OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

CUBOT Kingkong ACE 3 (8GB + 256GB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£170RAM capacity:8 GBInternal storage:256 GBScreen size:6.58 inchesMain camera megapixels:100 MP & 5 MP

CUBOT Kingkong ACE 3 (8GB + 256GB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

CUBOT Kingkong ACE 3 (8GB + 256GB)
6.0/10

Overall score

Score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
Score components

90%

5.8

Technical score

10%

7.3

User score

â–¼Worse than 79% of smartphones
7.1

Value for money

Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Score components

70%

6.0

Overall score

30%

9.6

Price

â–¼Worse than 71%
5.8

Technical score

Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
Score components

25%

5.1

Performance & Hardware

18%

5.7

Camera

15%

6.0

Display

15%

6.2

Battery

10%

7.4

Software

10%

6.7

Connectivity

4%

2.9

Audio

3%

6.2

Design

â–¼Worse than 79%
7.3

User score

User score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Score components

70%

9.4

User ratings

30%

2.5

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 86%
  • cubot-kingkong-ace-3
  • cubot-kingkong-ace-3
  • cubot-kingkong-ace-3
  • cubot-kingkong-ace-3
  • cubot-kingkong-ace-3
  • cubot-kingkong-ace-3
cubot-kingkong-ace-3
cubot-kingkong-ace-3
cubot-kingkong-ace-3
cubot-kingkong-ace-3
cubot-kingkong-ace-3
cubot-kingkong-ace-3
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone CUBOT Kingkong ACE 3 (8GB + 256GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
Score components:

25%

5.1

Performance & Hardware

18%

5.7

Camera

15%

6.0

Display

15%

6.2

Battery

10%

7.4

Software

10%

6.7

Connectivity

4%

2.9

Audio

3%

6.2

Design

5.8
User score
User score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Score components

70%

9.4

User ratings

30%

2.5

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
7.3
Popularity
Popularity
2.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Popularity:
CUBOT Kingkong ACE 3 (8GB + 256GB) has a popularity of 2.5 points, which is lower than 62.2% of smartphones.
2.5
Value for money
Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Score components:

70%

6.0

Overall score

30%

9.6

Price

7.1
Brand name
CUBOT
Processor model
MediaTek Helio G88
This smartphone uses the MediaTek Helio G88 processor model which is slower than processors in 89.2% of smartphones and equal to processors in 0.6% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
8 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 8 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 28.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 30.4% of smartphones.
Internal storage
256 GB
Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 256 GB which is larger than the storage of 38.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 38.3% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
2 GHz
Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 2 GHz which is lower than the boost speed of 84.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 8.3% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 14
Android version
Android 14
This smartphone runs Android version Android 14 which is newer than that found in 49.5% of smartphones and equal to that in 21% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
no
This smartphone does not receive direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
yes
This smartphone offers dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
yes
This smartphone includes a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
100 MP & 5 MP
Market range: <10 – >100
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 100 MP & 5 MP which is higher than that of 88.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.2% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
?
Main camera sensor area
25 mm²
Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
This smartphone has a main camera sensor area of 25 mm² which is smaller than the main camera sensor area of 71.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.2% of smartphones.
Main camera pixel size
0.5 µm
Market range: <0.64 µm – >1.22 µm
This smartphone has a main camera pixel size of 0.5 µm which is smaller than in 99.8% of smartphones and equal to the size in 0.2% of smartphones.
2 binned
Show more
Number of SIM slots
2
Market range: <1 – >6
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.8% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.1% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
no
This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
6.58 inches
Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 6.58 inches which is smaller than the screens of 68.7% of smartphones and equal to those of 2.4% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
1080x 2408 px
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 1080x2408 px which is higher than that of 56.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 4.2% of smartphones.
Pixel density
401 ppi
Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 401 ppi which is higher than that of 58.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 3% of smartphones.
Display type
IPS LCD
This smartphone uses a IPS LCD display type. 0% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
90 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 90 Hz which is lower than in 65.4% of smartphones and equal to that in 18.9% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
5,100 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 5,100 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 59.5% of smartphones and equal to those in 2% of smartphones.
Charging speed
33 W
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 33 W which is faster than in 38.9% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 12% of smartphones.
Fast charging
yes
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
?
Wireless charging
no
This smartphone does not support wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
no
This smartphone does not include stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
no
This smartphone does not include a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
?
FM radio
yes
This smartphone includes an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
no
This smartphone does not support aptX Lossless. 12.9% of smartphones provide aptX Lossless.
Show more
Height
173.9 mm
Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
This smartphone has a height of 173.9 mm which is taller than 93.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.1% of smartphones.
Width
81.8 mm
Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
This smartphone has a width of 81.8 mm which is wider than 92.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.1% of smartphones.
Thickness
12.7 mm
Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 12.7 mm which is thicker than 91.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.1% of smartphones.
Weight
284 g
Market range: <175 g – >256 g
This smartphone weighs 284 g which is heavier than 91.7% of smartphones and equal to the weight of 0.1% of smartphones.
Device volume
168,156 cm³
Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 168,156 cm³ which is larger than 91.4% of smartphones.
Show more

