OVERALL

ALTERNATIVES

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4060 OC Spider-Man review: 117 specs compared

Avg. price:~£290VRAM:8 GBMemory bus width:128 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):115 W

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4060 OC Spider-Man Review: Compare 117 technical specifications and 5 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4060 OC Spider-Man

6.7/10

▼Worse than 75% of graphics cards

7.4

▼Worse than 54%

6.0

▼Worse than 72%

6.0

▼Worse than 83%

?

Not in any best-of list yet

4.4
Gaming
Gaming
4.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Measures floating-point compute power, dedicated VRAM capacity, ray-tracing hardware, and modern PCIe generation bandwidth.
When it matters
When you want to play demanding mobile games, 3D titles, or run graphics-intensive apps smoothly.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
45.0%
3.4
FP32 performance
25.0%
4.9
VRAM
20.0%
3.7
Ray tracing cores / units
10.0%
8.8
PCI Express (PCIe) version
7.0
Video editing
Video editing
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates hardware AV1 encoding support, generous video memory, raw compute power, and fast interface throughput.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this graphics-cards meets your specific video editing needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
35.0%
10
AV1 encode
30.0%
4.9
VRAM
20.0%
3.4
FP32 performance
15.0%
8.8
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4.3
1080p
1080p
4.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Assesses pure rasterization power and VRAM balance optimized for consistently high frame rates at 1080p resolution.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this graphics-cards meets your specific 1080p needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
55.0%
3.4
FP32 performance
25.0%
4.9
VRAM
10.0%
3.7
Ray tracing cores / units
10.0%
8.8
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4.2
1440p
1440p
4.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Measures compute throughput, sufficient VRAM buffer, and ray-tracing performance tailored for sharp 1440p gaming.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this graphics-cards meets your specific 1440p needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
50.0%
3.4
FP32 performance
30.0%
4.9
VRAM
15.0%
3.7
Ray tracing cores / units
5.0%
8.8
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4.2
4K
4K
4.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates ultra-high compute capability, heavy VRAM capacities, and advanced ray-tracing cores required for native 4K gaming.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this graphics-cards meets your specific 4k needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
40.0%
3.4
FP32 performance
35.0%
4.9
VRAM
20.0%
3.7
Ray tracing cores / units
5.0%
8.8
PCI Express (PCIe) version

Where to buy

Check price

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

What reviewers say about the ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4060 OC Spider-Man

Based on 3 · 2

Reviewers like its power efficiency, but find the video memory too limited.

Praised

Criticised

Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4060 OC Spider-Man

Based on 197 owners sharing their experience in online comments

78%positive15%mixed7%negative

Owners praise its strong gaming performance and efficiency, while limited video memory and softer upscaling remain the main frustrations.

What owners like

Owners say it runs 1440p and 1080p games at high or ultra settings, with DLSS and frame generation reaching around 60 to 100 fps.79
Owners upgrading from older cards such as the GTX 1050, 1060, 1650 or 2060 report clearly higher frame rates and smoother play in newer and demanding games.47
Owners say DLSS and frame generation raise frame rates to around 70 to 100 fps in demanding titles, with little visible lag or artifacts.15
Owners say the card draws modest power, around 35 to 110 watts, and suits small builds and budget power supplies while still running games well.13
Owners say 8GB of video memory is enough for most games at 1080p, and report no problems so far.7
Owners say the card stays cool and quiet in gaming, with temperatures around 60°C and fans much quieter than older cards.5

What owners dislike

Owners say 8GB of video memory forces them to lower texture settings in some demanding games, and they expect it to limit performance in future titles.7
Owners say DLSS at 1080p looks softer and blurrier than native resolution, and frame generation can cause shimmering or flickering textures.3
Owners report stutter and frame drops below 60 fps in some demanding games, and some laptop versions dip further under load.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4060 OC Spider-Man

6.7

Show more

Hide

Performance

5.0

Show more

Hide

3DMark Time Spy benchmark score

3DMark Port Royal score

PassMark (G3D) result

PassMark (DirectCompute) result

FP32 performance

Show more

Memory

4.0

Show more

Hide

VRAM

Memory type

Memory bus width

Maximum memory bandwidth

Effective memory speed

Show more

What reviewers say

Features

9.4

Show more

Hide

PCI Express (PCIe) version

PCIe lanes

DirectX version

Vulkan version

OpenGL version

Show more

Connectivity

9.6

Show more

Hide

Max displays supported

Max digital resolution

DisplayPort outputs

DisplayPort version

DisplayPort link rates

Show more

Power

8.0

Show more

Hide

Thermal Design Power (TDP)

Power consumption while under peak load

Recommended PSU wattage

Board power limit

PCIe power spec

115 W

Show more

What reviewers say

Design

9.4

Show more

Hide

Size

222.3x 116.8x 42 mm

Length

Height

Slot width

Weight

Show more

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4060 OC Spider-Man vs the average graphics card

Why is ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4060 OC Spider-Man better than the average graphics card?

