Samsung Galaxy A71 (6GB + 128GB) Review | 197 Data compared

The Samsung Galaxy A71 is identified as a versatile mid-range smartphone featuring a 64MP camera, a 4,500 mAh battery, and an "Infinity-O" Super AMOLED display, offering significant performance upgrades via the Snapdragon 730 chipset. Pros highlighted include impressive daytime photography, excellent battery longevity, and fast 25W charging, making it a strong contender in its class. However, the review notes several cons, specifically pointing to poor low-light camera performance, a low-resolution macro sensor, and a "frustratingly quiet" single speaker. Additional drawbacks include the lack of water resistance and the presence of preloaded software on the plastic-built device.

The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a high-performing mid-range device offering a 6.7-inch Super AMOLED display, excellent battery life, and high durability. While it supports 5G and offers 43 hours of battery life, it lacks optical image stabilization and wireless charging. The device features a plastic build, no water-resistance rating, and a mono speaker.

The DXOMARK camera review of the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G (Snapdragon) highlights a mid-range device with a 64MP main sensor that provides accurate target exposure and consistent autofocus, particularly excelling with a solid ultra-wide camera for landscape shots. However, significant drawbacks include low detail in most conditions, high noise in low-light, a recurring blue color cast, and a lack of a dedicated tele-lens resulting in poor zoom. While video features effective gyro-EIS stabilization, it suffers from autofocus failures in low light and various artifacts, making it a capable but outmatched competitor against other mid-range handsets.

Wired rates the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G as a reliable mid-range phone (7/10) with a strong display and 5G support, though it notes drawbacks like a plastic build and camera issues. Pros include its 6.7-inch Super AMOLED screen, 4K video recording, a headphone jack, expandable storage, and long battery life with fast charging; however, cons encompass its plastic build that lacks water resistance, a slow fingerprint sensor, weak low-light camera performance, a poor macro lens, and a disappointing mono speaker. While 5G is a key feature, its practical benefit was limited at the time of review, and accessing millimeter-wave 5G required a carrier-locked version.

PCMag concludes the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a strong mid-range phone offering good value with few compromises, highlighting its 5G connectivity, vibrant display, and excellent battery life. Pros include a 6.7-inch AMOLED screen, a slim design with a headphone jack, and expandable storage. Cons include the lack of water resistance (no IP rating), older Gorilla Glass 3, and poor audio quality from the single speaker.

According to Tom's Guide, the 2020 Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a mid-range phone with a large 6.7-inch AMOLED display and a 4,500-mAh battery offering nearly 11 hours of life, alongside affordable 5G connectivity. While the Snapdragon 765 processor provides respectable performance, the device features a glossy plastic back that attracts fingerprints and a slow in-display fingerprint sensor; its 64MP camera array performs decently in bright light but poorly in low light compared to rivals like the Google Pixel 4a. The review notes pros including strong battery, a vibrant display, a headphone jack, and microSD expansion, but highlights cons such as a lack of wireless charging and water resistance, bloatware, and an initial $599 price tag that made it difficult to recommend over competitors.

The Samsung Galaxy A71 is a refined mid-range smartphone featuring a 6.7-inch Super AMOLED display and a Snapdragon 730 chipset. It excels with a 4,500mAh battery offering over a day's use and supports 25W fast charging, alongside a 64MP primary camera capable of great daylight photos. Key pros include its vibrant screen, robust performance, long battery life, and the inclusion of a headphone jack and NFC. However, the device struggles with low-light camera performance, has a largely unusable 5MP macro lens, lacks wireless charging and IP water resistance, and features a weak mono speaker. More information is available on the Android Central website.

According to Hardware Canucks, the Samsung Galaxy A71 represents a significant upgrade over the Galaxy A51, offering a more premium multitasking experience with its 6GB of RAM and Snapdragon 730 chipset. Key advantages include a large 6.7-inch Super AMOLED Plus display, a 4,500mAh battery lasting up to two days, and a quad-camera system praised for accurate white balance and colors. However, the review notes the absence of features like wireless charging, IP water resistance, and a telephoto lens, and questions the value of the 5G variant's price premium. Original Samsung Galaxy A71 A715F 4G Mobile Phone NFC Dual SIM 6.7" MP£121.99£131.994.5(7.5k)(Prism Crush Black) Samsung Galaxy A51 Dual Sim | 128GB | 4GB RAM£145.004.4(15.6k)

The Samsung Galaxy A71 is a mid-tier phone with many features similar to the S10 Lite, highlighted by a 6.7-inch Super AMOLED Plus display. It features a slim 7.9mm profile, a light 179g weight, and a "glasstic" back with a distinctive finish. Pros include a 64MP main sensor in its versatile quad-camera system, a Snapdragon 730 chipset, up to 8GB of RAM, a 4,500mAh battery with 25W fast charging, and a 3.5mm headphone jack. However, cons include a plastic build, lack of wireless charging, no waterproof rating, the absence of a telephoto lens, and potentially difficult one-handed use due to its size.

DXOMARK awarded the Samsung Galaxy A71 an overall camera score of 84, placing it as a mid-range performer with accurate exposure, wide dynamic range, and effective video stabilization, but noting limitations in detail, autofocus, and zoom. The review highlighted strengths like well-controlled noise, vivid colors in bright light, and pleasing bokeh, while pointing out significant weaknesses including lack of detail, poor zoom quality, slow autofocus, and a blue color cast in outdoor photos. Video performance, scoring 74, offered stabilization and accurate white balance but suffered from limited dynamic range and jerky autofocus tracking.