OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Twin Edge OC Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£570VRAM:12 GBMemory bus width:192 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):200 W

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Twin Edge OC Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Twin Edge OC
7.5/10

Overall score

Score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 58% of models
Score components

90%

7.4

Technical score

10%

8.5

User score

▲Better than 58% of graphics cards
7.5

Value for money

Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 64% of models
Score components

70%

7.5

Overall score

30%

7.5

Price

▲Better than 64%
7.4

Technical score

Technical score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 56% of models
Score components

44%

6.8

Performance

24%

6.3

Memory

12%

8.0

Power & Cooling

11%

9.8

Platform & Features

5%

9.2

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

▲Better than 56%
8.5

User score

User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 72% of models
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

7.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▲Better than 72%
  • zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4070-twin-edge-oc
  • zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4070-twin-edge-oc
  • zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4070-twin-edge-oc
  • zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4070-twin-edge-oc
  • zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4070-twin-edge-oc
  • zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4070-twin-edge-oc
  • zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4070-twin-edge-oc
  • zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4070-twin-edge-oc
zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4070-twin-edge-oc
zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4070-twin-edge-oc
zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4070-twin-edge-oc
zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4070-twin-edge-oc
zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4070-twin-edge-oc
zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4070-twin-edge-oc
zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4070-twin-edge-oc
zotac-gaming-geforce-rtx-4070-twin-edge-oc
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Twin Edge OC

Technical score
Technical score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 56% of models
Score components:

44%

6.8

Performance

24%

6.3

Memory

12%

8.0

Power & Cooling

11%

9.8

Platform & Features

5%

9.2

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

7.4
User score
User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 72% of models
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

7.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.5
Popularity
Popularity
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 69% of models
Popularity:
ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Twin Edge OC has a popularity score of 7.4 points, which is higher than that of 69% of products in this category.
7.4
Value for money
Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 64% of models
Score components:

70%

7.5

Overall score

30%

7.5

Price

7.5
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
17,500 points
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 17,500 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 58% of graphics cards and equal to 0.8% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
13,500 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 13,500 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 64.7% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
26,918 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 26,918 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 62.4% of graphics cards and equal to 0.7% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
14,646 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 14,646 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 58.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.3% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
29.32 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 29.32 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 57.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
12 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 12 GB of VRAM, which is more than 45.5% of graphics cards and equal to 16% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6X
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
192 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 192 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 50.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 18.8% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
504.2 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 504.2 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 55.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.3% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.3
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.3, which is older than on 79.4% of graphics cards and equal to 15.7% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
1.4 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 1.4 Gbps, which is slower than on 96.4% of graphics cards and equal to 3.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
200 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 200 W, which is lower than that of 51.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 3.9% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
200 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 200 W under peak load, which is lower than 54% of graphics cards and equal to 3.6% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
600 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 600 W PSU, which is lower than that of 54.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 7.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
200 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 200 W, which is lower than that of 55.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.5% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
200 W
Show more
Size
225.5x 123.2x 40.1 mm
This graphics card measures 225.5x123.2x 40.1 mm, which is more compact than 88.4% of graphics cards and equal in size to 0.6% of graphics cards.
Length
225.5 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 225.5 mm long, which is shorter than 84.1% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.3% of graphics cards.
Height
123.2 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 123.2 mm tall, which is shorter than 54.8% of graphics cards and equal in height to 0.5% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2.2 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2.2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 51.8% of graphics cards and equal in width to 1.1% of graphics cards.
Weight
700 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 700 g, which is lighter than 78.7% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.9% of graphics cards.
Show more

