets and equal to 17.8% of tablets.
Process node
12 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 12 nm process, which is smaller than 53.2% of tablets and equal to 13.9% of tablets.
Internal storage
64 GB
Market range: <16 GB – >256 GB
This tablet has 64 GB of internal storage, which is more than 39.1% of tablets and equal to 17% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core score
378 points
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scores 378 points in single-core tests, which is lower than 72.8% of tablets and equal to 0.2% of tablets.
Chipset
Unisoc Tiger T610
This tablet runs on Unisoc Tiger T610, which is less advanced than 63.2% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen resolution
1920×1200
This tablet has a 1920×1200 screen, which is sharper than 39.1% of tablets and equal to 18.8% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet has a 60 Hz screen, which is smoother than 0.1% of tablets and equal to 73.4% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
224 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 224 ppi, which is higher than 50.1% of tablets and equal to 11.5% of tablets.
Display glass type
AGC Dragontrail Glass
This tablet protects its screen with AGC Dragontrail Glass, which is less durable than 54.6% of tablets and the same as 2.8% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical stabilisation. 0.4% of tablets offer this.
Main camera megapixels
13 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a rear camera with 13 MP resolution, which is higher than 73.9% of tablets and equal to 21.7% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
8 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera with 8 MP resolution, which is higher than 69.6% of tablets and equal to 19.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.2
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.2, which is wider than 30.1% of tablets and equal to 27.3% of tablets.
Optical zoom
N/A
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery capacity
7,480 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has 7,480 mAh battery capacity, which is larger than 63.3% of tablets and equal to 0.1% of tablets.
Charging speed
10 W
Market range: <10 W – >45 W
This tablet charges at 10 W, which is slower than 60.9% of tablets and equal to 33.3% of tablets.
Battery life
6 hours
Market range: <7 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 6 hours, which is shorter than that of 92% of tablets and equal to that of 2.6% of tablets.
mixed use
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets offer this.
Fast charging
no
This tablet does not support fast charging. 56.9% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
LTE support
yes
This tablet has built-in LTE. 57.1% of tablets offer this.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet connects to Wi-Fi. 0.2% of tablets offer this.
GPS
yes
This tablet has built-in GPS. 17.1% of tablets offer this.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G. 8.1% of tablets offer this.
NFC
no
This tablet does not include NFC. 10.8% of tablets offer this.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.2%.
Update support duration
short
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.4% of tablets and equal to that of 47.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
no
This tablet does not support direct OS updates. 79.8% of tablets offer this.
On-device AI
?
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not support app tracking protection. 28.4% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
IP rating
not rated
This tablet's IP rating is not rated, which is less protected than 16.5% of tablets and the same as 83.6% of tablets.
Weight
570 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 570 g, which is heavier than 69.1% of tablets and equal to 0.4% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.7% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
1
Market range: <1 – >3
This tablet has a microphone array of 1, which is more than 0.2% of tablets and equal to 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.3% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
Market range: <2 – >4
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.8% of tablets.
FM radio
yes
This tablet includes an FM radio. 81.1% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say

Blackview Tab 9 4G (4GB + 64GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftwareDesignAudio
  • 5 MP higher rear resolution
    This tablet has a higher-resolution rear camera than the average tablet (13 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a rear camera of 8 MP.
    13 MP vs 8 MP
  • 3 MP higher front resolution
    This tablet has a higher-resolution front camera than the average tablet (8 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    8 MP vs 5 MP
  • Supports LTE
    This tablet supports LTE, while the average tablet does not. 42.9% of tablets support LTE.
  • Supports manual ISO
    This tablet supports manual ISO, while the average tablet does not. 45.9% of tablets support manual ISO.
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Unisoc Tiger T610 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Unisoc Tiger T610 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • More advanced memory type
    This tablet uses more advanced memory than the average tablet (LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3).
    LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3
  • Supports live text recognition
    This tablet supports live text recognition, while the average tablet does not. 35.1% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports cellular data
    This tablet supports cellular data, while the average tablet does not. 47.4% of tablets offer this.
  • 14.3% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 60% of models

