OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Tablets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Acer One 10 4G (6GB + 128GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£190RAM capacity:6 GBInternal storage:128 GBScreen size:10.1 inchesChipset:MediaTek Helio P60T

Acer One 10 4G (6GB + 128GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

6.1

Overall score

Score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 55% of models
Score components

90%

6.0

Technical score

10%

7.3

User score

▼Worse than 55% of tablets
6.0

Technical score

Technical score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 54% of models
Score components

22%

6.3

Performance

20%

4.6

Display

16%

7.4

Camera

14%

5.0

Battery

12%

6.5

Connectivity

8%

6.8

Software & Features

5%

6.3

Design

3%

4.8

Audio & Multimedia

▼Worse than 54% of tablets
7.3

User score

User score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 80% of models
Score components

70%

8.1

User ratings

30%

5.3

Number of reviews

Based on 61 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▼Worse than 80% of tablets
  • acer-one-10-6gb-128gb-4g
  • acer-one-10-6gb-128gb-4g
  • acer-one-10-6gb-128gb-4g
  • acer-one-10-6gb-128gb-4g
  • acer-one-10-6gb-128gb-4g
  • acer-one-10-6gb-128gb-4g
  • acer-one-10-6gb-128gb-4g
acer-one-10-6gb-128gb-4g
acer-one-10-6gb-128gb-4g
acer-one-10-6gb-128gb-4g
acer-one-10-6gb-128gb-4g
acer-one-10-6gb-128gb-4g
acer-one-10-6gb-128gb-4g
acer-one-10-6gb-128gb-4g

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
6GB + 128GB
Other versions:
4GB + 64GB
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Acer One 10 4G (6GB + 128GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 54% of models
Score components:

22%

6.3

Performance

20%

4.6

Display

16%

7.4

Camera

14%

5.0

Battery

12%

6.5

Connectivity

8%

6.8

Software & Features

5%

6.3

Design

3%

4.8

Audio & Multimedia

6.0
User score
User score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 80% of models
Score components

70%

8.1

User ratings

30%

5.3

Number of reviews

Based on 61 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.3
Popularity
Popularity
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 53% of models
Popularity:
Acer One 10 4G (6GB + 128GB) has a user popularity of 5.3 points, which is lower than 53.2% of Tablets.
5.3
Value for money
Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 52% of models
Score components:

