OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

ASRock X670E Taichi Carrara Review | 107 Data compared

Avg. price in UK:~£480Avg. price in US:~$420CPU socket:AM5Chipset:AMD X670EForm factor:E-ATX

ASRock X670E Taichi Carrara Review: Compare 107 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Motherboards category and whether it is worth buying.

8.9

Overall score

Score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the motherboard's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best motherboards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models
Score components

90%

9.0

Technical Score

10%

8.2

User score

★Better than 92% of motherboards
9.0

Technical Score

Technical score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Motherboards category across these key areas: Platform & Features, Memory, Storage, Expansion, Ports & USB, Network, Audio, Power & Cooling.
When it matters
When you want to compare motherboards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models
Score components

19%

9.1

Memory

16%

9.5

Platform & Features

16%

9.6

Storage

15%

9.1

Network

13%

8.6

Ports & USB

8%

6.3

Expansion

8%

9.2

Power & Cooling

5%

9.2

Audio

★Better than 92% of motherboards
8.2

User score

User score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the motherboard.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a motherboard performs in real-world builds and how reliable it is in terms of stability, BIOS usability, connectivity, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 65% of models
Score components

70%

9.0

User reviews

30%

6.5

Popularity

User score:
United Kingdom
amazon
4.6
(67)
United States
Amazon_logo.png
4.5
(71)

(Reviews last updated: May 2026)

▲Better than 65% of motherboards
  • asrock-x670e-taichi-carrara
  • asrock-x670e-taichi-carrara
  • asrock-x670e-taichi-carrara
  • asrock-x670e-taichi-carrara
  • asrock-x670e-taichi-carrara
  • asrock-x670e-taichi-carrara
  • asrock-x670e-taichi-carrara
  • asrock-x670e-taichi-carrara
  • asrock-x670e-taichi-carrara
  • asrock-x670e-taichi-carrara
  • asrock-x670e-taichi-carrara
  • asrock-x670e-taichi-carrara
  • asrock-x670e-taichi-carrara
  • asrock-x670e-taichi-carrara
  • asrock-x670e-taichi-carrara
  • asrock-x670e-taichi-carrara
asrock-x670e-taichi-carrara
asrock-x670e-taichi-carrara
asrock-x670e-taichi-carrara
asrock-x670e-taichi-carrara
asrock-x670e-taichi-carrara
asrock-x670e-taichi-carrara
asrock-x670e-taichi-carrara
asrock-x670e-taichi-carrara
asrock-x670e-taichi-carrara
asrock-x670e-taichi-carrara
asrock-x670e-taichi-carrara
asrock-x670e-taichi-carrara
asrock-x670e-taichi-carrara
asrock-x670e-taichi-carrara
asrock-x670e-taichi-carrara
asrock-x670e-taichi-carrara

Best prices in UK

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The ASRock X670E Taichi Carrara is a flagship E-ATX motherboard designed for AMD AM5 Ryzen 9000, 8000, and 7000 series processors, featuring a distinctive marble-inspired aesthetic and a massive 24+2+1 phase power design with 105A Smart Power Stages. Its premium specification includes support for up to 128GB of dual-channel DDR5-7800+(OC) memory, dual PCIe 5.0 x16 slots, and comprehensive storage with one Blazing M.2 (Gen5x4) and three Hyper M.2 (Gen4x4) sockets. Notable pros include ultra-fast connectivity via two USB4 Type-C ports (40 Gbps), Killer 2.5G LAN, and Wi-Fi 6E, alongside an active VRM cooling system and a bundled 12cm Carrara edition fan. However, cons include its large E-ATX form factor which may limit case compatibility, the absence of dedicated DisplayPort outputs on the rear I/O, and the lack of quick-release mechanisms for M.2 drives.

Technical Specifications of motherboard ASRock X670E Taichi Carrara

Technical Score
Technical score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Motherboards category across these key areas: Platform & Features, Memory, Storage, Expansion, Ports & USB, Network, Audio, Power & Cooling.
When it matters
When you want to compare motherboards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models
Score components:

19%

9.1

Memory

16%

9.5

Platform & Features

16%

9.6

Storage

15%

9.1

Network

13%

8.6

Ports & USB

8%

6.3

Expansion

8%

9.2

Power & Cooling

5%

9.2

Audio

9.0
ASRock X670E Taichi Carrara has a technical score of 9 points, which is higher than that of 92.1% of products in this category.
User score
User score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the motherboard.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a motherboard performs in real-world builds and how reliable it is in terms of stability, BIOS usability, connectivity, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 65% of models
Score components