    80%

    8.2

    Average grade

    20%

    7.6

    Popularity

    Grades by review (9)
    1 review, its grade estimated from the review text. 8 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.0 vs 7.0
  • 73.3% cheaper
    Blackview Tab 9 4G (4GB + 64GB) is cheaper than the average tablet (£150 vs £260).
    £150 vs £260
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Unisoc Tiger T610 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Unisoc Tiger T610 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • More advanced memory type
    This tablet uses more advanced memory than the average tablet (LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3).
    LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3
  • 14.3% smaller process node
    This tablet has a smaller process node than the average tablet (12 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet is built on 14 nm.
    12 nm vs 14 nm
  • 5 MP higher rear resolution
    This tablet has a higher-resolution rear camera than the average tablet (13 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a rear camera of 8 MP.
    13 MP vs 8 MP
  • 3 MP higher front resolution
    This tablet has a higher-resolution front camera than the average tablet (8 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    8 MP vs 5 MP
  • Supports manual ISO
    This tablet supports manual ISO, while the average tablet does not. 45.9% of tablets support manual ISO.
  • Built-in camera flash
    This tablet has a camera flash, while the average tablet does not. 45.5% of tablets have one.
  • 13.3% larger battery capacity
    This tablet has a larger battery capacity than the average tablet (7,480 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    7,480 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • Supports LTE
    This tablet supports LTE, while the average tablet does not. 42.9% of tablets support LTE.
  • Supports cellular data
    This tablet supports cellular data, while the average tablet does not. 47.4% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports live text recognition
    This tablet supports live text recognition, while the average tablet does not. 35.1% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports LDAC
    This tablet supports LDAC, the average tablet does not. 25.3% of tablets support LDAC.
  • 4 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (6 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    mixed use
    6 hours vs 10 hours
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No fast charging
    This tablet does not support fast charging, while the average tablet does. 56.8% of tablets support fast charging.
  • No direct OS updates
    This tablet does not support direct OS updates, while the average tablet does. 79.7% of tablets offer this.
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    This tablet has a narrower front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's front camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • No manual exposure control
    This tablet does not support manual exposure, while the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets support manual exposure.
  • No HDR photo mode
    This tablet does not have HDR photo mode, the average tablet does. 79.8% of tablets support HDR photo mode.
  • 51 nits dimmer screen
    This tablet is dimmer than the average tablet (350 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits.
    350 nits vs 401 nits
  • 22.7% lower sentiment score
    5.8 vs 7.5
  • 30.6% lower multi-core score
    This tablet has a lower multi-core score than the average tablet (1,313 points vs 1,891 points). The average tablet scores 1,891 points in multi-core tests.
    1,313 points vs 1,891 points
  • 48.1% lower single-core score
    This tablet has a lower single-core score than the average tablet (378 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in single-core tests.
    378 points vs 729 points
  • 10% lower CPU speed
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.8 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 2 fewer GPU execution units
    This tablet has less GPU execution units than the average tablet (2 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    2 vs 4
  • 14.1% less memory bandwidth
    This tablet has less memory bandwidth than the average tablet (12.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has 14.9 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
    12.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 51 nits dimmer screen
    This tablet is dimmer than the average tablet (350 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits.
    350 nits vs 401 nits
  • 50 nits lower typical brightness
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (350 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    350 nits vs 400 nits
  • Less durable glass
    This tablet has less durable glass than the average tablet (AGC Dragontrail Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). The average tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass.
    AGC Dragontrail Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    This tablet has a narrower front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's front camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • No manual exposure control
    This tablet does not support manual exposure, while the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets support manual exposure.
  • No HDR photo mode
    This tablet does not have HDR photo mode, the average tablet does. 79.8% of tablets support HDR photo mode.
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not support manual white balance, while the average tablet does. 51.5% of tablets support manual white balance.
  • 4 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (6 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    mixed use
    6 hours vs 10 hours
  • No fast charging
    This tablet does not support fast charging, while the average tablet does. 56.8% of tablets support fast charging.
  • 44.4% slower charging
    This tablet charges slower than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet charges at 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • No Ethernet support
    This tablet does not have Ethernet support, the average tablet does. 76.5% of tablets support Ethernet.
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No direct OS updates
    This tablet does not support direct OS updates, while the average tablet does. 79.7% of tablets offer this.
  • No camera and mic privacy
    This tablet does not support camera and mic privacy, while the average tablet does. 56.6% of tablets offer this.
  • No offline voice recognition
    This tablet does not support offline voice recognition, the average tablet does. 76.4% of tablets support offline voice recognition.
  • 16.3% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (570 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    570 g vs 490 g
  • 0.5 mm thicker
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (8.5 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8 mm thick.
    8.5 mm vs 8 mm
  • 43.7 mm taller
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (243.7 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200 mm tall.
    243.7 mm vs 200 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
C Butler
≈ estimated
14/06/2021
Hands-on gaming review · racing, Roblox and Call of Duty tests
Verdict
Blackview Tab 9 4G delivers smooth gaming performance, making it a recommended choice for mobile gamers.
9.0
Orr
≈ estimated
11/06/2021
Unboxing and review · gaming, display and speaker tests
Verdict
Blackview Tab 9 4G is a really good buy: strong display, speakers and gaming performance for a budget tablet.
8.0
ETA PRIME
≈ estimated
25/04/2021
Hands-on review · benchmarks, gaming and emulation tests
Verdict
Blackview Tab 9 4G is a budget tablet with decent performance, good build and screen, though gaming and emulation are limited.
7.0
Redskull
≈ estimated
21/04/2021
Hands-on review · display, performance and battery tests
Verdict
Blackview Tab 9 4G is a decent budget tablet with nothing special to set it apart from others.
9.0
Sami Luo Tech
≈ estimated
28/08/2021
Long-term review · three months of use and gaming tests
Verdict
Blackview Tab 9 4G is a solid budget tablet with good battery life and build, easily recommended despite modest hardware.
Not graded
Overview video
Overview video
Hands-on video, no verdict
Not graded
Hands-on video, no verdict
Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0
smartzone.de
≈ estimated
21/06/2021
Hands-on test · Budget 10-inch tablet
Verdict
The Blackview Tab 9 4G is a solid 10-inch tablet with a sharp screen and quick apps, but it is heavy and streams Netflix only in SD.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Blackview Tab 9 4G (4GB + 64GB)

