OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Smartphones Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

DOOGEE Blade20 Ultra (32GB + 512GB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£190RAM capacity:32 GBInternal storage:512 GBScreen size:6.6 inchesMain camera megapixels:50 MP

DOOGEE Blade20 Ultra (32GB + 512GB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

6.2

Overall score

Score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Score components

90%

6.1

Technical score

10%

7.0

User score

â–¼Worse than 71% of smartphones
6.1

Technical score

Technical score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components

25%

6.4

Performance & Hardware

18%

5.4

Camera

15%

4.9

Display

15%

7.4

Battery

10%

7.6

Software

10%

6.7

Connectivity

4%

1.6

Audio

3%

6.1

Design

â–¼Worse than 70% of smartphones
7.0

User score

User score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
Score components

70%

7.8

User ratings

30%

5.1

Number of reviews

Based on 45 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 92% of smartphones
  • doogee-blade-20-ultra
  • doogee-blade-20-ultra
  • doogee-blade-20-ultra
  • doogee-blade-20-ultra
  • doogee-blade-20-ultra
  • doogee-blade-20-ultra
  • doogee-blade-20-ultra
  • doogee-blade-20-ultra
  • doogee-blade-20-ultra
  • doogee-blade-20-ultra
doogee-blade-20-ultra
doogee-blade-20-ultra
doogee-blade-20-ultra
doogee-blade-20-ultra
doogee-blade-20-ultra
doogee-blade-20-ultra
doogee-blade-20-ultra
doogee-blade-20-ultra
doogee-blade-20-ultra
doogee-blade-20-ultra

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone DOOGEE Blade20 Ultra (32GB + 512GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components:

25%

6.4

Performance & Hardware

18%

5.4

Camera

15%

4.9

Display

15%

7.4

Battery

10%

7.6

Software

10%

6.7

Connectivity

4%

1.6

Audio

3%

6.1

Design

6.1
User score
User score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
Score components

70%

7.8

User ratings

30%

5.1

Number of reviews

Based on 45 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.0
Popularity
Popularity
5.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
Popularity:
DOOGEE Blade20 Ultra (32GB + 512GB) has a popularity of 5.1 points, which is lower than 52.2% of smartphones.
5.1
Value for money
Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
Score components:

60%

6.2

Overall score

40%

9.5

Price

7.2
Brand name
DOOGEE
Processor model
Unisoc T7250
Processor model
Unisoc T7250
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
This smartphone uses the Unisoc T7250 processor model which is slower than processors in 67.7% of smartphones and equal to processors in 0.9% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
32 GB
RAM capacity
32 GB
★ Better than 99% of models
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 32 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 98.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.9% of smartphones.
Internal storage
512 GB
Internal storage
512 GB
â–² Better than 77% of models
Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 512 GB which is larger than the storage of 77.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 17.2% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
1.8 GHz
CPU boost clock speed
1.8 GHz
â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 1.8 GHz which is lower than the boost speed of 92.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 2% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
Operating system
Android
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 15
Android version
Android 15
Android version
Android 15
â–² Better than 71% of models
This smartphone runs Android version Android 15 which is newer than that found in 70.6% of smartphones and equal to that in 25.1% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
no
Direct OS updates
no
â–¼ Worse than 21% of models
This smartphone does not receive direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
Open-source OS
yes
â–² Better than 5% of models
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
yes
Dark mode
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartphone offers dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
yes
Multi-lens main camera
yes
â–² Better than 6% of models
This smartphone includes a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
50 MP
Main camera megapixels
50 MP
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Market range: <10 – >100
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 50 MP which is lower than that of 71.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 2.8% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
?
Main camera sensor area
24.5 mm²
Main camera sensor area
24.5 mm²
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
This smartphone has a main camera sensor area of 24.5 mm² which is smaller than the main camera sensor area of 71.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.8% of smartphones.
Main camera pixel size
0.7 µm
Main camera pixel size
0.7 µm
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Market range: <0.64 µm – >1.22 µm
This smartphone has a main camera pixel size of 0.7 µm which is smaller than in 64.6% of smartphones and equal to the size in 10.4% of smartphones.
1.4 binned
Show more
Number of SIM slots
2
Number of SIM slots
2
â–² Better than 4% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.8% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.1% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
Cellular module
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
no
5G connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
LTE support
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
6.6 inches
Screen size
6.6 inches
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 6.6 inches which is smaller than the screens of 62.9% of smartphones and equal to those of 4.9% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
720x 1612 px
Screen resolution
720x 1612 px
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 720x1612 px which is lower than that of 78.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 5.3% of smartphones.
Pixel density
267 ppi
Pixel density
267 ppi
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 267 ppi which is lower than that of 86.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.5% of smartphones.
Display type
IPS LCD
Display type
IPS LCD
â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
This smartphone uses a IPS LCD display type. 0% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
90 Hz
Refresh rate
90 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 90 Hz which is lower than in 65.4% of smartphones and equal to that in 18.9% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
10,300 mAh
Battery capacity
10,300 mAh
★ Better than 95% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 10,300 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 95.5% of smartphones and equal to those in 0.2% of smartphones.
Charging speed
33 W
Charging speed
33 W
â–¼ Worse than 49% of models
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 33 W which is faster than in 38.9% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 12% of smartphones.
Fast charging
yes
Fast charging
yes
â–² Better than 7% of models
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
?
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 25% of models
This smartphone does not support wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
no
Stereo speakers
no
â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
This smartphone does not include stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
no
3.5 mm headphone jack
no
â–¼ Worse than 45% of models
This smartphone does not include a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
2
Number of microphones
2
â–¼ Worse than 23% of models
Market range: <1 – >3
This smartphone includes 2 microphones, which is more than in 10.5% of smartphones and equal to the number in 66.6% of smartphones.
FM radio
no
FM radio
no
â–¼ Worse than 34% of models
This smartphone does not include an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
no
aptX Lossless
no
â–¼ Worse than 13% of models
This smartphone does not support aptX Lossless. 12.9% of smartphones provide aptX Lossless.
Show more
Height
174 mm
Height
174 mm
â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
This smartphone has a height of 174 mm which is taller than 94% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.4% of smartphones.
Width
81.2 mm
Width
81.2 mm
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
This smartphone has a width of 81.2 mm which is wider than 90.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.4% of smartphones.
Thickness
15.8 mm
Thickness
15.8 mm
â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 15.8 mm which is thicker than 93.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.3% of smartphones.
Weight
326 g
Weight
326 g
â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
Market range: <175 g – >256 g
This smartphone weighs 326 g which is heavier than 93.7% of smartphones and equal to the weight of 0.1% of smartphones.
Device volume
211,410 cm³
Device volume
211,410 cm³
â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 211,410 cm³ which is larger than 93.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.2% of smartphones.
Show more

