Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

Intel ARC B580 Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~ÂŁ280VRAM:12 GBMemory bus width:192 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):190 W

Intel ARC B580 Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

Intel ARC B580
7.1/10

Overall score

Score
7.1/ 10
âś•
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

7.0

Technical score

10%

8.6

User score

â–˛Better than 50% of graphics cards
7.7

Value for money

Value for money
7.7/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.1

Overall score

30%

9.0

Price

â–˛Better than 75%
7.0

Technical score

Technical score
7.0/ 10
âś•
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

6.0

Performance

24%

6.3

Memory

12%

8.2

Power & Cooling

11%

9.2

Platform & Features

5%

9.0

Design

4%

9.7

Connectivity & Media

â–˛Better than 50%
8.6

User score

User score
8.6/ 10
âś•
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.1

User ratings

30%

7.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–˛Better than 73%
  • intel-arc-b580
  • intel-arc-b580
  • intel-arc-b580
  • intel-arc-b580
intel-arc-b580
intel-arc-b580
intel-arc-b580
intel-arc-b580
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card Intel ARC B580

Technical score
Technical score
7.0/ 10
âś•
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

6.0

Performance

24%

6.3

Memory

12%

8.2

Power & Cooling

11%

9.2

Platform & Features

5%

9.0

Design

4%

9.7

Connectivity & Media

7.0
User score
User score
8.6/ 10
âś•
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.1

User ratings

30%

7.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.6
Popularity
Popularity
7.4/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Intel ARC B580 has a popularity score of 7.4 points, which is higher than that of 69% of products in this category.
7.4
Value for money
Value for money
7.7/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

7.1

Overall score

30%

9.0

Price

7.7
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
14,719 points
This graphics card scores 14,719 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 50.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
8,589 points
This graphics card scores 8,589 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 54.3% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
15,985 points
This graphics card scores 15,985 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 73.4% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
7,911 points
This graphics card scores 7,911 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 71.2% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
13.67 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 13.67 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 66.2% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
12 GB
This graphics card has 12 GB of VRAM, which is more than 45.5% of graphics cards and equal to 16% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
192 bit
This graphics card uses a 192 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 50.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 18.8% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
456 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 456 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 52.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.2% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x8
This graphics card uses x8 PCIe lanes, which is fewer than 76.7% of graphics cards and equal to 22.2% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
2.1
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 2.1, which is more advanced than on 67.5% of graphics cards and equal to 8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
10 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 10 Gbps, which is slower than on 63.1% of graphics cards and equal to 1.6% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
190 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 190 W, which is lower than that of 55.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.8% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
196 W
This graphics card draws 196 W under peak load, which is lower than 57.8% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
600 W
This graphics card recommends a 600 W PSU, which is lower than that of 54.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 7.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
190 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 190 W, which is lower than that of 59% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
190 W
Show more
Size
272x 115x 45 mm
Length
272 mm
This graphics card is 272 mm long, which is shorter than 56.6% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.4% of graphics cards.
Height
115 mm
This graphics card is 115 mm tall, which is shorter than 72.4% of graphics cards and equal in height to 1.7% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
779 g
This graphics card weighs 779 g, which is lighter than 73.4% of graphics cards.
Show more

