OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Smartphones Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

Tecno Camon 19 Pro (8GB + 256GB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£160RAM capacity:8 GBInternal storage:256 GBScreen size:6.8 inchesMain camera megapixels:64 MP & 50 MP & 2 MP

Tecno Camon 19 Pro (8GB + 256GB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

6.0

Overall score

Score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
Score components

90%

6.0

Technical score

10%

?

User score

â–¼Worse than 77% of smartphones
6.0

Technical score

Technical score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Score components

25%

4.8

Performance & Hardware

18%

7.7

Camera

15%

5.2

Display

15%

6.1

Battery

10%

7.1

Software

10%

6.5

Connectivity

4%

5.4

Audio

3%

5.9

Design

â–¼Worse than 72% of smartphones
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £160

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone Tecno Camon 19 Pro (8GB + 256GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Score components:

25%

4.8

Performance & Hardware

18%

7.7

Camera

15%

5.2

Display

15%

6.1

Battery

10%

7.1

Software

10%

6.5

Connectivity

4%

5.4

Audio

3%

5.9

Design

6.0
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Tecno Camon 19 Pro (8GB + 256GB) has a popularity of 1 point, which is lower than 63.9% of smartphones.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Score components:

60%

6.0

Overall score

40%

9.7

Price

7.1
Brand name
Tecno
Processor model
MediaTek Helio G96
Processor model
MediaTek Helio G96
â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
This smartphone uses the MediaTek Helio G96 processor model which is slower than processors in 80.9% of smartphones and equal to processors in 0.5% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
8 GB
RAM capacity
8 GB
â–¼ Worse than 41% of models
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 8 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 28.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 30.4% of smartphones.
Internal storage
256 GB
Internal storage
256 GB
â–² Better than 39% of models
Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 256 GB which is larger than the storage of 38.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 38.3% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
2.05 GHz
CPU boost clock speed
2.05 GHz
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 2.05 GHz which is lower than the boost speed of 83.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.1% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
Operating system
Android
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 12
Android version
Android 12
Android version
Android 12
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
This smartphone runs Android version Android 12 which is older than that found in 67.1% of smartphones and equal to that in 13.2% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
no
Direct OS updates
no
â–¼ Worse than 21% of models
This smartphone does not receive direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
Open-source OS
yes
â–² Better than 5% of models
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
yes
Dark mode
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartphone offers dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
yes
Multi-lens main camera
yes
â–² Better than 6% of models
This smartphone includes a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
64 MP & 50 MP & 2 MP
Main camera megapixels
64 MP & 50 MP & 2 MP
â–² Better than 86% of models
Market range: <10 – >100
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 64 MP & 50 MP & 2 MP which is higher than that of 85.9% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
f/1.6 & f/2.0 & f/2.4
Main camera aperture
f/1.6 & f/2.0 & f/2.4
★ Better than 95% of models
This smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.6 & f/2.0 & f/2.4 which is wider than that of 94.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.3% of smartphones.
Main camera sensor area
41 mm²
Main camera sensor area
41 mm²
â–² Better than 54% of models
Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
This smartphone has a main camera sensor area of 41 mm² which is larger than the main camera sensor area of 54.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 5.9% of smartphones.
Main camera pixel size
0.8 µm
Main camera pixel size
0.8 µm
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
Market range: <0.64 µm – >1.22 µm
This smartphone has a main camera pixel size of 0.8 µm which is larger than in 35.5% of smartphones and equal to the size in 21.9% of smartphones.
1.6 binned
Show more
Number of SIM slots
2
Number of SIM slots
2
â–² Better than 4% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.8% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.1% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
Cellular module
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
no
5G connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
LTE support
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
6.8 inches
Screen size
6.8 inches
â–² Better than 84% of models
Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 6.8 inches which is larger than the screens of 84.4% of smartphones and equal to those of 4.6% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
1080x 2460 px
Screen resolution
1080x 2460 px
â–² Better than 66% of models
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 1080x2460 px which is higher than that of 65.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 4.4% of smartphones.
Pixel density
395 ppi
Pixel density
395 ppi
â–¼ Worse than 49% of models
Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi which is higher than that of 41.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 8.9% of smartphones.
Display type
IPS LCD
Display type
IPS LCD
â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
This smartphone uses a IPS LCD display type. 0% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
120 Hz
Refresh rate
120 Hz
â–² Better than 35% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 120 Hz which is higher than in 34.7% of smartphones and equal to that in 55.2% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
5,000 mAh
Battery capacity
5,000 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 5,000 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 28.3% of smartphones and equal to those in 28.8% of smartphones.
Charging speed
33 W
Charging speed
33 W
â–¼ Worse than 49% of models
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 33 W which is faster than in 38.9% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 12% of smartphones.
Fast charging
yes
Fast charging
yes
â–² Better than 7% of models
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
?
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 25% of models
This smartphone does not support wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
no
Stereo speakers
no
â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
This smartphone does not include stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
yes
3.5 mm headphone jack
yes
â–² Better than 55% of models
This smartphone includes a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
?
FM radio
yes
FM radio
yes
â–² Better than 66% of models
This smartphone includes an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
?
Show more
Height
166.8 mm
Height
166.8 mm
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
This smartphone has a height of 166.8 mm which is taller than 78.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.1% of smartphones.
Width
74.5 mm
Width
74.5 mm
â–² Better than 77% of models
Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
This smartphone has a width of 74.5 mm which is narrower than 76.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.3% of smartphones.
Thickness
8.6 mm
Thickness
8.6 mm
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 8.6 mm which is thicker than 65% of smartphones and equal to that of 3.9% of smartphones.
Weight
204 g
Weight
204 g
â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
Market range: <175 g – >256 g
This smartphone weighs 204 g which is heavier than 64.2% of smartphones and equal to the weight of 1.3% of smartphones.
Device volume
98,272 cm³
Device volume
98,272 cm³
â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 98,272 cm³ which is larger than 54.5% of smartphones.
Show more

