OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Smartphones Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

CAT S75 (6GB + 128GB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£260RAM capacity:6 GBInternal storage:128 GBScreen size:6.6 inchesMain camera megapixels:50 MP & 8 MP & 2 MP

CAT S75 (6GB + 128GB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

6.5

Overall score

Score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
Score components

90%

6.4

Technical score

10%

7.2

User score

â–¼Worse than 57% of smartphones
6.4

Technical score

Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
Score components

25%

6.4

Performance & Hardware

18%

6.1

Camera

15%

6.0

Display

15%

6.7

Battery

10%

7.2

Software

10%

8.1

Connectivity

4%

3.0

Audio

3%

6.6

Design

â–¼Worse than 56% of smartphones
7.2

User score

User score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
Score components

70%

7.5

User ratings

30%

6.6

Number of reviews

Based on 335 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 89% of smartphones
  • cat-s75
  • cat-s75
  • cat-s75
  • cat-s75
  • cat-s75
  • cat-s75
  • cat-s75
  • cat-s75
cat-s75
cat-s75
cat-s75
cat-s75
cat-s75
cat-s75
cat-s75
cat-s75

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone CAT S75 (6GB + 128GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
Score components:

25%

6.4

Performance & Hardware

18%

6.1

Camera

15%

6.0

Display

15%

6.7

Battery

10%

7.2

Software

10%

8.1

Connectivity

4%

3.0

Audio

3%

6.6

Design

6.4
User score
User score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
Score components

70%

7.5

User ratings

30%

6.6

Number of reviews

Based on 335 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.2
Popularity
Popularity
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 60% of models
Popularity:
CAT S75 (6GB + 128GB) has a popularity of 6.6 points, which is higher than 60.2% of smartphones.
6.6
Value for money
Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
Score components:

