Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartwatches Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v3.0

TCL Movetime MT10g review: 127 specs compared

Avg. price:~£130Screen size:1.39 inchBattery life:0.92 daysDisplay type:AMOLED

TCL Movetime MT10g Review: Compare 127 technical specifications and 3 expert reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

TCL Movetime MT10g
6.3/10

Overall score

Score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

35%

5.5

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

5.5

Reviews score

10%

?

Sentiment scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 6.8, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 78% of smartwatches
7.3

Value for money

Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.3

Overall score

30%

9.8

Price

â–¼Worse than 79%
5.5

Technical score

Technical score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

24%

4.1

Health

21%

6.7

Fitness

16%

5.0

Battery

14%

7.0

Smart features

12%

4.6

Connectivity

9%

7.1

Display & Design

4%

4.3

Hardware

â–¼Worse than 71%
5.5

Reviews score

Reviews score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10

5.5

Mark 7.3 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

7.6

Average grade

20%

6.1

Popularity

Grades by review (3)
3 reviews, average 6.8/10. We use 5 reviews; the 2 missing count as the category's typical 8.0: (6.8 × 3 + 8.0 × 2) ÷ 5 = 7.3. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 79%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • tcl-movetime-mt10g
  • tcl-movetime-mt10g
  • tcl-movetime-mt10g
tcl-movetime-mt10g
tcl-movetime-mt10g
tcl-movetime-mt10g
Where to buy
    N/A~ £130

What reviewers say about the TCL Movetime MT10g

Based on 3 · 1

Reviewers like the design, but the apps and watch faces are a letdown.
Praised
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch TCL Movetime MT10g

Technical score
Technical score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

24%

4.1

Health

21%

6.7

Fitness

16%

5.0

Battery

14%

7.0

Smart features

12%

4.6

Connectivity

9%

7.1

Display & Design

4%

4.3

Hardware

5.5
Reviews score
5.5
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

6.3

Overall score

30%

9.8

Price

7.3
Heart rate monitor
yes
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 9.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
no
This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring. 69.7% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 18.2% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
HRV tracking
no
This smartwatch does not support HRV tracking. 45.2% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
Show more
Accelerometer
yes
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.5% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 46.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 28.9% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 32.9% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 3.7% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
Battery life
0.92 days
This smartwatch lasts 0.92 days on a charge, which is shorter than 96.4% of Smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
25 h
This smartwatch records workouts for 25 h on a charge, which is longer than 61.4% of Smartwatches and the same as 1.8% of Smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
?
Battery power
380 mAh
This smartwatch has a 380 mAh battery, which is larger than 68.2% of Smartwatches and the same as 0.4% of Smartwatches.
Charge time
?
Show more
Operating system
Proprietary OS
This smartwatch runs Proprietary OS, which is less advanced than the system in 54.2% of Smartwatches and equal to 42% of Smartwatches.
OS detail: Proprietary OS (RTOS).
Software update frequency
?
Third-party app support
no
This smartwatch does not support third-party apps. 51.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 30.8% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 16.7% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
yes
This smartwatch supports GPS. 40.3% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 43.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Dual-frequency GPS
no
This smartwatch does not support dual-frequency GPS. 15.1% of Smartwatches offer this.
Show more
Screen size
1.39 inch
This smartwatch has a 1.39 inch screen, which is smaller than 51.3% of Smartwatches and the same as 9% of Smartwatches.
Display type
AMOLED
This smartwatch uses AMOLED, which is more advanced than the screen in 46.9% of Smartwatches and equal to 53.1% of Smartwatches.
Resolution
400x 400
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 400x400 which is higher than that of 65.3% of smartwatches and equal to that of 2.5% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
407 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 407 ppi, which is higher than 70.4% of Smartwatches and equal to 1.6% of Smartwatches.
Display brightness
?
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
?
RAM
?
Internal storage
0 GB
This smartwatch has 0 GB of internal storage, which is less than 76.5% of Smartwatches and equal to 23.5% of Smartwatches.
No local user storage for apps/media
External memory slot
no
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