70%

9.0

User reviews

30%

6.5

Popularity

User score:
United Kingdom
amazon
4.6
(67)
United States
Amazon_logo.png
4.5
(71)

(Reviews last updated: May 2026)

8.2
ASRock X670E Taichi Carrara has a user score of 8.25 points, which is higher than that of 65.3% of products in this category.
Popularity
Popularity
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the motherboard.
When it matters
When you prefer a motherboard that has already been bought and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 52% of models
Popularity:
ASRock X670E Taichi Carrara has a popularity score of 6.5 points, which is higher than that of 52.3% of products in this category.
6.5
ASRock X670E Taichi Carrara has a popularity score of 6.5 points, which is higher than that of 52.3% of products in this category.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the motherboard's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a motherboard that offers a strong balance of features, performance, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 83% of models
Score components:

60%

8.9

Overall score

40%

8.0

Price

8.6
ASRock X670E Taichi Carrara has a value-for-money score of 8.6 points, which is higher than that of 82.6% of products in this category.
Brand name
Asrock
CPU socket
AM5
CPU socket
AM5
▲ Better than 86% of models
This motherboard uses the AM5 CPU socket, which is more advanced than that of 85.8% of motherboards and equal to that of 14.2% of motherboards.
CPU platform
AMD
CPU platform
AMD
▼ Worse than 68% of models
This motherboard is built for the AMD CPU platform, which is less common than that of 68.5% of motherboards and equal to that of 31.5% of motherboards.
Chipset
AMD X670E
Chipset
AMD X670E
▲ Better than 85% of models
This motherboard uses the AMD X670E chipset, which is more advanced than that of 84.5% of motherboards and equal to that of 1.1% of motherboards.
Form factor
E-ATX
Form factor
E-ATX
▼ Worse than 92% of models
This motherboard has the E-ATX form factor, which is less versatile than that of 92% of motherboards and equal to that of 6.8% of motherboards.
Show more
DDR memory version
DDR5
DDR memory version
DDR5
▲ Better than 64% of models
This motherboard uses DDR5 memory, which is newer than that of 64.3% of motherboards and equal to that of 35.7% of motherboards.
Memory slots
4
Memory slots
4
▲ Better than 21% of models
Market range: <2 – >4
This motherboard has 4 Memory slots, which is more than 21.5% of motherboards and equal to 72.5% of motherboards.
Maximum memory capacity
192 GB
Maximum memory capacity
192 GB
▲ Better than 72% of models
Market range: <32 GB – >256 GB
This motherboard supports up to 192 GB of memory, which is more than 72.4% of motherboards and equal to 10.5% of motherboards.
Memory channels
2
Memory channels
2
▼ Worse than 7% of models
This motherboard supports 2 memory channels, which is more than 0.2% of motherboards and equal to 92.6% of motherboards.
Maximum RAM speed
7,800 MT/s
Maximum RAM speed
7,800 MT/s
▲ Better than 83% of models
Market range: <2k MT/s – >8k MT/s
This motherboard supports memory speeds up to 7,800 MT/s, which is higher than that of 83.3% of motherboards and equal to that of 1.7% of motherboards.
Show more
N. of M.2 sockets
4
N. of M.2 sockets
4
▲ Better than 84% of models
Market range: <0 – >4
This motherboard has 4 M.2 sockets, which is more than 84.1% of motherboards and equal to 10.7% of motherboards.
M.2 slot interface per slot
1x PCIe 5.0 x4, 1x PCIe 4.0 x4/SATA, 2x PCIe 4.0 x4
M.2 slot interface per slot
1x PCIe 5.0 x4, 1x PCIe 4.0 x4/SATA, 2x PCIe 4.0 x4
★ Better than 91% of models
This motherboard offers 1x PCIe 5.0x4, 1x PCIe 4.0x4/SATA, 2x PCIe 4.0x4 for M.2 slot interfaces, which is faster than that of 91.4% of motherboards and equal to that of 0.1% of motherboards.
N. of SATA 3 connectors
8
N. of SATA 3 connectors
8
▲ Better than 85% of models
Market range: <4 – >8
This motherboard has 8 SATA 3 connectors, which is more than 85.4% of motherboards and equal to 11.1% of motherboards.
Supported RAID levels
0/1/10
Supported RAID levels
0/1/10
▼ Worse than 68% of models
This motherboard supports RAID levels 0/1/10, which is narrower than 68.1% of motherboards and equal to 23.3% of motherboards.
NVMe RAID support
yes
NVMe RAID support
yes
▲ Better than 40% of models
This motherboard supports NVMe RAID. 40.3% of motherboards support this feature.
Show more
N. of PCIe 5.0 x16 slots
2
N. of PCIe 5.0 x16 slots
2
★ Better than 95% of models
Market range: <0 – >1
This motherboard has 2 PCIe 5.0x16 slots, which is more than 95.2% of motherboards and equal to 4.3% of motherboards.
lane split supported
N. of PCIe 4.0 x16 slots
0
N. of PCIe 4.0 x16 slots
0
▼ Worse than 45% of models
Market range: <0 – >1
This motherboard has 0 PCIe 4.0x16 slots, which is fewer than 44.5% of motherboards and equal to 55.5% of motherboards.
N. of PCIe 3.0 x16 slots
0
N. of PCIe 3.0 x16 slots
0
▼ Worse than 60% of models
Market range: <0 – >3
This motherboard has 0 PCIe 3.0x16 slots, which is fewer than 59.6% of motherboards and equal to 40.4% of motherboards.
PCIe slot electrical configuration
