OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (4GB + 128GB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£220RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:128 GBScreen size:6.5 inchesMain camera megapixels:25 MP & 8 MP & 5 MP

Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (4GB + 128GB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

5.7/10

Overall score

Score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
Score components

90%

5.4

Technical score

10%

8.9

User score

â–¼Worse than 88% of smartphones
6.8

Value for money

Value for money
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
Score components

70%

5.7

Overall score

30%

9.4

Price

â–¼Worse than 88%
5.4

Technical score

Technical score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
Score components

25%

4.5

Performance & Hardware

18%

6.1

Camera

15%

6.4

Display

15%

5.1

Battery

10%

4.3

Software

10%

6.2

Connectivity

4%

3.1

Audio

3%

7.4

Design

â–¼Worse than 92%
8.9

User score

User score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 89% of models
Score components

70%

8.9

User ratings

30%

8.8

Number of reviews

â–²Better than 89%
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £220
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
6GB + 128GBCheck price
Other versions:
4GB + 128GB
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (4GB + 128GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
Score components:

25%

4.5

Performance & Hardware

18%

6.1

Camera

15%

6.4

Display

15%

5.1

Battery

10%

4.3

Software

10%

6.2

Connectivity

4%

3.1

Audio

3%

7.4

Design

5.4
User score
User score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 89% of models
Score components

70%

8.9

User ratings

30%

8.8

Number of reviews

8.9
Popularity
Popularity
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 84% of models
Popularity:
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (4GB + 128GB) has a popularity of 8.8 points, which is higher than 84.3% of smartphones.
8.8
Value for money
Value for money
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
Score components:

70%

5.7

Overall score

30%

9.4

Price

6.8
Brand name
Samsung
Processor model
Samsung Exynos 9610
This smartphone uses the Samsung Exynos 9610 processor model which is slower than processors in 83.2% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
4 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 4 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 82.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 14% of smartphones.
Internal storage
128 GB
Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 128 GB which is smaller than the storage of 61.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 28.4% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
2.3 GHz
Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 2.3 GHz which is lower than the boost speed of 63.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 4.4% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 9 Pie
Android version
Android 9 Pie
This smartphone runs Android version Android 9 Pie which is older than that found in 93.9% of smartphones and equal to that in 2.6% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
no
This smartphone does not receive direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
no
This smartphone does not offer dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
yes
This smartphone includes a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
25 MP & 8 MP & 5 MP
Market range: <10 – >100
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 25 MP & 8 MP & 5 MP which is lower than that of 83.8% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
f/1.7 & f/2.2 & f/2.2
This smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.7 & f/2.2 & f/2.2 which is wider than that of 85.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.1% of smartphones.
Main camera sensor area
16 mm²
Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
This smartphone has a main camera sensor area of 16 mm² which is smaller than the main camera sensor area of 96.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.8% of smartphones.
Main camera pixel size
0.8 µm
Market range: <0.64 µm – >1.22 µm
This smartphone has a main camera pixel size of 0.8 µm which is larger than in 35.5% of smartphones and equal to the size in 21.9% of smartphones.
Show more
Number of SIM slots
2
Market range: <1 – >6
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.8% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.1% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
no
This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
6.5 inches
Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 6.5 inches which is smaller than the screens of 80% of smartphones and equal to those of 3.9% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
1080x 2400 px
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 1080x2400 px which is higher than that of 36.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 20.4% of smartphones.
Pixel density
405 ppi
Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 405 ppi which is higher than that of 64.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.3% of smartphones.
Display type
OLED/AMOLED
This smartphone uses a OLED/AMOLED display type. 58.6% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
120 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 120 Hz which is higher than in 34.7% of smartphones and equal to that in 55.2% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
4,000 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 4,000 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 90.2% of smartphones and equal to those in 2.6% of smartphones.
Charging speed
25 W
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 25 W which is slower than in 66.9% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 5.3% of smartphones.
Fast charging
yes
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
?
Wireless charging
no
This smartphone does not support wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
no
This smartphone does not include stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
yes
This smartphone includes a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
2
Market range: <1 – >3
This smartphone includes 2 microphones, which is more than in 10.5% of smartphones and equal to the number in 66.6% of smartphones.
FM radio
yes
This smartphone includes an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
no
This smartphone does not support aptX Lossless. 12.9% of smartphones provide aptX Lossless.
Show more
Height
159.9 mm
Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
This smartphone has a height of 159.9 mm which is shorter than 80.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.8% of smartphones.
Width
75.1 mm
Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
This smartphone has a width of 75.1 mm which is narrower than 66.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.7% of smartphones.
Thickness
8.4 mm
Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 8.4 mm which is thicker than 55.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 4.6% of smartphones.
Weight
189 g
Market range: <175 g – >256 g
This smartphone weighs 189 g which is lighter than 68% of smartphones and equal to the weight of 1.9% of smartphones.
Device volume
95,400 cm³
Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 95,400 cm³ which is smaller than 59% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.4% of smartphones.
Show more

Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (4GB + 128GB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • Has optical image stabilization
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    This smartphone uses a BSI sensor, the average smartphone does not. 40.5% of smartphones include BSI sensors.
  • 2 more memory channels
    This smartphone has more memory channels than the average smartphone (4 vs 2). The average smartphone has 2 memory channels.
    4 vs 2
  • Has an always-on display
    This smartphone features an always-on display, the average smartphone does not. 49.2% of smartphones offer always-on functionality.
  • 33.3% lower TDP
    This smartphone has a lower TDP than the average smartphone (8 W vs 6 W). The average TDP for smartphones is 6 W.
    8 W vs 6 W
  • Supports ANT+
    This smartphone supports ANT+ technology, the average smartphone does not. 6% of smartphones are ANT+ compatible.
  • 14% higher PCMark Work 3.0 Performance benchmark
    This smartphone has a higher PCMark Work 3.0 performance score than the average smartphone (12,290 vs 10,783). The average score is 10,783.
    12,290 vs 10,783
  • Has a 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This smartphone features a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average smartphone does not. 45.5% of smartphones include a standard headphone jack.
  • 10.9% higher user score
    User score
    8.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
    the average smartphone
    Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (4GB + 128GB) has a higher user score than the average smartphone (8.88 vs 8).
    8.88 vs 8
  • 62.4% more popular
    Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (4GB + 128GB) is more popular than the average smartphone (8.83 vs 5.4).
    8.83 vs 5.44
  • 2 more memory channels
    This smartphone has more memory channels than the average smartphone (4 vs 2). The average smartphone has 2 memory channels.
    4 vs 2
  • 33.3% lower TDP
    This smartphone has a lower TDP than the average smartphone (8 W vs 6 W). The average TDP for smartphones is 6 W.
    8 W vs 6 W
  • 14% higher PCMark Work 3.0 Performance benchmark
    This smartphone has a higher PCMark Work 3.0 performance score than the average smartphone (12,290 vs 10,783). The average score is 10,783.
    12,290 vs 10,783
  • Higher CPU base clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (4x2.3 GHz & 4x1.7 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    4x2.3 GHz & 4x1.7 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • Has optical image stabilization
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    This smartphone uses a BSI sensor, the average smartphone does not. 40.5% of smartphones include BSI sensors.
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This smartphone has a wider main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.7 & f/2.2 & f/2.2 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/1.7 & f/2.2 & f/2.2 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This smartphone has a wider front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Higher front camera megapixels
    This smartphone has more front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (25 MP vs 16 MP). The average front camera has 16 MP megapixels.
    25 MP vs 16 MP
  • Supports ANT+
    This smartphone supports ANT+ technology, the average smartphone does not. 6% of smartphones are ANT+ compatible.
  • 1 more external displays supported
    This smartphone supports more external displays than the average smartphone (2 vs 1). The average smartphone supports 1 external displays.
    2 vs 1
  • Has an always-on display
    This smartphone features an always-on display, the average smartphone does not. 49.2% of smartphones offer always-on functionality.
  • 2.5% higher pixel density
    This smartphone has a higher pixel density than the average smartphone (405 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    405 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • 21.2% higher screen brightness
    This smartphone has a higher screen brightness than the average smartphone (800 nits vs 660 nits). The average smartphone brightness is 660 nits.
    800 nits vs 660 nits
  • Has a 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This smartphone features a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average smartphone does not. 45.5% of smartphones include a standard headphone jack.
  • Has FM radio
    This smartphone features an FM radio, the average smartphone does not. 34.2% of smartphones include an FM tuner.
  • 1 m deeper water resistance
    This smartphone has a deeper water resistance rating than the average smartphone (1 m vs 0 m). The average depth rating is 0 m.
    1 m vs 0 m
  • 3.7 mm shorter
    This smartphone is shorter than the average smartphone (159.9 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone height is 163.6 mm.
    159.9 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • 3.7% lighter
    This smartphone is lighter than the average smartphone (189 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    189 g vs 196.2 g
