OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Tablets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Acer One 10 4G (4GB + 64GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£130RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:10.1 inchesChipset:MediaTek MT8766

Acer One 10 4G (4GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

6.1

Overall score

Score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 55% of models
Score components

90%

6.0

Technical score

10%

7.3

User score

▼Worse than 55% of tablets
6.0

Technical score

Technical score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 54% of models
Score components

22%

5.7

Performance

20%

5.2

Display

16%

7.4

Camera

14%

5.0

Battery

12%

6.5

Connectivity

8%

6.7

Software & Features

5%

6.1

Design

3%

4.8

Audio & Multimedia

▼Worse than 54% of tablets
7.3

User score

User score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 80% of models
Score components

70%

8.1

User ratings

30%

5.3

Number of reviews

No reviews for this version.

Check reviews from other versions.

▼Worse than 80% of tablets
  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £130

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
6GB + 128GBCheck price
Other versions:
4GB + 64GB
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Acer One 10 4G (4GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 54% of models
Score components:

22%

5.7

Performance

20%

5.2

Display

16%

7.4

Camera

14%

5.0

Battery

12%

6.5

Connectivity

8%

6.7

Software & Features

5%

6.1

Design

3%

4.8

Audio & Multimedia

6.0
User score
User score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 80% of models
Score components

70%

8.1

User ratings

30%

5.3

Number of reviews

No reviews for this version.

Check reviews from other versions.

7.3
Popularity
Popularity
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 53% of models
Popularity:
Acer One 10 4G (4GB + 64GB) has a user popularity of 5.3 points, which is lower than 53.2% of Tablets.
5.3
Value for money
Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 52% of models
Score components:

