OVERALL

ALTERNATIVES

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

Intel Core i7-9700K review: 74 specs compared

Avg. price:~£300PassMark multi-core score:14401N. of physical cores:8CPU boost clock speed:4.9 GHzCPU socket:LGA1151TDP (Thermal design power):95 W

Intel Core i7-9700K Review: Compare 74 technical specifications, 23 expert and video reviews and 1 best-of list to see how this product ranks in the Processors category and whether it is worth buying.

Intel Core i7-9700K

6.5/10

▼Worse than 57% of processors

7.2

▼Worse than 60%

5.6

▼Worse than 53%

7.8

▲Better than 61%

5.6

▲Better than 89%

5.2
Gaming
Gaming
5.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Measures single-core benchmark performance, peak boost clock speeds, and fast L3 cache sizing critical for high frame rates.
When it matters
When you want to play demanding mobile games, 3D titles, or run graphics-intensive apps smoothly.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
30.0%
5.5
PassMark single-core score
25.0%
5.1
Geekbench 6 single-core score
20.0%
7.8
CPU boost clock speed
17.0%
2.1
L3 cache
8.0%
4.9
N. of physical cores
4.3
Video editing
Video editing
4.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Assesses multi-core benchmark throughput, total physical core and thread count, and cache bandwidth for rapid video rendering.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this processors meets your specific video editing needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
45.0%
4.8
Geekbench 6 multi-core score
20.0%
4.9
N. of physical cores
20.0%
4.4
CPU threads
15.0%
2.1
L3 cache

Where to buy

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

What reviewers say about the Intel Core i7-9700K

Based on 10 · 5

A gaming favourite with strong overall speed, but reviewers widely regret the missing Hyper-Threading and high power consumption.

Praised

Mixed views

Criticised

Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the Intel Core i7-9700K

Based on 188 owners sharing their experience in online comments

64%positive14%mixed22%negative

Owners praise its lasting gaming speed and overclocking potential, while newer games expose CPU limits and heat concerns.

What owners like

Owners with a 4.9–5.1 GHz overclock and 1080p–1440p GPUs report strong, smooth gaming, and many say it still handles most titles well.73
Many owners reach stable 4.8–5.1 GHz overclocks at around 1.2–1.38 V on Z370 and Z390 boards, and some get one-click 5 GHz settings.28
Owners say the chip still runs games well 5–7 years after launch, often at 1080p or 1440p with mid-range or older GPUs.26
Owners say it is cheap to buy used or new, often $100–$200, and that it still gives good gaming performance for the money.11
Owners with an overclock or water cooling say temperatures stay moderate, often 60–76°C under gaming load, and some say it draws only modest power.10
Owners use it for office work, streaming, game servers and creative tools such as FL Studio, and say it handles these tasks well.4

What owners dislike

With fast GPUs like the RTX 4070 or 4080 at 1080p or 1440p, owners see the CPU max out while the GPU sits at 40–60% usage.24
Owners say newer demanding titles such as Battlefield 2042, Warzone, Dragon's Dogma 2 and Star Wars Outlaws drop to low, uneven frame rates.20
Owners report temperatures of 80–100°C under heavy load, especially when overclocked or cooled by a basic air cooler or small AIO.13
Owners report stutters and uneven frame pacing in games like Fortnite, Rust and Marvel Rivals, even when the GPU is not fully used.8
Owners say it needs 1.3 V or more for 4.9–5.1 GHz, and some found it unstable at those settings and drew more power than rivals.5
Owners say it struggles when a game, streaming, and background apps all run at once, and it cannot handle heavy multi-workload tasks well.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of processor Intel Core i7-9700K

6.5

Show more

Hide

Platform

8.0

Show more

Hide

Processor type

CPU socket

Chipset

CPU architecture

Instruction sets

Show more

Performance

5.6

Show more

Hide

N. of physical cores

CPU threads

CPU boost clock speed

CPU base clock speed

PassMark multi-core score

Show more

What reviewers say

Architecture

4.9

Show more

Hide

Semiconductor size

Foundry

L3 cache

L2 cache

L1 cache

Show more

Memory & PCIe

5.9

Show more

Hide

DDR memory version

Maximum memory speed

Max memory speed (JEDEC)

Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)

?