  • 2.5% higher French repairability index
    This smartphone has a higher French repairability index score than the average smartphone (8.2 vs 8). The average score is 8.
    8.2 vs 8
  • 0.9 mm narrower
    This smartphone is narrower than the average smartphone (75.1 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone width is 76 mm.
    75.1 mm vs 76 mm
  • Worse processor
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Samsung Exynos 9,610 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • No 5G connectivity
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • 50% smaller main camera sensor area
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (16 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average smartphone sensor area is 32 mm².
    16 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • Worse main camera video quality
    This smartphone records worse main camera video than the average smartphone. 11.80x of smartphones support 4K video recording.
    1080x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • 31.6% slower GPU clock
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (650 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    650 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • 50% less storage
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (128 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    128 GB vs 256 GB
  • 4 GB less RAM
    This smartphone has less RAM than the average smartphone (4 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    4 GB vs 8 GB
  • Lacks multithreading support
    This smartphone does not support multithreading, the average smartphone does. 80.5% of smartphones support multithreading.
  • 7.8% worse value for money
    Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (4GB + 128GB) has worse value for money than the average smartphone (6.8 vs 7.3).
    6.8 vs 7.34
  • Worse processor
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Samsung Exynos 9,610 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 31.6% slower GPU clock
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (650 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    650 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • 4 GB less RAM
    This smartphone has less RAM than the average smartphone (4 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    4 GB vs 8 GB
  • 50% less storage
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (128 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    128 GB vs 256 GB
  • Lacks multithreading support
    This smartphone does not support multithreading, the average smartphone does. 80.5% of smartphones support multithreading.
  • 57.1% lower maximum RAM capacity
    This smartphone supports less maximum RAM than the average smartphone (6 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB of RAM.
    6 GB vs 14 GB
  • 66.7% larger process node
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (10 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    10 nm vs 6 nm
  • 41.8% slower memory speed
    This smartphone has a lower memory speed than the average smartphone (1,600 MHz vs 2,750 MHz). The average smartphone has a memory speed of 2,750 MHz.
    1,600 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • 53.4% lower memory bandwidth
    This smartphone has lower memory bandwidth than the average smartphone (11.9 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s). The average smartphone has a bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s.
    11.92 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s
  • 63% lower 3DMark Steel Nomad benchmark
    This smartphone performs worse in 3DMark Steel Nomad than the average smartphone (225 vs 608). The average smartphone scores 608.
    225 vs 608
  • 85.9% fewer shader units
    This smartphone includes fewer shader units than the average smartphone (36 vs 256). The average smartphone has 256 shader units.
    36 vs 256
  • 35.3% lower 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited benchmark
    This smartphone scores lower in 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited than the average smartphone (2,476 vs 3,825). The average smartphone scores 3,825.
    2,476 vs 3,825
  • 44.1% lower 3DMark Wild Life Extreme benchmark
    This smartphone scores lower in 3DMark Wild Life Extreme than the average smartphone (685 vs 1,226). The average smartphone scores 1,226.
    685 vs 1,226
  • 4.2% lower CPU boost clock speed
    This smartphone has a lower CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (2.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    2.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • 21% lower 3DMark Wild Life benchmark
    This smartphone performs worse in the 3DMark Wild Life benchmark than the average smartphone (2,462 vs 3,115). The average smartphone scores 3,115 in this benchmark.
    2,462 vs 3,115
  • No live text recognition
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • Older Android version
    This smartphone runs an older Android version than the average smartphone (Android 9 Pie vs Android 14). The average smartphone runs Android version Android 14.