x16/x0, x8/x8
PCIe slot electrical configuration
x16/x0, x8/x8
▼ Worse than 76% of models
This motherboard uses x16/x0, x8/x8 for PCIe slot electrical configuration, which is less flexible than that of 76.4% of motherboards and equal to that of 2.9% of motherboards.
PCIe bifurcation support
yes
PCIe bifurcation support
yes
▲ Better than 40% of models
This motherboard supports PCIe bifurcation. 40.4% of motherboards support this feature.
x8/x8.
Show more
Total USB ports (rear I/O)
10
Total USB ports (rear I/O)
10
▲ Better than 75% of models
Market range: <6 – >10
This motherboard has 10 USB ports (rear I/O), which is more than 75.5% of motherboards and equal to 15.5% of motherboards.
includes USB4 / Thunderbolt ports.
Total USB ports (including headers)
19
Total USB ports (including headers)
19
▲ Better than 87% of models
Market range: <11 – >19
This motherboard has 19 USB ports (including headers), which is more than 87% of motherboards and equal to 4.2% of motherboards.
Total USB-C ports (rear I/O)
2
Total USB-C ports (rear I/O)
2
▲ Better than 84% of models
Market range: <0 – >2
This motherboard has 2 USB-C ports (rear I/O), which is more than 84.2% of motherboards and equal to 12.3% of motherboards.
Total USB-C ports (including headers)
3
Total USB-C ports (including headers)
3
▲ Better than 85% of models
Market range: <0 – >3
This motherboard has 3 USB-C ports (including headers), which is more than 84.6% of motherboards and equal to 11% of motherboards.
includes internal USB-C header.
N. of USB 3.2 Gen2x2 ports (USB-C)
0
N. of USB 3.2 Gen2x2 ports (USB-C)
0
▼ Worse than 18% of models
Market range: <0 – >1
This motherboard has 0 USB 3.2 Gen2x2 ports (USB-C), which is fewer than 18.3% of motherboards and equal to 81.7% of motherboards.
USB4 excluded.
Show more
LAN speed
2.5 Gbps
LAN speed
2.5 Gbps
▲ Better than 49% of models
Market range: <1 Gbps – >2.5 Gbps
This motherboard supports LAN speeds up to 2.5 Gbps, which is higher than that of 49.3% of motherboards and equal to that of 41.4% of motherboards.
LAN controller
Killer E3100G
LAN controller
Killer E3100G
▲ Better than 49% of models
This motherboard uses the Killer E3100G LAN controller, which is more advanced than that of 49.1% of motherboards and equal to that of 1.5% of motherboards.
N. of RJ45 ports
1
N. of RJ45 ports
1
▼ Worse than 14% of models
Market range: <1 – >2
This motherboard has 1 RJ45 ports, which is fewer than 14.4% of motherboards and equal to 85.6% of motherboards.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
▲ Better than 50% of models
This motherboard supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 50% of motherboards support this feature.
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax)
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax)
▲ Better than 72% of models
This motherboard supports Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax), which is newer than that of 72.1% of motherboards and equal to that of 16.6% of motherboards.
Show more
Audio codec
Realtek ALC4082
Audio codec
Realtek ALC4082
★ Better than 97% of models
This motherboard uses the Realtek ALC4082 audio codec, which is more advanced than that of 96.8% of motherboards and equal to that of 3.1% of motherboards.
Audio channels
5.1
Audio channels
5.1
▼ Worse than 95% of models
This motherboard offers 5.1 audio channels, which is fewer than 95.2% of motherboards and equal to 4.1% of motherboards.
Audio SNR
130 dB
Audio SNR
130 dB
★ Better than 98% of models
Market range: <95 dB – >120 dB
This motherboard has an audio SNR of 130 dB, which is higher than that of 97.8% of motherboards and equal to that of 2% of motherboards.
Headphone amp support
yes
Headphone amp support
yes
▲ Better than 41% of models
This motherboard supports a headphone amp. 40.8% of motherboards support this feature.
headphone amp on front panel.
N. of 3.5mm audio jacks
2
N. of 3.5mm audio jacks
2
▼ Worse than 89% of models
Market range: <2 – >6
This motherboard has 2 3.5mm audio jacks, which is fewer than 88.6% of motherboards and equal to 11.1% of motherboards.
Show more
VRM phases
24+2+1
VRM phases
24+2+1
★ Better than 99% of models
This motherboard has 24+2+1 VRM phases, which is more than 98.8% of motherboards and equal to 0.4% of motherboards.
N. of CPU power connectors
2
N. of CPU power connectors
2
▲ Better than 55% of models
Market range: <1 – >2
This motherboard has 2 CPU power connectors, which is more than 54.6% of motherboards and equal to 45.1% of motherboards.
Dual 8-pin CPU power.
N. of fan headers
8
N. of fan headers
8
▲ Better than 82% of models
Market range: <3 – >8
This motherboard has 8 fan headers, which is more than 82.2% of motherboards and equal to 15% of motherboards.
Pump header
yes
Pump header
yes
▲ Better than 22% of models
This motherboard has a pump header. 21.9% of motherboards include this feature.
Pump header max current
3 A
Pump header max current
3 A
▲ Better than 78% of models
Market range: <0 A – >3 A
This motherboard supports up to 3 A on the pump header, which is higher than that of 77.8% of motherboards and equal to that of 22.1% of motherboards.
Show more

