Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Asus Memo Pad 8 4G (2GB + 64GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£210RAM capacity:2 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:8 inchesChipset:Intel Atom Z3745

Asus Memo Pad 8 4G (2GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

5.7/10

Overall score

Score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

5.5

Technical score

10%

7.3

User score

â–¼Worse than 67% of tablets
6.8

Value for money

Value for money
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

5.7

Overall score

30%

9.4

Price

â–¼Worse than 63%
5.5

Technical score

Technical score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

22%

5.7

Performance

20%

5.3

Display

16%

5.7

Camera

14%

3.3

Battery

12%

6.6

Connectivity

8%

6.7

Software & Features

5%

6.8

Design

3%

4.8

Audio & Multimedia

â–¼Worse than 69%
7.3

User score

User score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

4.8

Number of reviews

â–¼Worse than 79%
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £210
Available versions:
Other versions:
2GB + 64GB2GB + 32GB
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Asus Memo Pad 8 4G (2GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

22%

5.7

Performance

20%

5.3

Display

16%

5.7

Camera

14%

3.3

Battery

12%

6.6

Connectivity

8%

6.7

Software & Features

5%

6.8

Design

3%

4.8

Audio & Multimedia

5.5
User score
User score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

4.8

Number of reviews

7.3
Popularity
Popularity
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Asus Memo Pad 8 4G (2GB + 64GB) has a user popularity of 4.8 points, which is lower than 49.5% of Tablets.
4.8
Value for money
Value for money
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

5.7

Overall score

30%

9.4

Price

6.8
RAM capacity
2 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 2 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 60.9% of tablets and equal to that of 15.6% of tablets.
Process node
22 nm
This tablet is built on a 22 nm process node, which is larger than the node size used in 57.5% of tablets and equal to the node used in 7.2% of tablets.
Internal storage
64 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 64 GB which is larger than the storage of 39.5% of tablets and equal to that of 17.1% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
?
Chipset
Intel Atom Z3745
This tablet uses the Intel Atom Z3745 chipset, which is less advanced than the chipsets in 77.6% of tablets and equal to those in 1% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1920×1200
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1920×1200 which is higher than that of 39.2% of tablets and equal to that of 18.8% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
283 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 283 ppi which is higher than that of 84.5% of tablets and equal to that of 3% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass 3
This tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass 3 display glass which is stronger than that on 80.1% of tablets and equal to that on 11.2% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
5 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 5 MP which is lower than that of 63.6% of tablets and equal to that of 26% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
1.2 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 1.2 MP which is lower than in 86.3% of tablets and equal to that in 4.8% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.8
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.8 which is narrower than that of 89.6% of tablets and equal to that of 3.1% of tablets.
Optical zoom
N/A
Show more
Battery capacity
3,950 mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 3,950 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 89.4% of tablets and equal to those in 0.7% of tablets.
Charging speed
10 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 10 W which is slower than in 61% of tablets and equal to speeds in 33.2% of tablets.
Battery life
9 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 9 hours, which is shorter than that of 62.7% of tablets and equal to that of 6.8% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
no
This tablet does not support fast charging. 49.7% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
yes
This tablet supports LTE. 36.8% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
yes
This tablet supports NFC. 89.1% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
medium
This tablet offers medium update support, which is longer than the support period of 47.3% of tablets and equal to that of 32.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
299 g
This tablet weighs 299 g which is lighter than 94.4% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.2% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
1
This tablet includes 1 microphones, which is more than in 0.2% of tablets and equal to the number in 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Asus Memo Pad 8 4G (2GB + 64GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • 26.3% higher pixel density
    This tablet has a higher pixel density than the average tablet (283 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    283 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • 39% lighter
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (299 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    299 g vs 490 g
  • Supports NFC
    This tablet has NFC support, the average tablet does not. 10.9% of tablets include NFC.
  • More durable display glass
    This tablet uses better display glass than the average tablet (Corning Gorilla Glass 3 vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 3 vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • Supports slow-motion recording
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, the average tablet does not. 37.5% of tablets offer slow-mo.
  • 52.3 mm narrower
    This tablet is narrower than the average tablet (123 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    123 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 77 mm shorter
    This tablet is shorter than the average tablet (123 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    123.0 mm vs 200.0 mm
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Intel Atom Z3745 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Intel Atom Z3745 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Intel Atom Z3745 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Intel Atom Z3745 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 26.3% higher pixel density
    This tablet has a higher pixel density than the average tablet (283 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    283 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • More durable display glass
    This tablet uses better display glass than the average tablet (Corning Gorilla Glass 3 vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 3 vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • Supports slow-motion recording
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, the average tablet does not. 37.5% of tablets offer slow-mo.
  • Supports NFC
    This tablet has NFC support, the average tablet does not. 10.9% of tablets include NFC.
  • 39% lighter
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (299 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    299 g vs 490 g
  • 52.3 mm narrower
    This tablet is narrower than the average tablet (123 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    123 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 77 mm shorter
    This tablet is shorter than the average tablet (123 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    123.0 mm vs 200.0 mm
  • 3.8 MP lower front camera megapixels
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (1.2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    1.2 MP vs 5 MP
  • No USB Type-C
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    This tablet has a worse front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.8 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.8 vs f/2.2
  • 40% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (3,950 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    3,950 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • 3 MP lower main camera megapixels
    This tablet has a lower-resolution main camera than the average tablet (5 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a 8 MP main camera.
    5 MP vs 8 MP
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    This tablet uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • 2 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (2 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    2 GB vs 4 GB
  • No split-screen
    This tablet does not support split-screen, the average tablet does. 72.4% of tablets support split-screen.
  • 9.5% lower user score
    User score
    7.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Asus Memo Pad 8 4G
    the average tablet
    Asus Memo Pad 8 4G (2GB + 64GB) has a lower user score than the average tablet (7.31 vs 8.000).
    7.31 vs 8
  • 2 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (2 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    2 GB vs 4 GB
  • 2 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    4 vs 6
  • Worse GPU
    This tablet uses the PowerVR G6430 GPU, while the average tablet uses the stronger Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    PowerVR G6430 vs Mali-G51
  • 57.1% larger process node
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (22 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    22 nm vs 14 nm
  • 14.1% lower memory bandwidth
    This tablet has a lower memory bandwidth than the average tablet (12.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    12.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 2.1 inches smaller screen size
    This tablet has a lower screen size than the average tablet (8 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    8 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 32 ppi lower screen sharpness
    This tablet has a lower screen sharpness than the average tablet (189 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    189 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 50% lower touch sampling rate
    This tablet has a lower touch sampling rate than the average tablet (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet has touch sampling rate of 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 1 nits lower peak brightness
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (400 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    400 nits vs 401 nits
  • 3.8 MP lower front camera megapixels
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (1.2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    1.2 MP vs 5 MP
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    This tablet has a worse front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.8 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.8 vs f/2.2
  • 3 MP lower main camera megapixels
    This tablet has a lower-resolution main camera than the average tablet (5 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a 8 MP main camera.
    5 MP vs 8 MP
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    This tablet has a worse main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.8 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/2.8 vs f/2.2
  • 40% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (3,950 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    3,950 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • 44.4% slower charging speed
    This tablet supports slower charging than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • 1 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (9 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    9 hours vs 10 hours
  • No USB Type-C
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    This tablet uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    4.0 vs 5.0
  • No HDMI output
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
  • No face recognition
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56% of tablets support face recognition.
  • No split-screen
    This tablet does not support split-screen, the average tablet does. 72.4% of tablets support split-screen.
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    This tablet lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average tablet includes them. 56.2% of tablets offer these toggles.
  • No full-page screenshots
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 52.5% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No location privacy controls
    This tablet does not offer location privacy controls, the average tablet does. 76.5% of tablets include location privacy features.
  • No dark mode
    This tablet does not support dark mode, the average tablet does. 57.2% of tablets have dark mode.
  • 6 older release date
    This tablet is an older model than the average tablet (2013 vs 2019).
    2013 vs 2019