60%

6.5

Overall score

40%

9.2

Price

7.3
Brand name
CAT
Processor model
MediaTek Dimensity 930
Processor model
MediaTek Dimensity 930
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
This smartphone uses the MediaTek Dimensity 930 processor model which is slower than processors in 56.8% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
6 GB
RAM capacity
6 GB
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 6 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 71.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 10.8% of smartphones.
Internal storage
128 GB
Internal storage
128 GB
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 128 GB which is smaller than the storage of 61.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 28.4% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
2.2 GHz
CPU boost clock speed
2.2 GHz
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 2.2 GHz which is lower than the boost speed of 68.4% of smartphones and equal to that of 14.2% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
Operating system
Android
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 12
Android version
Android 12
Android version
Android 12
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
This smartphone runs Android version Android 12 which is older than that found in 67.1% of smartphones and equal to that in 13.2% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
no
Direct OS updates
no
â–¼ Worse than 21% of models
This smartphone does not receive direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
Open-source OS
yes
â–² Better than 5% of models
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
yes
Dark mode
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartphone offers dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
yes
Multi-lens main camera
yes
â–² Better than 6% of models
This smartphone includes a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
50 MP & 8 MP & 2 MP
Main camera megapixels
50 MP & 8 MP & 2 MP
â–² Better than 52% of models
Market range: <10 – >100
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 50 MP & 8 MP & 2 MP which is higher than that of 52.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 4.1% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4
Main camera aperture
f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4
â–² Better than 53% of models
This smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 which is wider than that of 53.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 10.7% of smartphones.
Main camera sensor area
32 mm²
Main camera sensor area
32 mm²
â–¼ Worse than 49% of models
Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
This smartphone has a main camera sensor area of 32 mm² which is larger than the main camera sensor area of 42.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 8.2% of smartphones.
Main camera pixel size
0.8 µm
Main camera pixel size
0.8 µm
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
Market range: <0.64 µm – >1.22 µm
This smartphone has a main camera pixel size of 0.8 µm which is larger than in 35.5% of smartphones and equal to the size in 21.9% of smartphones.
1.6 binned
Show more
Number of SIM slots
2
Number of SIM slots
2
â–² Better than 4% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.8% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.1% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
Cellular module
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
yes
5G connectivity
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This smartphone supports 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
LTE support
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
6.6 inches
Screen size
6.6 inches
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 6.6 inches which is smaller than the screens of 62.9% of smartphones and equal to those of 4.9% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
1080x 2408 px
Screen resolution
1080x 2408 px
â–² Better than 57% of models
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 1080x2408 px which is higher than that of 56.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 4.2% of smartphones.
Pixel density
400 ppi
Pixel density
400 ppi
â–² Better than 56% of models
Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 400 ppi which is higher than that of 56.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 2.4% of smartphones.
Display type
IPS LCD
Display type
IPS LCD
â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
This smartphone uses a IPS LCD display type. 0% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
120 Hz
Refresh rate
120 Hz
â–² Better than 35% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 120 Hz which is higher than in 34.7% of smartphones and equal to that in 55.2% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
5,000 mAh
Battery capacity
5,000 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 5,000 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 28.3% of smartphones and equal to those in 28.8% of smartphones.
Charging speed
15 W
Charging speed
15 W
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 15 W which is slower than in 87.7% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 5.9% of smartphones.
Fast charging
yes
Fast charging
yes
â–² Better than 7% of models
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
?
Wireless charging
yes
Wireless charging
yes
â–² Better than 75% of models
This smartphone supports wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
no
Stereo speakers
no
â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
This smartphone does not include stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
no
3.5 mm headphone jack
no
â–¼ Worse than 45% of models
This smartphone does not include a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
2
Number of microphones
2
â–¼ Worse than 23% of models
Market range: <1 – >3
This smartphone includes 2 microphones, which is more than in 10.5% of smartphones and equal to the number in 66.6% of smartphones.
FM radio
?
aptX Lossless
no
aptX Lossless
no
â–¼ Worse than 13% of models
This smartphone does not support aptX Lossless. 12.9% of smartphones provide aptX Lossless.
Show more
Height
171 mm
Height
171 mm
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
This smartphone has a height of 171 mm which is taller than 88.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.1% of smartphones.
Width
80 mm
Width
80 mm
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
This smartphone has a width of 80 mm which is wider than 89% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.3% of smartphones.
Thickness
11.9 mm
Thickness
11.9 mm
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 11.9 mm which is thicker than 90.7% of smartphones.
Weight
268 g
Weight
268 g
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Market range: <175 g – >256 g
This smartphone weighs 268 g which is heavier than 90.7% of smartphones and equal to the weight of 0.1% of smartphones.
Device volume
150,480 cm³
Device volume
150,480 cm³
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 150,480 cm³ which is larger than 90.9% of smartphones.
Show more