Tecno Camon 19 Pro (8GB + 256GB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • Has optical image stabilization
    Optical image stabilization
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • 2 x higher optical zoom
    Optical zoom
    2 x
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <0 x – >3 x
    This smartphone offers higher optical zoom than the average smartphone (2 x vs 0 x).
    2 x vs 0 x
  • Higher GSMArena battery life endurance score
    GSMArena battery life endurance score
    121
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    Market range: <74 – >125
    This smartphone has a higher GSMArena battery life endurance score than the average smartphone (121 vs 99.5). The average endurance score is 99.5.
    121 vs 99.5
  • 0.13 inches inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    6.8 inches
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
    This smartphone has a larger screen size than the average smartphone (6.8 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone screen is 6.67 inches.
    6.8 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • Higher-resolution main camera
    Main camera megapixels
    64 MP & 50 MP & 2 MP
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    Market range: <10 – >100
    This smartphone has a higher main camera resolution than the average smartphone (64 MP & 50 MP & 2 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone main camera has 50 MP & 8 MP megapixels.
    64 MP & 50 MP & 2 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • 3 more flash LEDs
    Number of flash LEDs
    4
    ★ Better than 96% of models
    Market range: <1 – >2
    This smartphone has more flash LEDs than the average smartphone (4 vs 1). The average smartphone has 1 flash LEDs.
    4 vs 1
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 60% of models
    This smartphone uses a BSI sensor, the average smartphone does not. 40.5% of smartphones include BSI sensors.
  • Wider main camera aperture
    Main camera aperture
    f/1.6 & f/2.0 & f/2.4
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    This smartphone has a wider main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.6 & f/2 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/1.6 & f/2.0 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • 62.5% cheaper
    Tecno Camon 19 Pro (8GB + 256GB) is cheaper than the average smartphone (£160 vs £260).
    £160 vs £260
  • 2x more L1
    L1 cache
    64 KB
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    Market range: <32 KB – >192 KB
    This smartphone has more L1 cache than the average smartphone (64 KB vs 32 KB). The average L1 cache is 32 KB.
    64 KB vs 32 KB
  • Has optical image stabilization
    Optical image stabilization
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • 2 x higher optical zoom
    Optical zoom
    2 x
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <0 x – >3 x
    This smartphone offers higher optical zoom than the average smartphone (2 x vs 0 x).
    2 x vs 0 x
  • Higher-resolution main camera
    Main camera megapixels
    64 MP & 50 MP & 2 MP
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    Market range: <10 – >100
    This smartphone has a higher main camera resolution than the average smartphone (64 MP & 50 MP & 2 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone main camera has 50 MP & 8 MP megapixels.
    64 MP & 50 MP & 2 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • 3 more flash LEDs
    Number of flash LEDs
    4
    ★ Better than 96% of models
    Market range: <1 – >2
    This smartphone has more flash LEDs than the average smartphone (4 vs 1). The average smartphone has 1 flash LEDs.
    4 vs 1
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 60% of models
    This smartphone uses a BSI sensor, the average smartphone does not. 40.5% of smartphones include BSI sensors.
  • Wider main camera aperture
    Main camera aperture
    f/1.6 & f/2.0 & f/2.4
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    This smartphone has a wider main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.6 & f/2 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/1.6 & f/2.0 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • Supports laser autofocus
    Laser autofocus
    yes
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    This smartphone features laser autofocus, the average smartphone does not. 21.4% of smartphones include laser AF.
  • Has a dual-tone LED flash
    Dual-tone LED flash
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This smartphone features a dual-tone LED flash, the average smartphone does not. 41.4% of smartphones include dual-tone flash.
  • 28.1% larger main camera sensor area
    Main camera sensor area
    41 mm²
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
    This smartphone has a larger main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (41 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average main camera sensor area is 32 mm².
    41 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • Higher front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    32 MP
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    Market range: <5 – >40
    This smartphone has more front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (32 MP vs 16 MP). The average front camera has 16 MP megapixels.
    32 MP vs 16 MP
  • 0.13 inches inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    6.8 inches
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
    This smartphone has a larger screen size than the average smartphone (6.8 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone screen is 6.67 inches.
    6.8 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • Higher screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    1080 x 2460 px
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    This smartphone has a higher screen resolution than the average smartphone (1080x2460 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone resolution is 1080x2400 px.
    1080x2460 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • Higher GSMArena battery life endurance score
    GSMArena battery life endurance score
    121
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    Market range: <74 – >125
    This smartphone has a higher GSMArena battery life endurance score than the average smartphone (121 vs 99.5). The average endurance score is 99.5.
    121 vs 99.5
  • Has a 3.5 mm headphone jack
    3.5 mm headphone jack
    yes
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    This smartphone features a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average smartphone does not. 45.5% of smartphones include a standard headphone jack.
  • Has FM radio
    FM radio
    yes
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    This smartphone features an FM radio, the average smartphone does not. 34.2% of smartphones include an FM tuner.