60%

6.1

Overall score

40%

9.8

Price

7.2
RAM capacity
4 GB
RAM capacity
4 GB
▲ Better than 48% of models
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 4 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 47.6% of tablets and equal to that of 17.6% of tablets.
Process node
12 nm
Process node
12 nm
▲ Better than 54% of models
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 12 nm process node, which is smaller than the node size used in 53.7% of tablets and equal to the node used in 13.6% of tablets.
Internal storage
64 GB
Internal storage
64 GB
▼ Worse than 43% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 64 GB which is larger than the storage of 39.5% of tablets and equal to that of 17.1% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
?
Chipset
MediaTek MT8766
Chipset
MediaTek MT8766
▼ Worse than 87% of models
This tablet uses the MediaTek MT8766 chipset, which is less advanced than the chipsets in 87.1% of tablets and equal to those in 0.1% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1920x1080
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Refresh rate
60 Hz
▼ Worse than 26% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
Display type
IPS LCD
▲ Better than 17% of models
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
149 ppi
Pixel density
149 ppi
▼ Worse than 87% of models
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 149 ppi which is lower than that of 86.8% of tablets and equal to that of 9.2% of tablets.
Display glass type
?
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
Category Benchmark
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
13 MP
Main camera megapixels
13 MP
▲ Better than 74% of models
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 13 MP which is higher than that of 74% of tablets and equal to that of 21.6% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
5 MP
Front camera megapixels
5 MP
▲ Better than 49% of models
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 5 MP which is higher than in 48.8% of tablets and equal to that in 19.6% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.2
Main camera aperture
f/2.2
▼ Worse than 43% of models
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.2 which is wider than that of 30.2% of tablets and equal to that of 27.3% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
Optical zoom
1xx
▲ Better than 18% of models
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
7,100 mAh
Battery capacity
7,100 mAh
▲ Better than 60% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 7,100 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 59.9% of tablets and equal to those in 0.4% of tablets.
Charging speed
18 W
Charging speed
18 W
▲ Better than 48% of models
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 18 W which is faster than in 48% of tablets and equal to speeds in 12.3% of tablets.
Battery life
10 hours
Battery life
10 hours
▼ Worse than 40% of models
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 10 hours, which is longer than that of 39.1% of tablets and equal to that of 20.5% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
▼ Worse than 2% of models
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
no
Fast charging
no
▼ Worse than 50% of models
This tablet does not support fast charging. 49.7% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
yes
LTE support
yes
▲ Better than 37% of models
This tablet supports LTE. 36.8% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
▲ Better than 17% of models
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
5G connectivity
no
▼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
NFC
no
▼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android 12
Operating system
Android 12
★ Better than 92% of models
This tablet uses the Android 12 operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 91.6%.
Update support duration
short
Update support duration
short
▼ Worse than 53% of models
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.7% of tablets and equal to that of 47.3% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
no
Direct OS updates
no
▼ Worse than 80% of models
This tablet does not receive direct OS updates. 79.7% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
On-device AI
no
▼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
App tracking protection
no
▼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
IP rating
not rated
▼ Worse than 16% of models
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
449 g
Weight
449 g
▲ Better than 68% of models
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 449 g which is lighter than 67.9% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.4% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
Backlit keyboard
no
▼ Worse than 10% of models
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
Keyboard accessory
yes
▲ Better than 16% of models
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
1
Number of microphones
1
▼ Worse than 45% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This tablet includes 1 microphones, which is more than in 0.2% of tablets and equal to the number in 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
aptX Adaptive
no
▼ Worse than 7% of models
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
Dolby Atmos support
no
▼ Worse than 31% of models
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
N. of speakers
2
▼ Worse than 29% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
yes
FM radio
yes
▲ Better than 81% of models
This tablet includes an FM radio. 81.1% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Acer One 10 4G (4GB + 64GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • 5 MP higher main camera megapixels
    Main camera megapixels
    13 MP
    ▲ Better than 74% of models
    Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
    This tablet has a higher main camera resolution than the average tablet (13 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet main camera has 8 MP megapixels.
    13 MP vs 8 MP
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Android 12
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    This tablet has a more advanced operating system than the average tablet (Android 12 vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Android 12 vs Android
  • Allows manual focus
    Manual focus
    yes
    ▲ Better than 63% of models
    This tablet allows manual focus control, the average tablet does not. 37.2% of tablets include manual focus.
  • Allows manual ISO
    Manual ISO
    yes
    ▲ Better than 54% of models
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • Newer DDR memory version
    DDR memory version
    LPDDR4X
    ▲ Better than 54% of models
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3
  • Allows app offloading
    App offloading
    yes
    ▲ Better than 74% of models
    This tablet allows app offloading, the average tablet does not. 26.4% of tablets support app offloading.
  • 8.4% lighter
    Weight
    449 g
    ▲ Better than 68% of models
    Market range: <315 g – >730 g
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (449 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    449 g vs 490 g
  • 7.9% larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    7,100 mAh
    ▲ Better than 60% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
    This tablet has a higher battery capacity than the average tablet (7100 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    7,100 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • 2x cheaper
    Acer One 10 4G (4GB + 64GB) is cheaper than the average tablet (£130 vs £260).
    £130 vs £260
  • Newer DDR memory version
    DDR memory version
    LPDDR4X
    ▲ Better than 54% of models
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3
  • 5 MP higher main camera megapixels
    Main camera megapixels
    13 MP
    ▲ Better than 74% of models
    Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
    This tablet has a higher main camera resolution than the average tablet (13 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet main camera has 8 MP megapixels.
    13 MP vs 8 MP
  • Allows manual focus
    Manual focus
    yes
    ▲ Better than 63% of models
    This tablet allows manual focus control, the average tablet does not. 37.2% of tablets include manual focus.
  • Allows manual ISO
    Manual ISO
    yes
    ▲ Better than 54% of models
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • 7.9% larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    7,100 mAh