CUBOT Kingkong ACE 3 (8GB + 256GB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • Higher-resolution main camera
    This smartphone has a higher main camera resolution than the average smartphone (100 MP & 5 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone main camera has 50 MP & 8 MP megapixels.
    100 MP & 5 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • Has a secondary display
    This smartphone features a secondary display, the average smartphone does not. 6.7% of smartphones include a secondary screen.
  • 2% larger battery capacity
    This smartphone has a larger battery capacity than the average smartphone (5100 mAh vs 5000 mAh). The average smartphone battery is 5000 mAh.
    5,100 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • Newer Wi-Fi version
    This smartphone supports a newer Wi-Fi version than the average smartphone (Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)). The average smartphone uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n).
    Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
  • Higher front camera megapixels
    This smartphone has more front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (32 MP vs 16 MP). The average front camera has 16 MP megapixels.
    32 MP vs 16 MP
  • Has a rugged design
    This smartphone features a rugged design, the average smartphone does not. 7.5% of smartphones are built for durability.
  • Has FM radio
    This smartphone features an FM radio, the average smartphone does not. 34.2% of smartphones include an FM tuner.
  • Higher screen resolution
    This smartphone has a higher screen resolution than the average smartphone (1080x2408 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone resolution is 1080x2400 px.
    1080x2408 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • 52.9% cheaper
    CUBOT Kingkong ACE 3 (8GB + 256GB) is cheaper than the average smartphone (£170 vs £260).
    £170 vs £260
  • Higher-resolution main camera
    This smartphone has a higher main camera resolution than the average smartphone (100 MP & 5 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone main camera has 50 MP & 8 MP megapixels.
    100 MP & 5 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • Higher front camera megapixels
    This smartphone has more front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (32 MP vs 16 MP). The average front camera has 16 MP megapixels.
    32 MP vs 16 MP
  • Newer Wi-Fi version
    This smartphone supports a newer Wi-Fi version than the average smartphone (Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)). The average smartphone uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n).
    Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
  • Has a secondary display
    This smartphone features a secondary display, the average smartphone does not. 6.7% of smartphones include a secondary screen.
  • Higher screen resolution
    This smartphone has a higher screen resolution than the average smartphone (1080x2408 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone resolution is 1080x2400 px.
    1080x2408 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • 1.5% higher pixel density
    This smartphone has a higher pixel density than the average smartphone (401 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    401 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • 2% larger battery capacity
    This smartphone has a larger battery capacity than the average smartphone (5100 mAh vs 5000 mAh). The average smartphone battery is 5000 mAh.
    5,100 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • Has FM radio
    This smartphone features an FM radio, the average smartphone does not. 34.2% of smartphones include an FM tuner.
  • Has a rugged design
    This smartphone features a rugged design, the average smartphone does not. 7.5% of smartphones are built for durability.
  • Better IP rating
    This smartphone has a better IP rating than the average smartphone (IP68 vs IP67). The average IP rating is IP67.
    IP68 vs IP67
  • Worse processor
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (MediaTek Helio G88 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    MediaTek Helio G88 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • Inferior display type
    This smartphone has an inferior display type compared to the average smartphone (IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED). 0.00% of smartphones use the superior display type.
    IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED
  • No 5G connectivity
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • 2x larger process node
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (12 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    12 nm vs 6 nm
  • Worse main camera video quality
    This smartphone records worse main camera video than the average smartphone. 11.80x of smartphones support 4K video recording.
    1080x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • 25% lower refresh rate
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (90 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    90 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • No stereo speakers
    This smartphone does not have stereo speakers, the average smartphone does. 64.4% of smartphones feature stereo speakers.
  • No LDAC support
    This smartphone does not support LDAC, the average smartphone does. 60.3% of smartphones support LDAC.
  • 9.2% lower user score
    User score
    7.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    CUBOT Kingkong ACE 3
    the average smartphone
    CUBOT Kingkong ACE 3 (8GB + 256GB) has a lower user score than the average smartphone (7.33 vs 8.000).
    7.33 vs 8
  • 3.6% worse value for money
    CUBOT Kingkong ACE 3 (8GB + 256GB) has worse value for money than the average smartphone (7.08 vs 7.3).
    7.08 vs 7.34
  • 2.19x less popular
    CUBOT Kingkong ACE 3 (8GB + 256GB) is less popular than the average smartphone (2.49 vs 5.4).
    2.49 vs 5.44
  • Worse processor
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (MediaTek Helio G88 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    MediaTek Helio G88 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 2x larger process node