ASRock X670E Taichi Carrara vs the average motherboard

246810TotalPlatform & FeaturesMemoryStorageExpansionPorts & USBNetworkAudioPower & Cooling
  • 2 more M.2 sockets
    N. of M.2 sockets
    4
    ▲ Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <0 – >4
    This motherboard has more M.2 sockets than the average motherboard (4 vs 2). The average motherboard has 2 M.2 socket/s.
    4 vs 2
  • Newer CPU socket
    CPU socket
    AM5
    ▲ Better than 86% of models
    This motherboard has newer CPU socket than the average motherboard (AM5 vs LGA 1151). The average motherboard uses LGA 1151 CPU socket.
    AM5 vs LGA 1,151
  • 2 more PCIe 5.0x16 slots
    N. of PCIe 5.0 x16 slots
    2
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Market range: <0 – >1
    This motherboard has more PCIe 5.0x16 slots than the average motherboard (2 vs 0). The average motherboard has 0 PCIe 5.0x16 slot/s.
    lane split supported
    2 vs 0
  • Newer DDR memory generation
    DDR memory version
    DDR5
    ▲ Better than 64% of models
    This motherboard has newer DDR memory generation than the average motherboard (DDR5 vs DDR4). The average motherboard supports DDR4 memory.
    DDR5 vs DDR4
  • 4 more USB 3.2 Gen2 ports
    N. of USB 3.2 Gen2 ports (USB-A)
    5
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    Market range: <0 – >4
    This motherboard has more USB 3.2 Gen2 ports than the average motherboard (5 vs 1). The average motherboard has 1 USB 3.2 Gen2 port/s.
    5 vs 1
  • More VRM phases
    VRM phases
    24+2+1
    ★ Better than 99% of models
    This motherboard has more VRM phases than the average motherboard (24+2+1 vs 10). The average motherboard has 10 VRM phase/s.
    24+2+1 vs 10
  • Better audio codec
    Audio codec
    Realtek ALC4082
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    This motherboard has better audio codec than the average motherboard (Realtek ALC4082 vs Realtek ALC897). The average motherboard uses Realtek ALC897 audio codec.
    Realtek ALC4082 vs Realtek ALC897
  • 2 more rear USB ports
    Total USB ports (rear I/O)
    10
    ▲ Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <6 – >10
    This motherboard has more rear USB ports than the average motherboard (10 vs 8). The average motherboard has 8 rear USB port/s.
    includes USB4 / Thunderbolt ports.
    10 vs 8
  • 16.3% better value for money
    ASRock X670E Taichi Carrara has better value for money than the average motherboard (8.62 vs 7.4).
    8.62 vs 7.41
  • Newer CPU socket
    CPU socket
    AM5
    ▲ Better than 86% of models
    This motherboard has newer CPU socket than the average motherboard (AM5 vs LGA 1151). The average motherboard uses LGA 1151 CPU socket.
    AM5 vs LGA 1,151
  • Integrated I/O shield
    Integrated I/O shield
    yes
    ▲ Better than 54% of models
    This motherboard has an integrated I/O shield, while the average motherboard does not. 46% of motherboards include an integrated I/O shield.
  • Includes POST code display
    POST code display
    yes
    ▲ Better than 73% of models
    This motherboard has a POST code display, while the average motherboard does not. 27.2% of motherboards include a POST code display.
  • Rear-panel CMOS reset button
    Rear-panel CMOS reset button
    yes
    ▲ Better than 73% of models
    This motherboard has a rear-panel CMOS reset button, while the average motherboard does not. 26.7% of motherboards include a rear-panel CMOS reset button.
  • Includes onboard power button
    Onboard power button
    yes
    ▲ Better than 72% of models
    This motherboard has an onboard power button, while the average motherboard does not. 27.7% of motherboards include an onboard power button.
  • Includes onboard reset button
    Onboard reset button
    yes
    ▲ Better than 72% of models
    This motherboard has an onboard reset button, while the average motherboard does not. 27.6% of motherboards include an onboard reset button.
  • Newer DDR memory generation
    DDR memory version
    DDR5
    ▲ Better than 64% of models
    This motherboard has newer DDR memory generation than the average motherboard (DDR5 vs DDR4). The average motherboard supports DDR4 memory.
    DDR5 vs DDR4
  • 50% more maximum memory capacity
    Maximum memory capacity
    192 GB
    ▲ Better than 72% of models
    Market range: <32 GB – >256 GB
    This motherboard has more maximum memory capacity than the average motherboard (192 GB vs 128 GB). The average motherboard supports 128 GB of memory.
    192 GB vs 128 GB
  • 64.8% higher maximum RAM speed
    Maximum RAM speed
    7,800 MT/s
    ▲ Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <2k MT/s – >8k MT/s