DOOGEE Blade20 Ultra (32GB + 512GB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • 24 GB more RAM
    RAM capacity
    32 GB
    ★ Better than 99% of models
    Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
    This smartphone has more RAM capacity than the average smartphone (32 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    32 GB vs 8 GB
  • 2.06x larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    10,300 mAh
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
    This smartphone has a larger battery capacity than the average smartphone (10300 mAh vs 5000 mAh). The average smartphone battery is 5000 mAh.
    10,300 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • 2x more storage
    Internal storage
    512 GB
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
    This smartphone offers more internal storage than the average smartphone (512 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone provides 256 GB of internal storage.
    512 GB vs 256 GB
  • 66.7% lower TDP
    TDP (Thermal design power)
    10 W
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    Market range: <4 W – >10 W
    This smartphone has a lower TDP than the average smartphone (10 W vs 6 W). The average TDP for smartphones is 6 W.
    10 W vs 6 W
  • Supports reverse wireless charging
    Reverse wireless charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    This smartphone supports reverse wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 23.6% of smartphones offer reverse wireless charging.
  • Higher on-device AI tier
    On-device AI level
    productivity
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    This smartphone runs on the productivity AI tier, while the average smartphone runs on fundamental, enabling stronger on-device AI features.
    Google Smart Camera, AI Main Camera, Google Intelligent Camera
    productivity vs fundamental
  • 1 more flash LEDs
    Number of flash LEDs
    2
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    Market range: <1 – >2
    This smartphone has more flash LEDs than the average smartphone (2 vs 1). The average smartphone has 1 flash LEDs.
    2 vs 1
  • 18.8% higher French repairability index
    French repairability index
    9.5
    â–² Better than 89% of models
    Market range: <6.2 – >9.5
    This smartphone has a higher French repairability index score than the average smartphone (9.5 vs 8). The average score is 8.
    9.5 vs 8
  • 36.8% cheaper
    DOOGEE Blade20 Ultra (32GB + 512GB) is cheaper than the average smartphone (£190 vs £260).
    £190 vs £260
  • 24 GB more RAM
    RAM capacity
    32 GB
    ★ Better than 99% of models
    Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
    This smartphone has more RAM capacity than the average smartphone (32 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    32 GB vs 8 GB
  • 2x more storage
    Internal storage
    512 GB
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
    This smartphone offers more internal storage than the average smartphone (512 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone provides 256 GB of internal storage.
    512 GB vs 256 GB
  • 66.7% lower TDP
    TDP (Thermal design power)
    10 W
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    Market range: <4 W – >10 W
    This smartphone has a lower TDP than the average smartphone (10 W vs 6 W). The average TDP for smartphones is 6 W.
    10 W vs 6 W
  • Higher on-device AI tier
    On-device AI level
    productivity
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    This smartphone runs on the productivity AI tier, while the average smartphone runs on fundamental, enabling stronger on-device AI features.
    Google Smart Camera, AI Main Camera, Google Intelligent Camera
    productivity vs fundamental
  • Newer Android version
    Android version
    Android 15
    â–² Better than 71% of models
    This smartphone features a newer Android version than the average smartphone (Android 15 vs Android 14). The average version is Android 14.
    Android 15 vs Android 14
  • 1 more flash LEDs
    Number of flash LEDs
    2
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    Market range: <1 – >2
    This smartphone has more flash LEDs than the average smartphone (2 vs 1). The average smartphone has 1 flash LEDs.
    2 vs 1
  • Newer Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This smartphone supports a newer Wi-Fi version than the average smartphone (Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)). The average smartphone uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n).
    Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
  • Has a secondary display
    Secondary display
    yes
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    This smartphone features a secondary display, the average smartphone does not. 6.7% of smartphones include a secondary screen.
  • 2.06x larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    10,300 mAh
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
    This smartphone has a larger battery capacity than the average smartphone (10300 mAh vs 5000 mAh). The average smartphone battery is 5000 mAh.
    10,300 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • Supports reverse wireless charging
    Reverse wireless charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    This smartphone supports reverse wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 23.6% of smartphones offer reverse wireless charging.
  • 18.8% higher French repairability index
    French repairability index
    9.5
    â–² Better than 89% of models
    Market range: <6.2 – >9.5
    This smartphone has a higher French repairability index score than the average smartphone (9.5 vs 8). The average score is 8.
    9.5 vs 8
  • 1.5 m deeper water resistance
    Waterproof depth rating
    1.5 m
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    Market range: <0 m – >2 m
    This smartphone has a deeper water resistance rating than the average smartphone (1.5 m vs 0 m). The average depth rating is 0 m.
    1.5 m vs 0 m
  • 1 year/s newer release date
    Release date
    2025
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartphone has a newer release date than the average smartphone (2025 vs 2024). 1.00% of smartphones are released annually.
    May 2025
    2025 vs 2024
  • Inferior display type
    Display type