Show more

Hide

46.5% lower TDP
This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (115 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
115 W vs 215 W
59.9 mm shorter card length
This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (222.3 mm vs 282.2 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 282.2 mm.
222.3 mm vs 282.2 mm
23.1% lower PSU requirement
This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (500 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
500 W vs 650 W
21.4% faster VRAM clock
This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2,125 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
2,125 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
0.5 slot/s slimmer design
This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
36.4% lower board power limit
This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (140 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W.
140 W vs 220 W
19.2% higher sentiment score
9.3 vs 7.8
8.2 mm lower card height
This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (116.8 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
116.8 mm vs 125 mm

19.2% higher sentiment score
9.3 vs 7.8

2.4x higher compute score
This graphics card has a higher compute score than the average graphics card (28,995 points vs 12,70.5 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12,070.5 points.
28,995 points vs 12,070.5 points

21.4% faster VRAM clock
This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2,125 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
2,125 MHz vs 1,750 MHz

46.5% lower TDP
This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (115 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
115 W vs 215 W
23.1% lower PSU requirement
This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (500 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
500 W vs 650 W
36.4% lower board power limit
This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (140 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W.
140 W vs 220 W
47.7% lower peak power draw
This graphics card has a lower peak power draw than the average graphics card (115 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
115 W vs 220 W

59.9 mm shorter card length
This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (222.3 mm vs 282.2 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 282.2 mm.
222.3 mm vs 282.2 mm
0.5 slot/s slimmer design
This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
8.2 mm lower card height
This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (116.8 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
116.8 mm vs 125 mm

Why is ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4060 OC Spider-Man worse than the average graphics card?

Show more

Hide

2 fewer fans
This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
1 vs 3
4 GB less VRAM
This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
8 GB vs 12 GB
16 fewer compute units
This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (24 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
24 vs 40
88 fewer TMUs
This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (96 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
96 vs 184
16 fewer ray tracing cores
This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (24 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
24 vs 40
No dual BIOS
This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
64 bit narrower memory bus
This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 192 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 192 bit.
128 bit vs 192 bit
Fewer PCIe lanes
This graphics card has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
x8 vs x16

16.7% lower review score
Reviews score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 83% of models
6.0
Mark 7.9 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score
80%
7.8
Average grade
20%
8.1
Popularity
Grades by review (5)
3 reviews: 2 with a printed score, 1 estimated from the review. 2 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
6.0 vs 7.2

16 fewer compute units
This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (24 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
24 vs 40
88 fewer TMUs
This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (96 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
96 vs 184
16 fewer ray tracing cores
This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (24 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
24 vs 40
37.1% lower texture rate
This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (237.6 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 378 GTexel/s.
237.6 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s
26.3% lower pixel rate
This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (118.8 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 161.3 GPixel/s.
118.8 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s
16 fewer ROPs
This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (48 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
48 vs 64
48 fewer AI cores
This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (96 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
96 vs 144
1.2% lower boost clock speed
This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,475 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
2,475 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
32.7% lower FP32 performance
This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (15.2 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.6 TFLOPS.
15.21 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS
28.1% lower gaming score
This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (10,626 points vs 14,779 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14,779 points.
10,626 points vs 14,779 points
4.7% lower base clock speed
This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,830 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
1,830 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
13.7% lower PassMark score
This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (19,545 points vs 22,638 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22,638 points.
19,545 points vs 22,638 points
50% lower FP64 performance
This graphics card has a lower FP64 performance than the average graphics card (0.2 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
0.24 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS

4 GB less VRAM
This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
8 GB vs 12 GB
64 bit narrower memory bus
This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 192 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 192 bit.
128 bit vs 192 bit
39.3% lower memory bandwidth
This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (272 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
272 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
10.5% slower memory speed
This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (17,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.
17,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz

Fewer PCIe lanes
This graphics card has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
x8 vs x16
Less advanced frame generation
This graphics card has less advanced frame generation than the average graphics card (frame generation vs multi frame generation).
frame generation vs multi frame generation
Older Vulkan version
This graphics card supports an older Vulkan version than the average graphics card (1.3 vs 1.4).
1.3 vs 1.4

2 fewer monitors per output type
This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
1 vs 3
No 3D output
This graphics card does not support 3D output, the average graphics card does.
Older NVDEC generation
This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
5 vs 6

2 fewer fans
This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
1 vs 3
No dual BIOS
This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
9 °C higher load temperature
This graphics card has a higher load temperature than the average graphics card (76 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
76 °C vs 67 °C

No RGB lighting
This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

6.0

Digital David

≈ estimated

26/07/2023

Hands-on review · temperatures, benchmarks and value comparison

Verdict

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4060 OC Spider-Man comes down to your priorities and budget.