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (12 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    12 nm vs 6 nm
  • 42.9% lower maximum RAM capacity
    This smartphone supports less maximum RAM than the average smartphone (8 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB of RAM.
    8 GB vs 14 GB
  • 54.9% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This smartphone performs worse in Geekbench 6 single-core than the average smartphone (425 vs 942). The average smartphone scores 942 in the Geekbench 6 single-core test.
    425 vs 942
  • 16.7% lower CPU boost clock speed
    This smartphone has a lower CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    2.0 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • 34.5% slower memory speed
    This smartphone has a lower memory speed than the average smartphone (1800 MHz vs 2750 MHz). The average smartphone has a memory speed of 2750 MHz.
    1,800 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • 16.7% higher TDP (less efficient)
    This smartphone has a higher TDP than the average smartphone (5 W vs 6 W). The average smartphone has a TDP of 6 W.
    5 W vs 6 W
  • 46.5% lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This smartphone performs worse in Geekbench 6 multi-core than the average smartphone (1,355 vs 2,533). The average smartphone scores 2,533 in the Geekbench 6 multi-core test.
    1,355 vs 2,533
  • 10.5% slower GPU clock
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (850 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    850 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • 68.8% less L2 cache
    This smartphone has a smaller L2 cache than the average smartphone (320 KB vs 1024 KB). The average smartphone has an L2 cache of 1024 KB.
    320 KB vs 1,024 KB
  • 47.6% lower memory bandwidth
    This smartphone has lower memory bandwidth than the average smartphone (13.4 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s). The average smartphone has a bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s.
    13.41 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s
  • 87.5% fewer shader units
    This smartphone includes fewer shader units than the average smartphone (32 vs 256). The average smartphone has 256 shader units.
    32 vs 256
  • Supports older OpenGL version
    This smartphone supports a lower OpenGL version than the average smartphone (3.1 vs 3.2). The average smartphone supports OpenGL version 3.2.
    3.1 vs 3.2
  • Lower CPU base clock speed
    This smartphone has a lower CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (2x2 GHz & 6x1.8 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    2x2 GHz & 6x1.8 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • Lacks focus mode
    This smartphone does not have a focus mode, the average smartphone does. 60.4% of smartphones include a dedicated focus mode.
  • No Wi-Fi password sharing
    This smartphone does not support Wi-Fi password sharing, the average smartphone does. 57.9% of smartphones allow easy Wi-Fi sharing.
  • Does not allow app offloading
    This smartphone does not support app offloading, the average smartphone does. 51.9% of smartphones support app offloading to save space.
  • Lacks instant markup
    This smartphone does not support instant markup, the average smartphone does. 52.2% of smartphones include instant markup tools.
  • Worse main camera video quality
    This smartphone records worse main camera video than the average smartphone. 11.80x of smartphones support 4K video recording.
    1080x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • 0.3 µm smaller main camera pixel size
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera pixel size than the average smartphone (0.5 µm vs 0.8 µm). The average smartphone has a pixel size of 0.8 µm.
    2 binned
    0.5 µm vs 0.8 µm
  • 21.9% smaller main camera sensor area
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (25 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average smartphone sensor area is 32 mm².
    25 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • No 5G connectivity
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This smartphone uses an older Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5 vs 5.2). The average smartphone uses Bluetooth 5.2.
    5.0 vs 5.2
  • Inferior display type
    This smartphone has an inferior display type compared to the average smartphone (IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED). 0.00% of smartphones use the superior display type.
    IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED
  • 25% lower refresh rate
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (90 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    90 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 0.09 inches inch smaller screen size
    This smartphone has a smaller screen size than the average smartphone (6.6 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone has a screen size of 6.67 inches.
    6.58 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • No stereo speakers
    This smartphone does not have stereo speakers, the average smartphone does. 64.4% of smartphones feature stereo speakers.
  • No LDAC support
    This smartphone does not support LDAC, the average smartphone does. 60.3% of smartphones support LDAC.
  • 44.8% heavier
    This smartphone is heavier than the average smartphone (284 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    284 g vs 196.2 g
  • 4.4 mm thicker
    This smartphone is thicker than the average smartphone (12.7 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone has a thickness of 8.3 mm.
    12.7 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • 5.8 mm wider
    This smartphone is wider than the average smartphone (81.8 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone has a width of 76 mm.
    81.8 mm vs 76 mm
  • 10.3 mm taller
    This smartphone is taller than the average smartphone (173.9 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone has a height of 163.6 mm.
    173.9 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • 71.9% larger volume
    This smartphone has a larger volume than the average smartphone (168156 cm³ vs 97800 cm³). The average smartphone volume is 97800 cm³.
    168,156 cm³ vs 97,800 cm³