TCL Movetime MT10g vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • Emergency SOS
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 44.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.5% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • Calorie tracking
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.7% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • 5 h longer training battery life
    This smartwatch lasts longer in training mode than the average smartwatch (25 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h in training mode.
    25 h vs 20 h
  • 1 mm slimmer
    This smartwatch is slimmer than the average smartwatch (10.7 mm vs 11.7 mm). The average smartwatch is 11.7 mm thick.
    Some sources mention variant-dependent thickness values.
    10.7 mm vs 11.7 mm
  • 81 ppi sharper screen
    This smartwatch has a sharper screen than the average smartwatch (407 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch has a pixel density of 326 ppi.
    407 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • 75 mAh larger battery capacity
    This smartwatch has a larger battery than the average smartwatch (380 mAh vs 305 mAh). The average smartwatch has a 305 mAh battery.
    380 mAh vs 305 mAh
  • Better band material
    This smartwatch uses tpu, leather, plastic for the band material, while the average smartwatch uses silicone.
    tpu, leather, plastic vs silicone
  • Calorie tracking
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.7% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • 5 h longer training battery life
    This smartwatch lasts longer in training mode than the average smartwatch (25 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h in training mode.
    25 h vs 20 h
  • 75 mAh larger battery capacity
    This smartwatch has a larger battery than the average smartwatch (380 mAh vs 305 mAh). The average smartwatch has a 305 mAh battery.
    380 mAh vs 305 mAh
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.5% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • 1 mm slimmer
    This smartwatch is slimmer than the average smartwatch (10.7 mm vs 11.7 mm). The average smartwatch is 11.7 mm thick.
    Some sources mention variant-dependent thickness values.
    10.7 mm vs 11.7 mm
  • 81 ppi sharper screen
    This smartwatch has a sharper screen than the average smartwatch (407 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch has a pixel density of 326 ppi.
    407 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • 10 °C higher heat tolerance
    This smartwatch tolerates a higher temperature than the average smartwatch (55 °C vs 45 °C). The average smartwatch is rated up to 45 °C.
    55 °C vs 45 °C
  • Better band material
    This smartwatch uses tpu, leather, plastic for the band material, while the average smartwatch uses silicone.
    tpu, leather, plastic vs silicone
  • Emergency SOS
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 44.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
  • No VO2 max measurement
    This smartwatch does not measure VO2 max, the average smartwatch does. 51.3% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • No blood oxygen monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 69.6% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
  • No third-party apps
    This smartwatch does not support third-party apps, the average smartwatch does. 51.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • No irregular heart rate alerts
    This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • No elevation tracking
    This smartwatch does not support elevation tracking, the average smartwatch does. 67.6% of smartwatches support elevation tracking.
  • 49 m shallower water rating
    This smartwatch is rated for shallower water than the average smartwatch (1 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch is rated to 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1 m vs 50 m
  • No pace tracking
    This smartwatch does not support pace tracking, the average smartwatch does. 80.6% of smartwatches support pace tracking.
  • No coaching features
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 58.8% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • 21.4% lower review score
    Reviews score
    5.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    5.5