CAT S75 (6GB + 128GB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • Supports wireless charging
    Wireless charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    This smartphone supports wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 25.2% of smartphones are wireless charging compatible.
  • 5.01x higher PassMark single-core benchmark
    PassMark single-core benchmark
    4,945
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    Market range: <408 – >2.4k
    This smartphone has a better PassMark single-core score than the average smartphone (4,945 vs 988). The average single-core score is 988.
    4,945 vs 988
  • 2.35x higher PassMark benchmark
    PassMark benchmark
    10,324
    â–² Better than 89% of models
    Market range: <2.2k – >10.5k
    This smartphone achieves a higher PassMark score than the average smartphone (10,324 vs 4,389). The average smartphone PassMark score is 4,389.
    10,324 vs 4,389
  • Newer DDR memory version
    DDR memory version
    5
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartphone supports a newer DDR version than the average smartphone (5 vs 4). The average DDR version is 4.
    5 vs 4
  • 5 m deeper water resistance
    Waterproof depth rating
    5 m
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <0 m – >2 m
    This smartphone has a deeper water resistance rating than the average smartphone (5 m vs 0 m). The average depth rating is 0 m.
    5 m vs 0 m
  • Supports satellite SOS
    Satellite SOS
    yes
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    This smartphone supports satellite SOS functionality, the average smartphone does not. 8.1% of smartphones offer satellite emergency services.
  • 1 more flash LEDs
    Number of flash LEDs
    2
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    Market range: <1 – >2
    This smartphone has more flash LEDs than the average smartphone (2 vs 1). The average smartphone has 1 flash LEDs.
    2 vs 1
  • Better display glass type
    Display glass type
    Corning Gorilla Glass Victus
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    This smartphone features a better display glass type than the average smartphone (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus vs Corning Gorilla Glass 5). The average smartphone uses Corning Gorilla Glass 5 protection.
    Corning Gorilla Glass Victus vs Corning Gorilla Glass 5
  • 5.01x higher PassMark single-core benchmark
    PassMark single-core benchmark
    4,945
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    Market range: <408 – >2.4k
    This smartphone has a better PassMark single-core score than the average smartphone (4,945 vs 988). The average single-core score is 988.
    4,945 vs 988
  • 2.35x higher PassMark benchmark
    PassMark benchmark
    10,324
    â–² Better than 89% of models
    Market range: <2.2k – >10.5k
    This smartphone achieves a higher PassMark score than the average smartphone (10,324 vs 4,389). The average smartphone PassMark score is 4,389.
    10,324 vs 4,389
  • Newer DDR memory version
    DDR memory version
    5
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartphone supports a newer DDR version than the average smartphone (5 vs 4). The average DDR version is 4.
    5 vs 4
  • 14.3% higher maximum RAM
    Maximum RAM
    16 GB
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    Market range: <8 GB – >16 GB
    This smartphone supports more maximum RAM than the average smartphone (16 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB RAM.
    16 GB vs 14 GB
  • 16.4% faster memory speed
    Memory speed
    3,200 MHz
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    Market range: <1.8k MHz – >4.8k MHz
    This smartphone supports faster memory speed than the average smartphone (3200 MHz vs 2750 MHz). The average smartphone supports 2750 MHz memory speed.
    3,200 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • 1 more flash LEDs
    Number of flash LEDs
    2
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    Market range: <1 – >2
    This smartphone has more flash LEDs than the average smartphone (2 vs 1). The average smartphone has 1 flash LEDs.
    2 vs 1
  • Has a dual-tone LED flash
    Dual-tone LED flash
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This smartphone features a dual-tone LED flash, the average smartphone does not. 41.4% of smartphones include dual-tone flash.
  • Wider front camera aperture
    Front camera aperture
    f/2.0
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This smartphone has a wider front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Supports satellite SOS
    Satellite SOS
    yes
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    This smartphone supports satellite SOS functionality, the average smartphone does not. 8.1% of smartphones offer satellite emergency services.
  • Better display glass type
    Display glass type
    Corning Gorilla Glass Victus
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    This smartphone features a better display glass type than the average smartphone (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus vs Corning Gorilla Glass 5). The average smartphone uses Corning Gorilla Glass 5 protection.
    Corning Gorilla Glass Victus vs Corning Gorilla Glass 5
  • Higher screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    1080 x 2408 px
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartphone has a higher screen resolution than the average smartphone (1080x2408 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone resolution is 1080x2400 px.
    1080x2408 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • 1.3% higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    400 ppi
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
    This smartphone has a higher pixel density than the average smartphone (400 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    400 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • Supports wireless charging