    ▲ Better than 60% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
    This tablet has a higher battery capacity than the average tablet (7100 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    7,100 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Android 12
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    This tablet has a more advanced operating system than the average tablet (Android 12 vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Android 12 vs Android
  • Allows app offloading
    App offloading
    yes
    ▲ Better than 74% of models
    This tablet allows app offloading, the average tablet does not. 26.4% of tablets support app offloading.
  • 8.4% lighter
    Weight
    449 g
    ▲ Better than 68% of models
    Market range: <315 g – >730 g
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (449 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    449 g vs 490 g
  • 4 newer release date
    Release date
    2023
    ▲ Better than 73% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This tablet has a newer release date than the average tablet (2023 vs 2019).
    August 2023
    2023 vs 2019
  • 38 mm shorter
    Width
    162.0 mm
    ▼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is shorter than the average tablet (162 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    162.0 mm vs 200.0 mm
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    1920x1080
    Category Benchmark
    This tablet has a lower screen resolution than the average tablet (1920x1080 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet has a resolution of 1920×1200.
    1920x1080 vs 1920×1200
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • 33.5% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    149 ppi
    ▼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (149 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    149 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • Does not receive direct OS updates
    Direct OS updates
    no
    ▼ Worse than 80% of models
    This tablet does not support direct OS updates, the average tablet does. 79.7% of tablets support direct OS updates.
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
    ▼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • No touch autofocus
    Touch autofocus
    no
    ▼ Worse than 83% of models
    This tablet does not support touch autofocus, the average tablet does. 82.8% of tablets allow touch-to-focus.
  • No burst mode
    Serial shot / Burst mode
    no
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.5% of tablets support burst mode.
  • 10.1% lower user score
    User score
    7.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Acer One 10 4G
    the average tablet
    Acer One 10 4G (4GB + 64GB) has a lower user score than the average tablet (7.27 vs 8.000).
    7.27 vs 8
  • 2 fewer CPU threads
    CPU threads
    4
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    4 vs 6
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    big.LITTLE Architecture
    no
    ▼ Worse than 51% of models
    This tablet does not use a big.LITTLE architecture, the average tablet does. 51.3% of tablets use a big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 69.2% slower GPU clock
    GPU frequency
    200 MHz
    ▼ Worse than 97% of models
    Market range: <311 MHz – >1.1k MHz
    This tablet has a lower GPU frequency than the average tablet (200 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet has GPU frequency of 650 MHz.
    200 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 266 MHz slower RAM speed
    RAM speed
    1,600 MHz
    ▼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <800 MHz – >6.4k MHz
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (1600 MHz vs 1866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1866 MHz.
    1,600 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 14.1% lower memory bandwidth
    Memory bandwidth
    12.8 GB/s
    ▼ Worse than 57% of models
    Market range: <4.26 GB/s – >60 GB/s
    This tablet has a lower memory bandwidth than the average tablet (12.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    12.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    1920x1080
    Category Benchmark
    This tablet has a lower screen resolution than the average tablet (1920x1080 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet has a resolution of 1920×1200.
    1920x1080 vs 1920×1200
  • 33.5% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    149 ppi
    ▼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (149 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    149 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • 50 nits lower typical brightness
    Typical brightness
    350 nits
    ▼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <300 nits – >600 nits
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (350 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    350 nits vs 400 nits
  • 72 ppi lower screen sharpness
    Screen sharpness
    149 ppi
    ▼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower screen sharpness than the average tablet (149 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    149 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • No touch autofocus
    Touch autofocus
    no
    ▼ Worse than 83% of models
    This tablet does not support touch autofocus, the average tablet does. 82.8% of tablets allow touch-to-focus.
  • No burst mode
    Serial shot / Burst mode
    no
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.5% of tablets support burst mode.
  • No panorama mode
    Panorama mode
    no
    ▼ Worse than 79% of models
    This tablet does not have a panorama mode, the average tablet does. 78.6% of tablets include panorama features.
  • No timelapse video
    Timelapse video
    no
    ▼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets include timelapse modes.
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
    ▼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • No face recognition
    Face recognition
    no
    ▼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56% of tablets support face recognition.
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • Does not receive direct OS updates
    Direct OS updates
    no
    ▼ Worse than 80% of models
    This tablet does not support direct OS updates, the average tablet does. 79.7% of tablets support direct OS updates.
  • No full-page screenshots
    Full-page screenshots
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 52.5% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • 86.7 mm wider
    Width
    262.0 mm
    ▼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (262 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    262.0 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 0.9 mm thicker
    Thickness
    8.9 mm
    ▼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <6.1 mm – >11.5 mm
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (8.9 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    8.9 mm vs 8.0 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
techradar.com
18/11/2017
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia One 10 (2017) review [Page 4: 4G Connectivity Details]
C
computerbild.de
10/07/2015
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia Tab 10: Mittelklasse-Tablet im Test
(Translated)Show original
C
chip.de
25/07/2016
Summary of the review
Acer Aspire One 10 (2-in-1 Tablet) Test
(Translated)Show original
P
pcwelt.de
15/03/2016
Summary of the review
Notebook & Tablet für 250 Euro: Acer One 10 im Test
(Translated)Show original
T
test-achats.be
Date non spécifiée
Summary of the review
Test ACER ONE 10 (S1003-10LD) - Testachats
(Translated)Show original
T
tremendoviaje.com
23/02/2023
Summary of the review
Viajar con el Acer One 10: ordenador portátil y tablet 2 en 1
(Translated)Show original
T
thegeekerz.it
28/05/2017
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia One 10 (B3 A 32) LTE, la recensione
(Translated)Show original
F
fwd.nl
08/03/2017
Summary of the review
Review: Acer Aspire Switch One 10 (SW1-011-194R)
(Translated)Show original
C
consumentenbond.nl
01/03/2017
Summary of the review
Acer Aspire One 10 S1003-14XA - Test, Reviews & Prijzen
(Translated)Show original
C
consumentenbond.nl
23/10/2026
Summary of the review
Acer Aspire One 10 S1002-13W5 - Test, Reviews & Prijzen
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What we like about Acer One 10 4G (4GB + 64GB)