Maximum memory capacity

Show more

Integrated graphics

7.0

Show more

Hide

Integrated graphics

Integrated GPU model

Integrated GPU execution units

Integrated GPU base frequency

Integrated media encoders/decoders

Show more

Power & Thermal

5.5

Show more

Hide

TDP (Thermal design power)

Base power (PL1)

Boost power (PL2)

?

Tau (power duration limit)

?

Configurable TDP

Show more

What reviewers say

Intel Core i7-9700K vs the average processor

Why is Intel Core i7-9700K better than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

4 more performance cores
This processor has more performance cores than the average processor (8 vs 4). The average processor has 4 performance cores.
8 vs 4
Unlocked for overclocking
This processor has an unlocked multiplier, while the average processor does not. 22.6% of processors offer this.
11.4% higher boost clock
This processor has a higher boost clock speed than the average processor (4.9 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.4 GHz.
4.9 GHz vs 4.4 GHz
Higher base clock
This processor has a higher base clock than the average processor (8x3.6 GHz vs 4x3.4 GHz).
8x3.6 GHz vs 4x3.4 GHz
Supports memory overclocking
This processor supports memory overclocking, while the average processor does not. 43.9% of processors support memory overclocking.
2 more CPU cores
This processor has more CPU cores than the average processor (8 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
8 vs 6
16.4% higher review score
Reviews score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.2 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 61% of models
80%
7.5
Average grade
20%
9.3
Popularity
Grades by review (23)
19 reviews: 9 with a printed score, 10 estimated from the review. 4 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
7.8 vs 6.7
2.09x faster classroom rendering
This processor has a lower Blender Classroom render time than the average processor (709.8 vs 340.1). The average processor needs 340.075 for the Blender Classroom test.
709.8 vs 340.075

16.4% higher review score
Reviews score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.2 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 61% of models
80%
7.5
Average grade
20%
9.3
Popularity
Grades by review (23)
19 reviews: 9 with a printed score, 10 estimated from the review. 4 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
7.8 vs 6.7
19.4% higher sentiment score
8.6 vs 7.2

Modern CPU socket
This processor uses a more modern CPU socket than the average processor (LGA1151 vs FP5).
LGA1151 vs FP5

4 more performance cores
This processor has more performance cores than the average processor (8 vs 4). The average processor has 4 performance cores.
8 vs 4
Unlocked for overclocking
This processor has an unlocked multiplier, while the average processor does not. 22.6% of processors offer this.
11.4% higher boost clock
This processor has a higher boost clock speed than the average processor (4.9 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.4 GHz.
4.9 GHz vs 4.4 GHz
Higher base clock
This processor has a higher base clock than the average processor (8x3.6 GHz vs 4x3.4 GHz).
8x3.6 GHz vs 4x3.4 GHz
2 more CPU cores
This processor has more CPU cores than the average processor (8 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
8 vs 6
2.09x faster classroom rendering
This processor has a lower Blender Classroom render time than the average processor (709.8 vs 340.1). The average processor needs 340.075 for the Blender Classroom test.
709.8 vs 340.075
25.6% higher PassMark score
This processor has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (14,401 vs 11,469). The average processor scores 11,469 in PassMark benchmark.
14,401 vs 11,469
30.4% better multi-core performance
This processor has a higher multi-core performance than the average processor (3,656 vs 2,804.5). The average processor scores 2,804.5 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.
3,656 vs 2,804.5
11.8% better single-core performance
This processor has a higher PassMark single-core score than the average processor (2,859 vs 2,558). The average processor scores 2,558 in PassMark single-core.
2,859 vs 2,558
10.7% higher single-core score
This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (1,700 vs 1,535). The average processor scores 1,535 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
1,700 vs 1,535

More advanced microarchitecture
This processor uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Coffee Lake Refresh vs Kaby Lake).
Coffee Lake Refresh vs Kaby Lake
33.3% larger L1 cache
This processor has a higher L1 cache than the average processor (512 KB vs 384 KB). The average processor has L1 cache of 384 KB.
512 KB vs 384 KB

Supports memory overclocking
This processor supports memory overclocking, while the average processor does not. 43.9% of processors support memory overclocking.
2x more memory capacity
This processor has more maximum memory capacity than the average processor (128 GB vs 64 GB). The average processor supports 64 GB of memory.
128 GB vs 64 GB

Why is Intel Core i7-9700K worse than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