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

D
de.root-nation.com
23/07/2024
Summary of the review
CUBOT King Kong Ace 3 Rugged Smartphone Review
(Translated)Show original
F
fr.root-nation.com
23/07/2024
Summary of the review
CUBOT King Kong Ace 3 Rugged Smartphone Review
(Translated)Show original
X
xiaomitoday.it
28/07/2024
Summary of the review
CUBOT KingKong ACE 3 - Uncompromising Ruggedness
(Translated)Show original
I
it.root-nation.com
23/07/2024
Summary of the review
CUBOT King Kong Ace 3 Rugged Smartphone Review
(Translated)Show original
N
nl.root-nation.com
23/07/2024
Summary of the review
CUBOT King Kong Ace 3 Rugged Smartphone Review
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: August 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about CUBOT Kingkong ACE 3 (8GB + 256GB)

  • High durability with IP68/IP69K waterproof and dustproof ratings, plus MIL-STD-810H drop resistance.
  • Features a unique 1.32-inch rear touch screen for notifications and music control.
  • Generous internal storage of 256GB, expandable up to 1TB via TF card.
  • Equipped with the latest Android 14 operating system for a clean software experience.
  • Bright 6.58-inch FHD+ display with a smooth 90Hz refresh rate.
  • Very attractive price point for a rugged device with these specifications.

What we don't like about CUBOT Kingkong ACE 3 (8GB + 256GB)

  • Battery capacity (5100mAh) is considered small compared to other rugged competitors in the same series.
  • The single speaker on the back provides flat and basic sound quality that distorts easily.
  • Low-light camera performance is poor, with image quality plummeting without Night mode.
  • The MediaTek Helio G88 processor can struggle with multitasking or intensive gaming.
  • Facial recognition is inconsistent and often fails in low-light conditions.
  • Lacks support for several major US LTE bands, limiting carrier compatibility.

Verdict

The Cubot KingKong Ace 3 (8GB + 256GB version) is a rugged smartphone running Android 14 and featuring a 6.58-inch FHD+ 90Hz display with an additional 1.32-inch rear touchscreen, powered by a budget MediaTek Helio G88 octa-core processor. Key pros include its IP68/IP69K and MIL-STD-810H durability ratings for water/dust/drop resistance, a large 5100mAh battery with 33W fast charging, a high-resolution 100MP main camera, NFC for payments, and ample expandable storage (up to 1TB via microSD). Potential cons are its relatively bulky design, a mono speaker with flat sound quality, and the fact that its cameras perform only adequately in good lighting but struggle in low light conditions, while video recording lacks stabilization and is limited to 1080p.

Compare CUBOT Kingkong ACE 3 (8GB + 256GB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of CUBOT Kingkong ACE 3 (8GB + 256GB) and other smartphones

No results found