    This motherboard has a higher maximum RAM speed than the average motherboard (7800 MT/s vs 4733 MT/s). The average motherboard supports RAM speed of 4733 MT/s.
    7,800 MT/s vs 4,733 MT/s
  • Supports ECC memory
    ECC memory support
    yes
    ▲ Better than 79% of models
    This motherboard supports ECC memory, while the average motherboard does not. 21% of motherboards support ECC memory.
    supports full end-to-end ECC.
  • 58.1% higher overclocked RAM speed
    Maximum overclocked RAM speed
    7,800 MT/s
    ▲ Better than 79% of models
    Market range: <2.7k MT/s – >8.2k MT/s
    This motherboard has a higher overclocked RAM speed than the average motherboard (7800 MT/s vs 4933 MT/s). The average motherboard supports overclocked RAM speed of 4933 MT/s.
    7,800 MT/s vs 4,933 MT/s
  • 2 more M.2 sockets
    N. of M.2 sockets
    4
    ▲ Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <0 – >4
    This motherboard has more M.2 sockets than the average motherboard (4 vs 2). The average motherboard has 2 M.2 socket/s.
    4 vs 2
  • 4 more SATA 3 connectors
    N. of SATA 3 connectors
    8
    ▲ Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <4 – >8
    This motherboard has more SATA 3 connectors than the average motherboard (8 vs 4). The average motherboard has 4 SATA 3 connectors.
    8 vs 4
  • 2 more PCIe 5.0x16 slots
    N. of PCIe 5.0 x16 slots
    2
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Market range: <0 – >1
    This motherboard has more PCIe 5.0x16 slots than the average motherboard (2 vs 0). The average motherboard has 0 PCIe 5.0x16 slot/s.
    lane split supported
    2 vs 0
  • 4 more USB 3.2 Gen2 ports
    N. of USB 3.2 Gen2 ports (USB-A)
    5
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    Market range: <0 – >4
    This motherboard has more USB 3.2 Gen2 ports than the average motherboard (5 vs 1). The average motherboard has 1 USB 3.2 Gen2 port/s.
    5 vs 1
  • 2 more rear USB ports
    Total USB ports (rear I/O)
    10
    ▲ Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <6 – >10
    This motherboard has more rear USB ports than the average motherboard (10 vs 8). The average motherboard has 8 rear USB port/s.
    includes USB4 / Thunderbolt ports.
    10 vs 8
  • 1 more rear USB-C ports
    Total USB-C ports (rear I/O)
    2
    ▲ Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <0 – >2
    This motherboard has more rear USB-C ports than the average motherboard (2 vs 1). The average motherboard has 1 rear USB-C port/s.
    2 vs 1
  • 4 more total USB connections
    Total USB ports (including headers)
    19
    ▲ Better than 87% of models
    Market range: <11 – >19
    This motherboard has more total USB connections than the average motherboard (19 vs 15). The average motherboard has 15 total USB connections.
    19 vs 15
  • 1 more USB 3.2 Gen1 headers
    N. of USB 3.2 Gen1 headers (USB-A)
    2
    ▲ Better than 68% of models
    Market range: <1 – >2
    This motherboard has more USB 3.2 Gen1 headers than the average motherboard (2 vs 1). The average motherboard has 1 USB 3.2 Gen1 header/s.
    two internal headers
    2 vs 1
  • 2 more total USB-C connections
    Total USB-C ports (including headers)
    3
    ▲ Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <0 – >3
    This motherboard has more total USB-C connections than the average motherboard (3 vs 1). The average motherboard has 1 total USB-C connections.
    includes internal USB-C header.
    3 vs 1
  • 1 more USB 3.2 Gen2 headers
    N. of USB 3.2 Gen2 headers (USB-C)
    1
    ▲ Better than 61% of models
    Market range: <0 – >1
    This motherboard has more USB 3.2 Gen2 headers than the average motherboard (1 vs 0). The average motherboard has 0 USB 3.2 Gen2 header/s.
    Gen 2x2 Type-C header
    1 vs 0
  • 1 more USB 3.2 Gen2x2 headers
    N. of USB 3.2 Gen2x2 headers (USB-C)
    1
    ▲ Better than 80% of models
    Market range: <0 – >1
    This motherboard has more USB 3.2 Gen2x2 headers than the average motherboard (1 vs 0). The average motherboard has 0 USB 3.2 Gen2x2 header/s.
    1 vs 0
  • Newer Wi-Fi standard
    Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax)
    ▲ Better than 72% of models
    This motherboard has newer Wi-Fi standard than the average motherboard (Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average motherboard supports Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) Wi-Fi.
    Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • More advanced LAN controller
    LAN controller
    Killer E3100G
    ▲ Better than 49% of models
    This motherboard has better LAN controller than the average motherboard (Killer E3100G vs Killer + Intel + Realtek). The average motherboard uses Killer + Intel + Realtek LAN controller.