Intel ARC B580 vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 6.6% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2670 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,670 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 39.1% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2670 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,670 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 35.7% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2375 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,375 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 30.9% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (213.6 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    213.6 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 16 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (80 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    80 vs 64
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 1.4a).
    2.1 vs 1.4a
  • 7.3% higher user score
    User score
    8.6/ 10
    âś•
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–Ľ
    â–Ľ
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Intel ARC B580
    the average graphics card
    Intel ARC B580 has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.58 vs 8.000).
    8.58 vs 8
  • 6.6% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2670 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,670 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 39.1% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2670 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,670 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 30.9% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (213.6 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    213.6 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 16 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (80 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    80 vs 64
  • 3.56x higher FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP64 performance than the average graphics card (1.7 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    1.71 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 3.94x higher FP16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP16 performance than the average graphics card (117 TFLOPS vs 29.7 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.725 TFLOPS.
    117 TFLOPS vs 29.725 TFLOPS
  • Better FP64 ratio
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
    1:16 vs 1:64
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 35.7% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2375 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,375 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 2x larger L1 cache
    This graphics card has more L1 cache than the average graphics card (256 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    256 vs 128
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 1.4a).
    2.1 vs 1.4a
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1a vs 2.1).
    2.1a vs 2.1
  • 4x higher HDMI bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher HDMI bandwidth than the average graphics card (48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps). The average graphics card has HDMI bandwidth of 12 Gbps.
    48 Gbps vs 12 Gbps
  • 7.7% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (600 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    600 W vs 650 W
  • 7 °C lower idle temperature
    This graphics card has a lower idle temperature than the average graphics card (30 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    30 °C vs 37 °C
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 10 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (115 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    115 mm vs 125 mm
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 20 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (20 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    20 vs 40
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    192 bit vs 256 bit
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 20 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (20 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    20 vs 40
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • Fewer PCIe lanes
    This graphics card has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
    x8 vs x16
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 20 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (20 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    20 vs 40
  • 20 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (20 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    20 vs 40
  • 39.4% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (13.7 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    13.67 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 29.4% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (15985 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    15,985 points vs 22,653 points
  • 24 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (160 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    160 vs 184
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    192 bit vs 256 bit
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • Fewer PCIe lanes
    This graphics card has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
    x8 vs x16
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (2 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    2.0 vs 8
  • Older shader model
    This graphics card supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (6.6 vs 6.8).
    6.6 vs 6.8
  • Older FSR version
    This graphics card supports an older FSR version than the average graphics card (3 vs 3.1).
    3.0 vs 3.1
  • Older HDCP version
    This graphics card supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 2.3).
    2.2 vs 2.3
  • Not VR ready
    This graphics card is not VR ready, while the average graphics card is.
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

I
ign.com
05/06/2025
Summary of the review
M
maxi-geek.com
13/05/2025
Summary of the review
T
tweaktown.com
12/12/2024
Summary of the review
P
pcgamer.com
12/12/2024
Summary of the review
P
pugetsystems.com
12/12/2024
Summary of the review
T
techspot.com
12/12/2024
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
23/09/2025
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
20/12/2024
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
12/12/2024
Summary of the review
I
impulsegamer.com
25/06/2025
Summary of the review
K
kitguru.net
12/12/2024
Summary of the review
C
cgmagonline.com
12/12/2024
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
12/12/2024
Summary of the review
G
gamersnexus.net
11/12/2024
Summary of the review
H
hardwareluxx.de
16/10/2025
Summary of the review
C
computerbase.de
14/12/2024
Summary of the review
H
hardwareluxx.de
13/12/2024
Summary of the review
C
cowcotland.com
19/12/2024
Summary of the review
G
geektopia.es
07/03/2025
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Intel ARC B580

  • Exceptional price-to-performance ratio in the budget tier
  • Generous 12GB VRAM provides an edge over 8GB competitors at 1440p
  • Strong ray-tracing performance for its class
  • Highly efficient and quiet operation with many models running cool
  • Excellent AV1 encoding and media engine for streaming/content creation
  • XeSS 2 technology provides effective upscaling with high visual fidelity

What we don't like about Intel ARC B580

  • Requires Resizable BAR (ReBAR) support for optimal performance
  • Significant performance loss when paired with older CPUs or legacy systems
  • Inconsistent drivers and performance across different game titles
  • Power consumption is higher compared to equivalent NVIDIA cards
  • Lack of DLSS support may be a drawback for some users
  • Limited board partner options compared to major competitors

Verdict

The Intel Arc B580 is a budget-focused graphics card based on the Xe2 'Battlemage' architecture, featuring 20 Xe-cores, 2,560 shading units, and a substantial 12GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus. It operates with a base clock of 2,670 MHz (boostable to 2,850 MHz) and delivers excellent 1080p and 1440p gaming performance, often rivaling or surpassing competitors like the RTX 4060 due to its higher VRAM capacity and upgraded ray-tracing units. Main pros include its exceptional price-to-performance ratio, quiet operation, and robust media engine with dual AV1 encoders, making it a strong choice for both gamers and budget-conscious content creators. However, it suffers from high idle power consumption, notable driver overhead on older CPU platforms, and requires Resizable BAR (ReBAR) support to achieve its intended performance levels.

Compare Intel ARC B580 with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Intel ARC B580 and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found