    IPS LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This smartphone has an inferior display type compared to the average smartphone (IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED). 0.00% of smartphones use the superior display type.
    IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED
  • Worse processor
    Processor model
    Unisoc T7250
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (Unisoc T7250 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Unisoc T7250 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • No 5G connectivity
    5G connectivity
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • 2x larger process node
    Process node
    12 nm
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >12 nm
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (12 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    12 nm vs 6 nm
  • Worse main camera video quality
    Main camera video
    1080 x 30 fps
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartphone records worse main camera video than the average smartphone. 11.80x of smartphones support 4K video recording.
    1080x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • 25% lower refresh rate
    Refresh rate
    90 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (90 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    90 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • No stereo speakers
    Stereo speakers
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartphone does not have stereo speakers, the average smartphone does. 64.4% of smartphones feature stereo speakers.
  • 32.4% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    267 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
    This smartphone has a lower pixel density than the average smartphone (267 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    267 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • 14.3% lower user score
    User score
    7.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    DOOGEE Blade20 Ultra
    the average smartphone
    DOOGEE Blade20 Ultra (32GB + 512GB) has a lower user score than the average smartphone (7.00 vs 8.000).
    7 vs 8
  • 2.1% worse value for money
    DOOGEE Blade20 Ultra (32GB + 512GB) has worse value for money than the average smartphone (7.19 vs 7.3).
    7.19 vs 7.34
  • Worse processor
    Processor model
    Unisoc T7250
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (Unisoc T7250 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Unisoc T7250 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 2x larger process node
    Process node
    12 nm
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >12 nm
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (12 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    12 nm vs 6 nm
  • 80.6% fewer transistors
    Number of transistors
    2000 million
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <5.3k million – >19k million
    This smartphone contains fewer transistors than the average smartphone (2000 million vs 10300 million). The average smartphone has 10300 million transistors.
    2,000 million vs 10,300 million
  • 25% lower CPU boost clock speed
    CPU boost clock speed
    1.8 GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
    This smartphone has a lower CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (1.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    1.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • 75% less L3 cache
    L3 cache
    1,024 KB
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <1k KB – >8.2k KB
    This smartphone has a smaller L3 cache than the average smartphone (1024 KB vs 4096 KB). The average smartphone has an L3 cache of 4096 KB.
    1,024 KB vs 4,096 KB
  • 53.2% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    441
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    Market range: <392 – >2.2k
    This smartphone performs worse in Geekbench 6 single-core than the average smartphone (441 vs 942). The average smartphone scores 942 in the Geekbench 6 single-core test.
    441 vs 942
  • 32.1% slower memory speed
    Memory speed
    1,866 MHz
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <1.8k MHz – >4.8k MHz
    This smartphone has a lower memory speed than the average smartphone (1866 MHz vs 2750 MHz). The average smartphone has a memory speed of 2750 MHz.
    1,866 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • 10.5% slower GPU clock
    GPU frequency
    850 MHz
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <646 MHz – >1.2k MHz
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (850 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    850 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • 42.3% lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    1,461
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <1.4k – >6.7k
    This smartphone performs worse in Geekbench 6 multi-core than the average smartphone (1,461 vs 2,533). The average smartphone scores 2,533 in the Geekbench 6 multi-core test.
    1,461 vs 2,533
  • 87.5% fewer shader units
    N. of shading units
    32
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <32 – >1.5k
    This smartphone includes fewer shader units than the average smartphone (32 vs 256). The average smartphone has 256 shader units.
    32 vs 256
  • 14.3% lower maximum RAM capacity
    Maximum RAM
    12 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    Market range: <8 GB – >16 GB
    This smartphone supports less maximum RAM than the average smartphone (12 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB of RAM.
    12 GB vs 14 GB
  • Lower CPU base clock speed
    CPU base clock speed
    2 x 1.8 GHz & 6 x 1.6 GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    This smartphone has a lower CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (2x1.8 GHz & 6x1.6 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    2x1.8 GHz & 6x1.6 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • Lacks focus mode
    Focus mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    This smartphone does not have a focus mode, the average smartphone does. 60.4% of smartphones include a dedicated focus mode.
  • No Wi-Fi password sharing
    Wi-Fi password sharing
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This smartphone does not support Wi-Fi password sharing, the average smartphone does. 57.9% of smartphones allow easy Wi-Fi sharing.
  • Lacks instant markup