    Killer E3100G vs Killer + Intel + Realtek
  • Supports Bluetooth
    Bluetooth connectivity
    yes
    ▲ Better than 51% of models
    This motherboard supports Bluetooth, while the average motherboard does not. 48.9% of motherboards support Bluetooth.
  • Better audio codec
    Audio codec
    Realtek ALC4082
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    This motherboard has better audio codec than the average motherboard (Realtek ALC4082 vs Realtek ALC897). The average motherboard uses Realtek ALC897 audio codec.
    Realtek ALC4082 vs Realtek ALC897
  • 15 dB higher audio SNR
    Audio SNR
    130 dB
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    Market range: <95 dB – >120 dB
    This motherboard has a higher audio SNR than the average motherboard (130 dB vs 115 dB). The average motherboard has audio SNR of 115 dB.
    130 dB vs 115 dB
  • More VRM phases
    VRM phases
    24+2+1
    ★ Better than 99% of models
    This motherboard has more VRM phases than the average motherboard (24+2+1 vs 10). The average motherboard has 10 VRM phase/s.
    24+2+1 vs 10
  • 1 more CPU power connectors
    N. of CPU power connectors
    2
    ▲ Better than 55% of models
    Market range: <1 – >2
    This motherboard has more CPU power connectors than the average motherboard (2 vs 1). The average motherboard has 1 CPU power connectors.
    Dual 8-pin CPU power.
    2 vs 1
  • 2.5 more fan headers
    N. of fan headers
    8
    ▲ Better than 82% of models
    Market range: <3 – >8
    This motherboard has more fan headers than the average motherboard (8 vs 5.5). The average motherboard has 5.5 fan header/s.
    8 vs 5.5
  • 1 more ARGB headers
    N. of ARGB headers (3-pin)
    3
    ▲ Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <0 – >3
    This motherboard has more ARGB headers than the average motherboard (3 vs 2). The average motherboard has 2 ARGB header/s.
    3 vs 2
  • 1 A higher pump header current limit
    Pump header max current
    3 A
    ▲ Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <0 A – >3 A
    This motherboard has a higher pump header current than the average motherboard (3 A vs 2 A). The average motherboard provides pump header current of 2 A.
    3 A vs 2 A
  • Fewer RAID options
    Supported RAID levels
    0/1/10
    ▼ Worse than 68% of models
    This motherboard has fewer RAID options than the average motherboard (0/1/10 vs 0/1/5/10). The average motherboard has 0/1/5/10 RAID level/s.
    0/1/10 vs 0/1/5/10
  • More basic chipset cooling
    Chipset cooling type
    Active
    ▼ Worse than 96% of models
    This motherboard has more basic chipset cooling than the average motherboard (Active vs Passive). The average motherboard uses Passive chipset cooling.
    Active vs Passive
  • Less flexible PCIe lane configuration
    PCIe slot electrical configuration
    x16/x0, x8/x8
    ▼ Worse than 76% of models
    This motherboard has less flexible PCIe lane configuration than the average motherboard (x16/x0, x8/x8 vs x16/x0/x4, x8/x8/x4). The average motherboard uses x16/x0/x4, x8/x8/x4 PCIe slot lane configuration.
    x16/x0, x8/x8 vs x16/x0/x4, x8/x8/x4
  • 3 fewer 3.5mm audio jacks
    N. of 3.5mm audio jacks
    2
    ▼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <2 – >6
    This motherboard has fewer 3.5mm audio jacks than the average motherboard (2 vs 5). The average motherboard has 5 3.5mm audio jacks.
    2 vs 5
  • Fewer audio channels
    Audio channels
    5.1
    ▼ Worse than 95% of models
    This motherboard has fewer audio channels than the average motherboard (5.1 vs 7.1). The average motherboard has 7.1 audio channel/s.
    5.1 vs 7.1
  • 1 fewer DisplayPort outputs
    N. of DisplayPort outputs
    0
    ▼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <0 – >1
    This motherboard has fewer DisplayPort outputs than the average motherboard (0 vs 1). The average motherboard has 1 DisplayPort outputs.
    0 vs 1
  • 3x more expensive
    ASRock X670E Taichi Carrara is more expensive than the average motherboard (£480 vs £160).
    £480 vs £160
  • 1 fewer USB 3.2 Gen1 ports
    N. of USB 3.2 Gen1 ports (USB-A)
    3
    ▼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <0 – >6
    This motherboard has fewer USB 3.2 Gen1 ports than the average motherboard (3 vs 4). The average motherboard has 4 USB 3.2 Gen1 port/s.
    3 vs 4
  • 3x more expensive
    ASRock X670E Taichi Carrara is more expensive than the average motherboard (£480 vs £160).
    £480 vs £160
  • Less versatile form factor
    Form factor
    E-ATX
    ▼ Worse than 92% of models