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Twin Edge OC vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 59.5 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (225.5 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    225.5 mm vs 285 mm
  • 10.5% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (21000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    21,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 12.5% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (504.2 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    504.2 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • More compact card size
    This graphics card is more compact than the average graphics card (225.5x123.2 x 40.1 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm). The average graphics card has a size of 285x127 x 52 mm.
    225.5x123.2 x 40.1 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm
  • 9x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (36 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    36 MB vs 4 MB
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1a vs 2.1).
    2.1a vs 2.1
  • 6.7% higher user score
    User score
    8.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Twin Edge OC
    the average graphics card
    ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Twin Edge OC has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.53 vs 8.000).
    8.53 vs 8
  • 50% larger L2 cache
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (36 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    36 MB vs 24 MB
  • 6.7% higher user score
    User score
    8.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Twin Edge OC
    the average graphics card
    ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Twin Edge OC has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.53 vs 8.000).
    8.53 vs 8
  • 20.2% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (458.2 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    458.2 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 29.9% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (29.3 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    29.32 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 40 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (184 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    184 vs 144
  • 47.3% higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (13500 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    13,500 points vs 9,166 points
  • 6 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (46 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    46 vs 40
  • 10.5% faster memory speed
    This graphics card has a higher effective memory speed than the average graphics card (21000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    21,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 12.5% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (504.2 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    504.2 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 9x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (36 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    36 MB vs 4 MB
  • 50% larger L2 cache
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (36 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    36 MB vs 24 MB
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1a vs 2.1).
    2.1a vs 2.1
  • 7.7% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (600 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    600 W vs 650 W
  • 59.5 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (225.5 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    225.5 mm vs 285 mm
  • More compact card size
    This graphics card is more compact than the average graphics card (225.5x123.2 x 40.1 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm). The average graphics card has a size of 285x127 x 52 mm.
    225.5x123.2 x 40.1 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    192 bit vs 256 bit
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • 25% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1313 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • Older Vulkan version
    This graphics card supports an older Vulkan version than the average graphics card (1.3 vs 1.4).
    1.3 vs 1.4
  • 0.6% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2490 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,490 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • 93% lower DisplayPort bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower DisplayPort bandwidth than the average graphics card (1.4 Gbps vs 20 Gbps). The average graphics card has DisplayPort bandwidth of 20 Gbps.
    1.4 Gbps vs 20 Gbps
  • 0.6% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2490 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,490 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    192 bit vs 256 bit
  • 25% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1313 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,313 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • Older Vulkan version
    This graphics card supports an older Vulkan version than the average graphics card (1.3 vs 1.4).
    1.3 vs 1.4
  • Older FSR version
    This graphics card supports an older FSR version than the average graphics card (3 vs 3.1).
    3.0 vs 3.1
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • 93% lower DisplayPort bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower DisplayPort bandwidth than the average graphics card (1.4 Gbps vs 20 Gbps). The average graphics card has DisplayPort bandwidth of 20 Gbps.
    1.4 Gbps vs 20 Gbps
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • 5 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (100 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    100 °C vs 95 °C
  • 3.1 dB noisier under load
    This graphics card has a higher load noise level than the average graphics card (38.5 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    38.5 dB vs 35.4 dB

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

P
popzara.com
01/06/2023
Summary of the review
ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 4070 Twin Edge OC Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse Graphics Card Review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Twin Edge OC

  • Compact 2.2-slot design (225.5mm length) ideal for Small Form Factor (SFF) builds
  • Excellent 1440p gaming performance with DLSS 3 support
  • Highly power efficient, consuming roughly 180W-200W under typical load
  • Solid build quality featuring a protective metal backplate
  • Quiet operation at idle thanks to the FREEZE Fan Stop technology
  • Five-year extended warranty available in select regions upon registration

What we don't like about ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Twin Edge OC

  • Fan noise becomes significantly more noticeable once speeds exceed 60-70%
  • Reported occurrences of moderately audible coil whine under heavy load
  • Cooling performance is average compared to larger triple-fan models, with temps sometimes reaching 80-83°C in warmer environments
  • Limited RGB lighting restricted to a small side logo
  • The 12VHPWR connector placement can make cable removal difficult due to tight spacing near the shroud

Verdict

The Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Twin Edge OC is a compact, SFF-friendly graphics card built on the NVIDIA Ada Lovelace architecture, featuring 5,888 CUDA cores and 12GB of GDDR6X VRAM on a 192-bit bus. It offers a factory-overclocked boost speed of up to 2490 MHz and utilizes the IceStorm 2.0 cooling system with dual 90mm fans to maintain performance within a modest 200W TDP. Key advantages include its space-saving 2.2-slot design (225.5mm length), efficient power consumption requiring only a single 8-pin PCIe connector, and full support for DLSS 3 frame generation and ray tracing. However, some users have noted that the smaller cooler can lead to audible fan noise at high speeds (above 70%), and the limited RGB customization often requires specific software to disable.

Compare ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Twin Edge OC with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4070 Twin Edge OC and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found