28.2% lower list score
List score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (1)
List score: in 1 of 87 lists (1%)
5.6 vs 7.8
No configurable TDP
This processor does not support configurable TDP, while the average processor does. 53.7% of processors support configurable TDP.
2.11x higher base power
This processor has a higher base power draw than the average processor (95 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
95 W vs 45 W
No simultaneous multithreading
This processor does not support simultaneous multithreading, while the average processor does. 73.8% of processors support it.
43.5% slower Blender rendering
This processor has a higher Blender BMW27 render time than the average processor (224.8 vs 398). The average processor needs 398.015 for the Blender BMW27 test.
224.8 vs 398.015
16.7% larger process node
This processor has a higher process node than the average processor (14 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
14 nm vs 12 nm
50% less L2 per core
This processor has less L2 cache per core than the average processor (0.3 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core). The average processor provides 0.5 MB/core of L2 cache per core.
0.25 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core
18.9% less L3 per core
This processor has less L3 cache per core than the average processor (1.5 MB/core vs 1.85 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.85 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
1.5 MB/core vs 1.85 MB/core

28.2% lower list score
List score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (1)
List score: in 1 of 87 lists (1%)
5.6 vs 7.8

Weaker security extensions
This processor provides less advanced security extensions than the average processor (AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, SGX, TXT, MPX, OS Guard, Boot Guard vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME, TME-MK).
AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, SGX, TXT, MPX, OS Guard, Boot Guard vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME, TME-MK
More limited crypto acceleration
This processor offers more limited crypto acceleration than the average processor (AES vs AES, SHA).
AES vs AES, SHA
2 years older release date
This processor has an older release date than the average processor (2018 vs 2020).
October 2018
2018 vs 2020

No simultaneous multithreading
This processor does not support simultaneous multithreading, while the average processor does. 73.8% of processors support it.
43.5% slower Blender rendering
This processor has a higher Blender BMW27 render time than the average processor (224.8 vs 398). The average processor needs 398.015 for the Blender BMW27 test.
224.8 vs 398.015

16.7% larger process node
This processor has a higher process node than the average processor (14 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
14 nm vs 12 nm
50% less L2 per core
This processor has less L2 cache per core than the average processor (0.3 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core). The average processor provides 0.5 MB/core of L2 cache per core.
0.25 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core
18.9% less L3 per core
This processor has less L3 cache per core than the average processor (1.5 MB/core vs 1.85 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.85 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
1.5 MB/core vs 1.85 MB/core
33.3% smaller L2 cache
This processor has a lower L2 cache than the average processor (2 MB vs 3 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 3 MB.
2 MB vs 3 MB
1.9% larger die size
This processor has a higher die size than the average processor (180.3 mm² vs 177 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 177 mm².
180.3 mm² vs 177 mm²

16.7% lower memory speed
This processor has a lower maximum memory speed than the average processor (2,666 MHz vs 3,200 MHz). The average processor supports memory speed of 3,200 MHz.
2,666 MHz vs 3,200 MHz
Limited PCIe bifurcation
This processor supports less flexible PCIe bifurcation than the average processor (x16, x8/x8, x8/x4/x4 vs x16, x8/x8, x4/x4/x4/x4).
x16, x8/x8, x8/x4/x4 vs x16, x8/x8, x4/x4/x4/x4
11.3% lower memory bandwidth
This processor has a lower memory bandwidth than the average processor (41.6 GB/s vs 46.9 GB/s). The average processor offers memory bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s.
41.6 GB/s vs 46.9 GB/s
Lower JEDEC memory speed
This processor has a lower JEDEC memory speed than the average processor (DDR4-2666 MHz vs DDR4-3200 MHz). The average processor supports JEDEC memory speed of DDR4-3200 MHz.
DDR4-2,666 MHz vs DDR4-3,200 MHz

Narrower media codec support
This processor supports fewer media codecs than the average processor (H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode), VC-1 (HW decode), JPEG (HW decode) vs H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode), JPEG (HW decode/encode)).
H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode), VC-1 (HW decode), JPEG (HW decode) vs H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode), JPEG (HW decode/encode)

No configurable TDP
This processor does not support configurable TDP, while the average processor does. 53.7% of processors support configurable TDP.
2.11x higher base power
This processor has a higher base power draw than the average processor (95 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
95 W vs 45 W
2.11x higher TDP
This processor has a higher TDP than the average processor (95 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
95 W vs 45 W

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

6.0

Proceu Tech

≈ estimated

10/07/2025

Hands-on review · gaming, power and thermal tests

Verdict

Intel Core i7-9700K is still capable for gaming on a budget, but its power draw, PCIe 3.0 limits and newer rivals hold it back.