    This motherboard has less versatile form factor than the average motherboard (E-ATX vs ATX). The average motherboard comes in ATX form factor.
    E-ATX vs ATX
  • Older CPU platform
    CPU platform
    AMD
    ▼ Worse than 68% of models
    This motherboard uses the AMD CPU platform compared to Intel on the average motherboard. The average motherboard uses Intel CPU platform.
    AMD vs Intel
  • Fewer useful accessories
    Included accessories
    4x SATA cables, Wi-Fi antenna, M.2 kit
    ▲ Better than 54% of models
    This motherboard has fewer useful accessories than the average motherboard (4x SATA cables, Wi-Fi antenna, M.2 kit vs 2x SATA cables, Wi-Fi antenna, M.2 kit, front-panel adapter, RGB cable). The average motherboard comes with 2x SATA cables, Wi-Fi antenna, M.2 kit, front-panel adapter, RGB cable.
    4x SATA cables, Wi-Fi antenna, M.2 kit vs 2x SATA cables, Wi-Fi antenna, M.2 kit, front-panel adapter, RGB cable
  • Fewer RAID options
    Supported RAID levels
    0/1/10
    ▼ Worse than 68% of models
    This motherboard has fewer RAID options than the average motherboard (0/1/10 vs 0/1/5/10). The average motherboard has 0/1/5/10 RAID level/s.
    0/1/10 vs 0/1/5/10
  • Less flexible PCIe lane configuration
    PCIe slot electrical configuration
    x16/x0, x8/x8
    ▼ Worse than 76% of models
    This motherboard has less flexible PCIe lane configuration than the average motherboard (x16/x0, x8/x8 vs x16/x0/x4, x8/x8/x4). The average motherboard uses x16/x0/x4, x8/x8/x4 PCIe slot lane configuration.
    x16/x0, x8/x8 vs x16/x0/x4, x8/x8/x4
  • 1 fewer PCIe x1 slots
    N. of PCIe x1 slots
    0
    ▼ Worse than 69% of models
    Market range: <0 – >3
    This motherboard has fewer PCIe x1 slots than the average motherboard (0 vs 1). The average motherboard has 1 PCIe x1 slot/s.
    0 vs 1
  • 1 fewer PCIe 3.0x16 slots
    N. of PCIe 3.0 x16 slots
    0
    ▼ Worse than 60% of models
    Market range: <0 – >3
    This motherboard has fewer PCIe 3.0x16 slots than the average motherboard (0 vs 1). The average motherboard has 1 PCIe 3.0x16 slot/s.
    0 vs 1
  • 1 fewer DisplayPort outputs
    N. of DisplayPort outputs
    0
    ▼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <0 – >1
    This motherboard has fewer DisplayPort outputs than the average motherboard (0 vs 1). The average motherboard has 1 DisplayPort outputs.
    0 vs 1
  • 1 fewer USB 3.2 Gen1 ports
    N. of USB 3.2 Gen1 ports (USB-A)
    3
    ▼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <0 – >6
    This motherboard has fewer USB 3.2 Gen1 ports than the average motherboard (3 vs 4). The average motherboard has 4 USB 3.2 Gen1 port/s.
    3 vs 4
  • 1 fewer PS/2 ports
    N. of PS/2 ports
    0
    ▼ Worse than 59% of models
    Market range: <0 – >1
    This motherboard has fewer PS/2 ports than the average motherboard (0 vs 1). The average motherboard has 1 PS/2 port/s.
    0 vs 1
  • 2 fewer USB4 20Gbps ports
    N. of USB4 20Gbps ports (USB-C)
    2
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    Market range: <0 – >2
    This motherboard has fewer USB4 20Gbps ports than the average motherboard (2 vs 0). The average motherboard has 0 USB4 20Gbps port/s.
    2 vs 0
  • 2 fewer USB 2.0 ports
    N. of USB 2.0 ports
    0
    ▼ Worse than 81% of models
    Market range: <0 – >4
    This motherboard has fewer USB 2.0 ports than the average motherboard (0 vs 2). The average motherboard has 2 USB 2.0 port/s.
    0 vs 2
  • 3 fewer 3.5mm audio jacks
    N. of 3.5mm audio jacks
    2
    ▼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <2 – >6
    This motherboard has fewer 3.5mm audio jacks than the average motherboard (2 vs 5). The average motherboard has 5 3.5mm audio jacks.
    2 vs 5
  • Fewer audio channels
    Audio channels
    5.1
    ▼ Worse than 95% of models
    This motherboard has fewer audio channels than the average motherboard (5.1 vs 7.1). The average motherboard has 7.1 audio channel/s.
    5.1 vs 7.1
  • No rear line-in
    Line-in (rear, 3.5mm)
    no
    ▼ Worse than 95% of models
    This motherboard does not have rear line-in, while the average motherboard does. 94.7% of motherboards include rear line-in.
  • More basic chipset cooling
    Chipset cooling type
    Active
    ▼ Worse than 96% of models
    This motherboard has more basic chipset cooling than the average motherboard (Active vs Passive). The average motherboard uses Passive chipset cooling.
    Active vs Passive
  • 61 mm wider
    Width
    305 mm
    ▼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <170 mm – >320 mm
    This motherboard is wider than the average motherboard (305 mm vs 244 mm). The average motherboard width is 244 mm.
    305 mm vs 244 mm