    Wireless charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    This smartphone supports wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 25.2% of smartphones are wireless charging compatible.
  • 18.4% higher PCMark Work 3.0 battery benchmark
    PCMark Work 3.0 battery benchmark
    931 min
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <487 min – >1.3k min
    This smartphone has a higher PCMark Work 3.0 battery benchmark score than the average smartphone (931 min vs 786 min). The average score is 786 min.
    931 min vs 786 min
  • 5 m deeper water resistance
    Waterproof depth rating
    5 m
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <0 m – >2 m
    This smartphone has a deeper water resistance rating than the average smartphone (5 m vs 0 m). The average depth rating is 0 m.
    5 m vs 0 m
  • Has a rugged design
    Rugged design
    yes
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    This smartphone features a rugged design, the average smartphone does not. 7.5% of smartphones are built for durability.
  • Better IP rating
    IP rating
    IP68
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This smartphone has a better IP rating than the average smartphone (IP68 vs IP67). The average IP rating is IP67.
    IP68 vs IP67
  • Inferior display type
    Display type
    IPS LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This smartphone has an inferior display type compared to the average smartphone (IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED). 0.00% of smartphones use the superior display type.
    IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED
  • Worse processor
    Processor model
    MediaTek Dimensity 930
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (MediaTek Dimensity 930 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    MediaTek Dimensity 930 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • Worse main camera video quality
    Main camera video
    1080 x 30 fps
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartphone records worse main camera video than the average smartphone. 11.80x of smartphones support 4K video recording.
    1080x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • 50% less storage
    Internal storage
    128 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (128 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    128 GB vs 256 GB
  • No stereo speakers
    Stereo speakers
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartphone does not have stereo speakers, the average smartphone does. 64.4% of smartphones feature stereo speakers.
  • Lacks focus mode
    Focus mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    This smartphone does not have a focus mode, the average smartphone does. 60.4% of smartphones include a dedicated focus mode.
  • 54.5% slower charging speed
    Charging speed
    15 W
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <15 W – >90 W
    This smartphone has a slower charging speed than the average smartphone (15 W vs 33 W). The average smartphone charges at 33 W.
    15 W vs 33 W
  • Lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    8 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    Market range: <5 – >40
    This smartphone has lower front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (8 MP vs 16 MP). The average smartphone has a 16 MP front camera.
    8 MP vs 16 MP
  • 11% lower user score
    User score
    7.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    CAT S75
    the average smartphone
    CAT S75 (6GB + 128GB) has a lower user score than the average smartphone (7.21 vs 8.000).
    7.21 vs 8
  • Worse processor
    Processor model
    MediaTek Dimensity 930
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (MediaTek Dimensity 930 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    MediaTek Dimensity 930 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 50% less storage
    Internal storage
    128 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (128 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    128 GB vs 256 GB
  • 2 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    6 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
    This smartphone has less RAM than the average smartphone (6 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    6 GB vs 8 GB
  • 31.6% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    644
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <392 – >2.2k
    This smartphone performs worse in Geekbench 6 single-core than the average smartphone (644 vs 942). The average smartphone scores 942 in the Geekbench 6 single-core test.
    644 vs 942
  • 8.3% lower CPU boost clock speed
    CPU boost clock speed
    2.2 GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
    This smartphone has a lower CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • 5.3% slower GPU clock
    GPU frequency
    900 MHz
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    Market range: <646 MHz – >1.2k MHz
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (900 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    900 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • 23.6% lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    1935
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    Market range: <1.4k – >6.7k
    This smartphone performs worse in Geekbench 6 multi-core than the average smartphone (1935 vs 2,533). The average smartphone scores 2,533 in the Geekbench 6 multi-core test.
    1,935 vs 2,533
  • 2.9% fewer transistors
    Number of transistors
    10,000 million
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    Market range: <5.3k million – >19k million
    This smartphone contains fewer transistors than the average smartphone (10000 million vs 10300 million). The average smartphone has 10300 million transistors.
    10,000 million vs 10,300 million
  • 50% fewer shader units
    N. of shading units
    128
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    Market range: <32 – >1.5k
    This smartphone includes fewer shader units than the average smartphone (128 vs 256). The average smartphone has 256 shader units.