8.0

eTeknix

≈ estimated

07/07/2023

Hands-on review · one-hour gaming temperatures, noise and power

Verdict

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4060 OC Spider-Man is a solid, quiet card for upgrading older GPUs, though the bundle feels underwhelming.

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0

techpowerup.com

✓ explicit

28/06/2023

Zotac GeForce RTX 4060 Spider-Man OC Review

Hands-on review · Special edition

Verdict

The Zotac RTX 4060 Spider-Man OC is a basic, efficient 1080p card with DLSS 3 Frame Generation and Spider-Man extras, held back by 8GB of memory.

7.5

pcgamer.com

✓ explicit

10/07/2023

Zotac GeForce RTX 4060 OC Spider-Man GPU review If you would like to see video-based hardware reviews or benchmark comparisons against other graphics...

Lab test · Mid-range 1080p card

Verdict

The Zotac RTX 4060 Spider-Man is an efficient 1080p card that beats the RTX 3060, but its fans get loud and it's a weak upgrade over RTX 30 cards.

8.0

cowcotland.com

≈ estimated

28/06/2023

Review of ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 4060 Spider-Man OC - Temperatures and Power Consumption Cowcotland.com

Lab test · Power and heat

Verdict

The Zotac RTX 4060 Spider-Man OC draws only 128W under full load, less than the RTX 3060, and runs efficiently, though its idle power readings were off.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4060 OC Spider-Man

The Spider-Man themed bundle includes high-quality extras like custom fan emblems, decorative decals, and a movie-inspired figure.
Excellent energy efficiency with a low power draw (approx. 115W TDP), requiring only a single 8-pin connector.
Strong performance for 1080p gaming, often reaching 60+ FPS at maximum settings in modern titles.
Supports NVIDIA's latest Ada Lovelace architecture features, including DLSS 3 Frame Generation and AV1 encoding.
Compact two-slot design makes it an ideal fit for smaller PC builds.
Maintains good thermal management, with reviewers noting it runs cool even under load.

What customers don't like about ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4060 OC Spider-Man

Equipped with only 8GB of VRAM and a 128-bit memory bus, which can be a bottleneck for 1440p gaming or memory-intensive tasks.
Fans can become noticeably loud when the card is under a heavy workload compared to some competitors.
Offers only a minor performance improvement over the previous-generation RTX 3060 in pure rasterisation.
Higher price point compared to some other RTX 4060 models or AMD alternatives with similar performance.
Performance can significantly drop in older systems limited to PCIe 3.0 due to the card's x8 interface.

Verdict

The Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 4060 8GB OC Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse Edition is a compact, factory-overclocked graphics card featuring the NVIDIA Ada Lovelace architecture, 3,072 CUDA cores, and a boost clock of 2,475 MHz. It is equipped with 8GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 17 Gbps memory speed and a total bandwidth of 272 GB/s. Main characteristics include its dual-slot footprint (222.3mm length), a single 8-pin power connector, and an included themed bundle with a magnetic backplate and custom decals. Its primary pros are excellent 1080p gaming performance, high energy efficiency (approx. 115W TDP), and support for DLSS 3 Frame Generation and 3rd Gen Ray Tracing. However, its main cons include a relatively high idle power draw and the 8GB VRAM limit, which can be restrictive for 1440p gaming or modern AAA titles with high-resolution textures.

Best alternatives

Graphics cards

EVGA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Gaming

Graphics cards

GALAX GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

Graphics cards

EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming Dual Fan 12GB

Graphics cards

ASUS GeForce RTX 5060 LP BRK 8GB

Graphics cards

EVGA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti XC

Graphics cards

MAXSUN Arc Pro B60 Milestone 24GB

Graphics cards

Gainward GeForce RTX 5060 Ghost

Graphics cards

Palit GeForce RTX 4060 Dual

Graphics cards

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4060 EX 1-Click OC

Graphics cards

PNY GeForce RTX 4060 Verto Dual Fan

Graphics cards

COLORFUL iGame GeForce RTX 4060 Ultra W Duo OC

Graphics cards

See best alternatives in Buying Guide

Compare ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4060 OC Spider-Man with other products in the Graphics cards category

Graphic comparison of ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 4060 OC Spider-Man and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found