Graphic comparison of ASRock X670E Taichi Carrara and other products in the Motherboards category

No results found

Third-party reviews

United Kingdom
amazon
4.6
67 Reviews
United States
Amazon_logo.png
4.5
71 Reviews

(Reviews last updated: May 2026)

What customers like about ASRock X670E Taichi Carrara?

  • Striking 'Carrara Marble' aesthetic that is unique in the high-end market
  • Extreme power delivery with a 24+2+1 phase VRM suitable for heavy overclocking
  • Dual USB4 (40 Gbps) ports which are often missing from competitors
  • Comprehensive connectivity including WiFi 6E, 2.5G LAN, and 8 SATA ports
  • Effective cooling solutions including active cooling for both VRM and Gen5 M.2 slots
  • Highly reliable and stable compared to some other flagship AM5 boards
  • Premium build quality with a rigid 8-layer PCB and massive backplate

What customers dislike about ASRock X670E Taichi Carrara?

  • Premium price tag near $500–$530 makes it a significant investment
  • E-ATX form factor may limit compatibility with smaller or standard mid-tower cases
  • Lacks 10Gb Ethernet, which some users expect at this flagship price point
  • Initial boot times can be long (sometimes minutes) due to DDR5 memory training
  • The BIOS interface is functional but described as basic or 'no-frills' compared to rivals
  • Large Gen5 M.2 heatsink can make reaching the primary PCIe latch difficult
  • Four-stick DDR5 configurations can be finicky or unstable at high speeds

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Compare ASRock X670E Taichi Carrara with other products in the Motherboards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)