    Instant markup
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    This smartphone does not support instant markup, the average smartphone does. 52.2% of smartphones include instant markup tools.
  • Worse main camera video quality
    Main camera video
    1080 x 30 fps
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartphone records worse main camera video than the average smartphone. 11.80x of smartphones support 4K video recording.
    1080x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • 23.4% smaller main camera sensor area
    Main camera sensor area
    24.5 mm²
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (24.5 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average smartphone sensor area is 32 mm².
    24.5 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • Lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    8 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    Market range: <5 – >40
    This smartphone has lower front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (8 MP vs 16 MP). The average smartphone has a 16 MP front camera.
    8 MP vs 16 MP
  • No timelapse video
    Timelapse video
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    This smartphone does not support timelapse video, the average smartphone does. 92.3% of smartphones include timelapse modes.
  • Lower-resolution main camera
    Main camera megapixels
    50 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <10 – >100
    This smartphone has a lower-resolution main camera than the average smartphone (50 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone has a 50 MP & 8 MP main camera.
    50 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • 0.1 µm smaller main camera pixel size
    Main camera pixel size
    0.7 µm
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <0.64 µm – >1.22 µm
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera pixel size than the average smartphone (0.7 µm vs 0.8 µm). The average smartphone has a pixel size of 0.8 µm.
    1.4 binned
    0.7 µm vs 0.8 µm
  • No 5G connectivity
    5G connectivity
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.0
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    This smartphone uses an older Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5 vs 5.2). The average smartphone uses Bluetooth 5.2.
    5.0 vs 5.2
  • Inferior display type
    Display type
    IPS LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This smartphone has an inferior display type compared to the average smartphone (IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED). 0.00% of smartphones use the superior display type.
    IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED
  • 25% lower refresh rate
    Refresh rate
    90 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (90 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    90 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 32.4% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    267 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
    This smartphone has a lower pixel density than the average smartphone (267 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    267 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • 42.4% lower screen brightness
    Screen brightness
    380 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
    Market range: <437 nits – >1.3k nits
    This smartphone has a lower screen brightness than the average smartphone (380 nits vs 660 nits). The average smartphone has a brightness of 660 nits.
    380 nits vs 660 nits
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    720 x 1612 px
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    This smartphone has a lower screen resolution than the average smartphone (720x1612 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone has a resolution of 1080x2400 px.
    720x1612 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • 0.07 inches inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    6.6 inches
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
    This smartphone has a smaller screen size than the average smartphone (6.6 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone has a screen size of 6.67 inches.
    6.6 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • No stereo speakers
    Stereo speakers
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartphone does not have stereo speakers, the average smartphone does. 64.4% of smartphones feature stereo speakers.
  • No LDAC support
    LDAC
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    This smartphone does not support LDAC, the average smartphone does. 60.3% of smartphones support LDAC.
  • No aptX HD
    aptX HD
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartphone does not support aptX HD, the average smartphone does. 50.7% of smartphones support aptX HD.
  • 66.2% heavier
    Weight
    326 g
    â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
    Market range: <175 g – >256 g
    This smartphone is heavier than the average smartphone (326 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    326 g vs 196.2 g
  • 7.5 mm thicker
    Thickness
    15.8 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
    Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
    This smartphone is thicker than the average smartphone (15.8 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone has a thickness of 8.3 mm.
    15.8 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • 5.2 mm wider
    Width
    81.2 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
    This smartphone is wider than the average smartphone (81.2 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone has a width of 76 mm.
    81.2 mm vs 76 mm
  • 10.4 mm taller
    Height
    174 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
    Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
    This smartphone is taller than the average smartphone (174 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone has a height of 163.6 mm.
    174 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • 2.16x larger volume
    Device volume
    211,410 cm³
    â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
    Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
    This smartphone has a larger volume than the average smartphone (211410 cm³ vs 97800 cm³). The average smartphone volume is 97800 cm³.
    211,410 cm³ vs 97,800 cm³