8.0

Proceu Tech

≈ estimated

17/08/2024

Performance overview · gaming and multi-core tests against newer chips

Verdict

Intel Core i7-9700K is still a strong gaming and multi-core chip, but used prices are high next to newer Alder Lake options.

4.0

Hardware Unboxed

≈ estimated

19/10/2018

Comparison review · performance, heat and power notes

Verdict

Intel Core i7-9700K offers only a minor gain over the 8700K while running hotter and drawing more power, so it's a poor buy.

Overview video

Overview video

Not graded

Not graded

Hands-on video, no verdict

Overview video

Not graded

Not graded

Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0

pcmag.com

✓ explicit

14/02/2020

Intel Core i7-9700K Review - PCMag

Benchmark review · Gaming-focused CPU

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-9700K is a capable gaming chip with eight cores, but AMD's Ryzen 7 3700X is faster in many multi-core tasks.

8.0

techradar.com

✓ explicit

18/11/2019

Intel Core i7-9700K review - TechRadar

Performance review · Gaming CPU

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-9700K is a strong gaming chip with the best single-core speed, but without HyperThreading it trails AMD in heavy multi-threaded work.

6.0

gamersnexus.net

≈ estimated

27/12/2018

Intel i7-9700K Review vs. 8700K, 9900K, 2700, and More

Benchmark review · Gaming CPU

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-9700K is a fast gaming CPU with steady frame times, but the 8700K's extra threads win in Blender rendering.

9.0

rockpapershotgun.com

≈ estimated

04/07/2019

Intel Core i7-9700K review: The best gaming CPU that doesn't cost a fortune

Gaming benchmarks · Eight-core CPU

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-9700K is a strong gaming chip, nearly matching the Core i9-9900K in games at stock, but it needs a liquid cooler to overclock well.

7.0

techspot.com

✓ explicit

19/10/2018

Intel Core i9-9900K and Core i7-9700K Review - TechSpot

Benchmark review · Desktop CPU

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-9700K is a fast single-core chip that beats the 8700K in some tests, but it falls behind in multi-core rendering like Blender and V-Ray.

10

techpowerup.com

✓ explicit

26/10/2018

Intel Core i7-9700K Review - Value & Conclusion - TechPowerUp

Full benchmark · Gaming CPU

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-9700K is the best pick for pure gaming, but its 95 W power cap and lack of HyperThreading hold back heavy productivity work.

8.0

tomshardware.com

✓ explicit

06/11/2018

Intel Core i7-9700K 9th Gen CPU Review: Eight Physical Cores, No Hyper-Threading - Tom's Hardware

Benchmark review · Gaming CPU

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-9700K is a strong gaming chip with eight cores and better heat transfer, but it lacks Hyper-Threading and needs a good cooler.

6.0

bit-tech.net

≈ estimated

19/11/2018

Intel Core i7-9700K Review | bit-tech.net

Lab review · Stock performance

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-9700K is a modest step up from the Core i7-8700K, with eight cores and a soldered heat spreader but no Hyper-Threading.

8.8

pcgamer.com

✓ explicit

23/10/2018

Intel Core i7-9700K review | PC Gamer

Gaming-focused review · Desktop CPU

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-9700K matches the i9-9900K in games while drawing less power and needing less cooling, though it lacks HyperThreading for heavy video editing.

8.0

notebookcheck.net

≈ estimated

17/12/2018

Intel Core i7-9700K Desktop CPU Review

Lab test · Stress and overclock

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-9700K is a fast gaming chip that matches the Core i9-9900K in most scenarios, but it runs hot and needs a good cooler.

8.0

chip.de

≈ estimated

06/12/2018

Intel-Core-i7-9700K-im-Test_154322891 Intel Core i7-9700K im Test

Lab test · Gaming and work CPU

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-9700K suits gaming and work PCs thanks to high clock speeds and overclocking headroom, but it is only slightly faster than its predecessor.