60%

6.1

Overall score

40%

9.5

Price

7.1
RAM capacity
6 GB
RAM capacity
6 GB
▲ Better than 65% of models
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 6 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 65.3% of tablets and equal to that of 7% of tablets.
Process node
12 nm
Process node
12 nm
▲ Better than 54% of models
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 12 nm process node, which is smaller than the node size used in 53.7% of tablets and equal to the node used in 13.6% of tablets.
Internal storage
128 GB
Internal storage
128 GB
▲ Better than 57% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 128 GB which is larger than the storage of 56.7% of tablets and equal to that of 19.6% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
?
Chipset
MediaTek Helio P60T
Chipset
MediaTek Helio P60T
▼ Worse than 57% of models
This tablet uses the MediaTek Helio P60T chipset, which is less advanced than the chipsets in 56.9% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1920×1200
Screen resolution
1920×1200
▼ Worse than 42% of models
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1920×1200 which is higher than that of 39.2% of tablets and equal to that of 18.8% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Refresh rate
60 Hz
▼ Worse than 26% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
Display type
IPS LCD
▲ Better than 17% of models
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
149 ppi
Pixel density
149 ppi
▼ Worse than 87% of models
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 149 ppi which is lower than that of 86.8% of tablets and equal to that of 9.2% of tablets.
Display glass type
Tempered Glass
Display glass type
Tempered Glass
▼ Worse than 78% of models
This tablet uses Tempered Glass display glass which is weaker than that on 78.1% of tablets and equal to that on 19.5% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
Category Benchmark
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
13 MP
Main camera megapixels
13 MP
▲ Better than 74% of models
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 13 MP which is higher than that of 74% of tablets and equal to that of 21.6% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
5 MP
Front camera megapixels
5 MP
▲ Better than 49% of models
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 5 MP which is higher than in 48.8% of tablets and equal to that in 19.6% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.2
Main camera aperture
f/2.2
▼ Worse than 43% of models
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.2 which is wider than that of 30.2% of tablets and equal to that of 27.3% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
Optical zoom
1xx
▲ Better than 18% of models
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
7,100 mAh
Battery capacity
7,100 mAh
▲ Better than 60% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 7,100 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 59.9% of tablets and equal to those in 0.4% of tablets.
Charging speed
18 W
Charging speed
18 W
▲ Better than 48% of models
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 18 W which is faster than in 48% of tablets and equal to speeds in 12.3% of tablets.
Battery life
10 hours
Battery life
10 hours
▼ Worse than 40% of models
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 10 hours, which is longer than that of 39.1% of tablets and equal to that of 20.5% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
▼ Worse than 2% of models
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
no
Fast charging
no
▼ Worse than 50% of models
This tablet does not support fast charging. 49.7% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
yes
LTE support
yes
▲ Better than 37% of models
This tablet supports LTE. 36.8% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
▲ Better than 17% of models
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
5G connectivity
no
▼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
NFC
no
▼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android 12
Operating system
Android 12
★ Better than 92% of models
This tablet uses the Android 12 operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 91.6%.
Update support duration
short
Update support duration
short
▼ Worse than 53% of models
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.7% of tablets and equal to that of 47.3% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
no
Direct OS updates
no
▼ Worse than 80% of models
This tablet does not receive direct OS updates. 79.7% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
On-device AI
no
▼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
?
Show more
IP rating
not rated
IP rating
not rated
▼ Worse than 16% of models
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
449 g
Weight
449 g
▲ Better than 68% of models
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 449 g which is lighter than 67.9% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.4% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
Backlit keyboard
no
▼ Worse than 10% of models
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
Keyboard accessory
yes
▲ Better than 16% of models
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
1
Number of microphones
1
▼ Worse than 45% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This tablet includes 1 microphones, which is more than in 0.2% of tablets and equal to the number in 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
aptX Adaptive
no
▼ Worse than 7% of models
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
Dolby Atmos support
no
▼ Worse than 31% of models
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
N. of speakers
2
▼ Worse than 29% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
yes
FM radio
yes
▲ Better than 81% of models
This tablet includes an FM radio. 81.1% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Acer One 10 4G (6GB + 128GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • 5 MP higher main camera megapixels
    Main camera megapixels
    13 MP
    ▲ Better than 74% of models
    Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
    This tablet has a higher main camera resolution than the average tablet (13 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet main camera has 8 MP megapixels.
    13 MP vs 8 MP
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Android 12
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    This tablet has a more advanced operating system than the average tablet (Android 12 vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Android 12 vs Android
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    MediaTek Helio P60T
    ▼ Worse than 57% of models
    This tablet uses the MediaTek Helio P60T chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    MediaTek Helio P60T vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Allows manual focus
    Manual focus
    yes
    ▲ Better than 63% of models
    This tablet allows manual focus control, the average tablet does not. 37.2% of tablets include manual focus.
  • Allows manual ISO
    Manual ISO
    yes
    ▲ Better than 54% of models
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • Newer DDR memory version
    DDR memory version
    LPDDR4X
    ▲ Better than 54% of models
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3
  • 2 GB more RAM
    RAM capacity
    6 GB
    ▲ Better than 65% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has more RAM capacity than the average tablet (6 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    6 GB vs 4 GB
  • 2x more storage
    Internal storage
    128 GB
    ▲ Better than 57% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (128 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    128 GB vs 64 GB
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    MediaTek Helio P60T
    ▼ Worse than 57% of models
    This tablet uses the MediaTek Helio P60T chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    MediaTek Helio P60T vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Newer DDR memory version
    DDR memory version
    LPDDR4X
    ▲ Better than 54% of models
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3
  • 2x more storage
    Internal storage
    128 GB
    ▲ Better than 57% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (128 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    128 GB vs 64 GB
  • 2 GB more RAM
    RAM capacity
    6 GB
    ▲ Better than 65% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has more RAM capacity than the average tablet (6 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    6 GB vs 4 GB
  • 5 MP higher main camera megapixels
    Main camera megapixels
    13 MP
    ▲ Better than 74% of models
    Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
    This tablet has a higher main camera resolution than the average tablet (13 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet main camera has 8 MP megapixels.