  • Excellent value for money and 'bang for the buck' for a budget tablet
  • Solid build quality, with some reviewers noting a premium metal feel compared to plastic competitors
  • Bright 10.1-inch FHD+ IPS display with good viewing angles and 1080p resolution
  • Comes with useful accessories in the box, including a folio case and screen protector
  • Supports expandable storage via microSD (up to 128GB or 1TB depending on model)
  • Includes a 3.5mm headphone jack and support for external keyboards/OTG
  • Good performance for everyday tasks like web browsing, emails, and social media

What customers don't like about Blackview Tab 9 4G (4GB + 64GB)

  • Underpowered processor (Unisoc) makes it unsuitable for high-end gaming or video editing
  • Mixed reliability reports, including issues with boot loops, flickering screens, and devices failing after several months
  • Battery life sometimes falls short of advertised claims during active use
  • Cameras are mediocre, often producing washed-out or grainy photos, especially in low light
  • WiFi connectivity issues reported by some users, including slow speeds or frequent disconnections
  • Widevine level 3 certification on some models limits streaming quality on platforms like Netflix
  • Charging is relatively slow (10W), taking several hours for a full charge

Verdict

The Blackview Tab 9 4G is a budget-friendly 10.1-inch tablet featuring a 1920x1200 FHD+ IPS display and a slim 8.9mm aluminum alloy unibody. It is powered by an octa-core Unisoc Tiger T610 processor paired with 4GB of RAM and 64GB of internal storage, which is expandable up to 128GB via microSD. Key characteristics include dual 4G LTE SIM support, a substantial 7480mAh battery providing up to 6 hours of video playback, and a Sony IMX258 13MP rear camera alongside a 5MP front-facing sensor. Main pros highlighted by users include its vibrant screen, solid build quality for the price, and the inclusion of a protective case and OTG support for PC-like functionality. However, notable cons include underpowered performance for demanding games, mediocre camera quality in low light, and reports from some users regarding slow Wi-Fi reception and occasional system stability issues.

Compare Blackview Tab 9 4G (4GB + 64GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Blackview Tab 9 4G (4GB + 64GB) and other tablets

No results found