6.0

lesnumeriques.com

✓ explicit

26/11/2018

Intel Core i7-9700K Review: An 8-core CPU with plenty to offer

Lab test · Coffee Lake desktop CPU

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-9700K is a strong gaming chip with eight cores that fits 8th-generation motherboards, but it has no architectural change and drops Hyper-Threading.

8.0

tomshardware.fr

≈ estimated

19/10/2018

Core i9-9900K, i7-9700K, and i5-9600K Review: Intel Strikes Back at Ryzen

Full test · Desktop CPU

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-9700K is a fast chip for gaming and single-core tasks, but its 8 threads and older 14nm++ process limit multi-core work.

8.2

profesionalreview.com

✓ explicit

19/10/2018

Intel Core i7-9700K Review (Complete Analysis)

Hands-on test · Eight-core Coffee Lake Refresh

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-9700K has eight cores and overclocks to 5 GHz, but it performs about the same as the i7-8700K.

9.5

elchapuzasinformatico.com

≈ estimated

10/09/2018

Intel Core i7-9700K Review (Exclusive)

Early sample test · Desktop CPU

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-9700K is a fast single-core gaming chip, but without HyperThreading its 8 threads leave it behind Ryzen 7 in multi-threaded tasks.

8.0

global.techradar.com

✓ explicit

13/01/2020

Intel Core i7-9700K Review - TechRadar

Review · Eight-core gaming chip

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-9700K is a fast gaming chip with eight cores and no Hyper-Threading, beating its predecessor in games but trailing AMD in multi-thread work.

8.0

gamesource.it

≈ estimated

18/03/2019

Intel Core i7-9700K Review - GameSource

Hands-on test · Overclocking

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-9700K overclocks easily to 5 GHz for gaming and work, but without Hyper-Threading it trails the Core i9-9900K in threaded tests.

5.0

techtesters.eu

≈ estimated

22/10/2018

Intel Core i5-9600K & i7-9700K Review

Opinion and test · Desktop CPU

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-9700K beats the 8700K in single-core and most multi-threaded tests, but the Ryzen 7 2700X still wins in heavy multi-core work.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Intel Core i7-9700K

Excellent single-core performance, making it a top-tier choice for gaming
Strong overclocking potential, with many users easily reaching stable 5.0GHz to 5.2GHz speeds
High frame rates in AAA games and 1080p high-refresh gaming
Runs relatively cool for its class when paired with a good aftermarket cooler
Solid multitasking capabilities despite the lack of hyper-threading
Uses a soldered thermal interface (STIM), which improves heat transfer over previous generations

What customers don't like about Intel Core i7-9700K

Lacks Hyper-Threading support, which can limit performance in highly multi-threaded creative workloads like video editing
Does not include a stock heatsink or cooling fan in the box
Expensive compared to competitors from AMD (like the Ryzen 7 series) that offer more threads
Limited upgrade path as it uses the older LGA 1151 socket and lacks PCIe 4.0 support
Higher power consumption compared to some modern alternatives

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-9700K is a 9th Generation 'Coffee Lake Refresh' desktop processor featuring 8 physical cores and 8 threads with a base clock speed of 3.6 GHz and a maximum turbo boost of 4.9 GHz. Built on a 14nm process with a 95W TDP, it includes 12MB of Intel Smart Cache, an unlocked multiplier for overclocking, and integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630. Main pros include exceptional single-core performance that makes it a top-tier choice for high-frame-rate gaming and the inclusion of Solder Thermal Interface Material (STIM) for improved heat dissipation. However, its primary cons are the lack of Hyper-Threading support, which can limit performance in highly multi-threaded professional applications compared to its predecessors or competitors, and the fact that it does not come with a bundled thermal cooling solution.

Best alternatives

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Processors

Intel Core i7-13700K

Processors

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X

Processors

Intel Core i9-12900K

Processors

Intel Core i7-14700K

Processors

AMD Ryzen 9 7900

Processors

AMD Ryzen 7 9700X

Processors

AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D

Processors

Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus

Processors

Intel Core i9-12900F

Processors

Intel Core i7-14700F

Processors

Intel Core i9-12900KF

Processors

See best alternatives in Buying Guide

Compare Intel Core i7-9700K with other processors

Graphic comparison of Intel Core i7-9700K and other processors

No results found