    Android 9 Pie vs Android 14
  • No location privacy controls
    This smartphone does not offer location privacy controls, the average smartphone does. 88% of smartphones include location privacy features.
  • Lacks app tracking protection
    This smartphone does not have app tracking protection, the average smartphone does. 70.2% of smartphones include app tracking protection.
  • Lacks focus mode
    This smartphone does not have a focus mode, the average smartphone does. 60.4% of smartphones include a dedicated focus mode.
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    This smartphone lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average smartphone includes them. 87% of smartphones offer these toggles.
  • No Wi-Fi password sharing
    This smartphone does not support Wi-Fi password sharing, the average smartphone does. 57.9% of smartphones allow easy Wi-Fi sharing.
  • No battery health monitoring
    This smartphone lacks battery health monitoring, the average smartphone includes it. 66.3% of smartphones provide battery health stats.
  • Lacks dark mode
    This smartphone does not support dark mode, the average smartphone does. 95.8% of smartphones have dark mode.
  • Does not allow app offloading
    This smartphone does not support app offloading, the average smartphone does. 51.9% of smartphones support app offloading to save space.
  • No scrolling screenshot support
    This smartphone does not support scrolling screenshots, the average smartphone does. 81.1% of smartphones allow scrolling screenshots.
  • Does not allow play while downloading
    This smartphone cannot play games while downloading, the average smartphone can. 77.3% of smartphones support play-while-downloading.
  • No dynamic theme support
    This smartphone does not support dynamic themes, the average smartphone does. 81.9% of smartphones support dynamic theming.
  • Lacks extra dim mode
    This smartphone does not have extra dim mode, the average smartphone does. 82.5% of smartphones offer extra dimming features.
  • 50% smaller main camera sensor area
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (16 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average smartphone sensor area is 32 mm².
    16 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • Worse main camera video quality
    This smartphone records worse main camera video than the average smartphone. 11.80x of smartphones support 4K video recording.
    1080x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • Lower-resolution main camera
    This smartphone has a lower-resolution main camera than the average smartphone (25 MP & 8 MP & 5 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone has a 50 MP & 8 MP main camera.
    25 MP & 8 MP & 5 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • 36.7% lower DxOMark Mobile score
    This smartphone has a lower DxOMark Mobile score than the average smartphone (76 vs 120). The average smartphone scores 120.
    76 vs 120
  • No 5G connectivity
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • No NFC
    This smartphone does not support NFC, the average smartphone does. 83.1% of smartphones feature NFC.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This smartphone uses an older Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5 vs 5.2). The average smartphone uses Bluetooth 5.2.
    5 vs 5.2
  • 0.17 inches inch smaller screen size
    This smartphone has a smaller screen size than the average smartphone (6.5 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone has a screen size of 6.67 inches.
    6.5 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • 200 nits lower peak brightness
    This smartphone has a lower peak brightness than the average smartphone (800 nits vs 1,000 nits). The average smartphone peak brightness is 1,000 nits.
    800 nits vs 1,000 nits
  • 20% smaller battery capacity
    This smartphone has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartphone (4,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh). The average smartphone has a capacity of 5,000 mAh.
    4,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • No reverse wired charging
    This smartphone does not support reverse wired charging, the average smartphone does. 60.8% of smartphones support reverse wired charging.
  • 24.2% slower charging speed
    This smartphone has a slower charging speed than the average smartphone (25 W vs 33 W). The average smartphone charges at 33 W.
    25 W vs 33 W
  • No stereo speakers
    This smartphone does not have stereo speakers, the average smartphone does. 64.4% of smartphones feature stereo speakers.
  • No LDAC support
    This smartphone does not support LDAC, the average smartphone does. 60.3% of smartphones support LDAC.
  • 3 year/s older release date
    This smartphone is an older model than the average smartphone (2021 vs 2024). 3.00% of smartphones were released more recently.
    September 2021
    2021 vs 2024
  • Poor brand origin
    This smartphone has a poorer brand origin compared to the average smartphone. 0.00% of smartphones come from top-tier brand origins.
    South Korea vs China