  • Highly affordable price point, making it a great value for students and casual users.
  • Large, 10.1-inch IPS display provides vibrant colors and good viewing angles for media consumption.
  • Solid battery life that can last through several hours of continuous video streaming or standard daily use.
  • Front-facing stereo speakers provide clear audio directed toward the user, which is rare for budget tablets.
  • Includes a microSD card slot for easy storage expansion up to 128GB.

What we don't like about Acer One 10 4G (4GB + 64GB)

  • Limited RAM (often 1GB or 2GB depending on the model) leads to frequent 'low memory' warnings and sluggish multitasking.
  • Subpar camera quality with grainy photos and poor performance in low-light conditions.
  • Occasional lag or unresponsiveness during startup and when opening demanding applications or games.
  • Speakers, while front-facing, often lack bass and can sound tinny or distorted at higher volumes.
  • Significant amount of pre-installed bloatware that consumes limited system resources.
  • Build quality feels somewhat cheap due to the primarily plastic construction and a screen that attracts fingerprints.

Verdict

The Acer One 10 4G (T4-129L) is a budget-friendly 10.1-inch tablet featuring a 1920x1200 Full HD IPS display and integrated 4G VoLTE cellular connectivity for on-the-go use. It is powered by a MediaTek MT8786 octa-core processor paired with 4GB of RAM and 64GB of internal storage, which is expandable up to 256GB via microSD. Main pros include its vibrant high-resolution screen, a substantial 6,000mAh to 7,000mAh battery for extended use, and a sleek design with an 8MP rear and 5MP front camera setup. However, notable cons include its mid-range hardware which is not ideal for high-end gaming, a relatively long five-hour charging time, and a plastic build that some users find less premium than competitors.

Compare Acer One 10 4G (4GB + 64GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Acer One 10 4G (4GB + 64GB) and other tablets

No results found