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
technave.com
04/02/2015
Summary of the review
H
hardwarezone.com.sg
10/02/2015
Summary of the review
Z
zitseng.com
07/11/2014
Summary of the review
N
notebookcheck.com
05/01/2015
Summary of the review
H
hifitest.de
28/05/2015
Summary of the review
H
hifitest.de
07/11/2026
Summary of the review
Q
quechoisir.org
N/A
Summary of the review
L
lesandroides.net
29/04/2018
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
19/03/2014
Summary of the review
C
cnetfrance.fr
19/09/2014
Summary of the review
G
geeknetic.es
21/01/2015
Summary of the review
G
geeknetic.es
04/03/2014
Summary of the review
S
smartworld.it
22/05/2015
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Asus Memo Pad 8 4G (2GB + 64GB)

  • Slim, lightweight, and ergonomic design that is comfortable to hold.
  • Vibrant and bright 8-inch IPS display with good viewing angles.
  • Long-lasting battery life, often cited as reaching 9 to 10 hours.
  • Easily expandable storage via a dedicated microSD card slot.
  • Solid build quality for a budget-friendly tablet.
  • Support for 4G LTE, NFC, and Miracast connectivity in specific models.

What customers don't like about Asus Memo Pad 8 4G (2GB + 64GB)

  • Subpar camera quality that produces grainy, dull, or noisy images.
  • Noticeable performance lag and stuttering, especially when multitasking or waking from sleep.
  • Reflective screen surface that acts as a significant fingerprint magnet.
  • Limited RAM (1GB) in base models which struggles with graphics-heavy games.
  • Single rear speaker is easily muffled depending on how the tablet is held.
  • Slow charging speeds and inability to charge while in active use.

Verdict

The ASUS MeMO Pad 8 4G (ME581CL) is a lightweight 8-inch tablet featuring a sharp Full HD 1920x1200 IPS display protected by Corning Gorilla Glass 3. It is powered by a 64-bit Intel Atom Z3560 quad-core processor clocked at 1.83GHz, paired with 2GB of RAM and 64GB of internal storage for capable multitasking and media consumption. Key strengths include its vibrant high-resolution screen, built-in 4G LTE connectivity, and a slim 7.45mm profile that makes it highly portable. However, the device is held back by a relatively small 4,000mAh battery that leads to shorter usage times compared to competitors, an exposed microSD slot prone to dust, and mediocre 5MP rear and 1.2MP front cameras that struggle in low-light conditions.

Compare Asus Memo Pad 8 4G (2GB + 64GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Asus Memo Pad 8 4G (2GB + 64GB) and other tablets

No results found