  • 1.5 mm narrower
    Width
    74.5 mm
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
    This smartphone is narrower than the average smartphone (74.5 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone width is 76 mm.
    74.5 mm vs 76 mm
  • Worse processor
    Processor model
    MediaTek Helio G96
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (MediaTek Helio G96 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    MediaTek Helio G96 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • Inferior display type
    Display type
    IPS LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This smartphone has an inferior display type compared to the average smartphone (IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED). 0.00% of smartphones use the superior display type.
    IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED
  • No 5G connectivity
    5G connectivity
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • 2x larger process node
    Process node
    12 nm
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >12 nm
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (12 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    12 nm vs 6 nm
  • Worse main camera video quality
    Main camera video
    1080 x 30 fps
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartphone records worse main camera video than the average smartphone. 11.80x of smartphones support 4K video recording.
    1080x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • No stereo speakers
    Stereo speakers
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartphone does not have stereo speakers, the average smartphone does. 64.4% of smartphones feature stereo speakers.
  • No LDAC support
    LDAC
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    This smartphone does not support LDAC, the average smartphone does. 60.3% of smartphones support LDAC.
  • No memory card slot
    Memory card slot
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartphone does not have a memory card slot, the average smartphone does. 53.5% of smartphones feature expandable storage.
  • 5.44x less popular
    Tecno Camon 19 Pro (8GB + 256GB) is less popular than the average smartphone (1 vs 5.4).
    1 vs 5.44
  • 2.9% worse value for money
    Tecno Camon 19 Pro (8GB + 256GB) has worse value for money than the average smartphone (7.13 vs 7.3).
    7.13 vs 7.34
  • Worse processor
    Processor model
    MediaTek Helio G96
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (MediaTek Helio G96 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    MediaTek Helio G96 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 2x larger process node
    Process node
    12 nm
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >12 nm
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (12 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    12 nm vs 6 nm
  • 62.3% lower 3DMark Wild Life benchmark
    3DMark Wild Life benchmark
    1,173
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <661 – >11.1k
    This smartphone performs worse in the 3DMark Wild Life benchmark than the average smartphone (1,173 vs 3,115). The average smartphone scores 3,115 in this benchmark.
    1,173 vs 3,115
  • 14.6% lower CPU boost clock speed
    CPU boost clock speed
    2.05 GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
    This smartphone has a lower CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (2.1 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    2.05 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • 50% less L3 cache
    L3 cache
    2048 KB
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <1k KB – >8.2k KB
    This smartphone has a smaller L3 cache than the average smartphone (2048 KB vs 4096 KB). The average smartphone has an L3 cache of 4096 KB.
    2,048 KB vs 4,096 KB
  • 28.9% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    670
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <392 – >2.2k
    This smartphone performs worse in Geekbench 6 single-core than the average smartphone (670 vs 942). The average smartphone scores 942 in the Geekbench 6 single-core test.
    670 vs 942
  • 28.6% lower maximum RAM capacity
    Maximum RAM
    10 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    Market range: <8 GB – >16 GB
    This smartphone supports less maximum RAM than the average smartphone (10 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB of RAM.
    10 GB vs 14 GB
  • 69.3% lower 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited benchmark
    3DMark Wild Life Unlimited benchmark
    1,173
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <975 – >12.4k
    This smartphone scores lower in 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited than the average smartphone (1,173 vs 3,825). The average smartphone scores 3,825.
    1,173 vs 3,825
  • 73.4% lower 3DMark Wild Life Extreme benchmark
    3DMark Wild Life Extreme benchmark
    326
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <313 – >4.7k
    This smartphone scores lower in 3DMark Wild Life Extreme than the average smartphone (326 vs 1,226). The average smartphone scores 1,226.
    326 vs 1,226
  • Lacks NX Bit security
    NX Bit
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    This smartphone does not support NX Bit, the average smartphone does. 94.6% of smartphones support NX Bit.
  • 13.9% lower PCMark Work 3.0 Performance benchmark
    PCMark Work 3.0 Performance benchmark
    9,281
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <7.1k – >15.9k
    This smartphone performs worse in PCMark Work 3.0 than the average smartphone (9,281 vs 10,783). The average smartphone scores 10,783 in PCMark Work 3.0.
    9,281 vs 10,783
  • 22.4% slower memory speed
    Memory speed
    2,133 MHz
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    Market range: <1.8k MHz – >4.8k MHz
    This smartphone has a lower memory speed than the average smartphone (2133 MHz vs 2750 MHz). The average smartphone has a memory speed of 2750 MHz.
    2,133 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • 29.3% lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    1,791
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <1.4k – >6.7k
    This smartphone performs worse in Geekbench 6 multi-core than the average smartphone (1,791 vs 2,533). The average smartphone scores 2,533 in the Geekbench 6 multi-core test.
    1,791 vs 2,533
  • Supports older OpenGL version
    OpenGL version
    2.0
    Category Benchmark
    This smartphone supports a lower OpenGL version than the average smartphone (2 vs 3.2). The average smartphone supports OpenGL version 3.2.
    2.0 vs 3.2
  • 75% fewer shader units
    N. of shading units
    64
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    Market range: <32 – >1.5k
    This smartphone includes fewer shader units than the average smartphone (64 vs 256). The average smartphone has 256 shader units.