    Mark 7.3 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.6

    Average grade

    20%

    6.1

    Popularity

    Grades by review (3)
    3 reviews, average 6.8/10. We use 5 reviews; the 2 missing count as the category's typical 8.0: (6.8 × 3 + 8.0 × 2) ÷ 5 = 7.3. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    5.5 vs 7.0
  • 5.9% worse value for money
    TCL Movetime MT10g has a lower value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (7.33 vs 7.8).
    7.33 vs 7.76
  • No VO2 max measurement
    This smartwatch does not measure VO2 max, the average smartwatch does. 51.3% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • No blood oxygen monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 69.6% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
  • No irregular heart rate alerts
    This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • No cycle tracking
    This smartwatch does not support menstrual cycle tracking, the average smartwatch does. 66.8% of smartwatches support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • No smart scale support
    This smartwatch does not support smart scale compatibility, the average smartwatch does. 57.1% of smartwatches support smart scale compatibility.
  • 4 years older
    This smartwatch was released earlier than the average smartwatch (2017 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    June 2017
    2017 vs 2021
  • No elevation tracking
    This smartwatch does not support elevation tracking, the average smartwatch does. 67.6% of smartwatches support elevation tracking.
  • No pace tracking
    This smartwatch does not support pace tracking, the average smartwatch does. 80.6% of smartwatches support pace tracking.
  • No route tracking
    This smartwatch does not support route tracking, the average smartwatch does. 77% of smartwatches support route tracking.
  • No coaching features
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 58.8% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No auto-pause
    This smartwatch does not support auto pause, the average smartwatch does. 62.6% of smartwatches support auto pause.
  • No route support
    This smartwatch does not support route support, the average smartwatch does. 54.4% of smartwatches support route support.
  • 6.08 days shorter battery life
    This smartwatch runs for less time per charge than the average smartwatch (0.9 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    0.92 days vs 7 days
  • No low-power mode
    This smartwatch does not include a low power mode, the average smartwatch does. 93.1% of smartwatches include a low power mode.
  • No compass
    This smartwatch does not include a compass, the average smartwatch does. 56.7% of smartwatches include a compass.
  • Less current Bluetooth version
    This smartwatch uses a less current Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (4 vs 5).
    4 vs 5
  • 49 m shallower water rating
    This smartwatch is rated for shallower water than the average smartwatch (1 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch is rated to 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1 m vs 50 m
  • 3.2 mm taller case
    This smartwatch has a taller case than the average smartwatch (48.2 mm vs 45 mm). The average smartwatch is 45 mm tall.
    48.2 mm vs 45 mm
  • 5 g heavier
    This smartwatch is heavier than the average smartwatch (50 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45 g.
    50 g vs 45 g
  • 0.01 inch smaller display
    This smartwatch has a smaller screen than the average smartwatch (1.4 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch has a 1.4 inch screen.
    1.39 inch vs 1.4 inch
  • No third-party apps
    This smartwatch does not support third-party apps, the average smartwatch does. 51.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • No smart alarm
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support smart alarms.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    This smartwatch has fewer microphones than the average smartwatch (0 vs 1). The average smartwatch has 1 microphones.
    0 vs 1

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

6.0
Koogly
≈ estimated
10/01/2020
First look · unboxing and first impressions
Verdict
TCL Movetime MT10g feels slow so far, but it packs in plenty of features for its class.
Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0
techpp.com
≈ estimated
03/10/2017
Hands-on review · Analog-style smartwatch
Verdict
The TCL Movetime is a classic-looking watch with fitness tracking and two to three days of battery, best for buyers who don't need apps.
7.0
m.economictimes.com
≈ estimated
20/08/2017
Brief review · Analog-style smartwatch
Verdict
The TCL Movetime keeps things basic: a sharp round screen, heart rate tracking and call alerts, but no apps you can add.
5.5
andreagaleazzi.com
✓ explicit
24/10/2017
Review · Basic daily tracking
Verdict
The TCL Movetime MT10g suits people who want calls, steps and sleep on the wrist, but its plastic look, mediocre display and one-to-two-day battery hold it back.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about TCL Movetime MT10g

  • Premium and stylish design with a sleek silver/gold dial and high-quality leather-style strap
  • Vibrant and sharp AMOLED display that remains visible in direct sunlight
  • Good value for money as a starter smartwatch
  • Includes useful health tracking features like a heart rate monitor and inactivity alerts
  • Smooth and responsive touchscreen interface

What customers don't like about TCL Movetime MT10g

  • Frequent Bluetooth connectivity drops, particularly reported with iOS devices
  • Limited notification support, often restricted to standard SMS and major social apps (lacks Skype, Slack, etc.)
  • Battery life is a letdown for some, lasting only about 20 hours to a full day with regular use
  • Proprietary operating system is considered weak and lacks the versatility of Android Wear
  • Absence of built-in GPS for independent activity tracking
  • Short charging cable length limits where the device can be placed while charging

Verdict

The TCL Movetime MT10G is a modern circular smartwatch featuring a 1.39-inch touchscreen display with a high 400 x 400 resolution and 407 ppi pixel density. It is equipped with comprehensive health and activity tracking tools, including a heart rate monitor, sleep analysis, barometer, and gyroscope, while also supporting Wi-Fi 4 and Bluetooth connectivity for smartphone notifications and call control. Key advantages include its lightweight 50g metal construction, IP67 water resistance, and convenient features like a camera remote and phone locator; however, it lacks built-in GPS, is incompatible with iOS and Windows, and has a relatively small 350 mAh battery that typically requires daily charging with heavy use.

Compare TCL Movetime MT10g with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of TCL Movetime MT10g and other Smartwatches

No results found