    13 MP vs 8 MP
  • Allows manual focus
    Manual focus
    yes
    ▲ Better than 63% of models
    This tablet allows manual focus control, the average tablet does not. 37.2% of tablets include manual focus.
  • Allows manual ISO
    Manual ISO
    yes
    ▲ Better than 54% of models
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • 7.9% larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    7,100 mAh
    ▲ Better than 60% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
    This tablet has a higher battery capacity than the average tablet (7100 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    7,100 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Android 12
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    This tablet has a more advanced operating system than the average tablet (Android 12 vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Android 12 vs Android
  • 8.4% lighter
    Weight
    449 g
    ▲ Better than 68% of models
    Market range: <315 g – >730 g
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (449 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    449 g vs 490 g
  • 4 newer release date
    Release date
    2023
    ▲ Better than 73% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This tablet has a newer release date than the average tablet (2023 vs 2019).
    August 2023
    2023 vs 2019
  • 38 mm shorter
    Width
    162.0 mm
    ▼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is shorter than the average tablet (162 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    162.0 mm vs 200.0 mm
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • 33.5% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    149 ppi
    ▼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (149 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    149 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • Does not receive direct OS updates
    Direct OS updates
    no
    ▼ Worse than 80% of models
    This tablet does not support direct OS updates, the average tablet does. 79.7% of tablets support direct OS updates.
  • Less durable display glass
    Display glass type
    Tempered Glass
    ▼ Worse than 78% of models
    This tablet uses weaker display glass than the average tablet (Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
    ▼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • No touch autofocus
    Touch autofocus
    no
    ▼ Worse than 83% of models
    This tablet does not support touch autofocus, the average tablet does. 82.8% of tablets allow touch-to-focus.
  • 51 nits lower peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    350 nits
    ▼ Worse than 77% of models
    Market range: <320 nits – >750 nits
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (350 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    350 nits vs 401 nits
  • 10.1% lower user score
    User score
    7.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Acer One 10 4G
    the average tablet
    Acer One 10 4G (6GB + 128GB) has a lower user score than the average tablet (7.27 vs 8.000).
    7.27 vs 8
  • 2 fewer CPU threads
    CPU threads
    4
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    4 vs 6
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    big.LITTLE Architecture
    no
    ▼ Worse than 51% of models
    This tablet does not use a big.LITTLE architecture, the average tablet does. 51.3% of tablets use a big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 69.2% slower GPU clock
    GPU frequency
    200 MHz
    ▼ Worse than 97% of models
    Market range: <311 MHz – >1.1k MHz
    This tablet has a lower GPU frequency than the average tablet (200 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet has GPU frequency of 650 MHz.
    200 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 266 MHz slower RAM speed
    RAM speed
    1,600 MHz
    ▼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <800 MHz – >6.4k MHz
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (1600 MHz vs 1866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1866 MHz.
    1,600 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 14.1% lower memory bandwidth
    Memory bandwidth
    12.8 GB/s
    ▼ Worse than 57% of models
    Market range: <4.26 GB/s – >60 GB/s
    This tablet has a lower memory bandwidth than the average tablet (12.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    12.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 33.5% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    149 ppi
    ▼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (149 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    149 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • Less durable display glass
    Display glass type
    Tempered Glass
    ▼ Worse than 78% of models
    This tablet uses weaker display glass than the average tablet (Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • 51 nits lower peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    350 nits
    ▼ Worse than 77% of models
    Market range: <320 nits – >750 nits
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (350 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    350 nits vs 401 nits
  • 50 nits lower typical brightness
    Typical brightness
    350 nits
    ▼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <300 nits – >600 nits
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (350 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    350 nits vs 400 nits
  • 72 ppi lower screen sharpness
    Screen sharpness
    149 ppi
    ▼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower screen sharpness than the average tablet (149 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    149 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • No touch autofocus
    Touch autofocus
    no
    ▼ Worse than 83% of models
    This tablet does not support touch autofocus, the average tablet does. 82.8% of tablets allow touch-to-focus.
  • No burst mode
    Serial shot / Burst mode
    no
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.5% of tablets support burst mode.
  • No panorama mode
    Panorama mode
    no
    ▼ Worse than 79% of models
    This tablet does not have a panorama mode, the average tablet does. 78.6% of tablets include panorama features.
  • No timelapse video
    Timelapse video
    no
    ▼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets include timelapse modes.
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
    ▼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • No HDMI output
    HDMI output
    no
    ▼ Worse than 50% of models
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
  • No face recognition
    Face recognition
    no
    ▼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56% of tablets support face recognition.
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • Does not receive direct OS updates
    Direct OS updates
    no
    ▼ Worse than 80% of models
    This tablet does not support direct OS updates, the average tablet does. 79.7% of tablets support direct OS updates.
  • No full-page screenshots
    Full-page screenshots
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 52.5% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • 67.7 mm wider
    Width
    243.0 mm
    ▼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (243 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    243.0 mm vs 175.3 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
techradar.com
18/11/2017
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia One 10 (2017) review [Page 4: 4G Connectivity Details]
C
computerbild.de
10/07/2015
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia Tab 10: Mittelklasse-Tablet im Test
(Translated)Show original
C
chip.de
25/07/2016
Summary of the review
Acer Aspire One 10 (2-in-1 Tablet) Test
(Translated)Show original
P
pcwelt.de
15/03/2016
Summary of the review
Notebook & Tablet für 250 Euro: Acer One 10 im Test
(Translated)Show original
T
test-achats.be
Date non spécifiée
Summary of the review
Test ACER ONE 10 (S1003-10LD) - Testachats
(Translated)Show original
T
tremendoviaje.com
23/02/2023
Summary of the review
Viajar con el Acer One 10: ordenador portátil y tablet 2 en 1
(Translated)Show original
T
thegeekerz.it
28/05/2017
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia One 10 (B3 A 32) LTE, la recensione
(Translated)Show original
F
fwd.nl
08/03/2017
Summary of the review
Review: Acer Aspire Switch One 10 (SW1-011-194R)
(Translated)Show original
C
consumentenbond.nl
01/03/2017
Summary of the review
Acer Aspire One 10 S1003-14XA - Test, Reviews & Prijzen
(Translated)Show original
C
consumentenbond.nl
2016
Summary of the review
Acer Aspire One 10 S1002-13W5 - Test, Reviews & Prijzen
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on 61 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Acer One 10 4G (6GB + 128GB)