    64 vs 256
  • 33.2% lower memory bandwidth
    Memory bandwidth
    17.1 GB/s
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    Market range: <13.41 GB/s – >76.6 GB/s
    This smartphone has lower memory bandwidth than the average smartphone (17.1 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s). The average smartphone has a bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s.
    17.1 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s
  • Lower CPU base clock speed
    CPU base clock speed
    2 x 2.05 GHz & 6 x 2 GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This smartphone has a lower CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (2x2.05 GHz & 6x2 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    2x2.05 GHz & 6x2 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • Lacks focus mode
    Focus mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    This smartphone does not have a focus mode, the average smartphone does. 60.4% of smartphones include a dedicated focus mode.
  • No Wi-Fi password sharing
    Wi-Fi password sharing
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This smartphone does not support Wi-Fi password sharing, the average smartphone does. 57.9% of smartphones allow easy Wi-Fi sharing.
  • No battery health monitoring
    Battery health monitoring
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This smartphone lacks battery health monitoring, the average smartphone includes it. 66.3% of smartphones provide battery health stats.
  • Older Android version
    Android version
    Android 12
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartphone runs an older Android version than the average smartphone (Android 12 vs Android 14). The average smartphone runs Android version Android 14.
    Android 12 vs Android 14
  • Does not allow app offloading
    App offloading
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    This smartphone does not support app offloading, the average smartphone does. 51.9% of smartphones support app offloading to save space.
  • Lacks instant markup
    Instant markup
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    This smartphone does not support instant markup, the average smartphone does. 52.2% of smartphones include instant markup tools.
  • Worse main camera video quality
    Main camera video
    1080 x 30 fps
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartphone records worse main camera video than the average smartphone. 11.80x of smartphones support 4K video recording.
    1080x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    Front camera aperture
    f/2.4
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartphone has a narrower front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average smartphone front aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • No 5G connectivity
    5G connectivity
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • No memory card slot
    Memory card slot
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartphone does not have a memory card slot, the average smartphone does. 53.5% of smartphones feature expandable storage.
  • No compass
    Compass
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    This smartphone does not have a compass, the average smartphone does. 93.2% of smartphones include a built-in compass.
  • Inferior display type
    Display type
    IPS LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This smartphone has an inferior display type compared to the average smartphone (IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED). 0.00% of smartphones use the superior display type.
    IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED
  • 414.5 nits lower GSMArena max display brightness
    GSMArena max display brightness
    479 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    Market range: <537 nits – >1.4k nits
    This smartphone has a lower GSMArena max display brightness than the average smartphone (479 nits vs 893.5 nits). The average smartphone scores 893.5 nits.
    479 nits vs 893.5 nits
  • 521 nits lower peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    479 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <480 nits – >3.6k nits
    This smartphone has a lower peak brightness than the average smartphone (479 nits vs 1000 nits). The average smartphone peak brightness is 1000 nits.
    479 nits vs 1,000 nits
  • 27.4% lower screen brightness
    Screen brightness
    479 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <437 nits – >1.3k nits
    This smartphone has a lower screen brightness than the average smartphone (479 nits vs 660 nits). The average smartphone has a brightness of 660 nits.
    479 nits vs 660 nits
  • 5.9% lower PCMark Work 3.0 battery benchmark
    PCMark Work 3.0 battery benchmark
    740 min
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    Market range: <487 min – >1.3k min
    This smartphone scores lower in PCMark Work 3.0 battery benchmark than the average smartphone (740 min vs 786 min). The average smartphone scores 786 min.
    740 min vs 786 min
  • No stereo speakers
    Stereo speakers
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartphone does not have stereo speakers, the average smartphone does. 64.4% of smartphones feature stereo speakers.
  • No LDAC support
    LDAC
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    This smartphone does not support LDAC, the average smartphone does. 60.3% of smartphones support LDAC.
  • Lower IP rating
    IP rating
    IP53
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    This smartphone has a lower IP rating than the average smartphone (IP53 vs IP67). 0.00% of smartphones have a higher IP rating.
    IP53 vs IP67
  • 2 year/s older release date
    Release date
    2022
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartphone is an older model than the average smartphone (2022 vs 2024). 2.00% of smartphones were released more recently.
    July 2022
    2022 vs 2024
  • 3.2 mm taller
    Height
    166.8 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
    This smartphone is taller than the average smartphone (166.8 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone has a height of 163.6 mm.
    166.8 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • 4% heavier
    Weight
    204 g
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    Market range: <175 g – >256 g
    This smartphone is heavier than the average smartphone (204 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    204 g vs 196.2 g
  • 0.3 mm thicker
    Thickness
    8.6 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
    This smartphone is thicker than the average smartphone (8.6 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone has a thickness of 8.3 mm.
    8.6 mm vs 8.3 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