    128 vs 256
  • Lacks focus mode
    Focus mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    This smartphone does not have a focus mode, the average smartphone does. 60.4% of smartphones include a dedicated focus mode.
  • No Wi-Fi password sharing
    Wi-Fi password sharing
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This smartphone does not support Wi-Fi password sharing, the average smartphone does. 57.9% of smartphones allow easy Wi-Fi sharing.
  • No battery health monitoring
    Battery health monitoring
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This smartphone lacks battery health monitoring, the average smartphone includes it. 66.3% of smartphones provide battery health stats.
  • Older Android version
    Android version
    Android 12
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartphone runs an older Android version than the average smartphone (Android 12 vs Android 14). The average smartphone runs Android version Android 14.
    Android 12 vs Android 14
  • Does not allow app offloading
    App offloading
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    This smartphone does not support app offloading, the average smartphone does. 51.9% of smartphones support app offloading to save space.
  • Worse main camera video quality
    Main camera video
    1080 x 30 fps
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartphone records worse main camera video than the average smartphone. 11.80x of smartphones support 4K video recording.
    1080x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • Lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    8 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    Market range: <5 – >40
    This smartphone has lower front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (8 MP vs 16 MP). The average smartphone has a 16 MP front camera.
    8 MP vs 16 MP
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    Main camera aperture
    f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This smartphone has a narrower main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone aperture is f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • Older Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.1
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    This smartphone uses an older Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5.1 vs 5.2). The average smartphone uses Bluetooth 5.2.
    5.1 vs 5.2
  • Inferior display type
    Display type
    IPS LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This smartphone has an inferior display type compared to the average smartphone (IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED). 0.00% of smartphones use the superior display type.
    IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED
  • 0.07 inches inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    6.6 inches
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
    This smartphone has a smaller screen size than the average smartphone (6.6 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone has a screen size of 6.67 inches.
    6.6 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • 12.1% lower screen brightness
    Screen brightness
    580 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    Market range: <437 nits – >1.3k nits
    This smartphone has a lower screen brightness than the average smartphone (580 nits vs 660 nits). The average smartphone has a brightness of 660 nits.
    580 nits vs 660 nits
  • 54.5% slower charging speed
    Charging speed
    15 W
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <15 W – >90 W
    This smartphone has a slower charging speed than the average smartphone (15 W vs 33 W). The average smartphone charges at 33 W.
    15 W vs 33 W
  • 25% slower wireless charging speed
    Wireless charging speed
    15 W
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <10 W – >50 W
    This smartphone has a slower wireless charging speed than the average smartphone (15 W vs 20 W). The average smartphone wireless charging speed is 20 W.
    15 W vs 20 W
  • No stereo speakers
    Stereo speakers
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartphone does not have stereo speakers, the average smartphone does. 64.4% of smartphones feature stereo speakers.
  • No aptX HD
    aptX HD
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartphone does not support aptX HD, the average smartphone does. 50.7% of smartphones support aptX HD.
  • 36.6% heavier
    Weight
    268 g
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <175 g – >256 g
    This smartphone is heavier than the average smartphone (268 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    268 g vs 196.2 g
  • 3.6 mm thicker
    Thickness
    11.9 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
    This smartphone is thicker than the average smartphone (11.9 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone has a thickness of 8.3 mm.
    11.9 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • 4 mm wider
    Width
    80 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
    This smartphone is wider than the average smartphone (80 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone has a width of 76 mm.
    80 mm vs 76 mm
  • 7.4 mm taller
    Height
    171 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
    This smartphone is taller than the average smartphone (171 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone has a height of 163.6 mm.
    171 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • 1 year/s older release date
    Release date
    2023
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartphone is an older model than the average smartphone (2023 vs 2024). 1.00% of smartphones were released more recently.
    February 2023
    2023 vs 2024
  • 53.9% larger volume
    Device volume
    150,480 cm³
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
    This smartphone has a larger volume than the average smartphone (150480 cm³ vs 97800 cm³). The average smartphone volume is 97800 cm³.
    150,480 cm³ vs 97,800 cm³