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

sammobile.com
15/09/2021
Full review · Performance and battery
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is a mid-range phone with fast performance from its Snapdragon 778G chip, but it has no zoom camera.
medium.com
08/08/2024
Long-term review · Daily use
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is dependable after three years of use, with a bright display and about six hours of screen time, though its plastic build shows wear.
gsmarena.com
06/08/2026
Lab test · Mid-range phone
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is the A52 5G with a faster chip, so it suits buyers who want more speed without a new look.
techadvisor.com
01/04/2022
Hands-on test · Mid-range phone
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A52s is a reliable mid-range Android phone with a bright screen and strong cameras, but slow charging and a plain build hold it back.
gadgetbytenepal.com
11/10/2021
Long-term test · Camera and display
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A52s is a strong pick for camera fans who want water resistance, though its plastic back and slow charging let it down.
smartzone.de
30/01/2022
Full review · Samsung value pick
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is one of the best all-round packages around, with a fast chip and 120Hz screen, though its plastic body does not feel premium.
proudaspunch.com
17/02/2026
Benchmark test · Mid-range phone
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A52s is a reliable mid-range Android phone with a bright screen and strong cameras, but slow charging and a plain build hold it back.
lebensblick.net
06/02/2025
Experience report · Mid-range phone
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G suits everyday users, with a smooth 120Hz screen, a solid camera and about a day of battery, but has no telephoto lens.
frandroid.com
24/09/2021
Lab test · Gaming and battery
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is a modest step up from the A52 5G, mainly for gaming, but its ultrawide camera disappoints.
lesnumeriques.com
22/09/2021
Lab test · Performance over A52
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is a worthwhile speed boost over the A52 5G, with a calibrated screen and solid battery life, though its photos disappoint.
journaldugeek.com
05/10/2021
Hands-on review · Gaming upgrade
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is a sensible upgrade for gaming and multitasking, with the same good design and camera, though its battery life is a little shorter.
lesmobiles.com
22/10/2021
Hands-on test · Design and display
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is the A52 5G with a stronger chip, a 120Hz screen and IP67 rating, comfortable to hold one-handed, though its fingerprint sensor sits too low.
charlestech.fr
11/11/2021
Hands-on test · Benchmarks and screen
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is a very good mid-range phone, with a bright 120Hz screen and solid build, though its internal storage is slow.
Q
quechoisir.org
15/11/2021
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy A52s Smartphone Review - UFC-Que Choisir
(Translated)Show original
tuexperto.com
01/11/2021
Hands-on test · Samsung A52 comparison
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is a mid-range phone that lasts a full day and feels smooth, but its 25W charging trails Xiaomi and Oppo.
computerhoy.20minutos.es
06/11/2021
Hands-on test · Camera review
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is a strong all-round mid-range phone whose main camera, screen and two-day battery stand out, but the slow charger lets it down.
tuttoandroid.net
03/09/2021
Full review · Mid-range comparison
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G beats the A52 with a faster chip, a 120Hz screen and a headphone jack, though its ultrawide camera struggles in high-contrast scenes.
andreagaleazzi.com
14/09/2021
Full review · Mid-range value
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is a strong mid-range pick with a fast chip, long battery life and IP67 water resistance, though its video is less smooth than top models.
androidplanet.nl
21/09/2021
Short review · Upgrade check
Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is a light upgrade on the A52, with a faster chip and 120Hz screen, offering a lot for little with four years of updates.

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (4GB RAM + 128GB storage configuration) is a popular mid-range smartphone known for offering premium features at a competitive price point. Its main characteristics include a vibrant 6.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a smooth 120Hz refresh rate, a versatile 64MP quad-camera setup, and robust 5G connectivity powered by the capable Snapdragon 778G processor. Key pros are its inclusion of an IP67 water and dust resistance rating, optical image stabilization (OIS) for the main camera, and the useful presence of a 3.5mm headphone jack. Potential cons for this specific variant are the relatively modest 4GB of RAM, which might limit heavy multitasking compared to higher configurations, and a plastic build that some users feel is less premium than glass alternatives.

Compare Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (4GB + 128GB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (4GB + 128GB) and other smartphones

No results found