M
mobilityarenaap.pages.dev
07/01/2023
Summary of the review
Tecno Camon 19 Pro Review: Stellar Selfies And Better Battery Life
T
techweez.com
05/08/2022
Summary of the review
TECNO Camon 19 Pro Review: Performance and Style
G
gsmarena.com
30/07/2022
Summary of the review
Tecno Camon 19 Pro review
G
gadgetpilipinas.net
04/11/2022
Summary of the review
TECNO Camon 19 Pro 4G Review - Gadget Pilipinas
G
gizchina.com
13/07/2022
Summary of the review
TECNO CAMON 19 Pro - Mondrian Edition: when tech meets pure art - Gizchina
T
techweez.com.en2de.search.translate.goog
05/08/2022
Summary of the review
TECNO Camon 19 Pro Review: Performance and Design
(Translated)Show original
I
iftinfo.com
02/08/2022
Summary of the review
IFTINFO – Our Tecno Camon 19 Pro video review is now available
(Translated)Show original
T
techweez.com.en2fr.search.translate.goog
05/08/2022
Summary of the review
TECNO Camon 19 Pro Review: Performance and Style
(Translated)Show original
I
iftinfo.com
30/07/2022
Summary of the review
IFTINFO – Tecno Camon 19 Pro Review
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What we like about Tecno Camon 19 Pro (8GB + 256GB)