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

C
coolsmartphone.com
04/08/2023
Summary of the review
Cat S75 - Review - Coolsmartphone
T
trustedreviews.com
03/07/2023
Summary of the review
Cat S75 Review - Trusted Reviews
T
techradar.com
09/06/2023
Summary of the review
CAT S75 Rugged Phone review - TechRadar
T
techadvisor.com
12/07/2023
Summary of the review
CAT S75 review: Stay Connected via Satellite - Tech Advisor
O
outdoor-magazin.com
18/01/2024
Summary of the review
CAT S75: Satellite Smartphone Review
(Translated)Show original
H
heise.de
26/10/2023
Summary of the review
Cat S75 Outdoor Smartphone Review
(Translated)Show original
Z
zonamovilidad.es
12/09/2023
Summary of the review
Cat S75 Review: An indestructible phone for the most adventurous
(Translated)Show original
T
tg24.sky.it
20/07/2023
Summary of the review
CAT S75: The indestructible, always-connected smartphone
(Translated)Show original
G
global.techradar.com
09/06/2023
Summary of the review
CAT S75 Review
(Translated)Show original
I
igizmo.it
08/08/2023
Summary of the review
Cat S75 Review: A rugged smartphone, but not for everyone
(Translated)Show original
T
tomshw.it
29/06/2023
Summary of the review
CAT S75 Review: A Modern Rugged Phone with Satellite Communication
(Translated)Show original
S
smartworld.it
18/07/2023
Summary of the review
Cat S75 Review: The first Android with satellite connectivity
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on 335 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: August 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about CAT S75 (6GB + 128GB)

  • Exceptional ruggedness with IP68, IP69K, and Mil-Spec 810H ratings, making it dust-proof and drop-proof up to 1.8m onto steel.
  • Unique two-way satellite messaging capability through Bullitt Satellite Connect, allowing communication outside cellular coverage.
  • Includes a dedicated underwater camera mode that allows volume buttons to be used as shutters when the screen is submerged.
  • Supports both 15W wired and 15W wireless charging.
  • Smooth user experience for daily tasks supported by a 120Hz refresh rate display and near-stock Android software.
  • Full Widevine L1 support, enabling high-definition streaming for services like Netflix and Prime Video.

What we don't like about CAT S75 (6GB + 128GB)

  • High price point relative to mid-range hardware specifications.
  • Camera performance is average, lacking 4K video recording and struggling with low-light conditions and focus issues.
  • The 5,000mAh battery is considered small for a rugged phone, with some users reporting inconsistent longevity.
  • Display visibility is poor in direct sunlight due to a highly reflective Gorilla Glass Victus screen.
  • Small and difficult-to-locate rear-mounted fingerprint sensor.
  • Hardware limitations: only 6GB of RAM, 128GB of storage, and no dedicated headphone jack.
  • Reported software bugs, including random crashes during screen mirroring and intermittent connectivity issues with Bluetooth or mobile data.
  • Lack of integrated thermal imaging, a signature feature from previous CAT models like the S62 Pro.

Verdict

The CAT S75 (6GB + 128GB) is a robust, highly durable 5G smartphone primarily distinguished by its true two-way satellite messaging capability via the Bullitt Satellite Messenger service, ensuring connectivity where traditional networks fail. The device features a 6.6-inch FHD+ 120Hz display protected by Corning Gorilla Glass Victus, is powered by an octa-core MediaTek Dimensity 930 processor, and includes 6GB of RAM and 128GB of expandable storage. It boasts impressive durability, exceeding MIL-SPEC 810H standards and holding IP68/IP69K ratings for water (up to 5m for 35 mins) and dust resistance, along with a 50MP main camera with an underwater mode and a 5000mAh battery supporting 15W wired and wireless charging. The main cons include the cameras offering only 1080p video recording despite the high-resolution sensor, the screen being somewhat reflective in bright sunlight, a physically small fingerprint sensor, and the lack of a 3.5mm audio jack.

Compare CAT S75 (6GB + 128GB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of CAT S75 (6GB + 128GB) and other smartphones

No results found