  • Highly affordable price point, making it a great value for students and casual users.
  • Large, 10.1-inch IPS display provides vibrant colors and good viewing angles for media consumption.
  • Solid battery life that can last through several hours of continuous video streaming or standard daily use.
  • Front-facing stereo speakers provide clear audio directed toward the user, which is rare for budget tablets.
  • Includes a microSD card slot for easy storage expansion up to 128GB.

What we don't like about Acer One 10 4G (6GB + 128GB)

  • Limited RAM (often 1GB or 2GB depending on the model) leads to frequent 'low memory' warnings and sluggish multitasking.
  • Subpar camera quality with grainy photos and poor performance in low-light conditions.
  • Occasional lag or unresponsiveness during startup and when opening demanding applications or games.
  • Speakers, while front-facing, often lack bass and can sound tinny or distorted at higher volumes.
  • Significant amount of pre-installed bloatware that consumes limited system resources.
  • Build quality feels somewhat cheap due to the primarily plastic construction and a screen that attracts fingerprints.

Verdict

The Acer One 10 4G (T9-1212L) is a 10.1-inch Android 12 tablet featuring a WUXGA IPS display with a 1920 x 1200 resolution and 350 nits of brightness. It is equipped with 6GB of LPDDR4 RAM and 128GB of internal storage, supporting 4G LTE connectivity via a single SIM slot for on-the-go productivity. Key characteristics include a 13MP rear camera with flash, a 5MP secondary camera, and 1080p video recording capabilities at 30 fps. Main pros include its generous memory and storage for multitasking, a sharp high-definition display, and the flexibility of cellular data. Potential cons may include limited high-end gaming performance due to its budget-oriented chipset and a build that may feel less premium compared to higher-priced metal-clad competitors.

Compare Acer One 10 4G (6GB + 128GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Acer One 10 4G (6GB + 128GB) and other tablets

No results found