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Third-party reviews

Based on 45 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: August 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about DOOGEE Blade20 Ultra (32GB + 512GB)

  • Extremely durable, with IP68/IP69K and MIL-STD-810H certifications for water, dust, and shock resistance.
  • Massive 10,300mAh battery provides exceptional endurance, often lasting 2-3 days with normal use.
  • Unique and functional 1.54" smart rear display for notifications, music control, and selfies using the main camera.
  • Large memory and storage capacity (32GB RAM via expansion, 512GB ROM) which can be further expanded with a TF card.
  • Relatively thin and light for a rugged phone, making it more pocket-friendly than competitors.
  • Good value for the price, especially considering its robust features and design.
  • The 50MP main camera performs well in daylight and can capture good quality images in poor lighting conditions.
  • Features NFC for contactless payments and global network compatibility for travelers.
  • Runs on the recent Android 14 operating system.
  • The 90Hz display is considered clear and responsive for watching videos and browsing.
  • Build quality is generally praised, with one user noting it survived multiple accidental drops onto tiles.

What we don't like about DOOGEE Blade20 Ultra (32GB + 512GB)

  • Performance can be slow and laggy, with apps lagging during multitasking.
  • The phone is heavy and a bit bulky, as expected for a rugged device, which might not suit all users.
  • Camera quality is average; the macro lens is more of a 'party trick' than practical, and low-light performance is not great.
  • Audio quality from the speaker is mediocre and can sound metallic.
  • Some users reported poor customer service and issues with the company not honoring the warranty.
  • A lack of detailed operation manual makes it difficult for some users to learn about the phone's features.
  • Charging speed is acceptable but not rapid at 18W for such a large battery.
  • Some users experienced significant issues with the software/OS, including ghost touches or system corruption after updates.
  • Lacks a headphone jack, requiring an adapter for wired audio.
  • One user noted an issue with activating the device after shutdown, especially in bright sunlight, until face recognition was deactivated.

Verdict

The DOOGEE Blade 20 Ultra is a rugged 4G smartphone running Android 14, known for its extreme durability with IP68/IP69K and MIL-STD-810H certifications and an enormous 10,300mAh battery that can last for days. It features a 6.6-inch HD+ IPS display with a 90Hz refresh rate, a Unisoc T7250 octa-core processor, a 50MP main camera, an 8MP front camera, and a unique 1.54-inch rear display for quick access to notifications and controls. Key pros include its substantial 32GB RAM (via 8GB physical + 24GB virtual memory expansion) and 512GB UFS storage, which is expandable up to 2TB, ensuring ample space and smooth multitasking performance. Cons generally mention its heavy and bulky design (weighing around 326g) and average camera performance in low light conditions, while also having a relatively low screen resolution for its size.

Compare DOOGEE Blade20 Ultra (32GB + 512GB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of DOOGEE Blade20 Ultra (32GB + 512GB) and other smartphones

No results found