  • Impressive camera performance, especially in low light conditions, with good detail, OIS, and a capable 50MP portrait lens.
  • Beautiful, unique, and elegant design, with some users particularly appreciating the color-changing Mondrian edition back panel.
  • Very good battery life (5000 mAh capacity) that can last all day with heavy use and up to two days with moderate use.
  • Fast 33W charging, which can charge the device to full in around 60 minutes or 47% in 30 minutes.
  • Large 6.8-inch FHD+ display with a smooth 120Hz refresh rate and very slim bezels.
  • Solid performance for everyday tasks and multitasking, with some users finding it adequate for gaming with adjusted settings.
  • Presence of a 3.5mm headphone jack and NFC (Near Field Communication) support.
  • Good value for money, with many users finding it a great all-around device for its price point.
  • Runs on Android 12 (with HiOS 8.6) and is snappy in day-to-day use, with less bloatware compared to previous versions.
  • Comes with in-box accessories like a charger, cable, SIM tool, protective case, and wired headset.

What we don't like about Tecno Camon 19 Pro (8GB + 256GB)

  • The display is an IPS LCD panel, which some users find unexciting and not as vibrant as AMOLED alternatives in the same price range.
  • Performance for graphic-intensive games can be average, with the phone potentially heating up and throttling performance during extended gaming sessions.
  • Average single speaker with mediocre sound quality, lacking in bass and stereo sound.
  • Software experience can be clunky with occasional animation stutters, which detracts from the 120Hz refresh rate experience.
  • Lack of an ultrawide camera lens, which is a significant omission for some users.
  • Pre-installed apps and built-in adverts in the OS can be a nuisance for users.
  • The telephoto camera can have focusing issues.
  • No official IP rating for water resistance.
  • Charging speed, while decent (33W), is not the fastest available compared to some competitors in the market.
  • Some users reported build quality issues or performance issues after a few months of use.

Verdict

The Tecno Camon 19 Pro (8GB + 256GB) is a mid-range smartphone known for its stylish design and capable camera system, featuring a large 6.8-inch Full HD+ IPS LCD display with a smooth 120Hz refresh rate. It is powered by the MediaTek Helio G96 processor, offering solid performance for daily tasks and gaming. A significant pro is the impressive rear camera setup, which includes a 64MP main sensor with OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) and an industry-first RGBW sensor for enhanced low-light photography, plus a 50MP telephoto lens with 2x optical zoom, complemented by a 32MP selfie camera. The device also packs a large 5000mAh battery with 33W fast charging support and includes NFC and a 3.5mm headphone jack. Key cons include the use of a plastic build, the absence of an ultrawide camera lens, mono speakers instead of stereo, and a lack of formal IP ingress protection.

Compare Tecno Camon 19 Pro (8GB + 256GB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Tecno Camon 19 Pro (8GB + 256GB) and other smartphones

No results found